Sandromin Hes
Sand Mercenary Corps Inc.
204
   |
Posted - 2012.08.01 22:00:00 -
[1] - Quote
That guy wrote:
Wikipedia can tell you how wrong you are. The thompson is an smg and the mac fires a larger round. Did you use cod stats for
research?
P90 has a higher velocity, due to the 9mm round and longer barrel. And you're an idiot. He was comparing Mac and P90. Thompson uses a .45 round, which is larger than a 9mm. You had no thoughts flowing, and your argument is invalid. Your invalidity is bad and you should feel bad.
.45 round fires much slower than a 9mm, so it only hits with a thud, like a punch. The 9mm on the other hand fires at a much higher velocity, and can penetrate through multiple objects, so you could kill multiple people with one shot. The mac fires a 9mm, the P90 fires a 9mm, and the Thompson fires a .45 ACP. The biggest round has a different purpose. Shut up and take your invalidity elsewhere.
Do your research next time, m'kay? |
Sandromin Hes
Sand Mercenary Corps Inc.
204
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 20:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
Lurchasaurus wrote:well, the only thing i saw was you saying the FN 5.7x28mm having less stopping power than 9mm...while it does have a little less actual force, and by that i mean a minimal amount, the p90 cartridge is basically a rifle round, not a pistol round. The terminal ballistics because of that make it a superior cartridge and id say the increased penetration make it have more stopping power.....
was being really picky after seeing the idiots above you.
edit: ESPECIALLY after seeing the guy say a single 9mm round would penetrate and kill multiple bodies in one shot.......
I meant unarmored, sorry for the confusion. Yeah, the 9mm is useless against body armor because its impact is simply too small to penetrate body armor. It can however penetrate non-armored objects, which isn't optimal for some jobs; for example, Delta Force rejected the 9mm (which was in current use) because on something like an airplane during a hostage crisis, it could possibly go through the enemy and hit a civilian, thus they chose the .45 round (the grease gun and the m1911) because its stopping power was higher, and its velocity was slower (thus being safer in a CQ hostage crisis). Anyways, I forgot what the original argument was, probably something petty (I think it was mac10 is better than p90 that guy said? I might have misquoted too. Meh, it barely matters. Mac10 is by far inferior to the P90 and M1928 Thompson was all I was trying to say.)... Also, never played CoD so I actually have no clue what the guns, much less the stats, are.
Sorry for misunderstandings. |