Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Dzago Sevatarion
DUST University Ivy League
18
|
Posted - 2015.06.13 00:13:00 -
[121] - Quote
LLCs don't have to appoint officers, which is part of their attractiveness in the current business climate, so when one does it's demonstrative of people wanting to go above and beyond the bare minimum. |
thor424
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
381
|
Posted - 2015.06.13 00:20:00 -
[122] - Quote
Al the destroyer wrote:Shep, I think you should start an FC school for noob FCs. I'd be willing to bet they would learn some things lol.
I used to say this before.
In the army when you deploy into an area there's a transition with the unit that's currently operating there. They call it "right seat ride", where you go on missions together to pass down the intricacies of the area of operation.
Tell a CEO how you want two squads composed and then you bring in a vet squad with an FC to go into a battle. Do an after action critique, rinse and repeat.
Then I'd have a few of the key players play with the vet group in a PC to see how it all comes together. |
thor424
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
381
|
Posted - 2015.06.13 00:39:00 -
[123] - Quote
Tebu Gan wrote:Al the destroyer wrote:As we are both aware, our own corps like to bring our own 16 if we can always. 0.H loves to see ringers on the other side I personally don't care if others bring ringers. I can't speak for your CORP chat but I can speak for mine. We have a lot of ppl who love to ring and will do so for many who ask. But if we are talking about noob corp 1 vs noob corp 2 and one of those has 16 of there own and the other has 6 0.H on their team those are going to be tough odds to beat. It can be done but very experienced PC vets in a noob match will be tough to beat. I do agree however that to get better you have to play better teams. And no there isn't ringers for every battle in MH and if its only the strong survive so be it. Every corp I've been in only fields their own. That's why Cap Aq and 0.H are so strong. o7 It just frustrates me when people blame the stagnation or inability to enjoy on ringers. Too many simply give up, and don't even try. I mean I've seen a team of awesome players lose with the lack of a quality FC. Take the same team and throw in good FC and it totally changes. We can carebear the players newer to PC, but there's certainly nothing we can do about poor organization or leadership. No amount of carebearing (in fact it would be detrimental) would fix that. I'm totally for getting them started, yet eventually they have to learn to walk on their own. In the end, if only corps members were allowed to participate in a battle, what stops a corp from hiring out stronger corps to take their district back for them. Or simply wiping them off the map. Should we make it then that only a weaker corp can attack a weaker corp. Tier out molden heath maybe, so you will ever have an easy time of it or a fair fight. Considering the spirit of new eden continues to translate to Dust 514, this would never happen. And honestly, unless you matchmade PC matches, there will always be an imbalance for skill much like we had before the matchmaking for pubs. Ringing is most certainly NOT the problem. You can't fix PC until you address the problems with player behavior and incentives to win pub matches. People don't have the nerve to take an objective in a pub match, but they are going to become hyper competitive FCs?
I've probably written something to that effect on these forums a few thousand times.
Step 1- get people to use better gear when faced with a tough opponent instead of the other way around Step 2- get people to squad up and work together.
|
Heimdallr69
Negative-Feedback.
5
|
Posted - 2015.06.13 00:59:00 -
[124] - Quote
http://youtu.be/dGkU8jP4ixI The days of hardcore tear jerking epeen stroking are gone..the new pool of players are nothing like we were, they need all the help they can get... Thank you Shep
Removed inappropriate content - CCP Logibro
|
SOGZ PANDA
WarRavens
104
|
Posted - 2015.06.13 01:12:00 -
[125] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:Viktor Hadah Jr wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:DEATH SURRONDS wrote:0uter.Heaven stands behind this idea and will help protect new Corps Because you guys are so great at that OH isn't exactly known for being true to their word, lol. You guys kinda got a reputation for being wishy-washy and shady when it comes to politics. But, yanno, Jack Sparrow said it best: "-a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest. Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for, because you can never predict when they're going to do something incredibly... stupid." Do you even PC? where did that even come from? Yes, I PC. I PC quite a bit in the past (multiple wars, mercenary work, etc) but since joining NF I've sort of trailed off the PC end of things because we're mostly mercenaries who work for pay and... Well, work isn't exactly bustling at the moment Where does that come from? A long standing history of watching OH attack corporations in their own alliance and other corporations completely out of the blue O.o;
If there is anyone I wouldn't ask if he even pc's. It's Aeon Amadi lol
Done waaayyy too many pc's with him on the same team and on the opposition.
"Why should we make a story about you?"
"Cause I'm so f*ing good!"
|
Luther Mandrix
WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL RUST415
590
|
Posted - 2015.06.13 01:16:00 -
[126] - Quote
Yokal Bob wrote:Honestly, I think that as ringers are so widely used, it is pointless. Say you gave A a district, B goes to fight thinking they are of similr calibre. A hires PC veterans, B brings its own players and loses. So not a fair fight, nor honest. Or, another scenario, you give A a district, other big corp goes oh easy fight, takes.
The ringer mechanic has broken PC, the low playerbase has left PC broken. Certain players e-peens have left PC broken
Pointless in my opinion Alliance Corps should not be called Ringers! |
SHERIFF joe arapio
US Border Patrol
208
|
Posted - 2015.06.13 02:40:00 -
[127] - Quote
Shepherd Grey wrote:I will attempt to address the concerns raised since my last post as best as I can.
Since we have removed the fact that this isn't a political move with ISK motivation, the accusation diverts to some sort of PR "save face". I am still unclear as to where your misguided prejudice towards me derives from, considering we have never formally/personally interacted in any form or fashion whatsoever prior to this date. Simple as this: I have zero to gain from you being happy with what my organization or I do. To say that pursuing public approval from a video game population is somehow my goal is a complete farce, and you should contemplate the actual purpose of your statements. Rather, point out the possible faults within the system to assist in creating one with practicality.
Ringer usage can't be avoided, but inhibited. Lower the reward for ringers in lower tier zones, lower the chance of seeing them. In its current state, PC payouts are really what the lower tier should be - as there is almost no profit margin for proto users. With this low payout setup, low-tier teams will be encouraged to use proto sparingly and instead focus on tactics and teamwork as they battle each other to improve their overall skill. You simply can't remove the merc aspect of the game, but make it less lucrative for top guys to participate in low-tier affairs.
We had to play the same game, beating a team twice and then getting stomped by 15-man ring teams on the third battle for the flip -- essentially making our efforts a complete waste of time. But, these experiences actually improved us as a team to be more prepared the next time that same team shows up. Using ringers against you is a nod to the skill YOU have as a team, and you should take it as a compliment they have to rely on help to win in the first place.
This proposed "Security Counsel" aka "Player-controlled CONCORD" is pretty much what's been going on this entire time. However, it has been abused in the past or completely neglected altogether at the detriment of smaller or less experienced corps. Nevertheless, it is still the case that those at the top essentially police MH in what way they see fit. I can say, that those I communicate with on a daily basis that have the power to manipulate MH have no apparent desire to do so in a malicious manner that benefits them.
Thanks for the feedback so far, keep it up
Who is going to be the governing bodies on this new improved CBM? Will this new program eradicate the CBM and single man corps owning districts? Are the billboards coming down?
"The Wrath of God is Immense. His Justice is Swift and Decisive. His Tolerance is Limited."
|
Leither Yiltron
Molon Labe. RUST415
1
|
Posted - 2015.06.13 03:06:00 -
[128] - Quote
thor424 wrote:Al the destroyer wrote:Shep, I think you should start an FC school for noob FCs. I'd be willing to bet they would learn some things lol. I used to say this before. In the army when you deploy into an area there's a transition with the unit that's currently operating there. They call it "right seat ride", where you go on missions together to pass down the intricacies of the area of operation. Tell a CEO how you want two squads composed and then you bring in a vet squad with an FC to go into a battle. Do an after action critique, rinse and repeat. Then I'd have a few of the key players play with the vet group in a PC to see how it all comes together.
This is the only real way to help people off the ground, but:
- It takes serious effort - The newer corp seems to take insult to it a bunch in my experience - Nobody has really ever pulled it off
Long term roadmap by Aeon Amadi
Have a pony
|
thor424
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
384
|
Posted - 2015.06.13 03:46:00 -
[129] - Quote
Luther Mandrix wrote:Yokal Bob wrote:Honestly, I think that as ringers are so widely used, it is pointless. Say you gave A a district, B goes to fight thinking they are of similr calibre. A hires PC veterans, B brings its own players and loses. So not a fair fight, nor honest. Or, another scenario, you give A a district, other big corp goes oh easy fight, takes.
The ringer mechanic has broken PC, the low playerbase has left PC broken. Certain players e-peens have left PC broken
Pointless in my opinion Alliance Corps should not be called Ringers! In a Alliance many little Corps Work for the Good of the Alliance. We are a Team and we still retain our identity of our small Corps that we have created years ago,We are not willing to leave and join Mega Corps just to attain the SIZE to fight in PC 2.0
It's smarter in the upcoming system to merge. With activity you'd earn CP to attack and clone packs will be cheap. |
Silver Strike44
679
|
Posted - 2015.06.13 05:26:00 -
[130] - Quote
Al the destroyer wrote:Shep, I think you should start an FC school for noob FCs. I'd be willing to bet they would learn some things lol.
I know its not the complete picture, but I have plenty of matches on my channel where Shep FCs.
My YouTube Channel
|
|
Al the destroyer
0uter.Heaven
454
|
Posted - 2015.06.13 06:42:00 -
[131] - Quote
Silver Strike44 wrote:Al the destroyer wrote:Shep, I think you should start an FC school for noob FCs. I'd be willing to bet they would learn some things lol. I know its not the complete picture, but I have plenty of matches on my channel where Shep FCs. Yea I've watched others whom want to get into PC should as well! |
Luther Mandrix
WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL RUST415
591
|
Posted - 2015.06.13 09:27:00 -
[132] - Quote
thor424 wrote:Luther Mandrix wrote:Yokal Bob wrote:Honestly, I think that as ringers are so widely used, it is pointless. Say you gave A a district, B goes to fight thinking they are of similr calibre. A hires PC veterans, B brings its own players and loses. So not a fair fight, nor honest. Or, another scenario, you give A a district, other big corp goes oh easy fight, takes.
The ringer mechanic has broken PC, the low playerbase has left PC broken. Certain players e-peens have left PC broken
Pointless in my opinion Alliance Corps should not be called Ringers! In a Alliance many little Corps Work for the Good of the Alliance. We are a Team and we still retain our identity of our small Corps that we have created years ago,We are not willing to leave and join Mega Corps just to attain the SIZE to fight in PC 2.0 It's smarter in the upcoming system to merge. With activity you'd earn CP to attack and clone packs will be cheap. Hope CCP hears this because we are not merging. |
Greiv Rabbah
ROGUE RELICS
318
|
Posted - 2015.06.14 17:14:00 -
[133] - Quote
4lbert Wesker wrote:These Capital tryhards took Mithril Forge last 2 districts so yeah,noone likes you and your band of tryhards. But it doesn't matter,you will lose all when PC version of Dust comes out.And then my dear gentlemen,you will face true terror of mouse and keyboard veterans like myself and there will be no Minmatard strafing that will save you from the eyes and reflex of a true PC user :) Every scrub is afraid of that,and 5that's why they want it to be moved on PS4... lol... you know dust uses mouse and keyboard, right?
Sebiestor scout, MTAC pilot, Merc w/ a face
|
DEATH SURRONDS
0uter.Heaven
26
|
Posted - 2015.06.14 17:47:00 -
[134] - Quote
The billboards have already came down |
DUST Fiend
17
|
Posted - 2015.06.14 18:19:00 -
[135] - Quote
Someone tries to help stimulate the community and make the game even remotely worth playing, and you all jump on him like a pack of rabid dogs.
Well, at least it's nice to know that some things never change
This thread is now a dance party
~ Dances Boldly ~
DUST STUFF
|
Void Echo
Helix Terrestrial Operations LLC
2
|
Posted - 2015.06.14 18:38:00 -
[136] - Quote
Separation each constellation in hm for tiered pc systems is a bad idea, if mh wasn't the only region CCP opened up for us then it would work the same as eve with high sec, low sec and nul sec. But with only 1 region available it shouldn't be that condenced.
One point is this: how does one determine the tier level of a corp? How does one determine whether or not that corp is ready for the next level, when they have all the district in the constellation? How does one determine when and where the next level is?
All these questions and a few more are really keeping hm from this and quite frankly it's a good thing, only having one region for pc would make Shepards plan a nightmare. With multiple regions opened up then we would have a system that fully supports it.
Closed Beta Vet.
Founder of Helix Order.
For the Federation, For Freedom, Till all are Free.
|
CeeJ Mantis
Mantodea MC
198
|
Posted - 2015.06.15 00:27:00 -
[137] - Quote
Honestly, I think the main problem is reception. I've toyed with the idea of entering my corp into PC, and the 1 major concern is not the ringers, or even the costs, it's the fact that you see the squads of established PC corps in pubs, and many of them are just bastards to fight against. Camping uplinks, people exploiting broken/unbalance mechanics, hard to fight against packs of FotM. All I can think is that my corp made up of my friends would love to test our mettle against these corps, but if we can't just run the fun fits we made, and instead have to run full anti-frustrating-tactics fits, it quickly looses its appeal. I'd much rather avoid the stress of fighting a large, talent pooling group of people with functionally unlimited money, doing stuff that makes them unfun to fight against. No point when even if I win a district, and even if I can defend it every day when I don't have the billions of isk to hire alliance ringers/purchase clone packs. I'll stick to running pubs with my friends, with the occasional FW to mix it up.
Longest plasma cannon kill: 236.45m
|
Balistyc Farshot
MONSTER SYNERGY
224
|
Posted - 2015.06.15 14:45:00 -
[138] - Quote
Silver Strike44 wrote:Al the destroyer wrote:Shep, I think you should start an FC school for noob FCs. I'd be willing to bet they would learn some things lol. I know its not the complete picture, but I have plenty of matches on my channel where Shep FCs.
I think this would be a step in the correct direction. As a past FC I can tell you it is a hard thankless job. You spend tons of time on your mini map and still have to fight and direct 3 squads of people. Whenever things hit the fan, you have to turn into the ahole who yells at everyone to shut-up and give intelligent information over comms.
People talk about FW training but that is almost impossible because usually you steam roll the other team and learn so little about a real PC battle where you may be fighting out of one CRU.
I miss PFC a little for training and I think CCP should read this demand for training. That is where I learned the most about how to counter some steep odds with less mercs.
"Dying with your rep tool out - the logi-flasher!"
Who hasn't been caught by a cute little female scout doing this?
|
Viktor Hadah Jr
Negative-Impact Back and Forth
8
|
Posted - 2015.06.15 14:54:00 -
[139] - Quote
CeeJ Mantis wrote:Honestly, I think the main problem is reception. I've toyed with the idea of entering my corp into PC, and the 1 major concern is not the ringers, or even the costs, it's the fact that you see the squads of established PC corps in pubs, and many of them are just bastards to fight against. Camping uplinks, people exploiting broken/unbalance mechanics, hard to fight against packs of FotM. All I can think is that my corp made up of my friends would love to test our mettle against these corps, but if we can't just run the fun fits we made, and instead have to run full anti-frustrating-tactics fits, it quickly looses its appeal. I'd much rather avoid the stress of fighting a large, talent pooling group of people with functionally unlimited money, doing stuff that makes them unfun to fight against. No point when even if I win a district, and even if I can defend it every day when I don't have the billions of isk to hire alliance ringers/purchase clone packs. I'll stick to running pubs with my friends, with the occasional FW to mix it up. Well then PC simply is not for you guys. It's not about running around doing silly things. its about playing to get the win.
Vote Viktor Hadah for CPM2 or i'll hurt you.
CBM In the CPM
Get Dust ISK Here
|
Luna McDuffing
COALICION LATINA Smart Deploy
200
|
Posted - 2015.06.15 15:11:00 -
[140] - Quote
Capital Inquisitions idea of having a newb corp solar system is not a bad one. A while back Pc used to be 50m. for many people this was too expensive especially when you kept getting attacked by top corps. Even if you didnt lose your district there was no payout so they just wore you out. Now with the 10m entry fee and reward for what you kill PCs are definitrly viable for everybody. For that price and reward people are willing to take a chance because it no longer feels like a potential lost. If on top of that you give the younger corps a district then they will try to defend it or even launch an attact of their own by moving clones and thus not spending the 10m. Nothing motivates an individual more than the threat of loosing something. Given them a district and they will fight to keep it. And if they cant then at least they wil become better players.
At the end of the day this idea of having a reserved solar system works on the honor system. We cant expect everybody to play along. All we can do is keep our end of the bargain and do our part to defend this idea.
Some corps do have some level of honor even if a small one.
|
|
Balistyc Farshot
MONSTER SYNERGY
224
|
Posted - 2015.06.15 15:50:00 -
[141] - Quote
Here are 2 PR points that you OH and CA guys don't seem to get. I keep seeing venom in the responses as an indicator.
1. Stop talking about ringers. - Everyone who was in PCs during some of the worst times has terrible experience with the billboard corps bringing in 14 ringers for the smash, being farmed, or having ringers from like allied or like corps **** people off. I saw more people leave corps due to ringing or leveraging ringers than any other driving force. - You don't know the problem from where you are. Just be quiet about this issue. It is an issue or everyone wouldn't be so fing mad about it. Just acknowledge it is a problem, mention how it is less prevalent now (it is), and don't brow beat people for suffering from it. - If you don't get this point then come meet me in any COD and I will ride you all day and you tell me if you hate my guts because I use exploits like crazy.
2. Focus on this being brand new. New corps don't see the past as rosy. - The past exploits of the CBM is full of corruption. - Focus on this being your new legacy and drive home how this is a new day and you are marshaling in the next era of PC with the top position driving for a new player controlled PC. - You won't win districts for everyone, but you will start off as many "New" corps as you can into PC is the message. - Your previous message about you gaining nothing is a good start but people will mistrust that post. Focus on why you are doing this. Everyone has motives. I think if you talked about them that would tell everyone see where you are coming from. PC is an empty battlefield lately and this saddens you Your corp has a bad rap just like Nyain San used to and you want to be better than that Dust is losing player base and you have vested lots into the game and want to retain people in PC
Just a couple of suggestions. Like I said before, I support this movement but it requires new corps to risk everything (A few bad fights could burn out members and then the corp folds) on a benefactor they don't necessarily know. You are giving out district you don't even fight on so it costs you so very little. Think of new corps perspective.
"Dying with your rep tool out - the logi-flasher!"
Who hasn't been caught by a cute little female scout doing this?
|
Viktor Hadah Jr
Negative-Impact Back and Forth
8
|
Posted - 2015.06.15 15:56:00 -
[142] - Quote
Balistyc Farshot wrote:Here are 2 PR points that you OH and CA guys don't seem to get. I keep seeing venom in the responses as an indicator.
1. Stop talking about ringers. - Everyone who was in PCs during some of the worst times has terrible experience with the billboard corps bringing in 14 ringers for the smash, being farmed, or having ringers from like allied or like corps **** people off. I saw more people leave corps due to ringing or leveraging ringers than any other driving force. - You don't know the problem from where you are. Just be quiet about this issue. It is an issue or everyone wouldn't be so fing mad about it. Just acknowledge it is a problem, mention how it is less prevalent now (it is), and don't brow beat people for suffering from it. - If you don't get this point then come meet me in any COD and I will ride you all day and you tell me if you hate my guts because I use exploits like crazy.
2. Focus on this being brand new. New corps don't see the past as rosy. - The past exploits of the CBM is full of corruption. - Focus on this being your new legacy and drive home how this is a new day and you are marshaling in the next era of PC with the top position driving for a new player controlled PC. - You won't win districts for everyone, but you will start off as many "New" corps as you can into PC is the message. - Your previous message about you gaining nothing is a good start but people will mistrust that post. Focus on why you are doing this. Everyone has motives. I think if you talked about them that would tell everyone see where you are coming from. PC is an empty battlefield lately and this saddens you Your corp has a bad rap just like Nyain San used to and you want to be better than that Dust is losing player base and you have vested lots into the game and want to retain people in PC
Just a couple of suggestions. Like I said before, I support this movement but it requires new corps to risk everything (A few bad fights could burn out members and then the corp folds) on a benefactor they don't necessarily know. You are giving out district you don't even fight on so it costs you so very little. Think of new corps perspective.
Can you give some examples where the CBM came after the districts of legit PC corps not ones that were just there just to farm ISK and not participate in PC in any other way?
Vote Viktor Hadah for CPM2 or i'll hurt you.
CBM In the CPM
Get Dust ISK Here
|
Balistyc Farshot
MONSTER SYNERGY
224
|
Posted - 2015.06.15 17:39:00 -
[143] - Quote
Viktor Hadah Jr wrote:Balistyc Farshot wrote:Here are 2 PR points that you OH and CA guys don't seem to get. I keep seeing venom in the responses as an indicator.
1. Stop talking about ringers. - Everyone who was in PCs during some of the worst times has terrible experience with the billboard corps bringing in 14 ringers for the smash, being farmed, or having ringers from like allied or like corps **** people off. I saw more people leave corps due to ringing or leveraging ringers than any other driving force. - You don't know the problem from where you are. Just be quiet about this issue. It is an issue or everyone wouldn't be so fing mad about it. Just acknowledge it is a problem, mention how it is less prevalent now (it is), and don't brow beat people for suffering from it. - If you don't get this point then come meet me in any COD and I will ride you all day and you tell me if you hate my guts because I use exploits like crazy.
2. Focus on this being brand new. New corps don't see the past as rosy. - The past exploits of the CBM is full of corruption. - Focus on this being your new legacy and drive home how this is a new day and you are marshaling in the next era of PC with the top position driving for a new player controlled PC. - You won't win districts for everyone, but you will start off as many "New" corps as you can into PC is the message. - Your previous message about you gaining nothing is a good start but people will mistrust that post. Focus on why you are doing this. Everyone has motives. I think if you talked about them that would tell everyone see where you are coming from. PC is an empty battlefield lately and this saddens you Your corp has a bad rap just like Nyain San used to and you want to be better than that Dust is losing player base and you have vested lots into the game and want to retain people in PC
Just a couple of suggestions. Like I said before, I support this movement but it requires new corps to risk everything (A few bad fights could burn out members and then the corp folds) on a benefactor they don't necessarily know. You are giving out district you don't even fight on so it costs you so very little. Think of new corps perspective.
Can you give some examples where the CBM was corrupt. Also if you think the CBM was made to help PC it was not. CBM was made after a late night PC and a group of friends decided to have some fun. We never intended to actually do anything serious. After a while people started asking for help doing some stuff so we did what we could to make a good mix of philanthropy along side having fun so it would not be completely boring for us. Also second question what did the CBM set out to do and how did they fail. Because if you are comparing what shep is doing to what the CBM did you are off base on a few things.
Viktor - Sorry to call the CBM corrupt. I never saw a charter for the CBM but I do know from some of my friend's corps I used to help (Not giving names) that they would fight against a corp who instigated a fight, then be beaten down after violating the last district policy while avenging same said offense performed by the corp. I was told the last district rule was started by the CBM and the enforcement is as always political. All politics involve some people lying and exploiting facts, hence my corruption correlation.
There may be exceptions and probably good intentions that were involved. This is a game of battle and some perception is spread through people being angry they lost. There were other comments earlier about the CBM not being effective in the thread you did not respond to. Just curious why you called out mine? My statement wasn't even made for you but discussing general perceptions and helping top corps with PR.
If I am at all wrong this was my ignorance entirely. But I know my view is a bit of the shared perception. The CBM has never harmed me directly. If the CBM was trying to police PC, like I hear it was trying to perform, then it would be considered failing right? Dude, you told another corp they shouldn't PC because they don't try super hard and you can't take a little failure comment. If you become a CPM be careful. Those guys received some serious flaming at times. Like character attacks.
"Dying with your rep tool out - the logi-flasher!"
Who hasn't been caught by a cute little female scout doing this?
|
Holliticus Randle
D3ATH CARD RUST415
8
|
Posted - 2015.06.16 01:32:00 -
[144] - Quote
No D3ATH CARD is not sipping this Juice. Its all bogus. A lot of the corps supporting this initiative have spent so much time dishing out their superiority in this game that it comes as a surprise all of a sudden that they are getting a taste of their own medicine and they donGÇÖt like it. We have this bogus PR campaign against RUST 415 alliance accusing us of things that a lot of you who are pushing this new initiative now have been guilty of for a very , very long time. We are not sipping that juice.
D3ATH CARD will not be entertaining this initiative until we feel it can show some legitimate staying power. Cause all of the others have failed miserably. I recommend everyone spend time with the new changes in PC which will be introduced by CCP before even entertaining this initiative.
CEO /Diplomat /D3ATH CARD
Logistics Expert 56 Million Plus SP And Climbing.
Squad With Honor. Squad With Integrity.
|
CeeJ Mantis
Mantodea MC
199
|
Posted - 2015.06.16 01:41:00 -
[145] - Quote
Viktor Hadah Jr wrote:CeeJ Mantis wrote:Honestly, I think the main problem is reception. I've toyed with the idea of entering my corp into PC, and the 1 major concern is not the ringers, or even the costs, it's the fact that you see the squads of established PC corps in pubs, and many of them are just bastards to fight against. Camping uplinks, people exploiting broken/unbalance mechanics, hard to fight against packs of FotM. All I can think is that my corp made up of my friends would love to test our mettle against these corps, but if we can't just run the fun fits we made, and instead have to run full anti-frustrating-tactics fits, it quickly looses its appeal. I'd much rather avoid the stress of fighting a large, talent pooling group of people with functionally unlimited money, doing stuff that makes them unfun to fight against. No point when even if I win a district, and even if I can defend it every day when I don't have the billions of isk to hire alliance ringers/purchase clone packs. I'll stick to running pubs with my friends, with the occasional FW to mix it up. Well then PC simply is not for you guys. It's not about running around doing silly things. its about playing to get the win. Not doing silly things, just not wanting ro skill into the current anti-meta fit (which is often the current meta) and use it to fight people with unlimited resources, often from past PC exploitation. Hard to fight a meaningful/fun engagement under those circumstances. We make our fits and playstyles work.
Longest plasma cannon kill: 236.45m
|
Viktor Hadah Jr
Negative-Impact Back and Forth
8
|
Posted - 2015.06.16 13:02:00 -
[146] - Quote
Balistyc Farshot wrote:Viktor Hadah Jr wrote:Balistyc Farshot wrote:Here are 2 PR points that you OH and CA guys don't seem to get. I keep seeing venom in the responses as an indicator.
1. Stop talking about ringers. - Everyone who was in PCs during some of the worst times has terrible experience with the billboard corps bringing in 14 ringers for the smash, being farmed, or having ringers from like allied or like corps **** people off. I saw more people leave corps due to ringing or leveraging ringers than any other driving force. - You don't know the problem from where you are. Just be quiet about this issue. It is an issue or everyone wouldn't be so fing mad about it. Just acknowledge it is a problem, mention how it is less prevalent now (it is), and don't brow beat people for suffering from it. - If you don't get this point then come meet me in any COD and I will ride you all day and you tell me if you hate my guts because I use exploits like crazy.
2. Focus on this being brand new. New corps don't see the past as rosy. - The past exploits of the CBM is full of corruption. - Focus on this being your new legacy and drive home how this is a new day and you are marshaling in the next era of PC with the top position driving for a new player controlled PC. - You won't win districts for everyone, but you will start off as many "New" corps as you can into PC is the message. - Your previous message about you gaining nothing is a good start but people will mistrust that post. Focus on why you are doing this. Everyone has motives. I think if you talked about them that would tell everyone see where you are coming from. PC is an empty battlefield lately and this saddens you Your corp has a bad rap just like Nyain San used to and you want to be better than that Dust is losing player base and you have vested lots into the game and want to retain people in PC
Just a couple of suggestions. Like I said before, I support this movement but it requires new corps to risk everything (A few bad fights could burn out members and then the corp folds) on a benefactor they don't necessarily know. You are giving out district you don't even fight on so it costs you so very little. Think of new corps perspective.
Can you give some examples where the CBM was corrupt. Also if you think the CBM was made to help PC it was not. CBM was made after a late night PC and a group of friends decided to have some fun. We never intended to actually do anything serious. After a while people started asking for help doing some stuff so we did what we could to make a good mix of philanthropy along side having fun so it would not be completely boring for us. Also second question what did the CBM set out to do and how did they fail. Because if you are comparing what shep is doing to what the CBM did you are off base on a few things. Viktor - Sorry to call the CBM corrupt. I never saw a charter for the CBM but I do know from some of my friend's corps I used to help (Not giving names) that they would fight against a corp who instigated a fight, then be beaten down after violating the last district policy while avenging same said offense performed by the corp. I was told the last district rule was started by the CBM and the enforcement is as always political. All politics involve some people lying and exploiting facts, hence my corruption correlation. There may be exceptions and probably good intentions that were involved. This is a game of battle and some perception is spread through people being angry they lost. There were other comments earlier about the CBM not being effective in the thread you did not respond to. Just curious why you called out mine? My statement wasn't even made for you but discussing general perceptions and helping top corps with PR. If I am at all wrong this was my ignorance entirely. But I know my view is a bit of the shared perception. The CBM has never harmed me directly. If the CBM was trying to police PC, like I hear it was trying to perform, then it would be considered failing right? Dude, you told another corp they shouldn't PC because they don't try super hard and you can't take a little failure comment. If you become a CPM be careful. Those guys received some serious flaming at times. Like character attacks. I called out your post because i was not really keep up with this thread that actively because of real life stuff and when i logged on your post was the most recent.
Last district rule was made preCBM era but all of the CBM corps supported it to some extent. But it was not policed by the CBM it was policed by the corps within the CBM. the reasoning behind that is that the last district rule was never made to be policed by a single entity(like the CBM) it was meant to be policed by the community. Thats why i say the corps in the CBM enforced the last district rule as part of their duty to the community not as a duty to the CBM.
The one and only if i remember correctly CBM went out to do is stop district farming and encourage fighting instead of having districts locked 24/7. District farming was even an after thought of the CBM it was orginally created as a joke with no real purpose. There are many things that people think we set out to do and did incorrectly but they are wrong and during the era of CBM we generally did not correct them because we did not care to much what others thought of us at the time.
Vote Viktor Hadah for CPM2 or i'll hurt you.
CBM In the CPM
Get Dust ISK Here
|
Dalmont Legrand
RUST415
552
|
Posted - 2015.06.16 13:40:00 -
[147] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:Sometimes the sandbox delivers!
Sanbox is full of ***** and you can smell it... What ***** do is claim that they are just like the rest of the sand in the box. Can't wait to see babies ride hard for another give away land contest which will obviously fail some time later.
It truly delivers sometimes
"Shred Memories" | Reality Fiction
The best is yet to come
|
Dalmont Legrand
RUST415
552
|
Posted - 2015.06.16 14:13:00 -
[148] - Quote
Shepherd Grey wrote:I have been informed that some of you have a bad opinion of my organization, or me personally. To be honest, I never expected to be in the position that I am in...nor to have the responsibilities that come with it. I remember clearly coming from the bottom, fighting against the powers that be, and struggling to earn our right among the rest. I will spare you the memoir.
I am not a carebear (completely). I WANT you to struggle, to desire more, to strive for improvement. The hardest aspects of PC itself is what challenges both the player and the team in its entirety, and those with the fortitude to carry on build the bonds that make this game.....well, the game I love. To fully experience the single most dynamic component of DUST514, I believe you MUST participate in the competitive field and test your valor.
However, in PC's current state, it appears assistance is necessary to uplift the majority of "up and comers" (and those whose previous attempts have met with failure) and give them a chance. My current plan is to segregate, as best I can, corps based on tiers into corresponding constellations within Molden Heath (there are 6 constellations total). To begin, the lowest tiers will be provided a district free-of-charge in a specific constellation. This way, they can essentially "have it out" in fair fights with corps of similar skill in close proximity with each other without any disruption by corps of obviously higher skill.
So far, I have some top-tier corps that agree not to interfere with this course of action, and will devote resources toward construction of this system.
This thread is meant to gather corp names that wish to take part in this PC reformation, and be given their district. Also, relevant and coherent feedback would be appreciated.
I ask that only corp leaders make any attempt to contact me in game, that I may extradite this plan swiftly.
Shep
Well hello there creature, if under sauce of PC district faire you want to move corps without their approval, we disagree on that and for further notice: if no equal quantity of districts for the corps will be provided outside of the Tartatven due to relocation then be my guest.
At least we, I don't know about others, will flip all and every party outside Tartatven as well as permacamp your PC Faire in there. Have fun
If I hear any noise from your side claiming we are bunch of douche bags after that, be sure to recall who has pain in the buttocks when something goes not-his-way.
o/^
"Shred Memories" | Reality Fiction
The best is yet to come
|
Balistyc Farshot
MONSTER SYNERGY
224
|
Posted - 2015.06.16 14:41:00 -
[149] - Quote
Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: I called out your post because i was not really keep up with this thread that actively because of real life stuff and when i logged on your post was the most recent.
Last district rule was made preCBM era but all of the CBM corps supported it to some extent. But it was not policed by the CBM it was policed by the corps within the CBM. the reasoning behind that is that the last district rule was never made to be policed by a single entity(like the CBM) it was meant to be policed by the community. Thats why i say the corps in the CBM enforced the last district rule as part of their duty to the community not as a duty to the CBM.
The one and only if i remember correctly CBM went out to do is stop district farming and encourage fighting instead of having districts locked 24/7. District farming was even an after thought of the CBM it was orginally created as a joke with no real purpose. There are many things that people think we set out to do and did incorrectly but they are wrong and during the era of CBM we generally did not correct them because we did not care to much what others thought of us at the time.
You do know I have to call you out now? You are a CPM candidate and you talk both ways already. You should have come forth with a way better response than this IMO. You tote the CBM, but say it was a joke. You guard the charter or direction but say you did not fail or do anything wrong because you were aimless but were a gathering of powerful corps. You should have stuck to the, "We tried to enforce some order in PC. People got ruffled. Maybe I can make a difference in the CPM speech." Failure is ok, as long as you learn from it.Otherwise you come off as the person trying to be the try hard, "I fail nothing! It was all on purpose."
"Dying with your rep tool out - the logi-flasher!"
Who hasn't been caught by a cute little female scout doing this?
|
TheD1CK
Dead Man's Game
2
|
Posted - 2015.06.16 14:51:00 -
[150] - Quote
Something like this, needs to everyone on board.. so regarding TARTAVEN, the epeens need to be kept in your pants. It is not perfect, but it is a start, and I fully support a system for new corps, so when a new/undeveloped corp is given land, or even wants to come in and flip something, they can begin in a system with corps of similar skill levels, and progress.
I have tried something similar, intending to gain Osvetur as a EU PC zone.. as soon as QQuse was aware of this, he sent attacks to see it did not happen. After that I was not going to make a habit of building something the fat kids will break, So if TARTAVEN is going to work, the supporters need to outnumber the trolls because no matter who sets this up, there will be trolls, the only way to defend vs that is if the community supports this proposal.
- As someone who has been on the receiving end from the corps involved, I urge more players to settle these differences.
Because this 'project' is not about Cap, or anyone else instigating it, it is about MH and making a 'safezone' where undeveloped corps can battle without having to deal with the scrubbiest of tryhards being you neighbours.
So to the players this may benefit, you can either hide under tinfoil hats and call BS on this.. Or you can get off your ass and be part of making the first healthy change to how MH functions (in my time)
No-one is being asked to buddy up, no-one is being asked for anything in return (bar respecting noobs in Tartaven) Just take the fights somewhere else, leave this as the first step to growing PC, and draw blood/tears elsewhere |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |