|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
TheD1CK
Dead Man's Game
2
   |
Posted - 2015.06.12 18:16:00 -
[1] - Quote
This will take effort from the Corps supporting it, and the benefits will go to those that participate. While it may be hard for some of you to picture, most of the PC corps want to see more activity, this is the best way to achieve that..
I have seen some of the smaller corps, H84D, Destiny Immortals, YAMAH, in battles where they just cannot hit the opposition back, this is boring for the team winning, practically torture for those on the losing side, overall bad for PC. So any idea to separate activity into tiers capable of fighting each other is a good one, it just needs support. This proposal offers no real reward for supporting it, but that is the Corps choice, do they want to be part of growing PC, or killing it??
We can point the finger all day at who caused what, the fact is those active in PC can and should make these changes.
Deciding what corps qualify as 'new' will be tricky, some have lasted a while on not got off the ground yet, so while they are technically not new, they may be struggling and they need to battle other teams of their skill level.
Good Luck anyway, DMG will support any solid proposal to get new blood trained into PC. This looks good.
Note: The tiered systems would really help, having corps choose to stick to this will not be easy going, certainly at first.
If CCP Rattati is still stalking this, the best way to have this plan implemented is to make a few changes to MH.
- lower payouts in the 'safezone' systems (OR penalties to payouts for experienced corps attacking them)
- higher payouts in 'warzone' systems, Fittikan/Almur fit this well imo
To stop corps taking an entire region, simply make a change so it is not possible, we've seen 100% aimed for and it didn't do PC any favours bar the fountains of ISK flowing from it, so removing the ability to take entire planets/systems is one option. |
TheD1CK
Dead Man's Game
2
|
Posted - 2015.06.16 14:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
Something like this, needs to everyone on board.. so regarding TARTAVEN, the epeens need to be kept in your pants. It is not perfect, but it is a start, and I fully support a system for new corps, so when a new/undeveloped corp is given land, or even wants to come in and flip something, they can begin in a system with corps of similar skill levels, and progress.
I have tried something similar, intending to gain Osvetur as a EU PC zone.. as soon as QQuse was aware of this, he sent attacks to see it did not happen. After that I was not going to make a habit of building something the fat kids will break,
So if TARTAVEN is going to work, the supporters need to outnumber the trolls because no matter who sets this up, there will be trolls, the only way to defend vs that is if the community supports this proposal.
- As someone who has been on the receiving end from the corps involved, I urge more players to settle these differences.
Because this 'project' is not about Cap, or anyone else instigating it, it is about MH and making a 'safezone' where undeveloped corps can battle without having to deal with the scrubbiest of tryhards being you neighbours.
So to the players this may benefit, you can either hide under tinfoil hats and call BS on this..
Or you can get off your ass and be part of making the first healthy change to how MH functions (in my time)
No-one is being asked to buddy up, no-one is being asked for anything in return (bar respecting noobs in Tartaven)
Just take the fights somewhere else, leave this as the first step to growing PC, and draw blood/tears elsewhere |
TheD1CK
Dead Man's Game
2
|
Posted - 2015.06.16 18:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
Osvetur was inactive because we held 80% with the remainder being timers past 00:00, hence why I made contact. The goal was to take the planet then divide it out with any EU corps we could bring in, This crashed once your buddies were unhappy
If your unhappy about inactivity.. why not these Planets??
- Ennur
- Meildolf
- Kadlina
- Skarkon
All had less activity with no goal to create anything good there
So really it was just an excuse to exploit the 'because I can clause'
I don't get why people acting purely for themselves insist on sounding like they are supporting a cause.
|
|
|
| |
|