Ringers Sucks... if a corp doesn't have many players for district defense they don't worth it.

Example: Pianet Express yeap pianet with i, because Planet (with l) already have it a EVE corp.

14 Districts :O !?

Team A: Gand cubo and company... best players... good players... take off a distric it's ok, the game's rule but if somebody attack pianet.... they send only a Team B... with Random Gunz - Capital Adquisition and Outer Haven Ringers...

Maybe could be right but... THERE ARE NOT IN THERE ALLIANCE !!!


Smart Deploy:
LA-RESISTENCIA
Pendejitos
COALICION LATINA
EL Azteca Empire
Inmortales LLC
U-STARS
ScReWeD uP InC
El Imperio Hispano
ELEGIDOS POR EVE.
The Naughty Ninjas
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
Some Gave All

Pianet got 14 districts using ringers, xploids and broken mecanism.

Planetary Conquest 2.0 will be the panacea for this problems.

#NoRingersAllowed

#NoHashtagsInForumDusts

So what you're saying is I should pick up PE,OH and Cap into our alliance? All 3..sounds good to me I'd rather Fight for than against friends..and since only alliance ringers will work =ƒÿç

It's the inevitable outcome regardless lol!

Ringers Sucks... if a corp doesn't have many players for district defense they don't worth it.

Example: Pianet Express yeap pianet with i, because Planet (with l) already have it a EVE corp.

14 Districts :O !?

Team A: Gand cubo and company... best players... good players... take off a distric it's ok, the game's rule but if somebody attack pianet.... they send only a Team B... with Random Gunz - Capital Adquisition and Outer Haven Ringers...

Maybe could be right but... THERE ARE NOT IN THERE ALLIANCE !!!


Smart Deploy:
LA-RESISTENCIA
Pendejitos
COALICION LATINA
EL Azteca Empire
Inmortales LLC
U-STARS
ScReWeD uP InC
El Imperio Hispano
ELEGIDOS POR EVE.
The Naughty Ninjas
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
Some Gave All

Pianet got 14 districts using ringers, xploids and broken mecanism.

Planetary Conquest 2.0 will be the panacea for this problems.

#NoRingersAllowed

#NoHashtagsInForumDusts

We created NF alliance for ringing purposes, we are a ringing alliance sure some corps want districts now but the rest don't we just want to ring..we were created for ringing now your basically trying to null our purpose. Personally I'd rather have another corp hold the districts and I'll do the fighting if needed..holding districts and needing 16 guys to want to PC isn't my thing I'd rather just ring. But honestly that might be the strongest alliance ever though, RND/NF/FA/Cap/OH/PE/NS, that'd definitely be up their with EoN..but fortunately for everyone else this isn't a thing

Planet Express - 1 LKC's Grammar - 0
Lawls have been farmed during the making of this post

Ringers Sucks... if a corp doesn't have many players for district defense they don't worth it.

Example: Pianet Express yeap pianet with i, because Planet (with l) already have it a EVE corp.

14 Districts :O !?

Team A: Gand cubo and company... best players... good players... take off a distric it's ok, the game's rule but if somebody attack pianet.... they send only a Team B... with Random Gunz - Capital Adquisition and Outer Haven Ringers...

Maybe could be right but... THERE ARE NOT IN THERE ALLIANCE !!!


Smart Deploy:
LA-RESISTENCIA
Pendejitos
COALICION LATINA
EL Azteca Empire
Inmortales LLC
U-STARS
ScReWeD uP InC
El Imperio Hispano
ELEGIDOS POR EVE.
The Naughty Ninjas
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
Some Gave All

Pianet got 14 districts using ringers, xploids and broken mecanism.

Planetary Conquest 2.0 will be the panacea for this problems.

#NoRingersAllowed

#NoHashtagsInForumDusts

Nope, thats completely flawed. You are a Corp trying to take the land to further your success in New Eden. This is why we are known as mercs. We fight for the isk, not the loyalty.

And in the process, removing free agency.

Yes, that's a really stupid idea and everyone in EVE would be rolling their eyes at it.

Game mechanics aren't supposed to limit who you can fight for. Your own reputation exists for that. That's kind of the entire premise of New Eden and something a few key people seem to have forgotten along the way. In EVE I could offer my corporations services for a war and take the money. I could then sit back and do nothing, or even backstab the one who just paid me. Those are good wholesome mechanics for a not-so-good and wholesome universe.

But in Dust, we want it so you're locked into an agreement have HAVE to honor it? No.

Ringing can cost additional CP, that's fine. But contractual lockouts are stupid.

Go **** yourself you uneducated uninformed prick....rust415 wants **** its coming don't worry. We earned those districts with hard work from a full 16 man team of PE. Tell top i want their land but yours will fall first. Welcome to myrtle beach *****

That's what I mean. It's a thing, just not officially. Any corp that forms, and gets a district today, will fight the same guys repeatedly. The same corps not as often, but the same ringers most definitely. To the point where they can almost expect at the least a common 5 to 10 literally every time.

With this going on it's no wonder we're not seeing more willing volunteers. Personally, I have no issues fighting anyone, be it on an even plain. In our current condition as a corp, if I'm honest, we'd be hard pressed to hold off too many.

What I'd like to see in PC is tiers! The land can be broken down into different tiers of worth, and for large corps smaller, less lucrative areas, would not be worth their resources to attack. Smaller corps, however, could fight like cats and dogs for the same area as it carries value to them. Much more valuable areas would be worth the effort to top tier corps, but require more resources to take and maintain. This land will also be open to raids!

There's so many opportunities that come with change, but fear of the unknown keeps us clinging to what was.

Ringers Sucks... if a corp doesn't have many players for district defense they don't worth it.

Example: Pianet Express yeap pianet with i, because Planet (with l) already have it a EVE corp.

14 Districts :O !?

Team A: Gand cubo and company... best players... good players... take off a distric it's ok, the game's rule but if somebody attack pianet.... they send only a Team B... with Random Gunz - Capital Adquisition and Outer Haven Ringers...

Maybe could be right but... THERE ARE NOT IN THERE ALLIANCE !!!


Smart Deploy:
LA-RESISTENCIA
Pendejitos
COALICION LATINA
EL Azteca Empire
Inmortales LLC
U-STARS
ScReWeD uP InC
El Imperio Hispano
ELEGIDOS POR EVE.
The Naughty Ninjas
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
Some Gave All

Pianet got 14 districts using ringers, xploids and broken mecanism.

Planetary Conquest 2.0 will be the panacea for this problems.

#NoRingersAllowed

#NoHashtagsInForumDusts

..... He's hispanic..... I remember saying this once already?!

To be fair, you've picked up some pretty formidable mercs as of late...

Not pointing any fingers in any type of negative light, or anything.

However, the point of this thread was to highlight the use of ringers. Tags mean nothing. I can pick up all of fatal absolution and outer heaven into corp, hypothetically, and come after all your districts. Would you not scream foul play, or would you say "D3ATH CARD" did it off the muscle?

What all of us "vets" should be focusing on, more than anything, is player RETENTION! Not the fastest way to alienate an entire ethnic group of people because they speak spanish?!

If we don't do our best as players to help CCP in the one area they.... don't fair so well in.... all these ideas are nothing. They'll be no one to "farm" playing the game before long if the current atmosphere continues. You can hate each other later.

Frankly i would say good job. Then i would keep sending attacks utill i beat...complaing gets you nowhere...now practice is everything. I know its practice, we're talking bout practice....get gud scrub quite qqing nobody respects that ****

Lol this whole thread is corny.

Since the game began a group of players have always been whining about how ringing is cheating or disloyal or weak...


LOL WE'RE FRICKIN MERCENARIES. WHAT WE DO ON A DAILY BASIS IS RINGING.

Do you pick and choose your public contracts? No, you don't? EXACTLY.

I get pissed when it's the top corps QQing about how ringing should be frowned upon or illegal because they're being greedy and hypocritical whether it's a conscious or unconscious decision.

But when corps who aren't rich or neutral parties start to talk about it, it makes me wanna smack the Quafe outta those Kool-Aid sipping lips.



Ringing IS a major part of the economy and will continue to be. Ringing open up doors for various types of jobs and niche. Defense contractors, contracted specialists, scavengers, etc. It's like trying to deny us a piece of our future due to some pompous sense of "honor" or sick greed.

So what you're saying is I should pick up PE,OH and Cap into our alliance? All 3..sounds good to me I'd rather Fight for than against friends..and since only alliance ringers will work =ƒÿç

I agree, ringers from out of alliance should not be possible.
Otherwise corp and alliance has no sense to exist.

I'd like to see the price of clone packs go down, and the number of clones in the pack raised.

If a new corp wants to get into PC currently they have to join an alliance, and pray someone wants to spare a district.

If the prices varied:

10 mil for 150 clones
20 mil for 200 clones
50 mil for 350 clones

Something to that effect would let mercs without districts go for their's without having to tax their corps' member-less.

I gaurantee, even if they got obliterated, you'd see more effort out of corps, and this would mean more battles! Ringers aren't necessarily the problem so much as the lack of fights available.

Also, instead of 3 and out on battles to take a district. Make it more of a campaign with the factional warfare "move the chains" type of setup. Forcing corps to win a large number of battles over time, or win a smaller amount by epic proportion! You have to take control of the district. The map would show owned areas, and contested areas being fought over. Corps, like negative-feedback, could then sign up to fight for the side that pays the most, but would have to pledge temporary loyalty. A small number of ringers per battle would be allowed, 4 to 5 at the most, and that corp who paid for ringers would still have to actually be there to fight.

The fact that mercs aren't always online to help because "life and sh*t" eww, wouldn't hinder their ability to hold an area. Where they may lose ground on a tuesday, they can make a comeback on a wednesday. While this could help them hold, sustained attacks could weaken their ability to gain passive resources significantly, since you should have to have a 65-100% control to receive resources. So there's no "we'll just field outer heaven every saturday" bs?!

On the flipside, for the attacking corps, weakening resources produced weakens control over all, and the chains move faster in your corps favor! This also works for raiding! You could send lower level players in the corp on raids in different areas, while the vets fight larger scale battles elsewhere. Making it worth the time invested in rookies when it comes to tactics training.

On this alone so much fun could be had, but noooo! We wanna spend all our time beating the same guys..... with the same guys?!

Let's give CCP our best ideas, and make the game we love better. To the ringers! You're not losing much either way this ends up regardless.

But you're all ringing for the smallest piece of the pie ever! If we give PC 2.0 a chance you could ring all day and night if you wanted, in different types of battles! However, if we run all the players off who ya gonna ring for?

We must make PC better, and more lucrative, than the pubs. I'm all ears cuz ringing ain't doing it?

I will be waiting to be on the other side and see your corp use ringers.

Then I will take pictures and show the world your lack of honor.

Planet Express - 1 LKC's Grammar - 0
Lawls have been farmed during the making of this post

sounds like a lot of restrictions for something that is suppose to be a sand box.