Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Panthrax Oblivion
Horizons' Edge
16
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 03:42:00 -
[1] - Quote
Does anyone else not support this? I feel that people from your corp only should fight for your Corp. I've been in one battle where only 4 people were from the Corp we were attacking. It just doesn't seem right. It's Corp vs Corp, trying to find out which is the better one.
You all think you're so great, so I cant wait to put a bullet in your head and laugh at your dumb self
|
MythTanker
Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback
401
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 03:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
Panthrax Oblivion wrote:Does anyone else not support this? I feel that people from your corp only should fight for your Corp. I've been in one battle where only 4 people were from the Corp we were attacking. It just doesn't seem right. It's Corp vs Corp, trying to find out which is the better one. Nope, thats completely flawed. You are a Corp trying to take the land to further your success in New Eden. This is why we are known as mercs. We fight for the isk, not the loyalty.
Drink Quafe F@gg0t -CPM Awox
FA's official FG bitch
My mom couldn't afford a coat hanger, so now you have me.
|
deezy dabest
2181
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 03:47:00 -
[3] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:After spending the week with PC corporation representatives (The PC Think Tank), the issue of ringers has come up quite often. The consensus seems to be that ringers should exist, but not be risk free and as prevalant as now, particularly at the expense of homegrown talent.
More to follow later.
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2716923#post2716923
Personally I do not think there is a real fix aside from locking entry to PC to only alliance members who have been in the alliance for at least 3 days.
As long as ringers are allowed to enter PC they will be used to farm PC. It is going to be even worse once the new update comes out and passive rewards for districts return. |
Operative 1174 Uuali
Y.A.M.A.H
639
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 04:00:00 -
[4] - Quote
MythTanker wrote:Panthrax Oblivion wrote:Does anyone else not support this? I feel that people from your corp only should fight for your Corp. I've been in one battle where only 4 people were from the Corp we were attacking. It just doesn't seem right. It's Corp vs Corp, trying to find out which is the better one. Nope, thats completely flawed. You are a Corp trying to take the land to further your success in New Eden. This is why we are known as mercs. We fight for the isk, not the loyalty.
Yep, this. Sad how the combination of console crowd and CCP's failure on the EVE connection just make for so much fail.
Death is a serious businessGǪ So is running a shoddy, half-baked game company.
|
Dreis ShadowWeaver
0uter.Heaven Back and Forth
3424
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 04:14:00 -
[5] - Quote
I don't like how random people can fight for one player corp, and then another, without even being in the same alliance. Rattati had a good idea of not removing ringers, but instead formally contracting them to fight exclusively for a certain corporation for a set time period.
Creator of the 'Nova Knifers United' channel
My Minja Blog
Day 17/30 exclusively Minja
|
Panthrax Oblivion
Horizons' Edge
20
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 04:15:00 -
[6] - Quote
MythTanker wrote:Panthrax Oblivion wrote:Does anyone else not support this? I feel that people from your corp only should fight for your Corp. I've been in one battle where only 4 people were from the Corp we were attacking. It just doesn't seem right. It's Corp vs Corp, trying to find out which is the better one. Nope, thats completely flawed. You are a Corp trying to take the land to further your success in New Eden. This is why we are known as mercs. We fight for the isk, not the loyalty. What's the point of having Corp vs Corp if half the people don't even belong to it. It might as well be group A vs group B. The only circumstance I would find this acceptable is if the Corp has a shortage of mercs at the time of the PC
You all think you're so great, so I cant wait to put a bullet in your head and laugh at your dumb self
|
Panthrax Oblivion
Horizons' Edge
20
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 04:16:00 -
[7] - Quote
Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:I don't like how random people can fight for one player corp, and then another, without even being in the same alliance. Rattati had a good idea of not removing ringers, but instead formally contracting them to fight exclusively for a certain corporation for a set time period. That sounds like a decent idea
You all think you're so great, so I cant wait to put a bullet in your head and laugh at your dumb self
|
Dreis ShadowWeaver
0uter.Heaven Back and Forth
3424
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 04:16:00 -
[8] - Quote
Panthrax Oblivion wrote:MythTanker wrote:Panthrax Oblivion wrote:Does anyone else not support this? I feel that people from your corp only should fight for your Corp. I've been in one battle where only 4 people were from the Corp we were attacking. It just doesn't seem right. It's Corp vs Corp, trying to find out which is the better one. Nope, thats completely flawed. You are a Corp trying to take the land to further your success in New Eden. This is why we are known as mercs. We fight for the isk, not the loyalty. What's the point of having Corp vs Corp if half the people don't even belong to it. It might as well be group A vs group B. The only circumstance I would find this acceptable is if the Corp has a shortage of mercs at the time of the PC I'm currently in-favour of making it Alliance-only.
Creator of the 'Nova Knifers United' channel
My Minja Blog
Day 17/30 exclusively Minja
|
Bradric Banewolf
D3ATH CARD RUST415
859
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 04:19:00 -
[9] - Quote
Panthrax Oblivion wrote:Does anyone else not support this? I feel that people from your corp only should fight for your Corp. I've been in one battle where only 4 people were from the Corp we were attacking. It just doesn't seem right. It's Corp vs Corp, trying to find out which is the better one.
Most of us, including CCP Rattati, agree with you. The small group of ringers, that try to capitalize on every PC fought, will not agree because the new changes will benefit mercs that stay with corp, and not corp hoppers.
I saw a guy in local asking for 10 mil to run in any corp for a month lol! That's what we like to call prototype gear addiction. With what's being suggested in the PC think tank, alot of corp hoppers can see there easy isk days dwindling. They will be required to be in corp or alliance, and some of them have such bad reps that they won't get excepted into corps.
So many are joining alliances and corps already that it's hilarious lol! Hopefully CCP Rattati realizes that he's on the right path by cracking down on exploitation. It's the only way to grow the playerbase, and really make money on this game. If nothing changes this game will die. Why these guys don't see that is beyond me.
On the flipside to that though this is a video game, and if the team you're facing can't field a team that day, it's because they probably have jobs bro lol! We try to field full teams, and bring alliance to fill empty slots and roles. Not hiring any so-called good slayer (modded pad user) to carry us. If we lose so be it. Still gonna play the game,and have fun doing it. Doesn't mean we're not good, and most of the time we'll field fairly new players.
I'd suggest you report to the think tank, and let CCP Rattati know exactly what you think of PC's current state, but do it with an open mind to the fact that EVERYONE, regardless of corp size, should be able to play PC.
"Anybody order chaos?"
|
deezy dabest
2183
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 04:20:00 -
[10] - Quote
Panthrax Oblivion wrote:Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:I don't like how random people can fight for one player corp, and then another, without even being in the same alliance. Rattati had a good idea of not removing ringers, but instead formally contracting them to fight exclusively for a certain corporation for a set time period. That sounds like a decent idea
How is this really any different than them having to join a corp within the alliance to play? Making it alliance only would mean that ringers would have to make their employment history absolutely laughable.
Along with that corporations would be able to see if they happened to keep joining corps that were getting knocked out of PC. |
|
Panthrax Oblivion
Horizons' Edge
21
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 04:27:00 -
[11] - Quote
Bradric Banewolf wrote:Panthrax Oblivion wrote:Does anyone else not support this? I feel that people from your corp only should fight for your Corp. I've been in one battle where only 4 people were from the Corp we were attacking. It just doesn't seem right. It's Corp vs Corp, trying to find out which is the better one. Most of us, including CCP Rattati, agree with you. The small group of ringers, that try to capitalize on every PC fought, will not agree because the new changes will benefit mercs that stay with corp, and not corp hoppers. I saw a guy in local asking for 10 mil to run in any corp for a month lol! That's what we like to call prototype gear addiction. With what's being suggested in the PC think tank, alot of corp hoppers can see there easy isk days dwindling. They will be required to be in corp or alliance, and some of them have such bad reps that they won't get excepted into corps. So many are joining alliances and corps already that it's hilarious lol! Hopefully CCP Rattati realizes that he's on the right path by cracking down on exploitation. It's the only way to grow the playerbase, and really make money on this game. If nothing changes this game will die. Why these guys don't see that is beyond me. On the flipside to that though this is a video game, and if the team you're facing can't field a team that day, it's because they probably have jobs bro lol! We try to field full teams, and bring alliance to fill empty slots and roles. Not hiring any so-called good slayer (modded pad user) to carry us. If we lose so be it. Still gonna play the game,and have fun doing it. Doesn't mean we're not good, and most of the time we'll field fairly new players. I'd suggest you report to the think tank, and let CCP Rattati know exactly what you think of PC's current state, but do it with an open mind to the fact that EVERYONE, regardless of corp size, should be able to play PC. That's why I would be ok with ringers only on the occasion that for some reason you can't field a full squad. That's happened to my Corp once. I would love to see more corps involved in PC. there's so many corps out there but when I go into the PC on my neocom, I don't see that many. With multiple corps owning anywhere from 5-20 districts. That's insane
You all think you're so great, so I cant wait to put a bullet in your head and laugh at your dumb self
|
Viktor Hadah Jr
Negative-Impact Back and Forth
7937
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 04:45:00 -
[12] - Quote
If anyone can field a full corp team and does not currently have a district feel free to attack any of my districts, just show up with a full corp team and it is yours to have.
Vote Viktor Hadah for CPM2 or i'll take your districts and hurt you.
Get Dust ISK Here
|
Viktor Hadah Jr
Negative-Impact Back and Forth
7937
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 04:47:00 -
[13] - Quote
deezy dabest wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:After spending the week with PC corporation representatives (The PC Think Tank), the issue of ringers has come up quite often. The consensus seems to be that ringers should exist, but not be risk free and as prevalant as now, particularly at the expense of homegrown talent.
More to follow later. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2716923#post2716923Personally I do not think there is a real fix aside from locking entry to PC to only alliance members who have been in the alliance for at least 3 days. As long as ringers are allowed to enter PC they will be used to farm PC. It is going to be even worse once the new update comes out and passive rewards for districts return. that thread is riddled with hypocrisy. the ceo who is complaining about ringers uses ringers becuase he can't no field a full 16.
http://imgur.com/WMFI9uh,MWNz9IQ#0
Vote Viktor Hadah for CPM2 or i'll take your districts and hurt you.
Get Dust ISK Here
|
hold that
Capital Acquisitions LLC
815
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 04:48:00 -
[14] - Quote
deezy dabest wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:After spending the week with PC corporation representatives (The PC Think Tank), the issue of ringers has come up quite often. The consensus seems to be that ringers should exist, but not be risk free and as prevalant as now, particularly at the expense of homegrown talent.
More to follow later. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2716923#post2716923Personally I do not think there is a real fix aside from locking entry to PC to only alliance members who have been in the alliance for at least 3 days. As long as ringers are allowed to enter PC they will be used to farm PC. It is going to be even worse once the new update comes out and passive rewards for districts return. is PC going back to normal completely? Will you get 3 mil isk again for winning? |
Himiko Kuronaga
Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback
5877
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 04:50:00 -
[15] - Quote
Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:I don't like how random people can fight for one player corp, and then another, without even being in the same alliance. Rattati had a good idea of not removing ringers, but instead formally contracting them to fight exclusively for a certain corporation for a set time period.
And in the process, removing free agency.
Yes, that's a really stupid idea and everyone in EVE would be rolling their eyes at it.
Game mechanics aren't supposed to limit who you can fight for. Your own reputation exists for that. That's kind of the entire premise of New Eden and something a few key people seem to have forgotten along the way. In EVE I could offer my corporations services for a war and take the money. I could then sit back and do nothing, or even backstab the one who just paid me. Those are good wholesome mechanics for a not-so-good and wholesome universe.
But in Dust, we want it so you're locked into an agreement have HAVE to honor it? No.
Ringing can cost additional CP, that's fine. But contractual lockouts are stupid.
Usually banned for being too awesome.
|
Bradric Banewolf
D3ATH CARD RUST415
862
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 04:53:00 -
[16] - Quote
Panthrax Oblivion wrote:Bradric Banewolf wrote:Panthrax Oblivion wrote:Does anyone else not support this? I feel that people from your corp only should fight for your Corp. I've been in one battle where only 4 people were from the Corp we were attacking. It just doesn't seem right. It's Corp vs Corp, trying to find out which is the better one. Most of us, including CCP Rattati, agree with you. The small group of ringers, that try to capitalize on every PC fought, will not agree because the new changes will benefit mercs that stay with corp, and not corp hoppers. I saw a guy in local asking for 10 mil to run in any corp for a month lol! That's what we like to call prototype gear addiction. With what's being suggested in the PC think tank, alot of corp hoppers can see there easy isk days dwindling. They will be required to be in corp or alliance, and some of them have such bad reps that they won't get excepted into corps. So many are joining alliances and corps already that it's hilarious lol! Hopefully CCP Rattati realizes that he's on the right path by cracking down on exploitation. It's the only way to grow the playerbase, and really make money on this game. If nothing changes this game will die. Why these guys don't see that is beyond me. On the flipside to that though this is a video game, and if the team you're facing can't field a team that day, it's because they probably have jobs bro lol! We try to field full teams, and bring alliance to fill empty slots and roles. Not hiring any so-called good slayer (modded pad user) to carry us. If we lose so be it. Still gonna play the game,and have fun doing it. Doesn't mean we're not good, and most of the time we'll field fairly new players. I'd suggest you report to the think tank, and let CCP Rattati know exactly what you think of PC's current state, but do it with an open mind to the fact that EVERYONE, regardless of corp size, should be able to play PC. That's why I would be ok with ringers only on the occasion that for some reason you can't field a full squad. That's happened to my Corp once. I would love to see more corps involved in PC. there's so many corps out there but when I go into the PC on my neocom, I don't see that many. With multiple corps owning anywhere from 5-20 districts. That's insane
Lag and modded controller's keep alot of players out of PC, and playing this game in general. They go hand in hand, and guys would just rather not deal with nerds who can't take an L, just avoid playing PC.
Alot of guys (who use them) hate for me to say it, but it gives them a clear cut advantage in the game, because while your just praying for the match, and the lag, to end. They're having a field day kicking the handicap kids that can't defend themselves lol!
I'm sure they'll all come running saying that the modded pads aren't the problem, but CCP Rattati and co. have run themselves ragged fixing everything they come across. The game still suffers from unexplained lag.
Just saying
"Anybody order chaos?"
|
hold that
Capital Acquisitions LLC
815
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 04:56:00 -
[17] - Quote
only people in NPC corps and alliance can ring. lmao. |
Viktor Hadah Jr
Negative-Impact Back and Forth
7937
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 05:00:00 -
[18] - Quote
Bradric Banewolf wrote:Panthrax Oblivion wrote:Bradric Banewolf wrote:Panthrax Oblivion wrote:Does anyone else not support this? I feel that people from your corp only should fight for your Corp. I've been in one battle where only 4 people were from the Corp we were attacking. It just doesn't seem right. It's Corp vs Corp, trying to find out which is the better one. Most of us, including CCP Rattati, agree with you. The small group of ringers, that try to capitalize on every PC fought, will not agree because the new changes will benefit mercs that stay with corp, and not corp hoppers. I saw a guy in local asking for 10 mil to run in any corp for a month lol! That's what we like to call prototype gear addiction. With what's being suggested in the PC think tank, alot of corp hoppers can see there easy isk days dwindling. They will be required to be in corp or alliance, and some of them have such bad reps that they won't get excepted into corps. So many are joining alliances and corps already that it's hilarious lol! Hopefully CCP Rattati realizes that he's on the right path by cracking down on exploitation. It's the only way to grow the playerbase, and really make money on this game. If nothing changes this game will die. Why these guys don't see that is beyond me. On the flipside to that though this is a video game, and if the team you're facing can't field a team that day, it's because they probably have jobs bro lol! We try to field full teams, and bring alliance to fill empty slots and roles. Not hiring any so-called good slayer (modded pad user) to carry us. If we lose so be it. Still gonna play the game,and have fun doing it. Doesn't mean we're not good, and most of the time we'll field fairly new players. I'd suggest you report to the think tank, and let CCP Rattati know exactly what you think of PC's current state, but do it with an open mind to the fact that EVERYONE, regardless of corp size, should be able to play PC. That's why I would be ok with ringers only on the occasion that for some reason you can't field a full squad. That's happened to my Corp once. I would love to see more corps involved in PC. there's so many corps out there but when I go into the PC on my neocom, I don't see that many. With multiple corps owning anywhere from 5-20 districts. That's insane Lag and modded controller's keep alot of players out of PC, and playing this game in general. They go hand in hand, and guys would just rather not deal with nerds who can't take an L, just avoid playing PC. Alot of guys (who use them) hate for me to say it, but it gives them a clear cut advantage in the game, because while your just praying for the match, and the lag, to end. They're having a field day kicking the handicap kids that can't defend themselves lol! I'm sure they'll all come running saying that the modded pads aren't the problem, but CCP Rattati and co. have run themselves ragged fixing everything they come across. The game still suffers from unexplained lag. Just saying it is not modded controllers. i have been on both sides of the wars in molden heath winning and losing, and it is never even slightly the reason.
Lag yes, lag is large factor.
Vote Viktor Hadah for CPM2 or i'll take your districts and hurt you.
Get Dust ISK Here
|
Hector Carson
Tribal Band Dust Mercenaries Immortals of War
191
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 05:06:00 -
[19] - Quote
I am an EVE pilot, I believe that EVE pilots should get more involved in PC like allowing us to drop Installations such as CRU, Turret Installations, Supply Depots, and have specialized drones that can swoop down to the planet surface and perform surgical strikes.
By doing this EVE pilots will have a bigger impact in Planetary Conquest making them more desirable Dust side.
Commando Master
|
Viktor Hadah Jr
Negative-Impact Back and Forth
7937
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 05:10:00 -
[20] - Quote
Bradric Banewolf wrote: I saw a guy in local asking for 10 mil to run in any corp for a month lol! That's what we like to call prototype gear addiction. With what's being suggested in the PC think tank, alot of corp hoppers can see there easy isk days dwindling. They will be required to be in corp or alliance, and some of them have such bad reps that they won't get excepted into corps.
So many are joining alliances and corps already that it's hilarious lol! Hopefully CCP Rattati realizes that he's on the right path by cracking down on exploitation. It's the only way to grow the playerbase, and really make money on this game. If nothing changes this game will die. Why these guys don't see that is beyond me.
What easy isk days? where do you get easy isk from while corp hopping in PC corps, do you know something i don't know because I and everyone i know been losing millions in PC.
Things did change, you use to be able to go isk positive in PC matches and then pay out systems changed. Majority of the corps currently in PC are dying or don't want to PC anymore.
Vote Viktor Hadah for CPM2 or i'll take your districts and hurt you.
Get Dust ISK Here
|
|
Heimdallr69
Negative-Feedback.
5123
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 05:31:00 -
[21] - Quote
Game based on mercenaries, people go on to complain about mercenaries not having loyalty to one side..pay me I'll fight for you, that's all I care about..the isk
Removed inappropriate content - CCP Logibro
|
deezy dabest
2183
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 06:02:00 -
[22] - Quote
hold that wrote:deezy dabest wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:After spending the week with PC corporation representatives (The PC Think Tank), the issue of ringers has come up quite often. The consensus seems to be that ringers should exist, but not be risk free and as prevalant as now, particularly at the expense of homegrown talent.
More to follow later. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2716923#post2716923Personally I do not think there is a real fix aside from locking entry to PC to only alliance members who have been in the alliance for at least 3 days. As long as ringers are allowed to enter PC they will be used to farm PC. It is going to be even worse once the new update comes out and passive rewards for districts return. is PC going back to normal completely? Will you get 3 mil isk again for winning?
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=188510&find=unread
No but a somewhat passive system seems to be on the horizon. My concern is that in this new system newbies will just be farmed for command points while ringers are used to hold the districts.
Newbies will not mind this as they will receive dividends of that payout automatically but it still leaves PC as nothing but a game of who wants to pay more for ringers so that they can hold as many districts as they have newbies to farm to sustain this.
At the end of the day this still leaves PC as an end game that is only played by some while most freak out at having the chance to join one because they are so regularly left out.
@ the people saying a game of mercenaries blah blah blah.
Having to join an alliance to work for that alliance at least then shows up on someones employment history. The real issue here over all is the fact that a huge portion of the players in the game have not and will not actually get to be mercenaries. As long as that remains the scenario most people will only participate at a level of a lobby shooter.
Having an alliance lock does not stop you from being a mercenary it only means that you have to trade based on your actual skill and not the fact that you joined up with some corp that gives the image of being exclusive to good players.
You of all people should support an alliance lock more than anyone as having to be known based on your name and having to actually go through the joining process gives you the opportunity to make even more money than before if you are actually a good player.
Why would you not want to trade based on someone looking at your employment history and seeing that you have worked for top corps instead of trading on the name of a corp that just ends up full of people using that name and screwing people over until you just run off to the next ringer corp?
|
Viktor Hadah Jr
Negative-Impact Back and Forth
7939
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 06:07:00 -
[23] - Quote
from what i understand you won't be able to farm districts unless you have members. in order to sell clones under the new system you must use command points, you get command points from your corp members completing missions. If you have 1 member in your corp and you own 50 districts you will only be able to farm maybe 1 or half of 1 because that one member can only get so much command points in one day by himself.
So you can use ringers all you want(Doubt that will happen) but it won't mean you can profit off of all your districts unless you actually have a lot of active members in your corp.
Vote Viktor Hadah for CPM2 or i'll take your districts and hurt you.
Get Dust ISK Here
|
Ghost Kaisar
Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback
10997
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 06:11:00 -
[24] - Quote
Panthrax Oblivion wrote:MythTanker wrote:Panthrax Oblivion wrote:Does anyone else not support this? I feel that people from your corp only should fight for your Corp. I've been in one battle where only 4 people were from the Corp we were attacking. It just doesn't seem right. It's Corp vs Corp, trying to find out which is the better one. Nope, thats completely flawed. You are a Corp trying to take the land to further your success in New Eden. This is why we are known as mercs. We fight for the isk, not the loyalty. What's the point of having Corp vs Corp if half the people don't even belong to it. It might as well be group A vs group B. The only circumstance I would find this acceptable is if the Corp has a shortage of mercs at the time of the PC
Corporations ARE groups.
Think of it like this. Take "Corporation" by a literal meaning. A group of people with similar financial interests.
Naturally, they like to rely on people within the corporation to deal with things. Creates less hassle. However, you often have to contract people outside of the corporation to deal with problems.
Exactly like this. Corp A has a good ground team, but has almost no air power. They can contract out mercs to fight for them for air power.
Maybe they have no power, but big wallets. They can buy whatever they need.
I see no problem here. Then again, I've dealt with the issues of ringers for over a year now. Best way to deal with them? Show them the business side of your rifle and send them back to their MCC.
Currently listening to: Max Anarchy OST
Old School Scout, watch out for the knives
|
deezy dabest
2183
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 06:16:00 -
[25] - Quote
Viktor Hadah Jr wrote:from what i understand you won't be able to farm districts unless you have members. in order to sell clones under the new system you must use command points, you get command points from your corp members completing missions. If you have 1 member in your corp and you own 50 districts you will only be able to farm maybe 1 or half of 1 because that one member can only get so much command points in one day by himself.
So you can use ringers all you want(Doubt that will happen) but it won't mean you can profit off of all your districts unless you actually have a lot of active members in your corp.
It is true that you will need member activity to be able to maintain the district and make money off of it.
The problem is that now you end up with a corp full of newbies that are just being farmed for their missions while they still never once get to see a PC fight. I was under the impression that PC was meant to be an end game for all players and not just a reason to pile on newbies and alt accounts in your corp to feed the machine for the CEO and a few of his ringer buddies that just choose to farm CEOs instead of making an effort to hold their own districts.
The real question here is why ringers are so desperate to be able to hide behind their corp tags and not have their employment history show their actual employment history. |
Panthrax Oblivion
Horizons' Edge
26
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 11:23:00 -
[26] - Quote
Anyone else find it funny that only members of fatal absolution are strongly in favor of using ringers in this forum
You all think you're so great, so I cant wait to put a bullet in your head and laugh at your dumb self
|
Jolly Roger87
Nos Nothi
34
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 13:12:00 -
[27] - Quote
Nah not just one Corp. Some others who agree will just sit back and let the ones who so favor ringers get the pooh flung at them.
Anywho, pushing everyone into alliance to be able to ring is just. ... going to push everyone into alliance lol Point of fighting then?
pay isk to fight in a laggy game mode and now u want me join their Corp/alliance too? X( |
Bradric Banewolf
D3ATH CARD RUST415
864
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 14:18:00 -
[28] - Quote
Viktor Hadah Jr wrote:Bradric Banewolf wrote: I saw a guy in local asking for 10 mil to run in any corp for a month lol! That's what we like to call prototype gear addiction. With what's being suggested in the PC think tank, alot of corp hoppers can see there easy isk days dwindling. They will be required to be in corp or alliance, and some of them have such bad reps that they won't get excepted into corps.
So many are joining alliances and corps already that it's hilarious lol! Hopefully CCP Rattati realizes that he's on the right path by cracking down on exploitation. It's the only way to grow the playerbase, and really make money on this game. If nothing changes this game will die. Why these guys don't see that is beyond me.
What easy isk days? where do you get easy isk from while corp hopping in PC corps, do you know something i don't know because I and everyone i know been losing millions in PC. Things did change, you use to be able to go isk positive in PC matches and then pay out systems changed. Majority of the corps currently in PC are dying or don't want to PC anymore.
Payouts are crap now sure, but not too long ago guys were ringing 10-20 PC's a day. Same guys over and over?! No matter what team you fought the same guys showed up?! The monotony of it is stifling. Attack X corp, fight A group of ringers. Defend against X corp, defend against A group of ringers. Attack Y corp, same f*cking group of ringers like you slapped their moms and made her call you daddy lol!
I'll say it, and nothing against the kid, but for a solid month I couldn't fight a PC that didn't have kubo in it lol! Didn't matter who we were fighting?!
Now I don't know much about corp hopping, but I know a bunch of corp hoppers. They only leave because the corp leadership cuts off they're isk intake. A strong 97%, after passive isk, countless PC's, wallets stolen, and all kinds of shady tactics, are still broke because they can't turn the proto off.
I would definitely agree that PC isn't lucrative whatsoever right now, and mercs are fighting them now just to fight them. They've lost sight of their original reasons, and between butthurt and pride, are just going in against all logic and economical math. Yeah its fun sometimes, and I X up if I see my role needed too, but if you wanna get rich in dust simply don't play PC. Fight in the pubs and FW in bpos, and you'll be ridiculously rich in no time.
As far as the modded pads go..... I don't know about you, but when they shoot at me my toon quite literally freezes in place?! The lag instantly becomes as thick as molasses. It's like I'm guarding home, and I get told to go to the next nearest point, not 150 meters away, and I walk into a wall all lag?! I instantly know there's one there, and I'm either forced to retreat or die.
I got it, alot of you guys think it doesn't have an effect, and for some it may not. However, I literally can't retaliate, and that's not just PC either. I can instantly tell when I'm facing a group of guys with them. It's like we're moving in slow motion as they just pick us off. Even my speed tanked suits seem slow like I'm tanking armor.
I wouldn't give two f*cks, if that effect didn't happen, about guys using them. I'm not going to, but more power to those that do. As it stands now CCP is slowly isolating everything individually, and coming up with snake eyes for fixing lag....
"Anybody order chaos?"
|
Joel II X
Bacon with a bottle of Quafe
7299
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 15:04:00 -
[29] - Quote
"mercenaries" |
Dust User
PIanet Express Smart Deploy
1986
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 15:26:00 -
[30] - Quote
Panthrax Oblivion wrote:Does anyone else not support this? I feel that people from your corp only should fight for your Corp. I've been in one battle where only 4 people were from the Corp we were attacking. It just doesn't seem right. It's Corp vs Corp, trying to find out which is the better one.
I will be waiting to be on the other side and see your corp use ringers.
Then I will take pictures and show the world your lack of honor. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |