Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
One Eyed King
Land of the BIind
2964
|
Posted - 2014.07.28 20:35:00 -
[31] - Quote
Alena Ventrallis wrote:Tie active scans to suit precision, and you have a deal. Gal Logis might hate that.
This is how a minja feels
|
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui
Cornballs Get Stonewalled
970
|
Posted - 2014.07.28 21:44:00 -
[32] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote:Alena Ventrallis wrote:Tie active scans to suit precision, and you have a deal. Gal Logis might hate that. You don't care about Cal scouts so why would you care unless your a Gal logi and feel like your toes are walked upon by Cal scouts .
If people are being hunted down by a slow running massively weighted down heavy then they are officially a scrub .
Man up and pull your G-string out of your butts and lay off the shared scanning .
It's the only thing that a Cal scout have .
I swear that you people get bored and come up with the dumbest things to b!tch about .
If they can see you and the notification telling you that you are being scanned pops up , then it's time to find the one scanning or change locations .
This is why active scanners are horrible now but you people want no way to be detected like that's going to make you any better because if your complaining about shared scan , chances are your just a scrub anyway .
No I don't run Cal scouts , have them but I play Min logi with a scanner , a scanner that's kind of like $h!t from the last time people whined about active scanners .
Get gud scrubs .
You would think that CCP would have given the infantry refund that should have been in 1.8.
|
One Eyed King
Land of the BIind
2964
|
Posted - 2014.07.28 21:54:00 -
[33] - Quote
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote:One Eyed King wrote:Alena Ventrallis wrote:Tie active scans to suit precision, and you have a deal. Gal Logis might hate that. You don't care about Cal scouts so why would you care unless your a Gal logi and feel like your toes are walked upon by Cal scouts . If people are being hunted down by a slow running massively weighted down heavy then they are officially a scrub . Man up and pull your G-string out of your butts and lay off the shared scanning . It's the only thing that a Cal scout have . I swear that you people get bored and come up with the dumbest things to b!tch about . If they can see you and the notification telling you that you are being scanned pops up , then it's time to find the one scanning or change locations . This is why active scanners are horrible now but you people want no way to be detected like that's going to make you any better because if your complaining about shared scan , chances are your just a scrub anyway . No I don't run Cal scouts , have them but I play Min logi with a scanner , a scanner that's kind of like $h!t from the last time people whined about active scanners . Get gud scrubs . Actually, the only other suit I have other than my lvl 5 minja and a lvl 1 Minmando is a lvl 4 Cal scout. Every suit should have a role, and suits shouldn't be so OP that they completely negate any possible use of other suits, like a fully decked Cal scout does Amarr and Minamatar scouts.
Not to mention several highly competitive players in PC such as Moody, Ghost Kaiser, and Mr Musturd have all repeated the refrain that shared scanning on these Cal scouts make the suit worthless in on a competitive level.
I have no points in a Gal Logi, but given that their bonus is to active scanning, it gives them a role that should not be taken away by always active 360 shared scanning.
I want balance. I just find it ironic that you want a broken system that allows heavies with perfect sight, and a Cal scout to run around without worries of weakness for maxing precision and range because all his heavy squad mates have to do is protect him, then call others a scrub.
Only scrubs protect a crutch like shared scanning.
This is how a minja feels
|
Doc DDD
TeamPlayers
251
|
Posted - 2014.07.28 22:13:00 -
[34] - Quote
Big surprise, players that run cloaked shotguns want shared scans removed.
Players think that a squad of 4 organized players shouldn't have an advantage over 4 random cloaked scrubs . |
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui
Cornballs Get Stonewalled
970
|
Posted - 2014.07.28 23:11:00 -
[35] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote: Actually, the only other suit I have other than my lvl 5 minja and a lvl 1 Minmando is a lvl 4 Cal scout. Every suit should have a role, and suits shouldn't be so OP that they completely negate any possible use of other suits, like a fully decked Cal scout does Amarr and Minamatar scouts.
Not to mention several highly competitive players in PC such as Moody, Ghost Kaiser, and Mr Musturd have all repeated the refrain that shared scanning on these Cal scouts make the suit worthless in on a competitive level.
I have no points in a Gal Logi, but given that their bonus is to active scanning, it gives them a role that should not be taken away by always active 360 shared scanning.
I want balance. I just find it ironic that you want a broken system that allows heavies with perfect sight, and a Cal scout to run around without worries of weakness for maxing precision and range because all his heavy squad mates have to do is protect him, then call others a scrub.
Only scrubs protect a crutch like shared scanning.
I don't care about the players that you name , all prototype players who complain about passive scanners . I know that you had to throw their names in there like that's calls for merit as to your opinion .
It doesn't , if players that have several tens of millions plus the same in their SP banks , while most of the community can't even fathom what that feels like but yet they still complain , then there is something wrong with that picture .
But you would be quick to tell anyone else to " Adapt or die ."
Players as such are killing the game for those who are just trying to get a foothold in this game , kill the fun because you like to stay at the top and try to push any and everybody off of any footing .
Let's just get rid of Tacnet , E-war and scanners all together so that everybody can fight head's up and that would make it more interesting .
You people have you clique's and such so name dropping means nothing to me , even more so when your trying to be EVE famous .
You people are killing this game with your random calls for nerfs , changes and buffs .
It doesn't matter anyway because you can all have this crap that will be legion soon enough and you can all be dysfunctional together , trying to be EVE famous .
I can't wait til they shut these servers down .
Most of you are worst than Buzz Killington .
You make calls for changes and don't have the gumption to allow SP refunds because you sit on a pile of unallocated SP's but you call the rest of the community to grind away while you laugh your way to the next FOTM .
Who's the scrub protecting what crutch ? First you kill active scanning by ranting / complaining and now you would love to kill the Cal scout .
Sad , just sad .
You would think that CCP would have given the infantry refund that should have been in 1.8.
|
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui
Cornballs Get Stonewalled
970
|
Posted - 2014.07.28 23:17:00 -
[36] - Quote
Also , let you tell it , a Gal scout can get past scanners anyway , so that negates any use for other suits that are trying to scan it , is that not right ???
You sure like to double talk don't you , should be in politics the way you can place a spin on things in trying to justify your opinion .
You would think that CCP would have given the infantry refund that should have been in 1.8.
|
One Eyed King
Land of the BIind
2975
|
Posted - 2014.07.29 01:54:00 -
[37] - Quote
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: I don't care about the players that you name , all prototype players who complain about passive scanners . I know that you had to throw their names in there like that's calls for merit as to your opinion .
It doesn't , if players that have several tens of millions plus the same in their SP banks , while most of the community can't even fathom what that feels like but yet they still complain , then there is something wrong with that picture .
But you would be quick to tell anyone else to " Adapt or die ."
Players as such are killing the game for those who are just trying to get a foothold in this game , kill the fun because you like to stay at the top and try to push any and everybody off of any footing .
Let's just get rid of Tacnet , E-war and scanners all together so that everybody can fight head's up and that would make it more interesting .
You people have you clique's and such so name dropping means nothing to me , even more so when your trying to be EVE famous .
You people are killing this game with your random calls for nerfs , changes and buffs .
It doesn't matter anyway because you can all have this crap that will be legion soon enough and you can all be dysfunctional together , trying to be EVE famous .
I can't wait til they shut these servers down .
Most of you are worst than Buzz Killington .
You make calls for changes and don't have the gumption to allow SP refunds because you sit on a pile of unallocated SP's but you call the rest of the community to grind away while you laugh your way to the next FOTM .
Who's the scrub protecting what crutch ? First you kill active scanning by ranting / complaining and now you would love to kill the Cal scout .
Sad , just sad .
Random calls for nerfs? The scout community, when we were so UP that about 5% of all players bothered playing scouts, has always said that if buffs to the suits went too far, we would be the first to call for changes. Not to mention that most of us have been asking for an Assault buff so that they are viable and have a role as well.
The "clique" as you describe it, is really a community that has banded together and stuck around because of that for the many months that Scouts were irrelevant. Maybe you weren't here for that, but between May 14, 2013 when they game released, and March 2014 when 1.8 dropped, the scout role was in a horrible place, and for many months we were completely ignored despite the obvious issues, always being told buffs were on the way, and always disappointed when month after month we were ignored. I apologize that we have become close as a result. I can see how that would be offensive...
1.8 came out, there was a respec, and seemingly half or more of the population were running scouts, many of which were cloaked and tanked at the same time. There were issues that needed addressed. The nerf to cloak dampening just further forced tanking and reduced Minmatar and Amarr viability to nothing.
Changes need to be made. Not all changes were nerfs. Amarr got a role, and a significant buff. Minmatar are no longer lighting up on radar, but have to make a significant sacrifice in order to beat max scans.
If you want to take personal shots, go ahead.
I am trying to help make this game better, and am willing to listen to others that have a different opinion provided they are able to give data and examples to back it up. You keep attacking the person, and not the idea, precisely because you don't have a leg to stand on.
I have yet to hear a legitimate reason for shared permanent active scans.
This is how a minja feels
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
3345
|
Posted - 2014.07.29 02:11:00 -
[38] - Quote
Good writeup, King.
The vast majority of old-school Scouts favor removal of shared squad sight. Reasons:
1. It technically is not supposed to be happening (see patch notes). 2. Recon becoming an "active" role would be more rewarding for the recon unit. 3. Would make for more interesting infiltration vs counter-infiltration interplay. 4. Would make for a better balanced and easier to tweak ewar framework. 5. The current "Ultimate Scans x6" is too strong (reward outweighs risk).
- 49M SP Cal/Gal Scout
Shoot scout with yes...
- Ripley Riley
|
Doc DDD
TeamPlayers
251
|
Posted - 2014.07.29 05:24:00 -
[39] - Quote
99% of scouts that ever played have no problem with shared scans on a 300 eHP suit that does the samething active scans do on a 1000 eHPsuit.
All stats verified and true.
Why remove one but not the other? Is that the next suit cloaked shot gunners will cry about?
get some gun game and quit relying on cloak and flank crutch.
guess what removing passive scans will increase 100 fold... yes cloaked shotgun scouts, 16 vs 16 cloaked shotgun scouts.
99% of all scouts that ever played agree.
65 million sp
|
Happy Violentime
OMFGZOMBIESRUN
746
|
Posted - 2014.07.29 12:45:00 -
[40] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote:Heavies are supposed to have a weakness of being blind.
Skill up precision then?
I have Lvl 5 in all the passive 'scout' skills - my heavy can passive scan other suits quite well thx
|
|
OP FOTM
Commando Perkone Caldari State
186
|
Posted - 2014.07.29 17:53:00 -
[41] - Quote
Doc DDD wrote:99% of scouts that ever played have no problem with shared scans on a 300 eHP suit that does the samething active scans do on a 1000 eHPsuit.
All stats verified and true.
Why remove one but not the other? Is that the next suit cloaked shot gunners will cry about?
get some gun game and quit relying on cloak and flank crutch.
guess what removing passive scans will increase 100 fold... yes cloaked shotgun scouts, 16 vs 16 cloaked shotgun scouts.
99% of all scouts that ever played agree.
65 million sp
the shotgun scouts are already dampened anyway you bloody moron
oh snap guys! Doc DDD said something, and he's on the big ISK payroll! Better listen to him!
Of course HE, THE OP TANKER doesn't even MENTION that tanks are exploiting the scout dropsuit scans because it's a glitch that applies while inside a tank.
Doc, don't you realize something? Isn't removing shared tacnet going to... GASP... promote using the active scanner on non-Gallente logis?! Or GASP... maybe actually PROMOTE SCOUTS TO USE ACTUAL SCOUT TACTICS instead of RUNNING AROUND LIKE INVINCIBLE GODS WITH THEIR OP SCANS?
B-b-but guys! We need OP scan scouts to fight the OP scan scouts! This is why I'll always be proud I never became one of you "high profile Dust players." You're all a bunch of high school drama mimicking popular kids. Grow up.
CCP, I thought I was going to start liking you again. I really did. Then you announced this event.
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
3359
|
Posted - 2014.07.29 18:09:00 -
[42] - Quote
Doc DDD wrote: 99% of all scouts that ever played agree...
Nice numbers you have there. When you get time, swing by the Barbershop and ask the Scouts themselves what they think. I doubt you'll find that such a high percentage in agreement about anything.
Shoot scout with yes...
- Ripley Riley
|
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
4064
|
Posted - 2014.07.29 19:46:00 -
[43] - Quote
Doc DDD wrote:99% of scouts that ever played have no problem with shared scans on a 300 eHP suit that does the samething active scans do on a 1000 eHPsuit.
All stats verified and true.
Why remove one but not the other? Is that the next suit cloaked shot gunners will cry about?
get some gun game and quit relying on cloak and flank crutch.
guess what removing passive scans will increase 100 fold... yes cloaked shotgun scouts, 16 vs 16 cloaked shotgun scouts.
99% of all scouts that ever played agree.
65 million sp
This is so painfully obvious that it hurts.
You HAVE to have a Cal Scout set up to scan a Gal Scout in PC. I played in three PCs yesterday. In two of them our heavy squad didn't have a Cal Scout. In both of those matches a Gal Scout got 35+ kills. The setup to combat the Gal Scout is beyond squishy and basically needs to play passive to keep the scans going.
If you take away shared scans it WILL put the final nail I the coffin. If anything is one of the only carrots to get randoms into squads.
Level 4 Forum Warrior Currently on a quest to get all suits to ADV (8 remaining)
PSN: wbrom42
|
OP FOTM
Commando Perkone Caldari State
194
|
Posted - 2014.07.29 19:50:00 -
[44] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:Translation- I want to go 52-0 in all matches with my Gallente Scout while packing on 500-700 EHP and not having to worry about dampening up.
amarr's getting it now... do you know how many of you FOTM thumpers already have the amarr anyway... it's going to be a smooth transition on your side. the ISK rich side.
god i hope we dont have to deal with "rich players" in destiny... you guys are like the worst kind of internet trolls
Dust servers will be a ghost town on 09/09/14
Destiny kicks ass... Like Halo knocked up Mass Effect and gave birth
|
OP FOTM
Commando Perkone Caldari State
194
|
Posted - 2014.07.29 20:01:00 -
[45] - Quote
The dark cloud wrote: Problem is a single gal. logi with flux scanners could scan the whole map (200m range) for the whole team. Sure it would require to fill 4 slots with active scanners but the advantage for the team would be undeniable.
i own one. they don't even use us in PC... invite me to a channel and i'll ring for you though
Dust servers will be a ghost town on 09/09/14
Destiny kicks ass... Like Halo knocked up Mass Effect and gave birth
|
One Eyed King
Land of the BIind
2995
|
Posted - 2014.07.29 20:49:00 -
[46] - Quote
Happy Violentime wrote:One Eyed King wrote:Heavies are supposed to have a weakness of being blind. Skill up precision then? I have Lvl 5 in all the passive 'scout' skills - my heavy can passive scan other suits quite well thx Very smart.
I have all my scoutly skills at 5, precision, range, dampening etc.
But playing solo you don't have the precision a cal scout would have, and if you have one in squad, a heavy with 0 sp in precision can still know exactly where I am while having 5 times the ehp and a face melting weapon. That is a problem..
This is how a minja feels
|
Larry Desmo
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
63
|
Posted - 2014.07.29 22:46:00 -
[47] - Quote
OP FOTM wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:Translation- I want to go 52-0 in all matches with my Gallente Scout while packing on 500-700 EHP and not having to worry about dampening up. amarr's getting it now... do you know how many of you FOTM thumpers already have the amarr anyway... it's going to be a smooth transition on your side. the ISK rich side. god i hope we dont have to deal with "rich players" in destiny... you guys are like the worst kind of internet trolls looks to me like your just mad cause your poor, what u got in that little wallet 300k, 400k, lol |
Larry Desmo
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
63
|
Posted - 2014.07.29 22:49:00 -
[48] - Quote
shared scans are not a problem, a squad should have a synchronized tacnet why should you squad up if not? |
OP FOTM
Commando Perkone Caldari State
201
|
Posted - 2014.07.29 22:55:00 -
[49] - Quote
Larry Desmo wrote: looks to me like your just mad cause your poor, what u got in that little wallet 300k, 400k, lol
ever since kain spero fail collapsed the blue donut i've been sitting on at least 10 million isk at a time. last i checked today i was at 20 mil.
uh let me explain why shared tacnet is a problem...
- heavies aren't supposed to see you
- logis without scanners arent supposed to see you
- brick tanked scouts without EWAR aren't supposed to see you after their caldari scout buddies track you down
it literally takes the guesswork out of COMMS WITH YOUR TEAM. INTEL. It makes INTEL EASY MODE.
******* HMGS ARENT SUPPOSED TO SEE EVERYONE ON THE MAP ESPECIALLY SCOUTS
WHY DO YOU THINK GAL LOGI'S FOCUSED SCANNER IS SO BAD? SCANNING OTHER SCOUTS IS OP AND BROKEN
Dust servers will be a ghost town on 09/09/14
Destiny kicks ass... Like Halo knocked up Mass Effect and gave birth
|
Larry Desmo
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
63
|
Posted - 2014.07.29 23:04:00 -
[50] - Quote
im tired of this OP UP bullshlt, nerf this nerf that, buff this buff that, its the same people every time, the same people who ruined the content development for dumbass number tweeks. just play the fkn game, if your not asking for a content expansion STFU |
|
OP FOTM
Commando Perkone Caldari State
203
|
Posted - 2014.07.29 23:16:00 -
[51] - Quote
Larry Desmo wrote:im tired of this OP UP bullshlt, nerf this nerf that, buff this buff that, its the same people every time, the same people who ruined the content development for dumbass number tweeks. just play the fkn game, if your not asking for a content expansion STFU
you know what
shut the servers down. i'm tired of this game, period. destiny FTW
Dust servers will be a ghost town on 09/09/14
Destiny kicks ass... Like Halo knocked up Mass Effect and gave birth
|
One Eyed King
Land of the BIind
3000
|
Posted - 2014.07.29 23:16:00 -
[52] - Quote
Larry Desmo wrote:im tired of this OP UP bullshlt, nerf this nerf that, buff this buff that, its the same people every time, the same people who ruined the content development for dumbass number tweeks. just play the fkn game, if your not asking for a content expansion STFU Seriously.
We should just settle for a broken game with no balance where only a few suits out of all possibilities are viable, and we should just completely ignore the variety of roles and gear. I mean, who cares that assaults as a whole have no role and are out performed by scouts what should be their wheelhouse. Nothing should be buffed or nerfed. It is perfect.
This is how a minja feels
|
OP FOTM
Commando Perkone Caldari State
203
|
Posted - 2014.07.29 23:23:00 -
[53] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote:Larry Desmo wrote:im tired of this OP UP bullshlt, nerf this nerf that, buff this buff that, its the same people every time, the same people who ruined the content development for dumbass number tweeks. just play the fkn game, if your not asking for a content expansion STFU Seriously. We should just settle for a broken game with no balance where only a few suits out of all possibilities are viable, and we should just completely ignore the variety of roles and gear. I mean, who cares that assaults as a whole have no role and are out performed by scouts what should be their wheelhouse. Nothing should be buffed or nerfed. It is perfect.
EXACTLY.
Keep shared tacnet, KEEP ASSAULT USELESS.
Dust servers will be a ghost town on 09/09/14
Destiny kicks ass... Like Halo knocked up Mass Effect and gave birth
|
Larry Desmo
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
63
|
Posted - 2014.07.30 00:08:00 -
[54] - Quote
i think the balance is fine for the most part, the whole problem was ccp was balancing things without all of the content to balance it against hotfix bravo prety much fixed almost all of the problems with the balance issue, and hotfix charlie looks like its catering to you buff nerf idiots rather than actually doing anything of benefit. ccp rattati needs to look like he is got something to do else he would be out of a job.
new content should always take priority over number tweeks, wtf happened to amar vehicles, minmatar vehicles, or thoose plasma cannon variants. how about asking for some real content before whining to ccp to get something nerfed so you can use the next precived over powered fit untill you decide whatever can counter it is the next op thing and needs to be nerfed.
the guns are fine the suits are fine the vehicles are fine the lack of promised content and developer support is not fine |
Monkey MAC
Rough Riders..
3177
|
Posted - 2014.07.30 02:34:00 -
[55] - Quote
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote:501st Headstrong wrote:I personally think shared passives isn't such a bad thing. You're a scout, but you have no mic. How are you going to tell your teammates. Versus, you have passive scans so they can tell, no words needed.
Why is shared so bad? In most non-competitive settings, shared passives are perfectly fine. In a PC, however, where HMG heavies are the most dominant and competitive force, their one weakness can be completely eliminated by a super strong scanner scout. If you want shared scans, use an active scanner.
Hold on, are you saying you want to nerf teamwork? Trust me, if heavies are prelevant in PC giving the TACNET blindness won't cure anything. They only have to run in groups of 4, with a logi in a LAV.
Stop trying to nerf teamwork becuase you can't solo it.
They call me the Monkey - I like to jump off sh** and piss RE's all over your tank!
Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior Lvl 3
|
Monkey MAC
Rough Riders..
3177
|
Posted - 2014.07.30 02:36:00 -
[56] - Quote
Larry Desmo wrote:i think the balance is fine for the most part, the whole problem was ccp was balancing things without all of the content to balance it against hotfix bravo prety much fixed almost all of the problems with the balance issue, and hotfix charlie looks like its catering to you buff nerf idiots rather than actually doing anything of benefit. ccp rattati needs to look like he is got something to do else he would be out of a job.
new content should always take priority over number tweeks, wtf happened to amar vehicles, minmatar vehicles, or thoose plasma cannon variants. how about asking for some real content before whining to ccp to get something nerfed so you can use the next precived over powered fit untill you decide whatever can counter it is the next op thing and needs to be nerfed.
the guns are fine the suits are fine the vehicles are fine the lack of promised content and developer support is not fine
Umm? Who's gonna tell this guy they aren't making any more new content for DUST, EVER?
They call me the Monkey - I like to jump off sh** and piss RE's all over your tank!
Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior Lvl 3
|
Monkey MAC
Rough Riders..
3177
|
Posted - 2014.07.30 02:42:00 -
[57] - Quote
OP FOTM wrote:Larry Desmo wrote: looks to me like your just mad cause your poor, what u got in that little wallet 300k, 400k, lol
ever since kain spero fail collapsed the blue donut i've been sitting on at least 10 million isk at a time. last i checked today i was at 20 mil. uh let me explain why shared tacnet is a problem...
- heavies aren't supposed to see you
- logis without scanners arent supposed to see you
- brick tanked scouts without EWAR aren't supposed to see you after their caldari scout buddies track you down
it literally takes the guesswork out of COMMS WITH YOUR TEAM. INTEL. It makes INTEL EASY MODE. ******* HMGS ARENT SUPPOSED TO SEE EVERYONE ON THE MAP ESPECIALLY SCOUTS WHY DO YOU THINK GAL LOGI'S FOCUSED SCANNER IS SO BAD? SCANNING OTHER SCOUTS IS OP AND BROKEN WHY ARE EVEN GAL LOGI'S SCANS BAD? THEY'RE OP AND NEEDED TO BE NERFED Scouts are running around with SCANNERINAS that everyone was complaining about active scanners doing 360 degree scans of EVERYTHING. It took the guess work out of the game, it took STRATEGY OUT OF THE GAME
Why? Is it bad that at least 3 people can't engage in frontline combat without dying, while still having to be near the front line? Tell me though what is the actual point of an EWAR Scout if it isn't for EWAR?
Intel is part and parcel of Electronic Warfare, there is literally no reason for Caldari or Amarr Scout suits to exsist if they don't share their scan data.
Go on, name a function the the Caldari or Amarr scout suits that neither the Gallante or Minmatar can do.
They call me the Monkey - I like to jump off sh** and piss RE's all over your tank!
Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior Lvl 3
|
Doc DDD
TeamPlayers
255
|
Posted - 2014.07.30 05:46:00 -
[58] - Quote
All I see in this thread is the same broke scrub, who thinks that scout scans work while piloting a tank, moaning about a suit thats' sole purpose is counter cloaked flankers.
You have no idea how to play the game.
Get good.
Your whole arguement is that by losing suit diversity, particularly cal scouts with precision enhancers, we will gain suit diversity. Do you see the flaw in your logic?
By removing shared passive scans, you remove that niche playstyle. PAPERTHIN EWAR ( the scout doesn't kill you, his squadmate does )
You will only gain: - more cloaked shotgunners flanking (and killing you ) -more heavies covering the back of the squad instead of just pushing forward (and killing you) -more gal logis with 4 scanners spamming scans the entire match. (scanning and then killing you with 1000ehp)
this does not increase diversity on the battlefield, you will still die like a scrub.
Yes if you really think 99% of scouts ever agreed on anything then there are a lot of 'fuzzy statistics' thrown around in this thread you probably believe too...
Now just ask yourself.....
Do you want shared tacnet for passive scans removed so that you can cloak and flank:
ALL HEAVIES ALL COMMANDOS ALL ASSAULT SUITS ALL LOGI SUITS WITHOUT 4 SCANNERS EQUIPPED ALL SCOUT SUITS WITHOUT PRECISION ENHANCERS
?????
If that's why you want shared tacnet removed then please stop playing this game as you are garbage. YOU WANT THERE TO BE NO COUNTER FOR YOUR SUIT AND YOU WANT US TO TAKE YOU SERIOUSLY.
GUESS WHAT... CLOAKED SCOUTS FLANKING WITH SHOTGUNS ARE NOT THE COUNTER FOR A SQUAD WITH AN EFFECTIVE SCAN BONUS.... IF YOU CANT COUNTER THIS SQUAD WITH ONE PLAYER HAVING ONLY 300ehp PLEASE STOP PLAYING THIS GAME. PICK UP A RIFLE OR HMG AND GET SOME GUN GAME OR GTFO.
Or continue posting about how broke you are and about how removing roles actually increases roles or how kain spero has oppressed you and you require immediate reparations. I would rather see cloaks disappear with the amount of whiny indignant children using them as a crutch and QQing at their ONLY COUNTER.
Stay broke. |
SgtMajSquish MLBJ
Consolidated Dust
192
|
Posted - 2014.07.30 06:27:00 -
[59] - Quote
The dark cloud wrote:Apothecary Za'ki wrote:i agree with getting rid of shared passive scans
but then active scanners will need a buff.. and to share the info with the whole team aswell as give WP for ANYONE(not just squad) on the team killing a "Tagged" hostile
maybe change passive to squad only or just self.. self would be the best idea only IF the active scanners get BOOFed Problem is a single gal. logi with flux scanners could scan the whole map (200m range) for the whole team. Sure it would require to fill 4 slots with active scanners but the advantage for the team would be undeniable. that is how it should be. that person should then get crazy amounts of WP for playing an important role in the game. remember, strategy is OP
I'll see you guys on Legion when the Steambox is released
|
Monkey MAC
Rough Riders..
3181
|
Posted - 2014.07.30 10:04:00 -
[60] - Quote
Doc DDD wrote:All I see in this thread is the same broke scrub, who thinks that scout scans work while piloting a tank, moaning about a suit thats' sole purpose is counter cloaked flankers.
You have no idea how to play the game.
Get good.
Your whole arguement is that by losing suit diversity, particularly cal scouts with precision enhancers, we will gain suit diversity. Do you see the flaw in your logic?
By removing shared passive scans, you remove that niche playstyle. PAPERTHIN EWAR ( the scout doesn't kill you, his squadmate does )
You will only gain: - more cloaked shotgunners flanking (and killing you ) -more heavies covering the back of the squad instead of just pushing forward (and killing you) -more gal logis with 4 scanners spamming scans the entire match. (scanning and then killing you with 1000ehp)
this does not increase diversity on the battlefield, you will still die like a scrub.
Yes if you really think 99% of scouts ever agreed on anything then there are a lot of 'fuzzy statistics' thrown around in this thread you probably believe too...
Now just ask yourself.....
Do you want shared tacnet for passive scans removed so that you can cloak and flank:
ALL HEAVIES ALL COMMANDOS ALL ASSAULT SUITS ALL LOGI SUITS WITHOUT 4 SCANNERS EQUIPPED ALL SCOUT SUITS WITHOUT PRECISION ENHANCERS
?????
If that's why you want shared tacnet removed then please stop playing this game as you are garbage. YOU WANT THERE TO BE NO COUNTER FOR YOUR SUIT AND YOU WANT US TO TAKE YOU SERIOUSLY.
GUESS WHAT... CLOAKED SCOUTS FLANKING WITH SHOTGUNS ARE NOT THE COUNTER FOR A SQUAD WITH AN EFFECTIVE SCAN BONUS.... IF YOU CANT COUNTER THIS SQUAD WITH ONE PLAYER HAVING ONLY 300ehp PLEASE STOP PLAYING THIS GAME. PICK UP A RIFLE OR HMG AND GET SOME GUN GAME OR GTFO.
Or continue posting about how broke you are and about how removing roles actually increases roles or how kain spero has oppressed you and you require immediate reparations. I would rather see cloaks disappear with the amount of whiny indignant children using them as a crutch and QQing at their ONLY COUNTER.
Stay broke.
No I don't want to run around. In a 700-900 ehp scout suit, who only has to worry about some sorry excuse who's stacked EWAR mods and has less eHP than my little finger.
Gùå Why do you want more flanking scouts, they are the more OP version of scouts? Gùå Why do you want Gallogis doingnthe exact same thing current scouts are doing - with more eHP? Gùå Why would you put your most powerful weapon as a tail end charlie?
You can avoid Passive Scans quite easily observe. G-Scout profile (3x PRO Dampener) 11.45 C-Scout Prescision (3x PRO Enhancer) 15.45
Now this doesn't include the dampening bonus from the cloak either. Nor does it take into account Gùå The spare gallante low slot Gùå 2 gallante high slots.
All of which can be fitted in a manner you deem fit. The problem people have with Passive Tacnet scans is that they can't run half arsed dampened suits and slip under Everyone's radar.
Most of the people who want passive tacnet sharing gone, are the people who want to have their cake and eat it. Removing Squad EWAR functions does more to damage the games tactical diversity than, removing them will create Gallogi Spam.
Edit: Sorry just said the same thing as you anyway.
They call me the Monkey - I like to jump off sh** and piss RE's all over your tank!
Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior Lvl 3
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |