| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lynn Beck
NoGameNoLife
1899
   |
Posted - 2014.06.24 01:55:00 -
[61] - Quote
I recall Nanofibers being 8/15/20% in speed increase, with 5/10/15% armor loss. Although that is quite possibly EXTREMELY off.
General John Ripper
-HAM(Yum)
This message was approved by the 'Nobody Loved You' Non-Association Foster Care Office
|
DarthJT5
12th Shadow Legion
69
|
Posted - 2014.06.24 01:58:00 -
[62] - Quote
can anyone find Pyrex's old fitting videos for pre 1.7 tanks? he looks through the vehicle module markets in them i believe.
Dedicated Shield Tanking vet since Open Beta.
Up and coming Python pilot.
The awnser is always XT missiles....
|
MINA Longstrike
914
|
Posted - 2014.06.24 03:06:00 -
[63] - Quote
1.7 did the exact thing that the much loathed incarna did on eve - cut working content, removed existing functionality and removed existing features with promise of eventual reintroduction that still hasn't happened for incarna or for dust. We were lied to, vehicles are in a worse state than arguably ever before, the skill tree has huge sp investment that doesn't actually truly improve functionality or gameplay.
We were lied to and we want our features and functionality back.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. Kirjuun Heiian.
I have a few alts.
|
Spectre-M
The Generals
551
|
Posted - 2014.06.24 03:45:00 -
[64] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:I don't know man. I still have nightmares about the LLAV. I see a yellow Camaro with black racing stripes and I have a burning desire to bash it with a baseball bat.
And then the heavy HMG and his logi jump out, making a repping daisy chain of destruction. That was always fun.
Minnmitar in Amarr armor.
A Wolf in Sheeps clothing.
May the Empress live till she graces my sights.
|
Alena Ventrallis
The Neutral Zone
Psychotic Alliance
1384
|
Posted - 2014.06.24 05:01:00 -
[65] - Quote
The Eristic wrote:Would be happy to see them back IF the logi resistance + HP combos were made more manageable. Those ****s were completely out of hand.
What madeogi labs out of hand was the combination of murder taxis being so easy, and llavs not having anything else they can do. The rep they had was worthless, and the repair mods didn't have the range to be useful, requiring you to hump whatever you were trying to repair.
Make a vehicle repair tool with a decent range, say 50m, and give llavs a bonus to cycle time and range by a Sig if I can't portion, say 10% faster cycles and 50% more range for racial repairer per level of llav skill. Make them tanky like they were.
Now add an assault version of the lab, with bonuses to racial turret damage and ROF, making them great for drivebys. Make them slower than normal lavs.
Bring back SLAVs, and give them real good handling.
Calmanndo user with nova knives: Because someone has to do it.
|
DarthJT5
12th Shadow Legion
78
|
Posted - 2014.06.24 14:51:00 -
[66] - Quote
Bumping this because its the only thing i really care fir in this game.
Dedicated Shield Tanking vet since Open Beta.
Up and coming Python pilot.
The awnser is always XT missiles....
|
DarthJT5
12th Shadow Legion
82
|
Posted - 2014.06.29 16:40:00 -
[67] - Quote
Was giving a little rest to the spam, bumping back to the top because again, its the only thing i care for.
Dedicated Shield Tanking vet since Open Beta.
Up and coming Python pilot.
The awnser is always XT missiles....
|
knight guard fury
Carbon 7
Iron Oxide.
1072
|
Posted - 2014.06.29 16:48:00 -
[68] - Quote
they should also bring back all the vehicle mods they took out as well
NOLifing Dust for the Officer Combat rifle
Vherokior assassin
I fight for the Republic and my life is for the Elders
|
knight guard fury
Carbon 7
Iron Oxide.
1101
|
Posted - 2014.07.13 16:43:00 -
[69] - Quote
reserved
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=123266&find=unread
Vherokior assassin
I fight for the Republic and m
|
Yokal Bob
Escrow Removal and Acquisition
Dark Taboo
568
|
Posted - 2014.07.13 17:04:00 -
[70] - Quote
signed signed signed
If its not anime, its not real
|
|
|
DarthJT5
12th Shadow Legion
91
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 20:54:00 -
[71] - Quote
Wellp, moght as well bump for Delta... Or Echo...
Dedicated Shield Tanking vet since Open Beta.
Up and coming Python pilot.
The awnser is always XT missiles....
|
Soulja Ghostface
MCDUSTDONALDS
Top Men.
2662
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 20:56:00 -
[72] - Quote
Signed
Bring These Back
i Tanker Turned Ads Pilot !
|
Apothecary Za'ki
Biomass Positive
649
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 20:59:00 -
[73] - Quote
DarthJT5 wrote:Ok CCP, it looks to me that it HAS to be obvious that we want our vehicle variants back. Marauders, Enforcers, logi LAVs and DS, scout LAVs, etc. This is the thread to get your attention. No one I've met has said no to having them back. This is the petition for getting them back. If you agree with having our variants back and making vehicles on the battlefield unique again, sign below and give your reason for wanting them back. I have a few myself.
#1. Makes the difference between a 20 mill SP tanker and a 0 SP tanker much better.
#2. Makes vehicle usage non-boring, i mean really. How many vehicle fittings are out there that are actually viable? Everyone uses the exact same stuff. At least this will give us a little bit of variety in fittings by having more slots to use.
#3. Makes balancing AV vs. Tanks much easier. Pro AV vs. The better hulls with proto modules, adv AV for the better hulls with basic mods or basic tanks with proto mods, basic AV for basic hulls with basic mods, etc.
#4. Gives a reason to nerf mlt vehicles into the ground. With more than two types of hulls, we can actually make mlt mlt instead of being std with one less slot.
Please guys, lets get our vehicles back. Even you infantry guys, help us out. Imagine if you had at most three different types of suits for use. It would suck wouldn't it?
AV vs vehicles is nearly to a point where ccp may start to re introduce advanced vehicles.
[[LogiBro in Training]]
Level 1 Forum Pariah
|
DarthJT5
12th Shadow Legion
96
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 22:27:00 -
[74] - Quote
Bumpity bump bump
Dedicated Shield Tanking vet since Open Beta.
Up and coming Python pilot.
The awnser is always XT missiles....
|
Jammeh McJam
New Age Empire.
General Tso's Alliance
109
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 22:33:00 -
[75] - Quote
Signed, i never got to try an enforcer or a marauder :(
"We may be small and disorganized, but we're still gonna kill you" - Intergalactic Super Friends
MAG ~ Raven vet
|
Riptalis
Horizons' Edge
Proficiency V.
55
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 23:07:00 -
[76] - Quote
Yes.
Logistics ak.0
ADS Pilot
PSN: Riptalis
|
Anjelique Avengineer
SHAKING BABIES
FACTION WARFARE ALLIANCE
17
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 03:06:00 -
[77] - Quote
signed
|
Soulja Ghostface
MCDUSTDONALDS
Top Men.
2665
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 03:08:00 -
[78] - Quote
Jammeh McJam wrote:Signed, i never got to try an enforcer or a marauder :(
You poor soul.
Don't tell anybody but I never used an marauder tank either. I sure as hell did get face rolled by one tho.
Bring These Back
i Tanker Turned Ads Pilot !
|
DarthJT5
12th Shadow Legion
98
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 23:08:00 -
[79] - Quote
Aaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnd bump
Dedicated Shield Tanking vet since Open Beta.
Up and coming Python pilot.
The awnser is always XT missiles....
|
IMMORTAL WAR HERO
NECROM0NGERS
192
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 23:19:00 -
[80] - Quote
i want them back but i more or less want to see light and heavy air vehicles last time i seen one was footage from 2009 lol
Frowned upon by amateurs: The object of war is not to die for your country but make the other bastard die for his. GSP
|
|
|
TEBOW BAGGINS
GREATNESS ACHIEVED THRU TROLLING
1178
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 23:36:00 -
[81] - Quote
yea spider tanking with lurchasuras was good times.. RIP spider tanking.. the LLAV was removed because it was abused as a roadkill. theres no feasible way to reintroduce it and expect hotfixes to balance it out.. the logi DS flew like a grand piano with a measily 400 extra HP.. it was more isk efficeint to run MLT DS with a CRU because trying to rep another vehicle from it was worthless even tho that's what earlier cutscenes showed it doing.. inf cries already enuff about vehicles imagine if vehicle remote repping was reintroduced...
AKA Zirzo Valcyn
AFKing since 2012
|
Auris Lionesse
Kang Lo Directorate
Gallente Federation
951
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 23:39:00 -
[82] - Quote
ill never support more vehicles unless theres a direct counter with equivalent tiers of av.
militia av should always be better than militia tanks.
same for basic, adv, or pro.
its anti vehicle.
the counter to av is infantry not vehicles. your tank is supposed to die to av.
Don't vote for iron wolf saber.
Vote for someone who will help the community i.e. anyone else.
|
Soraya Xel
Abandoned Privilege
Top Men.
3220
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 23:55:00 -
[83] - Quote
A standing point is that the current vehicles are pretty much "better than proto" grade compared to infantry. I'd not expect to get more powerful vehicles than what exist now. Different, perhaps, but not better.
CPM1 Elect. Thanks for all your support. [email protected] for ideas, thoughts, and feedback.
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
13098
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 23:57:00 -
[84] - Quote
Auris Lionesse wrote:ill never support more vehicles unless theres a direct counter with equivalent tiers of av.
militia av should always be better than militia tanks.
same for basic, adv, or pro.
its anti vehicle.
the counter to av is infantry not vehicles. your tank is supposed to die to av.
True but there is then no reason for my bigger, better main Large Turret to not then have a mode of fire representative of its power.
An no I do not ever want Large Blasters back..... I would like tanks with Shells...... Single Shot, slow reload, high alpha, strong AoE rounds.
"We were commanded us to burn the system...We did. I mourn the loss of the innocent caught in our fires" -Kador Ouryon
|
Soulja Ghostface
MCDUSTDONALDS
Top Men.
2678
|
Posted - 2014.08.29 00:01:00 -
[85] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:A standing point is that the current vehicles are pretty much "better than proto" grade compared to infantry. I'd not expect to get more powerful vehicles than what exist now. Different, perhaps, but not better.
If we get the old vehicles back, Feel free to nerf mlt-std HAVS
If the tanks that have millions of sp invested into them are the only viable tanks to use.
Tank spam will be a thing of the past as swarms and other AV will eat the lower tanks for breakfeast
Source- 1.6
Bring These Back
i Tanker Turned Ads Pilot !
|
hhhhhhhjjjgfdss
Circle of Huskarl
Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2014.08.29 14:39:00 -
[86] - Quote
Pssst.... Geuss what? Bump. |
H0riz0n Unlimit
Inner.Hell
163
|
Posted - 2014.08.29 15:08:00 -
[87] - Quote
Every vehicle will be useless till jlav will exist...
Tanker since I was born -- Want back my blaster -- Madrugar 1125/6753 -- Reduce weakspot dimension
|
Tardthe GrumpyCat
Ikomari-Onu Enforcement
Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.08.29 15:10:00 -
[88] - Quote
DarthJT5 wrote:Ok CCP, it looks to me that it HAS to be obvious that we want our vehicle variants back. Marauders, Enforcers, logi LAVs and DS, scout LAVs, etc. This is the thread to get your attention. No one I've met has said no to having them back. This is the petition for getting them back. If you agree with having our variants back and making vehicles on the battlefield unique again, sign below and give your reason for wanting them back. I have a few myself.
#1. Makes the difference between a 20 mill SP tanker and a 0 SP tanker much better.
#2. Makes vehicle usage non-boring, i mean really. How many vehicle fittings are out there that are actually viable? Everyone uses the exact same stuff. At least this will give us a little bit of variety in fittings by having more slots to use.
#3. Makes balancing AV vs. Tanks much easier. Pro AV vs. The better hulls with proto modules, adv AV for the better hulls with basic mods or basic tanks with proto mods, basic AV for basic hulls with basic mods, etc.
#4. Gives a reason to nerf mlt vehicles into the ground. With more than two types of hulls, we can actually make mlt mlt instead of being std with one less slot.
Please guys, lets get our vehicles back. Even you infantry guys, help us out. Imagine if you had at most three different types of suits for use. It would suck wouldn't it?
Infantry doesn't allow it. |
Soulja Ghostface
MCDUSTDONALDS
Top Men.
2685
|
Posted - 2014.08.29 15:16:00 -
[89] - Quote
Tardthe GrumpyCat wrote:DarthJT5 wrote:Ok CCP, it looks to me that it HAS to be obvious that we want our vehicle variants back. Marauders, Enforcers, logi LAVs and DS, scout LAVs, etc. This is the thread to get your attention. No one I've met has said no to having them back. This is the petition for getting them back. If you agree with having our variants back and making vehicles on the battlefield unique again, sign below and give your reason for wanting them back. I have a few myself.
#1. Makes the difference between a 20 mill SP tanker and a 0 SP tanker much better.
#2. Makes vehicle usage non-boring, i mean really. How many vehicle fittings are out there that are actually viable? Everyone uses the exact same stuff. At least this will give us a little bit of variety in fittings by having more slots to use.
#3. Makes balancing AV vs. Tanks much easier. Pro AV vs. The better hulls with proto modules, adv AV for the better hulls with basic mods or basic tanks with proto mods, basic AV for basic hulls with basic mods, etc.
#4. Gives a reason to nerf mlt vehicles into the ground. With more than two types of hulls, we can actually make mlt mlt instead of being std with one less slot.
Please guys, lets get our vehicles back. Even you infantry guys, help us out. Imagine if you had at most three different types of suits for use. It would suck wouldn't it? Infantry doesn't allow it.
**** infantry. They have no right and they know nothing of vehicles.
Yesterday the same guy shooting my tank with a rail rifle complained on the forums to get them removed.
Bring These Back
i Tanker Turned Ads Pilot !
|
Tardthe GrumpyCat
Ikomari-Onu Enforcement
Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.08.29 16:25:00 -
[90] - Quote
Soulja Ghostface wrote:Tardthe GrumpyCat wrote:DarthJT5 wrote:Ok CCP, it looks to me that it HAS to be obvious that we want our vehicle variants back. Marauders, Enforcers, logi LAVs and DS, scout LAVs, etc. This is the thread to get your attention. No one I've met has said no to having them back. This is the petition for getting them back. If you agree with having our variants back and making vehicles on the battlefield unique again, sign below and give your reason for wanting them back. I have a few myself.
#1. Makes the difference between a 20 mill SP tanker and a 0 SP tanker much better.
#2. Makes vehicle usage non-boring, i mean really. How many vehicle fittings are out there that are actually viable? Everyone uses the exact same stuff. At least this will give us a little bit of variety in fittings by having more slots to use.
#3. Makes balancing AV vs. Tanks much easier. Pro AV vs. The better hulls with proto modules, adv AV for the better hulls with basic mods or basic tanks with proto mods, basic AV for basic hulls with basic mods, etc.
#4. Gives a reason to nerf mlt vehicles into the ground. With more than two types of hulls, we can actually make mlt mlt instead of being std with one less slot.
Please guys, lets get our vehicles back. Even you infantry guys, help us out. Imagine if you had at most three different types of suits for use. It would suck wouldn't it? Infantry doesn't allow it. **** infantry. They have no right and they know nothing of vehicles. Yesterday the same guy shooting my tank with a rail rifle complained on the forums to get them removed.
CCP will listen to that guy before they listen to you. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |