| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
MarasdF Loron
Fatal Absolution
Dirt Nap Squad.
517
   |
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:06:00 -
[31] - Quote
Atiim wrote:I should not die, because I am a tank.
Well, I should die regardless of what I'm using... o.O Dunno about the rest of the people, it's just about who is able to kill me and who is not.
Dem sweet tears here. 
R.I.P. Pre-1.7 Vehicles & AV, you will be missed.
|
Yoma Carrim
Kinsho Swords
Caldari State
469
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:06:00 -
[32] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:Yoma Carrim wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:
You guys know you cost way too little for your effectiveness, what defense could you possibly say? If you want to stay cheap - then buff AV.
One or the other, pick. Which is it?
Cheap? Cheap? How is a 518k Gunnlogi Cheap? Now if we're talking MLT tanks I'll give it to you, but SP intensive tanks aren't cheap. Your 518k tank Are you saying you refuse to use MLT tanks, just because? You can be just as effective in Soma or Sica at half the price, Why are you throwing away ISK then trying to claim tanks are balanced for it? Get out of my thread with this terrible logic.
No I don't refuse to run MLT tanks, I have a blaster fit sica i like to derp around in if I'm board, but I don't find them as effective. Dangers when fit as a glass cannon yes but not nearly as survivable if someone jumps you.
Oh Heck
Logi, Tanker, Heavy
|
NAV HIV
Heaven's Lost Property
Dirt Nap Squad.
1642
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:07:00 -
[33] - Quote
Also: Whats the Profile on the tanks... I run a Proto Cal Scout... I can see most cloaked/uncloaked Scouts and all other infantry on my HUD... But i can't see a bloody Tank Behind me ?! |
NAV HIV
Heaven's Lost Property
Dirt Nap Squad.
1644
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:09:00 -
[34] - Quote
Maximos Forcus wrote:NAV HIV wrote:Ridire Greine wrote:Forge Guns are actually great sources of AV, anyone who says otherwise doesn't use them.
The thing that makes them great is that unlike other sources of AV you can target a tank's weakspot for a 160% Damage rating, nerfing tanks would only make tank Vs tank battles even worse.
PLC needs a buff, and the SL needs a slight buff, and REs are great at what they do. RE's are not for Tanks... The fact that JLAV is the best AV right now, explains the balance between AV vs Tanks... I found a Madrugar last night, some blue dot left it there... I jumped in, pushed towards the redline... 3 guys were swarming it... After being hit 3 times, i jumped out and went to shoot the swarmers... With the help of other team mates i we killed those swarmers... Got back in the tank with FULL hp on it... Some balance that is... ...so it had reppers. What is the point you are trying to make? I once got shot in my MLT heavy suit, hid behind cover a while, and everything was back to 100%. Unbalanced?
If swarms actually worked, 3 guys (So that should in the books of teamwork) i would have backed off that area a long time ago... Yet i have the liberty to jump and kill those guys and not worry about the tank (Also cause it wasn't mine) |
Awry Barux
Ametat Security
Amarr Empire
2401
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:10:00 -
[35] - Quote
Maximos Forcus wrote:NAV HIV wrote:Ridire Greine wrote:Forge Guns are actually great sources of AV, anyone who says otherwise doesn't use them.
The thing that makes them great is that unlike other sources of AV you can target a tank's weakspot for a 160% Damage rating, nerfing tanks would only make tank Vs tank battles even worse.
PLC needs a buff, and the SL needs a slight buff, and REs are great at what they do. RE's are not for Tanks... The fact that JLAV is the best AV right now, explains the balance between AV vs Tanks... I found a Madrugar last night, some blue dot left it there... I jumped in, pushed towards the redline... 3 guys were swarming it... After being hit 3 times, i jumped out and went to shoot the swarmers... With the help of other team mates i we killed those swarmers... Got back in the tank with FULL hp on it... Some balance that is... ...so it had reppers. What is the point you are trying to make? I once got shot in my MLT heavy suit, hid behind cover a while, and everything was back to 100%. Unbalanced?
Oh my god.
*ULTRA FACEPALM*
In the heavy suit, you have to hide and avoid getting shot, or you'll die in 2 seconds, 3 at most.
The tank can literally sit there not moving and just eat the shots.
Nerdier than thou
|
MarasdF Loron
Fatal Absolution
Dirt Nap Squad.
517
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:15:00 -
[36] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:
Do you really believe this crap? I've been gone, away from the debates, but, really?
You guys know you cost way too little for your effectiveness, what defense could you possibly say? If you want to stay cheap - then buff AV.
One or the other, pick. Which is it?
Well, sure, increase our price and increase the effectiveness of AV, just at the same time increase the price of those STD suits that infantry uses to go 30-80/0-4 day in and day out. Margin that is beyond reach for tanks.
So lets see, if a tank does 30/1 in his/her best game for the day, and this infantry slayer does 65/3.
Tanker spent most likely 250-500k doing that while the infantry slayer did that in 10k-15k STD suit costing him/her a total of 30k-45k.
By that logic it should cost the tanker 750k-1.5M and the slayer it should be 1.6M-3.2M.
Well, I wouldn't go balance anything around ISK.
But then again I wouldn't go crying if Swarms OHK'd me for the cost of 0 ISK as long as those Swarms rendered.
R.I.P. Pre-1.7 Vehicles & AV, you will be missed.
|
Darken-Sol
BIG BAD W0LVES
Canis Eliminatus Operatives
1442
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:15:00 -
[37] - Quote
Yoma Carrim wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:
You guys know you cost way too little for your effectiveness, what defense could you possibly say? If you want to stay cheap - then buff AV.
One or the other, pick. Which is it?
Cheap? Cheap? How is a 518k Gunnlogi Cheap? Now if we're talking MLT tanks I'll give it to you, but SP intensive tanks aren't cheap.
1.7 tankers think 500k is expensive. Proto turrets alone used to be over a mil.
Crush them
|
SoTa PoP
Heaven's Lost Property
Dirt Nap Squad.
4718
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:16:00 -
[38] - Quote
Yoma Carrim wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:Yoma Carrim wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:
You guys know you cost way too little for your effectiveness, what defense could you possibly say? If you want to stay cheap - then buff AV.
One or the other, pick. Which is it?
Cheap? Cheap? How is a 518k Gunnlogi Cheap? Now if we're talking MLT tanks I'll give it to you, but SP intensive tanks aren't cheap. Your 518k tank Are you saying you refuse to use MLT tanks, just because? You can be just as effective in Soma or Sica at half the price, Why are you throwing away ISK then trying to claim tanks are balanced for it? Get out of my thread with this terrible logic. No I don't refuse to run MLT tanks, I have a blaster fit sica i like to derp around in if I'm board, but I don't find them as effective. Dangers when fit as a glass cannon yes but not nearly as survivable if someone jumps you.
You just aren't good then and need the crutch ISK can offer a tank.
It's really that simple. Don't use that as a logical basis for this debate. MLT tanks are imbalanced. Proto AV cannot solo MLT tanks.
That is not right. If anyone can hop into these things, then someone whose thrown millions of SP to deal with them should be able to walk all over them.
n+ÅS¦¦Gùò GÇ+GÇ+ GùòS¦¦n++ I watch anime for the plot
|
Maximos Forcus
BurgezzE.T.F
General Tso's Alliance
35
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:19:00 -
[39] - Quote
Awry Barux wrote:
Oh my god.
*ULTRA FACEPALM*
In the heavy suit, you have to hide and avoid getting shot, or you'll die in 2 seconds, 3 at most.
The tank can literally sit there not moving and just eat the shots.
Really? You so cool. His story's punch line was that AFTER KILLING 3 INFANTRY, he came back to the tank, jumped in, and, lo and behold, it was back to 100%. not the fact it didn't get destroyed while he was sitting there. No, the fact is was back to 100%. How was this tank fitted? What swarms where they using?
Three lefts don't make a right.
Unless you're two dimensional and only know right angles.
|
MarasdF Loron
Fatal Absolution
Dirt Nap Squad.
517
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:21:00 -
[40] - Quote
Darken-Sol wrote:Yoma Carrim wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:
You guys know you cost way too little for your effectiveness, what defense could you possibly say? If you want to stay cheap - then buff AV.
One or the other, pick. Which is it?
Cheap? Cheap? How is a 518k Gunnlogi Cheap? Now if we're talking MLT tanks I'll give it to you, but SP intensive tanks aren't cheap. 1.7 tankers think 500k is expensive. Proto turrets alone used to be over a mil.
Wrong. Proto turrets used to be around 600k for the basic one and the "best" specialized one used to be 927k or so.
R.I.P. Pre-1.7 Vehicles & AV, you will be missed.
|
|
|
Alena Ventrallis
PAND3M0N1UM
Top Men.
1241
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:22:00 -
[41] - Quote
Awry Barux wrote:Oh my god.
*ULTRA FACEPALM*
In the heavy suit, you have to hide and avoid getting shot, or you'll die in 2 seconds, 3 at most.
The tank can literally sit there not moving and just eat the shots.
Because he purposefully set up his tank to counter AV. LEaving him with no good buffer against railguns and RE. Wykiromi Breaches can also two shot a repper tank, with only 8 seconds of exposure to the tank at all (remember, we rarely have any idea you are even there until you hit us, even less if you're up high, so make that 4 seconds)
I can set up a tank to take high alpha weapons. 2 shield hardeners and a complex extender give quite a nice buffer against rails and takes at minimum 9 RE to kill me. But I rep slow, and the sustained damage of forges and swarms whittles me down. You also have cheap and no SP access to large railguns and militia damage mods, and 2 dam mods on a militia railgun will 4 shot a repper tank, 3 shots if one at least hits the weak point. This is with railguns being better at killing shields than armor.
Each fit has it's place. You just seem to be unwilling to field a repper tanks counters, or to squad with people who field such.
That's what you get!! - DA Rick
|
SoTa PoP
Heaven's Lost Property
Dirt Nap Squad.
4719
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:23:00 -
[42] - Quote
MarasdF Loron wrote:Darken-Sol wrote:Yoma Carrim wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:
You guys know you cost way too little for your effectiveness, what defense could you possibly say? If you want to stay cheap - then buff AV.
One or the other, pick. Which is it?
Cheap? Cheap? How is a 518k Gunnlogi Cheap? Now if we're talking MLT tanks I'll give it to you, but SP intensive tanks aren't cheap. 1.7 tankers think 500k is expensive. Proto turrets alone used to be over a mil. Wrong. Proto turrets used to be around 600k for the basic one and the "best" specialized one used to be 927k or so.
edit: Oh, actually, you're right. :3
n+ÅS¦¦Gùò GÇ+GÇ+ GùòS¦¦n++ I watch anime for the plot
|
Darken-Sol
BIG BAD W0LVES
Canis Eliminatus Operatives
1442
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:24:00 -
[43] - Quote
MarasdF Loron wrote:Darken-Sol wrote:Yoma Carrim wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:
You guys know you cost way too little for your effectiveness, what defense could you possibly say? If you want to stay cheap - then buff AV.
One or the other, pick. Which is it?
Cheap? Cheap? How is a 518k Gunnlogi Cheap? Now if we're talking MLT tanks I'll give it to you, but SP intensive tanks aren't cheap. 1.7 tankers think 500k is expensive. Proto turrets alone used to be over a mil. Wrong. Proto turrets used to be around 600k for the basic one and the "best" specialized one used to be 927k or so.
you are correct. Forgive me I should have specified that they would need a tank hull to mount that turret upon. I keep forgetting most of you can't think.
Crush them
|
MarasdF Loron
Fatal Absolution
Dirt Nap Squad.
517
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:24:00 -
[44] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:MarasdF Loron wrote:Darken-Sol wrote:Yoma Carrim wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:
You guys know you cost way too little for your effectiveness, what defense could you possibly say? If you want to stay cheap - then buff AV.
One or the other, pick. Which is it?
Cheap? Cheap? How is a 518k Gunnlogi Cheap? Now if we're talking MLT tanks I'll give it to you, but SP intensive tanks aren't cheap. 1.7 tankers think 500k is expensive. Proto turrets alone used to be over a mil. Wrong. Proto turrets used to be around 600k for the basic one and the "best" specialized one used to be 927k or so. edit: Oh, actually, you're right. :3
And SoTa, I really thought you were much smarter than you turned out to be.  But oh well.
R.I.P. Pre-1.7 Vehicles & AV, you will be missed.
|
SoTa PoP
Heaven's Lost Property
Dirt Nap Squad.
4719
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:26:00 -
[45] - Quote
lol I had a brain fart. I did use tanks back in the day, but only as tests. I remember being broke all day long.
My bad xD
n+ÅS¦¦Gùò GÇ+GÇ+ GùòS¦¦n++ I watch anime for the plot
|
MarasdF Loron
Fatal Absolution
Dirt Nap Squad.
517
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:27:00 -
[46] - Quote
Darken-Sol wrote:MarasdF Loron wrote:Darken-Sol wrote:Yoma Carrim wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:
You guys know you cost way too little for your effectiveness, what defense could you possibly say? If you want to stay cheap - then buff AV.
One or the other, pick. Which is it?
Cheap? Cheap? How is a 518k Gunnlogi Cheap? Now if we're talking MLT tanks I'll give it to you, but SP intensive tanks aren't cheap. 1.7 tankers think 500k is expensive. Proto turrets alone used to be over a mil. Wrong. Proto turrets used to be around 600k for the basic one and the "best" specialized one used to be 927k or so. you are correct. Forgive me I should have specified that they would need a tank hull to mount that turret upon. I keep forgetting most of you can't think.
Lol, I know you meant it needed a tank hull as well but you didn't say so, so I decided to be an a$$ and troll you.
But never the less, 500k is not expensive, but for the versatility that current day tanks have, it is way too much. I gladly paid 1.3-2.8M +300K for the LLAV because tanks used to be versatile. They just needed some tweaks here and there to be PC viable.
R.I.P. Pre-1.7 Vehicles & AV, you will be missed.
|
MarasdF Loron
Fatal Absolution
Dirt Nap Squad.
517
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:29:00 -
[47] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:lol I had a brain fart. I did use tanks back in the day, but only as tests. I remember being broke all day long.
My bad xD
I don't think you still got the point tho... Think harder, please, I know you can do it.  Would not like to tell it to everyone here tho. Not "in your face" anyway.
R.I.P. Pre-1.7 Vehicles & AV, you will be missed.
|
SoTa PoP
Heaven's Lost Property
Dirt Nap Squad.
4720
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:31:00 -
[48] - Quote
MarasdF Loron wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:lol I had a brain fart. I did use tanks back in the day, but only as tests. I remember being broke all day long.
My bad xD I don't think you still got the point tho... Think harder, please, I know you can do it. Would not like to tell it to everyone here tho. Not "in your face" anyway.
Is your argument a switch of gears to discuss proto level tanks?
Because, on that subject, I will claim ignorance an unable to speak. If they are balanced or not - I cannot say. I can only say MLT tanks are imbalanced
*Didn't re-read anything, just trying to remember what you wrote and see if I can hit the nail, If I'm wrong say so and i'll properly respond
n+ÅS¦¦Gùò GÇ+GÇ+ GùòS¦¦n++ I watch anime for the plot
|
MarasdF Loron
Fatal Absolution
Dirt Nap Squad.
517
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:34:00 -
[49] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:MarasdF Loron wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:lol I had a brain fart. I did use tanks back in the day, but only as tests. I remember being broke all day long.
My bad xD I don't think you still got the point tho... Think harder, please, I know you can do it. Would not like to tell it to everyone here tho. Not "in your face" anyway. Is your argument a switch of gears to discuss proto level tanks? Because, on that subject, I will claim ignorance an unable to speak. If they are balanced or not - I cannot say. I can only say MLT tanks are imbalanced *Didn't re-read anything, just trying to remember what you wrote and see if I can hit the nail, If I'm wrong say so and i'll properly respond
I'll give you a hint, I will always be a vehicle pilot because I just freaking love vehicles generally (not just in this game), no matter how much they will be nerfed or buffed (more likely nerfed). The effectiveness is not why I use them...
R.I.P. Pre-1.7 Vehicles & AV, you will be missed.
|
NAV HIV
Heaven's Lost Property
Dirt Nap Squad.
1644
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:35:00 -
[50] - Quote
Maximos Forcus wrote:Awry Barux wrote:
Oh my god.
*ULTRA FACEPALM*
In the heavy suit, you have to hide and avoid getting shot, or you'll die in 2 seconds, 3 at most.
The tank can literally sit there not moving and just eat the shots.
Really? You so cool. His story's punch line was that AFTER KILLING 3 INFANTRY, he came back to the tank, jumped in, and, lo and behold, it was back to 100%. not the fact it didn't get destroyed while he was sitting there. No, the fact is was back to 100%. How was this tank fitted? What swarms where they using?
- Point 1# I had the luxury to jump out of the tank, cause i know swarms won't do anything, even if there were 3 of them
- Point 2# It was getting hit even after i jumped out
- Point 3# Poor infantry had no chance, i could've killed em as easily with the blaster
- Point 4# It had 2 reppers, 1 hardener and damage mod
- Point 5# I would've asked them what swarms they were using, but they were too dead to say anything lol
- Point 6# The balance between 3 AVs trying to push one tank vs the tank was lolworthy... |
|
|
SoTa PoP
Heaven's Lost Property
Dirt Nap Squad.
4721
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:39:00 -
[51] - Quote
MarasdF Loron wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:MarasdF Loron wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:lol I had a brain fart. I did use tanks back in the day, but only as tests. I remember being broke all day long.
My bad xD I don't think you still got the point tho... Think harder, please, I know you can do it. Would not like to tell it to everyone here tho. Not "in your face" anyway. Is your argument a switch of gears to discuss proto level tanks? Because, on that subject, I will claim ignorance an unable to speak. If they are balanced or not - I cannot say. I can only say MLT tanks are imbalanced *Didn't re-read anything, just trying to remember what you wrote and see if I can hit the nail, If I'm wrong say so and i'll properly respond I'll give you a hint, I will always be a vehicle pilot because I just freaking love vehicles generally (not just in this game), no matter how much they will be nerfed or buffed (more likely nerfed). The effectiveness is not why I use them...
Sounds like why I'm a heavy. I'd probably be a much stronger Scout player, but I choose heavy because I say so. It's a general love for being able to take damage and keep moving, I always play a Tank. Or my RTS strategies revolves around higher-tech armies,
*Am I switching subjects? maybe I should go re-read lol*
n+ÅS¦¦Gùò GÇ+GÇ+ GùòS¦¦n++ I watch anime for the plot
|
Thumb Green
The Valyrian Guard
1042
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:41:00 -
[52] - Quote
MarasdF Loron wrote: so I decided to be an a$$ and troll you.
Decided? I thought that was an inherit trait of a vehicle specialist.
Support Orbital Spawns
|
Yoma Carrim
Kinsho Swords
Caldari State
469
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:44:00 -
[53] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:Yoma Carrim wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:Yoma Carrim wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:
You guys know you cost way too little for your effectiveness, what defense could you possibly say? If you want to stay cheap - then buff AV.
One or the other, pick. Which is it?
Cheap? Cheap? How is a 518k Gunnlogi Cheap? Now if we're talking MLT tanks I'll give it to you, but SP intensive tanks aren't cheap. Your 518k tank Are you saying you refuse to use MLT tanks, just because? You can be just as effective in Soma or Sica at half the price, Why are you throwing away ISK then trying to claim tanks are balanced for it? Get out of my thread with this terrible logic. No I don't refuse to run MLT tanks, I have a blaster fit sica i like to derp around in if I'm board, but I don't find them as effective. Dangers when fit as a glass cannon yes but not nearly as survivable if someone jumps you. You just aren't good then and need the crutch ISK can offer a tank. It's really that simple. Don't use that as a logical basis for this debate. MLT tanks are imbalanced. Proto AV cannot solo MLT tanks. That is not right. If anyone can hop into these things, then someone whose thrown millions of SP to deal with them should be able to walk all over them.
I didn't say MLT tanks were balanced or that Proto AV could solo them. I simply asked how you considered a 518k tank Cheap (You have yet to answer this question by the way).
I didn't even enter the AV vs HAV debate because it is not balanced and everyone knows it.
Oh Heck
Logi, Tanker, Heavy
|
Sigberct Amni
Goonfeet
Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
679
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:45:00 -
[54] - Quote
It's the economy. CCP designed a special snowflake mixture of events to generate ISK and to delete it. Then they broke they **** out of it with PC and character recycling.
I no longer give a **** how many proto'd out tanks I lose per round because I recycle characters. Close the ridiculous isk faucets and suddenly tanks are a bit more balanced. No SP invested militia tanks are too cheap for the power they give, but I suspect this is because CCP wants them as a form of AV. |
Yoma Carrim
Kinsho Swords
Caldari State
469
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:46:00 -
[55] - Quote
Darken-Sol wrote:Yoma Carrim wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:
You guys know you cost way too little for your effectiveness, what defense could you possibly say? If you want to stay cheap - then buff AV.
One or the other, pick. Which is it?
Cheap? Cheap? How is a 518k Gunnlogi Cheap? Now if we're talking MLT tanks I'll give it to you, but SP intensive tanks aren't cheap. 1.7 tankers think 500k is expensive. Proto turrets alone used to be over a mil.
I didn't say it was expensive (My 1.6 2.3mill Falcon fit can attest to that) I asked how it was considered Cheap.
Oh Heck
Logi, Tanker, Heavy
|
SoTa PoP
Heaven's Lost Property
Dirt Nap Squad.
4721
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:49:00 -
[56] - Quote
Yoma Carrim wrote:
I didn't say MLT tanks were balanced or that Proto AV could solo them. I simply asked how you considered a 518k tank Cheap (You have yet to answer this question by the way).
I didn't even enter the AV vs HAV debate because it is not balanced and everyone knows it.
It was my fault you responded the way you did, I should of been clear I meant there was something wrong with tanks lower-tier costs.
Sorry for jumping on you when I was the one being unclear.
n+ÅS¦¦Gùò GÇ+GÇ+ GùòS¦¦n++ I watch anime for the plot
|
MarasdF Loron
Fatal Absolution
Dirt Nap Squad.
518
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:49:00 -
[57] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:MarasdF Loron wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:MarasdF Loron wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:lol I had a brain fart. I did use tanks back in the day, but only as tests. I remember being broke all day long.
My bad xD I don't think you still got the point tho... Think harder, please, I know you can do it. Would not like to tell it to everyone here tho. Not "in your face" anyway. Is your argument a switch of gears to discuss proto level tanks? Because, on that subject, I will claim ignorance an unable to speak. If they are balanced or not - I cannot say. I can only say MLT tanks are imbalanced *Didn't re-read anything, just trying to remember what you wrote and see if I can hit the nail, If I'm wrong say so and i'll properly respond I'll give you a hint, I will always be a vehicle pilot because I just freaking love vehicles generally (not just in this game), no matter how much they will be nerfed or buffed (more likely nerfed). The effectiveness is not why I use them... Sounds like why I'm a heavy. I'd probably be a much stronger Scout player, but I choose heavy because I say so. It's a general love for being able to take damage and keep moving, I always play a Tank. Or my RTS strategies revolves around higher-tech armies, *Am I switching subjects? maybe I should go re-read lol*
I sent you mail ingame, maybe my hints sucked.
R.I.P. Pre-1.7 Vehicles & AV, you will be missed.
|
MarasdF Loron
Fatal Absolution
Dirt Nap Squad.
518
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:52:00 -
[58] - Quote
Thumb Green wrote:MarasdF Loron wrote: so I decided to be an a$$ and troll you. Decided? I thought that was an inherit trait of a vehicle specialist.
Same can be said about AV players but without the troll part. Sorry, it' just the way it goes... 
I'm so very arrogant that I think single AV player should be able to take out a tank easily when the rock-paper-scissors favor him/her, or with a bit of a struggle even if RPS doesn't favor him/her.
R.I.P. Pre-1.7 Vehicles & AV, you will be missed.
|
Harpyja
Molon Labe.
General Tso's Alliance
1693
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:53:00 -
[59] - Quote
NAV HIV wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Give me a proto vehicles first Give me a Proto AV to Counter that Proto Vehicle First
The current tanks become the proto tanks.
Militia becomes advanced.
Now we need a weaker new standard and a much weaker new militia.
Bring back proper tiers for all active modules; they shouldn't provide the same buffs across all levels.
Then I think everything should be balanced.
"By His light, and His will"
- The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32
|
Atiim
Heaven's Lost Property
Dirt Nap Squad.
7504
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:53:00 -
[60] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:wait, what?
REMOVE BLASTERS?
Are you AV guys INSANE????????
I don't want them removed.
Proposed Mobile CRU Changes
-HAND
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |