|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Atiim
Heaven's Lost Property Dirt Nap Squad.
7503
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 15:36:00 -
[1] - Quote
I should not die, because I am a tank.
Proposed Mobile CRU Changes
-HAND
|
Atiim
Heaven's Lost Property Dirt Nap Squad.
7503
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 15:39:00 -
[2] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Give me a proto vehicles first After you nerf just about every vehicle module, and buff AV; sure.
Proposed Mobile CRU Changes
-HAND
|
Atiim
Heaven's Lost Property Dirt Nap Squad.
7503
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 15:43:00 -
[3] - Quote
Soldner VonKuechle wrote:Meh, as long as i keep seeing +75+75+50(+50)+150 for shooting tanks I don't care what they or I end up having to do. Vehicle Damage points made me give a siht about shooting tanks again. It's a good thing you don't participate in competitive game-modes.
You being a FC would guarantee that your team gets cloned.
Proposed Mobile CRU Changes
-HAND
|
Atiim
Heaven's Lost Property Dirt Nap Squad.
7503
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 15:44:00 -
[4] - Quote
Yoma Carrim wrote:SoTa PoP wrote: You guys know you cost way too little for your effectiveness, what defense could you possibly say? If you want to stay cheap - then buff AV.
One or the other, pick. Which is it?
Cheap? Cheap? How is a 518k Gunnlogi Cheap? Now if we're talking MLT tanks I'll give it to you, but SP intensive tanks aren't cheap. It's cheap in the same sense that Rankers say 215k AV suits are cheap...
Proposed Mobile CRU Changes
-HAND
|
Atiim
Heaven's Lost Property Dirt Nap Squad.
7504
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 16:53:00 -
[5] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:wait, what?
REMOVE BLASTERS?
Are you AV guys INSANE????????
I don't want them removed.
Proposed Mobile CRU Changes
-HAND
|
Atiim
Heaven's Lost Property Dirt Nap Squad.
7505
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 17:55:00 -
[6] - Quote
MarasdF Loron wrote:NAV HIV wrote:Just another question on top of all the other questions...
- What do you do when you run out of ammo?! Drive to a safe place (If there are no accessible Supply depot, which tankers love to blow up for 50WP) and recall the tank and bring a fresh new one in...
- What does a FG or AV guy do if they get placed on a rooftop or something ?! Recall the suit ?! lol Try crossing a field and trying to get ammo with an AV suit with all the tanks, scouts and red dots running around lol
It's only fair and its lolTanker lolBalance What does a tank do if they get placed on a rooftop or something?! Oh wait... Absolutely nothing, because that rarely, if ever happens.
Proposed Mobile CRU Changes
-HAND
|
Atiim
Heaven's Lost Property Dirt Nap Squad.
7505
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 17:56:00 -
[7] - Quote
MarasdF Loron wrote: Let me repeat myself: So why are you crying about that again?
I'm pretty sure you were the one crying here.
Proposed Mobile CRU Changes
-HAND
|
Atiim
Heaven's Lost Property Dirt Nap Squad.
7506
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 18:31:00 -
[8] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:Void Echo wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:Void Echo wrote:really, even one of the biggest trolls has gotten serious for once to talk about tanking?
this issue has gotten worse than before is sota poop is putting his 2 cents in it. Has it not gone stupid? Tankers, you're hurting NPE. Quit your **** and pick one. I should of mentioned I only speak of lower tiered tank prices. That's what's harmful with tanks right now. There ratio of effectiveness with AV drastically goes higher at proto - but so what? That's the point. In strategic game modes they aren't a huge factor anyways, they can hold outside point 'sometimes' they're easily countered. So they're considered balanced. But MLT is NOT. Tankers aren't hurting the game, its the people that want them gone and to turn this into gall of duty that are hurting this game. the universe doesn't revolve around infantry. MLT tanks I couldn't care less about, they require nothing to use and should be treated and like such. they should have their effectiveness cut down because they are the lowest tier available. price remains the same but effectiveness is cut. Tanks are completely fine regarding anything out of MLT. Besides rep tank maddys - that's a little dumb. Well, that's the fitting that is surviving, you can't expect everyone to change to a fitting that will let you kill them in less than 5 seconds or so. come one that's unreasonable. Dropsuits can have up to 3 self rep modules and nobody is complaining about that, why should tanks be any different? That's like saying dropsuits shouldn't be able to have multiple rep modules fitted on them because it takes to long to kill them with an SMG Perhaps nobody's complaining about that becasue stacking reps don't negate damage from Mass Drivers?
Proposed Mobile CRU Changes
-HAND
|
Atiim
Heaven's Lost Property Dirt Nap Squad.
7507
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 19:39:00 -
[9] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:Thumb Green wrote:Void Echo wrote:
Well, that's the fitting that is surviving, you can't expect everyone to change to a fitting that will let you kill them in less than 5 seconds or so. come one that's unreasonable.
Dropsuits can have up to 3 self rep modules and nobody is complaining about that, why should tanks be any different?
That's like saying dropsuits shouldn't be able to have multiple rep modules fitted on them because it takes to long to kill them with an SMG
3 dropsuit rep modules doesn't allow you to out rep any weapons damage. when dealing with infantry vs infantry that's how its meant to be. infanvtry vs vehicles is another argument entirely. mainly because infantry is so small, why should they be able to take down something many times larger than they are as easily as they take down another infantry player? Why shouldn't they be able to?
It's not like the ability to do so is unrealistic, and this is a video game mind you.
Proposed Mobile CRU Changes
-HAND
|
Atiim
Heaven's Lost Property Dirt Nap Squad.
7508
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 20:28:00 -
[10] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:Guys, it's a tank that nothing any single infantry can possibly do about.
There is no other fitting in this entire game to do this, the forge is designed to be a hard counter, while the swarms is more the way for infantry to give a light counter.
A hard counter should NEVER EVER ******* BE RENDERED USELESS AGAINST ITS INTDED ******* TARGET. ARE YOU ******* STUPID?!?!
Thank you for listening. :) I'd argue that the Swarm Launcher is an even greater Hard Counter than the FG due to being an explosive weapon, and still a primary at the same time.
But even they are useless against them.
Proposed Mobile CRU Changes
-HAND
|
|
Atiim
Heaven's Lost Property Dirt Nap Squad.
7508
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 20:33:00 -
[11] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:Atiim wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:Guys, it's a tank that nothing any single infantry can possibly do about.
There is no other fitting in this entire game to do this, the forge is designed to be a hard counter, while the swarms is more the way for infantry to give a light counter.
A hard counter should NEVER EVER ******* BE RENDERED USELESS AGAINST ITS INTDED ******* TARGET. ARE YOU ******* STUPID?!?!
Thank you for listening. :) I'd argue that the Swarm Launcher is an even greater Hard Counter than the FG due to being an explosive weapon, and still a primary at the same time. But even they are useless against them. I wouldn't, they don't have the stats to back that theory. It's a light counter weapon, that deals extra armor damage to deal with the speedier armor tanks forges struggle to deal with. I mean against Armored HAVs, or at least supposed to be...
Proposed Mobile CRU Changes
-HAND
|
Atiim
Heaven's Lost Property Dirt Nap Squad.
7546
|
Posted - 2014.05.01 18:26:00 -
[12] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote: You're really going to take that seriously? Don't you have some pubs to stomp as a 6-man we-never-use-ADV-only-PRO squad against a team of fresh academy graduates?
Only time I've ever used PRO in a PUB is when I'm fighting vehicles.
How ironic.
Proposed Mobile CRU Changes
-HAND
|
Atiim
Heaven's Lost Property Dirt Nap Squad.
7563
|
Posted - 2014.05.01 21:41:00 -
[13] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:Soldner VonKuechle wrote:Last line quoted from you.
Can't bold quotes on my phone because the forums and my s3 hate each other. I see the change, I just don't get what it implies. it implies that Spkr4TheDead is sperging.
The joke, is that Spkr4TheDead's abbreviation is Spkr, which can easily be refereed to as Sperger.
The definition of the term sperging:
Quote:To rant with great anger or intensity about pointless minutiae, as someone with an asperger's-related fixation is prone to do. .
Proposed Mobile CRU Changes
-HAND
|
|
|
|