Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ankbar Latrommi
S.e.V.e.N. General Tso's Alliance
46
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 17:26:00 -
[31] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:What I'm asking for is for CCP to make competitive gameplay viable for everyone, not just the elite few. I don't have behind-the-scenes numbers, I only have my experience. But most of the time when I'm playing with my corp I have really enjoyable, competitive, public matches. I'm not even into advanced suits yet, nor advanced equipment other than +dams and submachine guns. People in my squads aren't bringing their proto suits to stomp the pubs. And these enjoyable, competitive matches, we only win about half of those.
So what I'm trying to say is you are asking for game design/mechanic changes to bring on competitive gameplay, and I am failing to see why those changes are necessary because I'm not failing to obtain competitive gameplay and I am not "elite few." (I suck at fps's, actually.)
Reiner Knizia-"When playing a game, the goal is to win, but it is the goal that is important, not the winning."
Eve> FPS
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
630
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 17:27:00 -
[32] - Quote
Ankbar Latrommi wrote:NAV HIV wrote:FPS is still the Main focus in Dust. Eve integration is a great Feature. But right now it doesn't have any proper useful value.. Other than the fact that it's Cool... FW, good change, but could've been better. We could've seen changes made in the starmap and so on, received better payouts and bonuses. But currently it's an ISK sink... May be in the Future... Currently that integration has as much influence on dust as Plasma cannon has to infantry...
PC well, currently it's worth playing... FPS players wants competitive battles, not 1 min to shoot 1 player... Corp battles allowed us to just go all out and have some fun... "FPS" is at most a genre, as little as merely a mechanical and user interface approach. ( Extra Credits had a video where they criticize the way we think about game genres, but I can't remember which it was.) Eve Online integration isn't just a 'great feature'. CCP has said from the very beginning they want to create an in-depth, holistic science fiction universe. That's CCP's goal. Eve Online integration with Eve DUST514 isn't just a neat idea they are marketing, it's their foundation. If that integration is weak right now (which I'm not debating, it's horri-bad,) then that's what they need to be working on. Fundamental game mechanics(bugs, aim assist, balance, etc) and Eve Online integration should be their top to priorities if they are going to deliver on their vision. I don't think I understand "not 1 min to shoot 1 player". Could you rephrase that statement? By "just go all out and have some fun" do you mean 'without consequences beyond the cost of our lost suits."?
I agree that EVE integration is essential, it's the point of this game just about.However I don't see why you're point is at all related to corporation battles, I'm not sure if you were around when they were going on. They were far preferable to PC as it let players actually play, no matter their class or rank. You can talk about EVE integration and place yourself on your space-sim pedestal all day, however it doesn't change the fact that players are not happy with the game. Something that was far better was removed and replaced with a crappier version that has lead people to quit and quite clearly uproar on the forums as we see daily.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
631
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 17:29:00 -
[33] - Quote
Ankbar Latrommi wrote:843-BANE wrote:What I'm asking for is for CCP to make competitive gameplay viable for everyone, not just the elite few. I don't have behind-the-scenes numbers, I only have my experience. But most of the time when I'm playing with my corp I have really enjoyable, competitive, public matches. I'm not even into advanced suits yet, nor advanced equipment other than +dams and submachine guns. People in my squads aren't bringing their proto suits to stomp the pubs. And these enjoyable, competitive matches, we only win about half of those. So what I'm trying to say is you are asking for game design/mechanic changes to bring on competitive gameplay, and I am failing to see why those changes are necessary because I'm not failing to obtain competitive gameplay and I am not "elite few." (I suck at fps's, actually.)
Probably about... 1 in every 5 public matches I have are competitive. The other 4 are us redlining the enemy and just ******* around in LAVs because the redberries are just awful. That's not their fault. You can not for one second compare public matches to corporation battles, that tells me you don't really understand competitive matches in Dust. Have you played a proper corporation battle? Or even PC? There is no comparison to public battles.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
940
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 17:40:00 -
[34] - Quote
Ankbar Latrommi wrote:NAV HIV wrote:FPS is still the Main focus in Dust. Eve integration is a great Feature. But right now it doesn't have any proper useful value.. Other than the fact that it's Cool... FW, good change, but could've been better. We could've seen changes made in the starmap and so on, received better payouts and bonuses. But currently it's an ISK sink... May be in the Future... Currently that integration has as much influence on dust as Plasma cannon has to infantry...
PC well, currently it's worth playing... FPS players wants competitive battles, not 1 min to shoot 1 player... Corp battles allowed us to just go all out and have some fun... "FPS" is at most a genre, as little as merely a mechanical and user interface approach. ( Extra Credits had a video where they criticize the way we think about game genres, but I can't remember which it was.) Eve Online integration isn't just a 'great feature'. CCP has said from the very beginning they want to create an in-depth, holistic science fiction universe. That's CCP's goal. Eve Online integration with Eve DUST514 isn't just a neat idea they are marketing, it's their foundation. If that integration is weak right now (which I'm not debating, it's horri-bad,) then that's what they need to be working on. Fundamental game mechanics(bugs, aim assist, balance, etc) and Eve Online integration should be their top to priorities if they are going to deliver on their vision. I don't think I understand "not 1 min to shoot 1 player". Could you rephrase that statement? By "just go all out and have some fun" do you mean 'without consequences beyond the cost of our lost suits."?
Eve Integration and all those Promo videos are what attacked most of the shooters here. Most of the shooter who have been here for a while love idea of Teamwork, Risk Vs Reward... I love it... But they can't expect the shooters to stick around for an indefinite period of time while they don't fix even the most basic things... ie: lag, framerate, DC in general....
Aim Assist?!!! AA is for people who love to call themselves FPS players but can't shoot at a building without assist... It's not very competitive... PC is stale and the mechanism isn't that great... Locking districts and hiding behind timers, Inducing lag issues (Yes we all know how it was done) to win battles... So please tell me, for a starting Corp who want's to get better and competitive what are they supposed to do?! Save 36 mil, buy a clone pack and attack some CORP? What would be the end result ? Lag, Framerate, in-battle DC... RAGE and lot of rage... Besides they aren't even gonna fight the corp they are attacking... So all in all it's not very competitive... Missing the main focus from the FPS bit... With Corp battle we could do a battle for as low as 100k and have some good all out fight and practice to get into PC one day when it's worth getting into again...
1 min to shoot 1 player... Play any other competitive FPS and see how long a person can survive in a battle ?! Here people start crying over TTK if they are dead within 5 seconds of an encounter. They don't wanna use cover and stay alive for the longest time... These aren`t battleship vs battleship encounters...But people expect them to be so. That isn't my idea of proper EvE integration... I`m sure EvE players wouldnt like it +¼f it took them 5 seconds to blow up a ship... (excuse my knowledge on EvE there)
Once again Dust is a shooter first, so they fix the very basics of a shooter first... |
Ankbar Latrommi
S.e.V.e.N. General Tso's Alliance
46
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 17:49:00 -
[35] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:However I don't see why you're point is at all related to corporation battles, I'm not sure if you were around when they were going on. I wasn't, no, which is why my very first post in this thread was asking about PC as compared to corp battles. I am trying to understand the request. Incorporating a bit more of what you said below, let's see if I understand it better now: you are highly-skilled (character and player skill), as is to some degree your corporation. doing pub matches doesn't provide you challenge, as the reds don't practice any f*ing teamwork (my #1 issue). you want to be able to setup matches with other people who are at your skill level for challenging game play.
843-BANE wrote:They were far preferable to PC as it let players actually play, no matter their class or rank. There's a restriction for that in PC?
843-BANE wrote: You can talk about EVE integration and place yourself on your space-sim pedestal all day, Hey, don't get personal, I am not being Eve Online-arrogant. There is no pedestal involved here.
843-BANE wrote:however it doesn't change the fact that players are not happy with the game. Something that was far better was removed and replaced with a crappier version that has lead people to quit and quite clearly uproar on the forums as we see daily. This is where I'm different from 99% of people out there, and I accept that. I don't give 1 rat's behind about $$. CCP has a vision. They should be doing quality work while striving to that goal. If that goal is unpopular, even to the point of becoming a non-viable business, I would not suggest nor support the compromising of the goal. If it can't get market support, then their dream is simply not viable and it "fails" (from a business perspective.) But they shouldn't compromise their dream. And I take the same approach when it means that I'll have to quit playing a game because the designer's goals and my fun don't line up.
Reiner Knizia-"When playing a game, the goal is to win, but it is the goal that is important, not the winning."
Eve> FPS
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
632
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 17:58:00 -
[36] - Quote
Ankbar Latrommi wrote:843-BANE wrote:However I don't see why you're point is at all related to corporation battles, I'm not sure if you were around when they were going on. I wasn't, no, which is why my very first post in this thread was asking about PC as compared to corp battles. I am trying to understand the request. Incorporating a bit more of what you said below, let's see if I understand it better now: you are highly-skilled (character and player skill), as is to some degree your corporation. doing pub matches doesn't provide you challenge, as the reds don't practice any f*ing teamwork (my #1 issue). you want to be able to setup matches with other people who are at your skill level for challenging game play. 843-BANE wrote:They were far preferable to PC as it let players actually play, no matter their class or rank. There's a restriction for that in PC? 843-BANE wrote: You can talk about EVE integration and place yourself on your space-sim pedestal all day, Hey, don't get personal, I am not being Eve Online-arrogant. There is no pedestal involved here. 843-BANE wrote:however it doesn't change the fact that players are not happy with the game. Something that was far better was removed and replaced with a crappier version that has lead people to quit and quite clearly uproar on the forums as we see daily. This is where I'm different from 99% of people out there, and I accept that. I don't give 1 rat's behind about $$. CCP has a vision. They should be doing quality work while striving to that goal. If that goal is unpopular, even to the point of becoming a non-viable business, I would not suggest nor support the compromising of the goal. If it can't get market support, then their dream is simply not viable and it "fails" (from a business perspective.) But they shouldn't compromise their dream. And I take the same approach when it means that I'll have to quit playing a game because the designer's goals and my fun don't line up.
As far as the actual restriction goes, no it is not physical. But as NAV has pointed out it means that a corporation has to grind 36 million ISK (This is a hell of a lot for some people) only to be wiped out by people far more experienced. This creates an atmosphere where only the elite can play
Apologies for the attack, I've had too many encounters with EVE players who view as COD-monkeys, I'm sure you don't, however.
I whole heartedly sympathize with CCP if that really is their dream, and I have not once suggested that they compromise it. I support PC, I think it needs to be fixed as it's a great concept. I never debated that they should strive from their dream, as that is what makes this game so rich. However, that being said, their dream is only accomplish-able if they have an audience, if they have players. I'm sure it's also their dream to have a large, adoring and growing fanbase. Perhaps it's also their dream to make a lot of money. One way or another, they can't achieve any of those dreams without appeasing the players and to at least some degree offering us what they want.
In fact they could create whatever EVE-lore behind corporation battles they want, have them as 'contracts' like they did before. We could still have EVE-OBs and all the cool stuff, just without all the crap-factory broken mechanics that reside in Molden Heath.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Ankbar Latrommi
S.e.V.e.N. General Tso's Alliance
48
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 18:00:00 -
[37] - Quote
NAV HIV wrote:Eve Integration and all those Promo videos are what attacked most of the shooters here. Most of the shooter who have been here for a while love idea of Teamwork, Risk Vs Reward... I love it... But they can't expect the shooters to stick around for an indefinite period of time while they don't fix even the most basic things... ie: lag, framerate, DC in general.... {...} Once again Dust is a shooter first, so they fix the very basics of a shooter first...
I can't really comment on most of those things. My preferred playstyle of FPSs is the campaign, so I'm not one to judge whether TTK is too low or too high. I really don't know much of anything about aim assist. Etc. FPSs make less than 10% of my game purchases. Clearly, they need to have all the basic bugs and elements of an FPS worked out. I can clearly see why some folks still consider Eve DUST to be in beta, despite it's official stance.
My involvement in this thread is really to get an understanding of what place corp battles have in the game design, and what's the driving force behind the request.
Reiner Knizia-"When playing a game, the goal is to win, but it is the goal that is important, not the winning."
Eve> FPS
|
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
940
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 18:04:00 -
[38] - Quote
Well The designers have a one of a kind, wonderful Goal... Trust me, we are still here spending AUR and playing this because We are still hoping this game to deliver what was promised... Eve integration an all is fine, but i'm not a EvE player... I don't have the time to play EvE honestly along with Dust... Or else i would've... But there are few things that irritates me though...
- Making an Alliance... Why is it only limited to EvE players ?! Us Dust players who don't have an EvE account should be allowed to make an alliance too and invite EvE corps to join us... Not just one sided business...
- Comms... EvE comms are much more efficient than Dust. Even till this day i have to log in to my Alt to get my Comms to Work... ( i have over 1.5 mil SP on my alt by doing this)
- Don't rely on EvE shooters all the time for weapon and gameplay balancing... It's like asking a PC player to Balance the DS3 controller or asking Dust players tr y and balance/fix issues in EvE... (btw even with 100% on Both X and Y, the movement and controls are too slow for my taste personally)
- Player Market : Well it's lolMarket
- Not enough rewards for the risk taken. I make the same amount of ISK if not more with standard gear, than i do with Proto... Just an example: Goin 14-9 against full proto team... My pay out was 162k isk ?! WHAT ?!
they say dust is a F2P Multiplayer Shooter... Not just Dust-EvE integration... So it would be nice if they would focus on fixing the core gameplay too... make it enjoyable atleast... I would rather have Lag Free militia Battle than Laggy Proto weapon battles |
Ankbar Latrommi
S.e.V.e.N. General Tso's Alliance
48
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 18:05:00 -
[39] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:As far as the actual restriction goes, no it is not physical. But as NAV has pointed out it means that a corporation has to grind 36 million ISK. {...} I whole heartedly sympathize with CCP if that really is their dream, and I have not once suggested that they compromise it. I support PC, I think it needs to be fixed as it's a great concept. I never debated that they should strive from their dream, as that is what makes this game so rich. However, that being said, their dream is only accomplish-able if they have an audience, if they have players. I'm sure it's also their dream to have a large, adoring and growing fanbase. Perhaps it's also their dream to make a lot of money. One way or another, they can't achieve any of those dreams without appeasing the players and to at least some degree offering us what we want.
Ah, I get the PC restriction now. I think this might be better balanced as they work on Eve-O integration, as quite frankly if an alliance wants mercs to protect their planets....well we're called "mercenaries" for a reason...
I see what you're saying in that latter paragraph. I think this is one of the places that CCP has bungled things from day 1 of Eve-O. Their "this will make people happy" priorities feel like they're coming from an 8-ball. Completely out of touch a lot of the time. And what they decided to prioritize in regards to PC and corp battles sounds like one of those times again.
Reiner Knizia-"When playing a game, the goal is to win, but it is the goal that is important, not the winning."
Eve> FPS
|
Roy Ventus
Foxhound Corporation General Tso's Alliance
1000
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 18:07:00 -
[40] - Quote
Just give us a stripped down version of the Battle Arena that CCP has talked about in the past. What? What would be the issues behind that? Simply:
Set aside a planet outside MH(or use one of the untouched ones in MH) and give some lore about a businessman looking to get rich off of corporations who are looking to compete in a controlled atmosphere, aka an arena. Make sure that there's a cost to each arena battle with a confirmation between both groups on their upcoming battles.
Would make doing player-made tournies easier along with Thunderdomes.
"There once was a time when there wasn't a Roy Ventus and it wasn't much of a time at all."
|
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1113
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 18:07:00 -
[41] - Quote
Well, almost all districs in PC are now locked. CCP better give us corp battles.
Prepare for 1.8: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPhISgw3I2w
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
632
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 18:11:00 -
[42] - Quote
Spectral Clone wrote:Well, almost all districs in PC are now locked. CCP better give us corp battles.
Hey that's an idea to get CCP to listen, compulse everyone to lock their districts in protest
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
942
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 18:25:00 -
[43] - Quote
Ankbar Latrommi wrote:NAV HIV wrote:Eve Integration and all those Promo videos are what attacked most of the shooters here. Most of the shooter who have been here for a while love idea of Teamwork, Risk Vs Reward... I love it... But they can't expect the shooters to stick around for an indefinite period of time while they don't fix even the most basic things... ie: lag, framerate, DC in general.... {...} Once again Dust is a shooter first, so they fix the very basics of a shooter first... I can't really comment on most of those things. My preferred playstyle of FPSs is the campaign, so I'm not one to judge whether TTK is too low or too high. I really don't know much of anything about aim assist. Etc. FPSs make less than 10% of my game purchases. Clearly, they need to have all the basic bugs and elements of an FPS worked out. I can clearly see why some folks still consider Eve DUST to be in beta, despite it's official stance. My involvement in this thread is really to get an understanding of what place corp battles have in the game design, and what's the driving force behind the request.
Corp Battle allows New Corps and Players to Get into the whole team based gameplay. Get a taste of What PC would feel like vs Fully organized Corps. Sometimes even take up Contracts against some of the best in the game to get some good practice in... They can Bring back Those Contracts and integrate it with FW may be ?! Use the Eve Dust link there ?! and make actual changes on the Starmap... trust me FPS players likes to see the Badge/Ribbon/Medal thingy lol... So Proper effect on Starmap and use of Eve ships and some decent return would be awesome... |
Zene Ren
Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising
40
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 18:26:00 -
[44] - Quote
+1 for corp battles +1 for ISK free no reward corp battles with the only reward being the corp standings and +1 for Eve/Dust deeper integration
Balance is the key to achieve knowledge and understanding
|
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
942
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 18:33:00 -
[45] - Quote
Zene Ren wrote:+1 for corp battles +1 for ISK free no reward corp battles with the only reward being the corp standings and +1 for Eve/Dust deeper integration
To simplify everything said... Yes to that ^ |
Varjac Theobroma Montenegro
Omega Elite Mercs INC.
97
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 18:33:00 -
[46] - Quote
Zene Ren wrote:+1 for corp battles +1 for ISK free no reward corp battles with the only reward being the corp standings and +1 for Eve/Dust deeper integration
Let me get his straight, no isk loss from suit loss in CBs? If so, what would stop cheese tactics...
FAME
|
Zene Ren
Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising
41
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 18:36:00 -
[47] - Quote
Varjac Theobroma Montenegro wrote:Zene Ren wrote:+1 for corp battles +1 for ISK free no reward corp battles with the only reward being the corp standings and +1 for Eve/Dust deeper integration Let me get his straight, no isk loss from suit loss in CBs? If so, what would stop cheese tactics... never said anything about not losing ISK when you die... there are still pubs and FW to earn some gear but the corp battles would be only for standings aka rated matches in other games
Balance is the key to achieve knowledge and understanding
|
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
945
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 18:42:00 -
[48] - Quote
Zene Ren wrote:Varjac Theobroma Montenegro wrote:Zene Ren wrote:+1 for corp battles +1 for ISK free no reward corp battles with the only reward being the corp standings and +1 for Eve/Dust deeper integration Let me get his straight, no isk loss from suit loss in CBs? If so, what would stop cheese tactics... never said anything about not losing ISK when you die... there are still pubs and FW to earn some gear but the corp battles would be only for standings aka rated matches in other games
Hell make it a Harcore Version... No minimap, no scanners... Definitely No AIM ASSIST |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
632
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 18:44:00 -
[49] - Quote
NAV HIV wrote:Zene Ren wrote:Varjac Theobroma Montenegro wrote:Zene Ren wrote:+1 for corp battles +1 for ISK free no reward corp battles with the only reward being the corp standings and +1 for Eve/Dust deeper integration Let me get his straight, no isk loss from suit loss in CBs? If so, what would stop cheese tactics... never said anything about not losing ISK when you die... there are still pubs and FW to earn some gear but the corp battles would be only for standings aka rated matches in other games Hell make it a Harcore Version... No minimap, no scanners... Definitely No AIM ASSIST
Now we're talking!
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Varjac Theobroma Montenegro
Omega Elite Mercs INC.
98
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 18:45:00 -
[50] - Quote
NAV HIV wrote:Zene Ren wrote:Varjac Theobroma Montenegro wrote:Zene Ren wrote:+1 for corp battles +1 for ISK free no reward corp battles with the only reward being the corp standings and +1 for Eve/Dust deeper integration Let me get his straight, no isk loss from suit loss in CBs? If so, what would stop cheese tactics... never said anything about not losing ISK when you die... there are still pubs and FW to earn some gear but the corp battles would be only for standings aka rated matches in other games Hell make it a Harcore Version... No minimap, no scanners... Definitely No AIM ASSIST
No scanners? That's kinda what this game is about. But, you could get ride of the mini map and scans then show up as bright red carrots on your screen still. No AA is fine too.
FAME
|
|
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
945
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 18:46:00 -
[51] - Quote
Varjac Theobroma Montenegro wrote:NAV HIV wrote:Zene Ren wrote:Varjac Theobroma Montenegro wrote:Zene Ren wrote:+1 for corp battles +1 for ISK free no reward corp battles with the only reward being the corp standings and +1 for Eve/Dust deeper integration Let me get his straight, no isk loss from suit loss in CBs? If so, what would stop cheese tactics... never said anything about not losing ISK when you die... there are still pubs and FW to earn some gear but the corp battles would be only for standings aka rated matches in other games Hell make it a Harcore Version... No minimap, no scanners... Definitely No AIM ASSIST No scanners? That's kinda what this game is about. But, you could get rid of the mini map and scans then show up as bright red carrots on your screen still. No AA is fine too.
I'd love to fight most of the 1337 shooters without AA... Would be a good practice for me... |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
632
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 18:49:00 -
[52] - Quote
Quote:Hell make it a Harcore Version... No minimap, no scanners... Definitely No AIM ASSIST[
No scanners? That's kinda what this game is about. But, you could get rid of the mini map and scans then show up as bright red carrots on your screen still. No AA is fine too.
I'd love to fight most of the 1337 shooters without AA... Would be a good practice for me...[/quote]
Same here. That would be awesome.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
945
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 18:54:00 -
[53] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:Quote:Hell make it a Harcore Version... No minimap, no scanners... Definitely No AIM ASSIST[
No scanners? That's kinda what this game is about. But, you could get rid of the mini map and scans then show up as bright red carrots on your screen still. No AA is fine too. I'd love to fight most of the 1337 shooters without AA... Would be a good practice for me...
Same here. That would be awesome.[/quote]
I hope they make the DS3 controls and movement a bit quicker than what it is now... I usually feel like i'm a fat man trying to run and shoot very slowly... |
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
945
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 19:06:00 -
[54] - Quote
Well they are saying PC is Dead... Must be sign !!! |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
636
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 19:10:00 -
[55] - Quote
The time is now!
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Sparky1510
Lunatic Response Unit
2
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 19:21:00 -
[56] - Quote
Signed.
I wasn't around for Corp battles, but this sounds like something I would like to see. I lead a small corp with some new players who don't yet understand this game. This sounds like a great way to get them trained. PC is not an option for us and won't be for a long while. Will be spreading this petition to the rest of my guys. |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
638
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 19:22:00 -
[57] - Quote
Sparky1510 wrote:Signed.
I wasn't around for Corp battles, but this sounds like something I would like to see. I lead a small corp with some new players who don't yet understand this game. This sounds like a great way to get them trained. PC is not an option for us and won't be for a long while. Will be spreading this petition to the rest of my guys.
THIS MAN, CCP. THIS MAN IS EXACTLY WHO I AM TALKING ABOUT. This is who needs Corp battles!
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Varjac Theobroma Montenegro
Omega Elite Mercs INC.
100
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 19:27:00 -
[58] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:Sparky1510 wrote:Signed.
I wasn't around for Corp battles, but this sounds like something I would like to see. I lead a small corp with some new players who don't yet understand this game. This sounds like a great way to get them trained. PC is not an option for us and won't be for a long while. Will be spreading this petition to the rest of my guys. THIS MAN, CCP. THIS MAN IS EXACTLY WHO I AM TALKING ABOUT. This is who needs Corp battles!
Agreed +1
I would enjoy this more than random pubs all the time. The inconsistencies are the biggest issue with pubs.
FAME
|
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
949
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 19:30:00 -
[59] - Quote
Varjac Theobroma Montenegro wrote:843-BANE wrote:Sparky1510 wrote:Signed.
I wasn't around for Corp battles, but this sounds like something I would like to see. I lead a small corp with some new players who don't yet understand this game. This sounds like a great way to get them trained. PC is not an option for us and won't be for a long while. Will be spreading this petition to the rest of my guys. THIS MAN, CCP. THIS MAN IS EXACTLY WHO I AM TALKING ABOUT. This is who needs Corp battles! Agreed +1 I would enjoy this more than random pubs all the time. The inconsistencies are the biggest issue with pubs.
Agreed + 1... Let us help build a competitive group of mercs... Not just pub stomping crews. |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
640
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 19:31:00 -
[60] - Quote
NAV HIV wrote:Varjac Theobroma Montenegro wrote:843-BANE wrote:Sparky1510 wrote:Signed.
I wasn't around for Corp battles, but this sounds like something I would like to see. I lead a small corp with some new players who don't yet understand this game. This sounds like a great way to get them trained. PC is not an option for us and won't be for a long while. Will be spreading this petition to the rest of my guys. THIS MAN, CCP. THIS MAN IS EXACTLY WHO I AM TALKING ABOUT. This is who needs Corp battles! Agreed +1 I would enjoy this more than random pubs all the time. The inconsistencies are the biggest issue with pubs. Agreed + 1... Let us help build a competitive group of mercs... Not just pub stomping crews.
Hell yeah.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |