DUST Search - If tankers insist that it should take 2+ ppl to kill them....

All Channels

General Discussions

If tankers insist that it should take 2+ ppl to kill them....

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
OverIord Ulath Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation 8	Posted - 2014.01.26 01:10:00 - [1] - Quote Then shouldn't they require the same number of people to run their tanks? I mean... If you are taking 3 people's attention away from focusing on winning the match just to deal with you, shouldn't you require the same number of people to distract them?
buzzzzzzz killllllllll TRA1LBLAZERS 68	Posted - 2014.01.26 01:12:00 - [2] - Quote ccp should make it so the driver can only use the front turret, and a gunner can use the large turret
Mdog 24158 Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation 103	Posted - 2014.01.26 01:13:00 - [3] - Quote OverIord Ulath wrote: Then shouldn't they require the same number of people to run their tanks? I mean... If you are taking 3 people's attention away from focusing on winning the match just to deal with you, shouldn't you require the same number of people to distract them? Yes it should because if you call in 6 tanks plus however many infantry people to fight against 12 to 16 av people its just not possible OMFG LEAKED PATCH NOTES EVERYONE TYPE RAGE POSTS
DeadlyAztec11 Ostrakon Agency Gallente Federation 3564	Posted - 2014.01.26 01:16:00 - [4] - Quote buzzzzzzz killllllllll wrote: ccp should make it so the driver can only use the front turret, and a gunner can use the large turret Boom. Tanker Logic. My alts: General John Ripper, Draxus Prime, MoonEagle A, Anarchide, Long Evity And this is why I am the #1 forum warrior
OverIord Ulath Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation 9	Posted - 2014.01.26 01:21:00 - [5] - Quote DeadlyAztec11 wrote: buzzzzzzz killllllllll wrote: ccp should make it so the driver can only use the front turret, and a gunner can use the large turret Boom. Tanker Logic. Wait a minute.... I know another alt of Long Evity..... and he's.... WAIT A MINUTE..... .......no.... it couldn't be... WAIT A MINUTE.... Are you.... a fan of anime.....?
Azura Sakura Altyr Initiative 569	Posted - 2014.01.26 01:23:00 - [6] - Quote buzzzzzzz killllllllll wrote: ccp should make it so the driver can only use the front turret, and a gunner can use the large turret OMG! This will honestly make so many tankers mad but makes so much sense lol. I honestly never thought of that since it is a video game and all but I don't know if there is even a video game on the market that does that.
DeadlyAztec11 Ostrakon Agency Gallente Federation 3566	Posted - 2014.01.26 01:23:00 - [7] - Quote OverIord Ulath wrote: DeadlyAztec11 wrote: buzzzzzzz killllllllll wrote: ccp should make it so the driver can only use the front turret, and a gunner can use the large turret Boom. Tanker Logic. Wait a minute.... I know another alt of Long Evity..... and he's.... WAIT A MINUTE..... .......no.... it couldn't be... WAIT A MINUTE.... Are you.... a fan of anime.....? I love me some Bleach, Naruto and FullMetal Alchemist My alts: General John Ripper, Draxus Prime, MoonEagle A, Anarchide, Long Evity And this is why I am the #1 forum warrior
Squagga The State Protectorate 58	Posted - 2014.01.26 01:32:00 - [8] - Quote I firmly believe that the most important and fairest way to solve this problem is to keep everything the way it is, but to make it more difficult to obtain these tanks. They should cost more, both in SP and in ISK. Maybe even the militia ones can be cheap. So that new people can get into them. But they arent nearly as strong. I was talking with some buddies last night they suggested that there should be a limit on how many vehiceles YOU can call in. If you lose a tank then you gotta wait for about four or five mins before you can call in another one. Which would cause you to have to be skilled in both infantry and vehicles. I do agree that just one person shouldn't be able to take out a tank. But then again it shouldn't be so easy for just one person to get a tank Reloading, the silent killer.
MrShooter01 Storm Wind Strikeforce Caldari State 466	Posted - 2014.01.26 01:33:00 - [9] - Quote Azura Sakura wrote: buzzzzzzz killllllllll wrote: ccp should make it so the driver can only use the front turret, and a gunner can use the large turret OMG! This will honestly make so many tankers mad but makes so much sense lol. I honestly never thought of that since it is a video game and all but I don't know if there is even a video game on the market that does that. The original Planetside was like this. There was a weak, fast tank called the lightning that could be operated solo, but the main battle tanks required a separate gunner and driver. Only one of those tanks even gave the driver control of a weak rapid fire weapon. If you wanted to roll around crushing people in a tank you either had to pick the small, fast one that would die when AV sneezed at it or you had to get a buddy to gun for your MBT (or hope a random in the gunner seat could shoot worth a damn).
Aizen Intiki OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 752	Posted - 2014.01.26 01:35:00 - [10] - Quote Squagga wrote: I firmly believe that the most important and fairest way to solve this problem is to keep everything the way it is, but to make it more difficult to obtain these tanks. They should cost more, both in SP and in ISK. Maybe even the militia ones can be cheap. So that new people can get into them. But they arent nearly as strong. I was talking with some buddies last night they suggested that there should be a limit on how many vehiceles YOU can call in. If you lose a tank then you gotta wait for about four or five mins before you can call in another one. Which would cause you to have to be skilled in both infantry and vehicles. I do agree that just one person shouldn't be able to take out a tank. But then again it shouldn't be so easy for just one person to get a tank This, minus that last suguestion "Hello, world!" lol, sounds like something a whore lover would say Alt of the great Godin I like chocolate ^___^

Aizen Intiki OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 752	Posted - 2014.01.26 01:37:00 - [11] - Quote We plug ourselves into the HAV, so we can control many of the functions at the same time. Degraging ourselves to mortal ways of life is silly. no. "Hello, world!" lol, sounds like something a whore lover would say Alt of the great Godin I like chocolate ^___^
DeadlyAztec11 Ostrakon Agency Gallente Federation 3570	Posted - 2014.01.26 01:40:00 - [12] - Quote Aizen Intiki wrote: We plug ourselves into the HAV, so we can control many of the functions at the same time. Degraging ourselves to mortal ways of life is silly. no. You know what's also silly? Needing Proto AV to destroy Militia HAV's. My alts: General John Ripper, Draxus Prime, MoonEagle A, Anarchide, Long Evity And this is why I am the #1 forum warrior
Aizen Intiki OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 752	Posted - 2014.01.26 01:41:00 - [13] - Quote DeadlyAztec11 wrote: Aizen Intiki wrote: We plug ourselves into the HAV, so we can control many of the functions at the same time. Degraging ourselves to mortal ways of life is silly. no. You know what's also silly? Needing Proto AV to destroy Militia HAV's. Do we have to do this again? "Hello, world!" lol, sounds like something a whore lover would say Alt of the great Godin I like chocolate ^___^
Ghosts Chance Inf4m0us 903	Posted - 2014.01.26 01:45:00 - [14] - Quote so more then a year now and people still ask this question? use the search function.
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 3926	Posted - 2014.01.26 01:46:00 - [15] - Quote Aizen Intiki wrote: We plug ourselves into the HAV, so we can control many of the functions at the same time. Degraging ourselves to mortal ways of life is silly. no. There are only two functions to control Next On To-Do List: Particle Cannons
OverIord Ulath Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation 15	Posted - 2014.01.26 01:47:00 - [16] - Quote Aizen Intiki wrote: We plug ourselves into the HAV, so we can control many of the functions at the same time. Degraging ourselves to mortal ways of life is silly. no. Pointless blanket excuse that means nothing. Actual, logical, gameplay balance response requested.
OverIord Ulath Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation 19	Posted - 2014.01.26 01:49:00 - [17] - Quote Ghosts Chance wrote: so more then a year now and people still ask this question? use the search function. More than a year now, and tankers still think it should take half a squad to kill them playing solo. Also, the search function doesn't yield any real argument that negates this statement. If you believe otherwise, link please.
Ghosts Chance Inf4m0us 903	Posted - 2014.01.26 01:49:00 - [18] - Quote OverIord Ulath wrote: Aizen Intiki wrote: We plug ourselves into the HAV, so we can control many of the functions at the same time. Degraging ourselves to mortal ways of life is silly. no. Pointless blanket excuse that means nothing. Actual, logical, gameplay balance response requested. actual responces have been givin 100 times over in the thousands of other threads started with the same title as yours, use the search function
OverIord Ulath Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation 19	Posted - 2014.01.26 01:52:00 - [19] - Quote Ghosts Chance wrote: OverIord Ulath wrote: Aizen Intiki wrote: We plug ourselves into the HAV, so we can control many of the functions at the same time. Degraging ourselves to mortal ways of life is silly. no. Pointless blanket excuse that means nothing. Actual, logical, gameplay balance response requested. actual responces have been givin 100 times over in the thousands of other threads started with the same title as yours, use the search function OverIord Ulath wrote: ..... Also, the search function doesn't yield any real argument that negates this statement. If you believe otherwise, link please. Shouldn't be hard for you to link then then, eh?
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 3926	Posted - 2014.01.26 01:52:00 - [20] - Quote Ghosts Chance wrote: OverIord Ulath wrote: Aizen Intiki wrote: We plug ourselves into the HAV, so we can control many of the functions at the same time. Degraging ourselves to mortal ways of life is silly. no. Pointless blanket excuse that means nothing. Actual, logical, gameplay balance response requested. actual responces have been givin 100 times over in the thousands of other threads started with the same title as yours, use the search function Funny how you say this because you can't even type the title in the search bar without hitting the max character limit. Is there any other irrelevant and generally false statements that you'd like to make? Next On To-Do List: Particle Cannons

Ludvig Enraga KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 848	Posted - 2014.01.26 01:58:00 - [21] - Quote Squagga wrote: I firmly believe that the most important and fairest way to solve this problem is to keep everything the way it is, but to make it more difficult to obtain these tanks. They should cost more, both in SP and in ISK. Maybe even the militia ones can be cheap. So that new people can get into them. But they arent nearly as strong. I was talking with some buddies last night they suggested that there should be a limit on how many vehiceles YOU can call in. If you lose a tank then you gotta wait for about four or five mins before you can call in another one. Which would cause you to have to be skilled in both infantry and vehicles. I do agree that just one person shouldn't be able to take out a tank. But then again it shouldn't be so easy for just one person to get a tank BS. We have already too many ppl that stack OP stuff on one team to be able to tilt the odds of winning rewards in their favor so that they can afford to run OP stuff ad perpetuum. This is a problem that feeds into itself. If you wanna run a proto suit, you better squad up with other proto ppl to minimize risk of loss. With risk of loss minmized... well why not run proto all day? The good solution to the tank problems is to truly have windows of opportunity and vulnerability - right now it's too one sided: modes off for regular OP mode, hardeners on for the god mode. I think that tanks have to be slow - so that once your hardeners wear off and you are in the open with your pants down, you pay for it. Oh, sht! I just learned you can make a signature! Thanks, CCP! Forums are getting better!
Azura Sakura Altyr Initiative 572	Posted - 2014.01.26 02:03:00 - [22] - Quote MrShooter01 wrote: Azura Sakura wrote: buzzzzzzz killllllllll wrote: ccp should make it so the driver can only use the front turret, and a gunner can use the large turret OMG! This will honestly make so many tankers mad but makes so much sense lol. I honestly never thought of that since it is a video game and all but I don't know if there is even a video game on the market that does that. The original Planetside was like this. There was a weak, fast tank called the lightning that could be operated solo, but the main battle tanks required a separate gunner and driver. Only one of those tanks even gave the driver control of a weak rapid fire weapon. If you wanted to roll around crushing people in a tank you either had to pick the small, fast one that would die when AV sneezed at it or you had to get a buddy to gun for your MBT (or hope a random in the gunner seat could shoot worth a damn). Thanks for the info. Do PS2 tanks operate like that? I played only infantry in PS2 xD
Scheneighnay McBob Learning Coalition College 3716	Posted - 2014.01.26 02:07:00 - [23] - Quote DeadlyAztec11 wrote: OverIord Ulath wrote: DeadlyAztec11 wrote: buzzzzzzz killllllllll wrote: ccp should make it so the driver can only use the front turret, and a gunner can use the large turret Boom. Tanker Logic. Wait a minute.... I know another alt of Long Evity..... and he's.... WAIT A MINUTE..... .......no.... it couldn't be... WAIT A MINUTE.... Are you.... a fan of anime.....? I love me some Bleach, Naruto and FullMetal Alchemist You need to watch some Mirai Nikki, Elfenlied, or Tasogare Otome x Amnesia (I know that one doesn't fit with the super-morbid theme of the other 2). None of that **** that gets on american tv. I am your scan error.
OverIord Ulath Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation 27	Posted - 2014.01.26 02:09:00 - [24] - Quote Scheneighnay McBob wrote: DeadlyAztec11 wrote: OverIord Ulath wrote: DeadlyAztec11 wrote: buzzzzzzz killllllllll wrote: ccp should make it so the driver can only use the front turret, and a gunner can use the large turret Boom. Tanker Logic. Wait a minute.... I know another alt of Long Evity..... and he's.... WAIT A MINUTE..... .......no.... it couldn't be... WAIT A MINUTE.... Are you.... a fan of anime.....? I love me some Bleach, Naruto and FullMetal Alchemist You need to watch some Mirai Nikki, Elfenlied, or Tasogare Otome x Amnesia (I know that one doesn't fit with the super-morbid theme of the other 2). None of that **** that gets on american tv. Gintama ftw
Joel II X Dah Gods O Bacon 669	Posted - 2014.01.26 02:12:00 - [25] - Quote Aizen Intiki wrote: DeadlyAztec11 wrote: Aizen Intiki wrote: We plug ourselves into the HAV, so we can control many of the functions at the same time. Degraging ourselves to mortal ways of life is silly. no. You know what's also silly? Needing Proto AV to destroy Militia HAV's. Do we have to do this again? Not if you don't back away. Tanks are broken. Everyone knows this.
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 3928	Posted - 2014.01.26 02:14:00 - [26] - Quote Scheneighnay McBob wrote: You need to watch some Mirai Nikki, Elfenlied, or Tasogare Otome x Amnesia (I know that one doesn't fit with the super-morbid theme of the other 2). None of that **** that gets on american tv. None of the good $#!t ever gets on American TV Next On To-Do List: Particle Cannons
Tech Ohm Eaven L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 1131	Posted - 2014.01.26 02:14:00 - [27] - Quote Tired of broken tanks. Anime?? Robot Carnival Neo Tokyo Lensman Vampire Hunter D Vexille Apple Seed Abandon Ship!, Abandon Ship!! Jumps into escape pod! Selected destination Planet PS4.
DeadlyAztec11 Ostrakon Agency Gallente Federation 3575	Posted - 2014.01.26 02:15:00 - [28] - Quote Scheneighnay McBob wrote: You need to watch some Mirai Nikki, Elfenlied, or Tasogare Otome x Amnesia (I know that one doesn't fit with the super-morbid theme of the other 2). None of that **** that gets on american tv. I only know Spanish, English and French. I do not know Japanese. On that note, I detest subtitles. My alts: General John Ripper, Draxus Prime, MoonEagle A, Anarchide, Long Evity And this is why I am the #1 forum warrior
Joel II X Dah Gods O Bacon 669	Posted - 2014.01.26 02:15:00 - [29] - Quote Scheneighnay McBob wrote: DeadlyAztec11 wrote: OverIord Ulath wrote: DeadlyAztec11 wrote: buzzzzzzz killllllllll wrote: ccp should make it so the driver can only use the front turret, and a gunner can use the large turret Boom. Tanker Logic. Wait a minute.... I know another alt of Long Evity..... and he's.... WAIT A MINUTE..... .......no.... it couldn't be... WAIT A MINUTE.... Are you.... a fan of anime.....? I love me some Bleach, Naruto and FullMetal Alchemist You need to watch some Mirai Nikki, Elfenlied, or Tasogare Otome x Amnesia (I know that one doesn't fit with the super-morbid theme of the other 2). None of that **** that gets on american tv. Gintama ftw[/quote] I'm pretty sure Future Diary and Elfen Lied made it to Adult Swim. Anyways, I enjoyed Death Note, and some comedies. I would tell everyone here my tastes in anime, but this isn't the thread for that.
OverIord Ulath Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation 27	Posted - 2014.01.26 02:16:00 - [30] - Quote /back on topic Still waiting on that link to a proper counter argument Ghosty. Aaaaaaany day now.



Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.