this one has a point.

I never once said the price cut was the problem. Proto AV being needed to take down Militia tanks is the problem. Anything above that is a fools errand without RE spam. I also believe those complaining about the price decrease wasn't counting on their AV getting nerfed without its price going down as well.

But since you have brought it up, Tanks have turned from an expensive DPS multiplier to flat-out outclassing Infantry in gameplay AND ISK sustainability. The main(and pretty much only) reason there is to not to use tanks right now is kamikaze jeeps, since it nets them a slight ISK gain while awarding them 150+ SP.

Dropping 7 RE's on the tank will kill any tank. Trust me :) You can even die before you set them off. Although it is outrageous that this is what it takes now unless you have a tank

The cost is not the problem, the problem is the balance.

2/3 guy needed to take down 1 guys with a Tank is not good.

its a ******* vehicle dumbass, in the future too... infantry cannot be god, you cannot expect to be superscrub every time you feel like it

How do you get 7 REs on 1 tank? Either you got some friends or a hell of a lot of time to just there. And you MUST run a logi suit with 3 sets of REs or 1 or 2 sets with Nanohive.

It's actually cool when tanks don't notice my scout and I get REs planted. If I could carry just ONE more.

its a ******* vehicle dumbass, in the future too... infantry cannot be god, you cannot expect to be superscrub every time you feel like it

Lvl 1 re and Lvl 3 re. The easiest way to do it is to put them on the front of a BPO jeep actually...

Tanks should take 2-3 people to kill, yes. The issue is, with the amount of tanks that deploy each side (just saw 6 a few minutes ago) unless the entire team dedicates to AV, they will lose. I proposed making a limit to the amount of HAVs per side. Like only one per side, maybe two tops. Tanks get to keep our ridiculously awesome tanks, and AV doesn't have a tanker swarm to deal with.

It's manned by one person, so it should be kill-able by one person. Stop being a douche. If a HAV comes across a standard infantryman, he should kill it. If an AV comes across a HAV, he should kill it. If a Infantry comes across an AV, he should kill it. It is a simple concept.

It's manned by one person, so it should be kill-able by one person. Stop being a douche. If a HAV comes across a standard infantryman, he should kill it. If an AV comes across a HAV, he should kill it. If a Infantry comes across an AV, he should kill it. It is a simple concept.

Infantry also:

Are not immune to small arms.
Only have one weapon able to feasibly combat one another.
Not able to speed across the map at LAV speeds.
Do not have enough health to take multiple FG shots.
Do not have modules that decrease damage taken.
Do not have the ability to one-shot across the map (and no, you cannot say FGs do this since one shotting has only ever happened to weak vehicles and infantry).

(Corrected grammar.)

I never once said the price cut was the problem. Proto AV being needed to take down Militia tanks is the problem. Anything above that is a fools errand without RE spam. I also believe those complaining about the price decrease wasn't counting on their AV getting nerfed without its price going down as well.

But since you have brought it up, Tanks have turned from an expensive DPS multiplier to flat-out outclassing Infantry in gameplay AND ISK sustainability. The main(and pretty much only) reason there is to not to use tanks right now is kamikaze jeeps, since it nets them a slight ISK gain while awarding them 150+ SP.

It takes 1 guy to kill a tank, want proof? Here you go...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3xsMqHu56g

What do you think the price difference is between the weapon and the tank?

The M136 AT4 is the Army's primary light anti-tank weapon Unit Replacement Cost: US $1,480.64
M1A2 Abrams with prototype TUSK equipment US $6.21 million

CUT.

I would like to see an escalation value in the game.

Maximum of x tanks.

You can only field 2 more HAVs then your opponent has fielded at one time in the game.

So one side could field none the entire game and the other side is limited to two.
If one side fields a tank the other could field three, of course at that point the first could now field a maximum of five.

Both sides have the same maximum which is two more then the others side.

This should naturally limit smaller 6 vs 6 games and also give a tactical gameplay where one team may decide to forgo all tanks to limit the other teams impact.

It would mean that their should be a more balanced number on the field. And there are always consequences for escalating the conflict as your opponent gets to open up their stable of tanks too.

Try a Side Arm in PC, let's see your score. Then you can come out and Say such thing.
I was a Ground forger till Beta, I know what am i saying.

As long as Tank are moved by ONE people, ONE people must could take him down.
Not only they nerf the dmg of the Forge, They also nerd the charge timer, so now it tools more time to shoot a tank.

Unite this thing to a Close time window of Module deactiv and ABSURD speed.

Shake.
And then you have your recipe to imbalance