its a ******* vehicle dumbass, in the future too... infantry cannot be god, you cannot expect to be superscrub every time you feel like it

Tanks should take 2-3 people to kill, yes. The issue is, with the amount of tanks that deploy each side (just saw 6 a few minutes ago) unless the entire team dedicates to AV, they will lose. I proposed making a limit to the amount of HAVs per side. Like only one per side, maybe two tops. Tanks get to keep our ridiculously awesome tanks, and AV doesn't have a tanker swarm to deal with.

It's manned by one person, so it should be kill-able by one person. Stop being a douche. If a HAV comes across a standard infantryman, he should kill it. If an AV comes across a HAV, he should kill it. If a Infantry comes across an AV, he should kill it. It is a simple concept.

It takes 1 guy to kill a tank, want proof? Here you go...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3xsMqHu56g

What do you think the price difference is between the weapon and the tank?

The M136 AT4 is the Army's primary light anti-tank weapon Unit Replacement Cost: US $1,480.64
M1A2 Abrams with prototype TUSK equipment US $6.21 million

I would like to see an escalation value in the game.

Maximum of x tanks.

You can only field 2 more HAVs then your opponent has fielded at one time in the game.

So one side could field none the entire game and the other side is limited to two.
If one side fields a tank the other could field three, of course at that point the first could now field a maximum of five.

Both sides have the same maximum which is two more then the others side.

This should naturally limit smaller 6 vs 6 games and also give a tactical gameplay where one team may decide to forgo all tanks to limit the other teams impact.

It would mean that their should be a more balanced number on the field. And there are always consequences for escalating the conflict as your opponent gets to open up their stable of tanks too.

Try a Side Arm in PC, let's see your score. Then you can come out and Say such thing.
I was a Ground forger till Beta, I know what am i saying.

As long as Tank are moved by ONE people, ONE people must could take him down.
Not only they nerf the dmg of the Forge, They also nerd the charge timer, so now it tools more time to shoot a tank.

Unite this thing to a Close time window of Module deactiv and ABSURD speed.

Shake.
And then you have your recipe to imbalance

Again, Iet's see if you understand, don't have MUCH hope in but let's give a try since you are a scrub tanker.

NO ONE is asking for AV to be sure Kill.

But tanks need some CONS. They simply don't have cons right now.

'Cause they only limit, the Cooldown time, is negated by their ABSURD speed.

That sounds fair. There is only ONE person manning the HAV, so it should only take ONE person to remove him from play. Simple arithmetic.

This couldn't be more wrong. The tanker should be able to be taken out by an equally or better skilled and armed AV infantry,
This is not the same as stating its equivalent to a drop suit. Tankers encounter zero resistance and faceroll AI based infantry, and have the capacity to kill AV and V alike.

Meanwhile AV is seriously gimped at AI, giving up all of that power to focus on a support role. That is keeping their team alive by destroying vehicles, and stopping the literal infantry wrecking ball that is a tank.

Dropping extra ISK should never give you the ability skip teamwork. That's the point of this game. If you require teamwork to be destroyed you should require team work to be operated.

tank =/= dropsuit.

By mere logic a tanks should always be more expensive than a dropsuit.

Plus i was in favor of a Tank ISK cost reduction. But not this much.Their performance does not match their cost at all.

I wasn't one of these people you speak of.
but quick question.

if it wasn't ok for them, then why is it ok for you?