Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mr m4gic
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
21
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 14:30:00 -
[1] - Quote
dust should go open world, just imagine hijacking a huge lorry load of goods or running minig ops on a planet |
Mac Dac
Wraith Shadow Guards
271
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 14:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
Mr m4gic wrote:dust should go open world, just imagine hijacking a huge lorry load of goods or running minig ops on a planet WHEEEEEEENNNNN(tm)
"We should take care not to make intellect our god; it has, of course, strong muscles, but no personality" Albert Einste
|
Aikuchi Tomaru
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1125
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 14:40:00 -
[3] - Quote
Your expectations don't hold up in reality. Dust open world? Not happening. Too many planets in Eve Online. Not even WoW during it's peak times would've had enough players to make sopmething like that fun. |
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
368
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 14:51:00 -
[4] - Quote
Unless you had ground gateways so that each "Planet" could be linked by high-powered warp systems with similar arrangement to WoW's zones..
Kind of like the gateways used by the Train systems to go from star to star in Pandora's Star.
If you can read this, it means you are reading.
Unless you are skimming
|
Mr m4gic
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
22
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 14:53:00 -
[5] - Quote
Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:Your expectations don't hold up in reality. Dust open world? Not happening. Too many planets in Eve Online. Not even WoW during it's peak times would've had enough players to make sopmething like that fun.
yh i thought it was slightly over ambitious. i was thinking eve players could have civilizations on planets tht need resources to keep them running generating income from its citizens. dust players could set up bases on planets or there could be bases on planets like stations on eve tht, store there vehicles and other resources then there would be mining sites. there could be huge trucks to move your resources across to places with space ports for transportation into space. idk but it just seems awesome in my head. i can imagine jumping in a shuttle and flying up to the space stations it would be pretty amazing. |
Mr m4gic
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
22
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 14:55:00 -
[6] - Quote
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote:Unless you had ground gateways so that each "Planet" could be linked by high-powered warp systems with similar arrangement to WoW's zones..
Kind of like the gateways used by the Train systems to go from star to star in Pandora's Star. trains would work or u could own transportation jets or something. |
lordjanuz
Norwegian Dust514 Corporation Top Men.
215
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 14:56:00 -
[7] - Quote
Mr m4gic wrote:dust should go open world, just imagine hijacking a huge lorry load of goods or running minig ops on a planet
+1 CCP have talked a lot about freedom and big maps. Lets hope it will happend soon. |
Mr m4gic
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
22
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 14:57:00 -
[8] - Quote
you could get on a shuttle at a spaceport then fly to a space station, then jump in a transportation ship in eve to get to different star systems. |
Cat Merc
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
3867
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 14:59:00 -
[9] - Quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92ljJ2Y72uQ
This applies very well to the problem.
Shield regeneration bonus for Gallente Assault is about as useful as Sharpshooter for Nova Knives.
|
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
920
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 15:12:00 -
[10] - Quote
Yes, let 10,000 players roam free on 5000+ temperate planets... That's like... Errr... 2 per planet?
If they are male and female, a mini-game can solve this Problem! |
|
Mr m4gic
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
22
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 15:25:00 -
[11] - Quote
most planets could be well protected by player owned structures, and player owned or hired AI, like drones or something with onscreen notifications to players tht there planet or territory is under attack, tht video was a little hard to follow for me but it seemed to be sayng eve should get rid of skills and focus entirely on resources and cashflow |
soulreaper73
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
531
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 15:35:00 -
[12] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:Yes, let 10,000 players roam free on 5000+ temperate planets... That's like... Errr... 2 per planet?
If they are male and female, a mini-game can solve this Problem!
or you could throw in mutated ewoks that are on crack on each planet to make it interesting.
|
Alaika Arbosa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Interstellar Murder of Crows
1130
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 15:49:00 -
[13] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:Yes, let 10,000 players roam free on 5000+ temperate planets... That's like... Errr... 2 per planet?
If they are male and female, a mini-game can solve this Problem! Yes because people would spread evenly across the available play area just like they do in Eve.....
Er, pay no attention to the clumps of activity on the maps and the vast areas of space which see little if any daily traffic
Yes the Eve players are spread evenly across all the solar systems of Eve existing in a grand state of space communism...
Praise St. Arzad and Pass the Nanohives
Karin Midular, gone, never forgotten
Executing Amarr Trash since Closed Beta
|
Doc Noah
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
880
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 15:54:00 -
[14] - Quote
Maybe one day they'll be able to link the 3 games so you start out as a DUST merc, work your way into space as an EVE Valkyrie fighter, and work your way up the chain of command to become a pilot of a starship in EVE Online. I doubt CCP would be ambitious enough to make that all in 1 game. |
Mr m4gic
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
23
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 15:56:00 -
[15] - Quote
i said civilization on planets earlier, these civilizations would be able to overthrow you if you didnt supply enough resources to keep the people alive, players could mine on mining sites having a percentage of stuff they mined on the planet taken away for profit but solely to keep the civilization happy, you would have to transport resources from planet to planet if the resources were running low or run some major mining ops on eve |
calisk galern
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
1236
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 15:56:00 -
[16] - Quote
seems simple enough in a way.
have one large planet with a story line war going on over the planet. then have numerous events/ battles going on at the planet.
you could freely attack any district on the map, and players could freely join that battle to defend it.
shortest defend timers would at the top of the list, and the higher the priority of the district the higher the payout.
this would earn loyalty points for the faction you are defending or attacking for, and you can trade those in for faction gear.
it would be the start of an open world style of game play anyway. |
Mr m4gic
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
23
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 15:57:00 -
[17] - Quote
calisk galern wrote:seems simple enough in a way.
have one large planet with a story line war going on over the planet. then have numerous events/ battles going on at the planet.
you could freely attack any district on the map, and players could freely join that battle to defend it.
shortest defend timers would at the top of the list, and the higher the priority of the district the higher the payout.
this would earn loyalty points for the faction you are defending or attacking for, and you can trade those in for faction gear.
it would be the start of an open world style of game play anyway.
i said civilization on planets earlier, these civilizations would be able to overthrow you if you didnt supply enough resources to keep the people alive, players could mine on mining sites having a percentage of stuff they mined on the planet taken away for profit but solely to keep the civilization happy, you would have to transport resources from planet to planet if the resources were running low or run some major mining ops on eve |
Jackof All-Trades
The Southern Legion The Umbra Combine
283
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 15:59:00 -
[18] - Quote
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote:Unless you had ground gateways so that each "Planet" could be linked by high-powered warp systems with similar arrangement to WoW's zones..
Kind of like the gateways used by the Train systems to go from star to star in Pandora's Star. +1 for Peter F. Hamilton reference
"Pulvis et umbra sums." We are but dust and shadow GÇò Horace, The Odes of Horace
\
Omni-Specialist
/ Focus: Gallente
|
Mr m4gic
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
23
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 16:32:00 -
[19] - Quote
Doc Noah wrote:Maybe one day they'll be able to link the 3 games so you start out as a DUST merc, work your way into space as an EVE Valkyrie fighter, and work your way up the chain of command to become a pilot of a starship in EVE Online. I doubt CCP would be ambitious enough to make that all in 1 game.
it could easily be an all in 1 game just make all the skill sets available on all the games, but i think eve are going for a player communication type thing so u can call in Valkyrie fighters whilst playing dust or eve or call in support from a ship. i think its so your always available for tht role and purpose. |
Avallo Kantor
Paladin Survey Force Amarr Empire
237
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 16:39:00 -
[20] - Quote
Doc Noah wrote:Maybe one day they'll be able to link the 3 games so you start out as a DUST merc, work your way into space as an EVE Valkyrie fighter, and work your way up the chain of command to become a pilot of a starship in EVE Online. I doubt CCP would be ambitious enough to make that all in 1 game.
Why would you want it all in one game? They are all going after different gameplay styles and target audiences.
I mean, lots of people I know who play EVE hate playing FPS games, and some of the people I am getting into DUST could never enjoy a game at EVE's pace.
They work well as they are planned, separate games that have lots of interaction planned between them. Forcing a player to go through one play style to get to another is not how you get players, nor are you going to be able to obtain players if you literally tell them that one playstyle is a lesser teir than another. |
|
Pvt Numnutz
Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State
281
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 16:47:00 -
[21] - Quote
YYYEEEAAAAAHHHH LETS WANDER AROUND THIS CRAPPY PLANET WHERE THE ONLY STRUCTURES ARE THE ONES WE WOULD BE DEFENDING IN CONTRACTS!!!!
Really though what's the point? Now if we were talking about walking around in stations with dust AND eve players then you would get a plus 1 and some real excitement. What a glorious day that would be, my eve character and my dust character shaking hands! |
Mr m4gic
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
23
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 16:56:00 -
[22] - Quote
can anybody tell me what the positives and negatives of planets are in eve, i cant find on evelopedia. ive never owned a planet or been envolved in anything planetary. |
Alaika Arbosa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Interstellar Murder of Crows
1131
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 17:12:00 -
[23] - Quote
Pvt Numnutz wrote:YYYEEEAAAAAHHHH LETS WANDER AROUND THIS CRAPPY PLANET WHERE THE ONLY STRUCTURES ARE THE ONES WE WOULD BE DEFENDING IN CONTRACTS!!!!
Really though what's the point? Now if we were talking about walking around in stations with dust AND eve players then you would get a plus 1 and some real excitement. What a glorious day that would be, my eve character and my dust character shaking hands! I would imagine that not 100% of the temperate planets are inhabited by intelligent life currently (maybe long ago but no more type of scenario). I think it would be a great opportunity for Exploration PvE/PvPvE, opportunities for wealth building that didn't involve gaming a broken faucet.
Praise St. Arzad and Pass the Nanohives
Karin Midular, gone, never forgotten
Executing Amarr Trash since Closed Beta
|
Aikuchi Tomaru
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1130
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 17:54:00 -
[24] - Quote
Mr m4gic wrote:Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:Your expectations don't hold up in reality. Dust open world? Not happening. Too many planets in Eve Online. Not even WoW during it's peak times would've had enough players to make sopmething like that fun. yh i thought it was slightly over ambitious. i was thinking eve players could have civilizations on planets tht need resources to keep them running generating income from its citizens. dust players could set up bases on planets or there could be bases on planets like stations on eve tht, store there vehicles and other resources then there would be mining sites. there could be huge trucks to move your resources across to places with space ports for transportation into space. idk but it just seems awesome in my head. i can imagine jumping in a shuttle and flying up to the space stations it would be pretty amazing.
MAYBE it could work as PvE. MAYBE. I heard something about CCP planning a normal Wave PvE mode and another which was more open world like. |
Mobius Wyvern
Guardian Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY
3849
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 18:11:00 -
[25] - Quote
Mr m4gic wrote:dust should go open world, just imagine hijacking a huge lorry load of goods or running minig ops on a planet Again, the issue is practicality. If it were that easy, don't you think it would have been done already?
Amidst the blue skies
A link from past to future
The sheltering wings of the protector
|
Mr m4gic
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
23
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 18:21:00 -
[26] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:Mr m4gic wrote:dust should go open world, just imagine hijacking a huge lorry load of goods or running minig ops on a planet Again, the issue is practicality. If it were that easy, don't you think it would have been done already?
thing is i think they are planning it they just havnnt done it yet because they are still balancing everything. I have heard they are planning on trade in dust and tht we will be able to send isk from eve into our dust games and they are defo gonna open up the stations at some point so dust and eve players can interact directly. I amm looking into sovereignty and planetary interaction atm need to gather some more info, do you know if players can own structures and gather resources on a system where they don't have the sovereignty? |
calisk galern
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
1245
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 18:21:00 -
[27] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:Mr m4gic wrote:dust should go open world, just imagine hijacking a huge lorry load of goods or running minig ops on a planet Again, the issue is practicality. If it were that easy, don't you think it would have been done already?
it's easy to do a lot of things, but if it's not part of the development plan it won't happen.
|
lordjanuz
Norwegian Dust514 Corporation Top Men.
216
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 18:40:00 -
[28] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:Mr m4gic wrote:dust should go open world, just imagine hijacking a huge lorry load of goods or running minig ops on a planet Again, the issue is practicality. If it were that easy, don't you think it would have been done already?
The plan has been there for many years they have told us, so one would expect them to have worked on it for a wile. Thats what plans are fore , right,
|
Mr m4gic
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
24
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 18:41:00 -
[29] - Quote
well if multiple players can stil own resource infrastructure on a planet, in a system where sovereignty isn't theres then yes it is possible. i find it all confusing its a lot of info to process im guessing dust would be fighting for those infrastructures for the resource gain, then i guess they pay the sovereignty owner some sort of tax and maybe extras for protection or something now like somebody said earlier the land inbetween would be free so it would be totally possible to go kill things and gather resources from the rocks just like in eve now all we need is somewhere we can store our vehicles as players can already build spaceports. |
Mr m4gic
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
24
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 18:52:00 -
[30] - Quote
its blatently gonna happen when it comes out on playstation 4. |
|
Dunk Mujunk
RestlessSpirits
267
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 18:55:00 -
[31] - Quote
Dust needs waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more work on the mechanics and balance before things like open worlds are discussed. Soon TM doesn't even apply here. |
Mr m4gic
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
24
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 18:57:00 -
[32] - Quote
Dunk Mujunk wrote:Dust needs waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more work on the mechanics and balance before things like open worlds are discussed. Soon TM doesn't even apply here. being a dumbass whats "soon TM" |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1269
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 19:09:00 -
[33] - Quote
Mr m4gic wrote:Dunk Mujunk wrote:Dust needs waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more work on the mechanics and balance before things like open worlds are discussed. Soon TM doesn't even apply here. being a dumbass whats "soon TM" It means it will be coming a year and a half from now and shoved under the rug when someone asks about it.
Check out my corp's new website here :D
-HAND
|
Dunk Mujunk
RestlessSpirits
268
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 19:09:00 -
[34] - Quote
CCP in the past has said things are coming soon, but then it has either taken forever or those things still aren't in the game. It's become a running gag and basically Soon TM represents a loooooong looooong time. |
Mr m4gic
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
25
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 19:11:00 -
[35] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Mr m4gic wrote:Dunk Mujunk wrote:Dust needs waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more work on the mechanics and balance before things like open worlds are discussed. Soon TM doesn't even apply here. being a dumbass whats "soon TM" It means it will be coming a year and a half from now and shoved under the rug when someone asks about it. LMAO ill remember tht 1 |
Mr m4gic
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
25
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 19:23:00 -
[36] - Quote
if you played the beta, it was loads better then it is now, so many things tht they changed have sucked, its like playing yoyo, goin back n fourth all the time wont be long before i cut the string. well atleast until things get better i have hi hopes for this game just tired of being a lab rat. . |
Dunk Mujunk
RestlessSpirits
268
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 19:28:00 -
[37] - Quote
Lol, "hope", and "until things get better" is all Dust is running on. The clock is ticking for CCP, and if the past is any indication, 1.7 will somehow manage to **** this game up even worse. |
darkiller240
K-A-O-S theory
181
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 20:05:00 -
[38] - Quote
Yes so then we can wipe out PS2 is better argument also dropships will much more usefull ^^
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." - Albert Einstein
|
Son-Of A-Gun
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
348
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 20:17:00 -
[39] - Quote
I had some pretty cool ideas for an open world dust. I never finished the whole thing though (because I got this character banned shortly after starting this thread) but the basics are all there.
Would love to see an open world dust, but it would be pretty tough to do right.
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
Tectonic Fusion
591
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 20:22:00 -
[40] - Quote
My thread that had more thought put into it wasn't this popular... But at least it got a CPM reply
Solo Player
Squad status: Locked
|
|
Alaika Arbosa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Interstellar Murder of Crows
1133
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 20:24:00 -
[41] - Quote
Tectonic Fusion wrote:My thread that had more thought put into it wasn't this popular... But at least it got a CPM reply Linky?
Praise St. Arzad and Pass the Nanohives
Karin Midular, gone, never forgotten
Executing Amarr Trash since Closed Beta
|
Roger Cordill
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
33
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 20:27:00 -
[42] - Quote
Mr m4gic wrote:you could get on a shuttle at a spaceport then fly to a space station, then jump in a transportation ship in eve to get to different star systems.
Shuttles carry people from system to system as well as station to station. There's no different one for each job. |
Son-Of A-Gun
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
348
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 20:27:00 -
[43] - Quote
Alaika Arbosa wrote:Tectonic Fusion wrote:My thread that had more thought put into it wasn't this popular... But at least it got a CPM reply Linky?
Was a tongue in cheek at me I think.
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
lordjanuz
Norwegian Dust514 Corporation Top Men.
217
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 20:29:00 -
[44] - Quote
Dunk Mujunk wrote:Dust needs waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more work on the mechanics and balance before things like open worlds are discussed. Soon TM doesn't even apply here.
Then they would never add content, it will always be mechanics and balance to work with, it is possible to do 2 things at the time.... |
Dunk Mujunk
RestlessSpirits
268
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 20:41:00 -
[45] - Quote
lordjanuz wrote:Dunk Mujunk wrote:Dust needs waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more work on the mechanics and balance before things like open worlds are discussed. Soon TM doesn't even apply here. Then they would never add content, it will always be mechanics and balance to work with, it is possible to do 2 things at the time....
It's not possible to create what would be basically a 2nd game when Dust is in shambles. Dust does not need an open world. It needs balance and it needs the mechanics straightened out. If an open world was introduced and everyone ran off and started mining, that obviously states the main game is broken.
People want open worlds and all that dumb ****, I want an FPS that works properly, not a bunch of idiots in heavy suits and ARs because of CCPs lack of ability to balance a game that has been "out of beta" for nearly a year. For CCP to even think about maybe talking about open world stuff within the next year would be idiotic, and a loss of focus. Dust is currently not working as intended, and being able to freely roam around 1000s of worlds with the same 4 generic maps to mine rock in a first person shooter is ******* stupid. Oh but we could have trains! **** a train, I have a Destroyer in orbit, I would want to transport myself with that.
Of course, if it was exploration I wanted, i'd hop on Eve, or another game. Unfortunately, right now if it's a functioning, balanced shooter I want, I am forced to find another game as well. |
CLONE117
planetary retaliation organisation
489
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 20:43:00 -
[46] - Quote
i think it would be to much trouble trying to fly a warbarge around eve from planet to planet.
not to mention the risk of crashing into a giant rock. or other ship. |
Dunk Mujunk
RestlessSpirits
268
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 20:46:00 -
[47] - Quote
?? Who said anything about a Warbarge? I'm talking about my Eve side destroyer. And 95% of Eve is flying around from planet to planet, crashing into rocks is not an issue........ |
Son-Of A-Gun
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
348
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 20:54:00 -
[48] - Quote
Son-Of A-Gun wrote:Alaika Arbosa wrote:Tectonic Fusion wrote:My thread that had more thought put into it wasn't this popular... But at least it got a CPM reply Linky? Was a tongue in cheek at me I think.
And still nobody cares about my thread.
Lol.
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
Mr m4gic
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
25
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 21:24:00 -
[49] - Quote
Roger Cordill wrote:Mr m4gic wrote:you could get on a shuttle at a spaceport then fly to a space station, then jump in a transportation ship in eve to get to different star systems. Shuttles carry people from system to system as well as station to station. There's no different one for each job.
lol i was thinking there would be groups of dust players travelling thru space together a shuttles cargo space is only 10 m3 so ur gonna need summin bigger remember some dust players don't play eve so they cant transport themselves but id assume they could fly shuttles as they have no weapons. transporting people across space would be a good way to make isk 2. |
Mr m4gic
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
25
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 21:41:00 -
[50] - Quote
Son-Of A-Gun wrote:Son-Of A-Gun wrote:Alaika Arbosa wrote:Tectonic Fusion wrote:My thread that had more thought put into it wasn't this popular... But at least it got a CPM reply Linky? Was a tongue in cheek at me I think. And still nobody cares about my thread. Lol.
jesus man u wrote a freakin essay lol u covered half a page |
|
lordjanuz
Norwegian Dust514 Corporation Top Men.
218
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 21:45:00 -
[51] - Quote
Dunk Mujunk wrote:lordjanuz wrote:Dunk Mujunk wrote:Dust needs waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more work on the mechanics and balance before things like open worlds are discussed. Soon TM doesn't even apply here. Then they would never add content, it will always be mechanics and balance to work with, it is possible to do 2 things at the time.... It's not possible to create what would be basically a 2nd game when Dust is in shambles. Dust does not need an open world. It needs balance and it needs the mechanics straightened out. If an open world was introduced and everyone ran off and started mining, that obviously states the main game is broken. People want open worlds and all that dumb ****, I want an FPS that works properly, not a bunch of idiots in heavy suits and ARs because of CCPs lack of ability to balance a game that has been "out of beta" for nearly a year. For CCP to even think about maybe talking about open world stuff within the next year would be idiotic, and a loss of focus. Dust is currently not working as intended, and being able to freely roam around 1000s of worlds with the same 4 generic maps to mine rock in a first person shooter is ******* stupid. Oh but we could have trains! **** a train, I have a Destroyer in orbit, I would want to transport myself with that. Of course, if it was exploration I wanted, i'd hop on Eve, or another game. Unfortunately, right now if it's a functioning, balanced shooter I want, I am forced to find another game as well.
I do not agree , I am here to play the Dust 514 that have been promised, not a Cod alike fps. Recomend you to watch the visions for Dust514 on fanfest 2013.
|
Son-Of A-Gun
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
348
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 21:57:00 -
[52] - Quote
Mr m4gic wrote:Son-Of A-Gun wrote:Son-Of A-Gun wrote:Alaika Arbosa wrote:Tectonic Fusion wrote:My thread that had more thought put into it wasn't this popular... But at least it got a CPM reply Linky? Was a tongue in cheek at me I think. And still nobody cares about my thread. Lol. jesus man u wrote a freakin essay lol u covered half a page
I would have finished it if I hadn't got banned. There was still a lot to go.
{edit>>> Now I don't think I care any more. Maybe I'll finish it one of these day. Have to start a new thread though.
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
Dunk Mujunk
RestlessSpirits
269
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 22:03:00 -
[53] - Quote
I know all about "the visions". Look where we are now. After nearly a year, not only is the game un balanced, it has wildly swung in multiple directions of balance over the course of the year. Uplinks are able to be laid in the middle of solid structures, swarms don't render, lag is brutal in PC, grenades will disappear from your hand after you pull them out, ect ect ect.
Thats all basic stuff. I don't care how open the world is, if the core gameplay isn't right the game is not going to work. The only thing CoD like atm is the gunplay, due to TTK. What was suppose to set it apart from CoD was the idea of mods and building a dropsuit, plus the whole PC idea. An open world is not required to create a difference from CoD, and if people are concerned about booking virtual flights to explore generic terrain with nothing to do but mine rock and maybe shoot a A.I. drone here and there, I would say those people may have the wrong game.
In reality implimenting what has been requested in this post and in the linked post is a pipe dream. Some of the ideas sound nice, but none of it is realistic. Which is why a ton of stuff has currently not been implimented. Dreams and visions are nice, but reality checks rule all. We are suppose to have speeder bike things, heavy aircraft, fighter aircraft, APC's, mechs, defensive relays, more heavy weapons, more suits, the ability for a Corp to purchase MCCs and installations, ect ect. Some of this may come one day, but more than likely CCP bit off more than they could chew, and they are coming to that realization.
Think about what you are asking for. Thousands of planets, each with an individual identity, affected by 2 totally different kinds of games, one of which only averages between 400-700 players on at any one moment, and since what is being asked for doesn't currently exist in any way shape or form, Dust would have to be rebuilt from the ground up to make it a totally different kind of game. Add to that the fact that PS2s "open worldness" has been called a flop by many, and you have a strong argument to keep open world far far away from Dust.
Thats my opinion though, I want a competitive FPS with RPG elements, not an Adventure game. |
Mr m4gic
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
25
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 22:12:00 -
[54] - Quote
[/quote]
I would have finished it if I hadn't got banned. There was still a lot to go.
{edit>>> Now I don't think I care any more. Maybe I'll finish it one of these day. Have to start a new thread though.[/quote]
why was you banned |
Son-Of A-Gun
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
348
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 22:16:00 -
[55] - Quote
I would have finished it if I hadn't got banned. There was still a lot to go.
{edit>>> Now I don't think I care any more. Maybe I'll finish it one of these day. Have to start a new thread though.[/quote]
why was you banned[/quote]
Cause I'm an ***hole.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_KDAicF0Yo&feature=youtube_gdata_player
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
lordjanuz
Norwegian Dust514 Corporation Top Men.
219
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 22:19:00 -
[56] - Quote
Dunk Mujunk wrote:I know all about "the visions". Look where we are now. After nearly a year, not only is the game un balanced, it has wildly swung in multiple directions of balance over the course of the year. Uplinks are able to be laid in the middle of solid structures, swarms don't render, lag is brutal in PC, grenades will disappear from your hand after you pull them out, ect ect ect.
Thats all basic stuff. I don't care how open the world is, if the core gameplay isn't right the game is not going to work. The only thing CoD like atm is the gunplay, due to TTK. What was suppose to set it apart from CoD was the idea of mods and building a dropsuit, plus the whole PC idea. An open world is not required to create a difference from CoD, and if people are concerned about booking virtual flights to explore generic terrain with nothing to do but mine rock and maybe shoot a A.I. drone here and there, I would say those people may have the wrong game.
In reality implimenting what has been requested in this post and in the linked post is a pipe dream. Some of the ideas sound nice, but none of it is realistic. Which is why a ton of stuff has currently not been implimented. Dreams and visions are nice, but reality checks rule all. We are suppose to have speeder bike things, heavy aircraft, fighter aircraft, APC's, mechs, defensive relays, more heavy weapons, more suits, the ability for a Corp to purchase MCCs and installations, ect ect. Some of this may come one day, but more than likely CCP bit off more than they could chew, and they are coming to that realization.
Think about what you are asking for. Thousands of planets, each with an individual identity, affected by 2 totally different kinds of games, one of which only averages between 400-700 players on at any one moment, and since what is being asked for doesn't currently exist in any way shape or form, Dust would have to be rebuilt from the ground up to make it a totally different kind of game. Add to that the fact that PS2s "open worldness" has been called a flop by many, and you have a strong argument to keep open world far far away from Dust.
Thats my opinion though, I want a competitive FPS with RPG elements, not an Adventure game.
Dont agree, visions are good. And the visions for this game is the only reason I play the game. Loose the visions and the game is dead.
CCP should hold on to the vision, players will have something diffrent . |
Alaika Arbosa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Interstellar Murder of Crows
1133
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 22:19:00 -
[57] - Quote
Notice how the only people who ever bring up "mining" are the ones against open world or those who make threads that don't really get noticed?
Theie primary argument against open world is something that apparently only they want.
LOL
Praise St. Arzad and Pass the Nanohives
Karin Midular, gone, never forgotten
Executing Amarr Trash since Closed Beta
|
Mr m4gic
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
26
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 22:26:00 -
[58] - Quote
Alaika Arbosa wrote:Notice how the only people who ever bring up "mining" are the ones against open world or those who make threads that don't really get noticed? Theie primary argument against open world is something that apparently only they want. LOL
its not just about mining its about running missions exploring worlds fighting pve finding cool stuff scanning down enviroments setting up ambushes i think u fail to see the bigger picture |
Doc Noah
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
881
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 22:28:00 -
[59] - Quote
Avallo Kantor wrote:Doc Noah wrote:Maybe one day they'll be able to link the 3 games so you start out as a DUST merc, work your way into space as an EVE Valkyrie fighter, and work your way up the chain of command to become a pilot of a starship in EVE Online. I doubt CCP would be ambitious enough to make that all in 1 game. Why would you want it all in one game? They are all going after different gameplay styles and target audiences. I mean, lots of people I know who play EVE hate playing FPS games, and some of the people I am getting into DUST could never enjoy a game at EVE's pace. They work well as they are planned, separate games that have lots of interaction planned between them. Forcing a player to go through one play style to get to another is not how you get players, nor are you going to be able to obtain players if you literally tell them that one playstyle is a lesser teir than another.
Think of it like Mass Effect, you travel around the universe in a ship gathering resources, when you reach your destination you get out in your land rover or transport ship, travel a certain distance, and get out on foot. Matter of speaking, I would love a Mass Effect version based on New Eden's lore although the lack of alien would be disspointing but the different cultures of the races would be a pleasant experience. I'm sure EVE pilots would love to explore the planets they orbit in a more intimate level.
Of course I said 1 game as in that 1 game will be optimized to suit this style of open world exploration and not the limited potential of any one specific game. If you like EVE and only EVE, then sure, but this 1 game will appeal to a different audience so I dont see the problem. It'll be a problem if CCP merged DUST and EVE and made it manditory to play FPS to enjoy EVE. Currently CCP is hoping that DUST players will play EVE Online and EVE online players would play DUST and expect a strong meaningful connection between the two but all I'm seeing is someone jumping back and forth between 2 completely different games. Its better if CCP created a completely different game where all those elements can seamlessly go together. |
Son-Of A-Gun
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
350
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 22:29:00 -
[60] - Quote
Mr m4gic wrote:Alaika Arbosa wrote:Notice how the only people who ever bring up "mining" are the ones against open world or those who make threads that don't really get noticed? Theie primary argument against open world is something that apparently only they want. LOL its not just about mining its about running missions exploring worlds fighting pve finding cool stuff scanning down enviroments setting up ambushes i think u fail to see the bigger picture
Yup, and eventually some game company will accomplish something really cool (whether it is CCP or not) and they will get all my money.
{edit>>> plus I think that the reason my thread didn't really get noticed has more to do with a literacy/desire to read something long problem than being a bad idea.
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
|
Dunk Mujunk
RestlessSpirits
270
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 22:35:00 -
[61] - Quote
Never said vision were a bad thing.
But when you say **** it, lets work on an open world when the mechanics and balance are all jacked up, thats a problem. Why have an open world when the core gameplay is broke? You think broken gameplay will be more fun with vasts amounts of empty space?
If you want an open world and mining, but you don't care if the shooting mechanics work, you are playing the wrong game.
And Alaika, not quite sure who you are refering to. I didn't bring up mining, it was brought up before my post. I am against open world at the moment (atm is the key part of the statement). The people who brought up mining before my post are for open world, therefore your post is invalid. Ever notice how people who post without reading threads are ignored?
LOL
Look, the idea of a totally open world sounds awesome, i'm not saying it doesn't, it's a question of what is realistic. At this point, with the current engine on the current system, what is being asked for is not possible, besides the fact that CCP would require many more people than it currently has focused on the games development. The rough plan for Dust was it would take a couple years to really come together, just as it was in Eve. If all the ducks were currently in a row, yea, go for an open world. But the ducks are currently scattered, and some have even been run over in the street. The focus needs to be on keeping Dust alive right now, and you don't keep a FPS of any kind alive by working on the features mentioned in this thread.
I know almost nothing about it, but those looking for what this thread advertises may want to look into Star Citizen. |
Pvt Numnutz
Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State
281
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 22:36:00 -
[62] - Quote
Alaika Arbosa wrote:Pvt Numnutz wrote:YYYEEEAAAAAHHHH LETS WANDER AROUND THIS CRAPPY PLANET WHERE THE ONLY STRUCTURES ARE THE ONES WE WOULD BE DEFENDING IN CONTRACTS!!!!
Really though what's the point? Now if we were talking about walking around in stations with dust AND eve players then you would get a plus 1 and some real excitement. What a glorious day that would be, my eve character and my dust character shaking hands! I would imagine that not 100% of the temperate planets are inhabited by intelligent life currently (maybe long ago but no more type of scenario). I think it would be a great opportunity for Exploration PvE/PvPvE, opportunities for wealth building that didn't involve gaming a broken faucet. None of the planets had life ever. New eden was a new or "virgin" galaxy that was still in the early stages of development. The only reason there are temperate planets is we made them. Most exploration occurs in space, since we can scan a planet in like 3 seconds there isn't much to explore. If eve pilots could take a squad with them in a ship and send them into data and relic sites and the dust mercs got a cool pve game mode with possible PvP (ie another ship drops another team of mercs) that would be very interesting. What I'm getting at is exploration should involve a lot of dust eve link. Sleeper sites would be amazing!!! Most industry/mining will revolve around facilities that can mine and produce items at a fast rate, similar to eve. In fact eve players will probably end up doing most of the manufactory aspects for mercs. I mean they can strip mine moons! Going out in the boonies to collect some rocks in a truck just wouldn't compete... |
Dunk Mujunk
RestlessSpirits
270
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 22:47:00 -
[63] - Quote
Doc Noah wrote:It'll be a problem if CCP merged DUST and EVE and made it manditory to play FPS to enjoy EVE. Currently CCP is hoping that DUST players will play EVE Online and EVE online players would play DUST and expect a strong
Eve will always control the universe we are in, as it should be. Eve has been around for 10 years, and it's player base has to pay to be able to play. The complexity of the Corporations in Eve goes far beyond any Dust Corp. Which brings up another issue with Dust industry. Currently, pretty much anything used in Eve is created by players of Eve, putting economic control in their hands. I highly doubt we in Dust will ever be making anything of significance equipment wise to Eve players, but to merge the economies of both games together in a meaningful way, someone will have to be making stuff for the other game. Seeing as how Eve is already fully setup for an industrial style of play, I would imagine they will be the ones making stuff for us, not the other way around. Especially since Eve people would justifiably freak out if the character they have been paying for and working on for so and so many years suddenly becomes dependent on players from a free to play game that was taken "out of beta" less than a year ago.
Again, alot of the stuff in this thread sounds fine and good, but to impliment it technically speaking, and to do it in a way so as not to **** off the people who have been paying to play Eve is currently way out of the realm of possibility. People can say "yea, but" and "well what if" all they want. Go ahead and hold your breath for the open world stuff. Don't worry, i'll wait.
Not trying to be a d*ck, just being realistic.
|
Son-Of A-Gun
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
351
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 23:03:00 -
[64] - Quote
Dunk Mujunk wrote:Doc Noah wrote:It'll be a problem if CCP merged DUST and EVE and made it manditory to play FPS to enjoy EVE. Currently CCP is hoping that DUST players will play EVE Online and EVE online players would play DUST and expect a strong Eve will always control the universe we are in, as it should be. Eve has been around for 10 years, and it's player base has to pay to be able to play. The complexity of the Corporations in Eve goes far beyond any Dust Corp. Which brings up another issue with Dust industry. Currently, pretty much anything used in Eve is created by players of Eve, putting economic control in their hands. I highly doubt we in Dust will ever be making anything of significance equipment wise to Eve players, but to merge the economies of both games together in a meaningful way, someone will have to be making stuff for the other game. Seeing as how Eve is already fully setup for an industrial style of play, I would imagine they will be the ones making stuff for us, not the other way around. Especially since Eve people would justifiably freak out if the character they have been paying for and working on for so and so many years suddenly becomes dependent on players from a free to play game that was taken "out of beta" less than a year ago. Again, alot of the stuff in this thread sounds fine and good, but to impliment it technically speaking, and to do it in a way so as not to **** off the people who have been paying to play Eve is currently way out of the realm of possibility. People can say "yea, but" and "well what if" all they want. Go ahead and hold your breath for the open world stuff. Don't worry, i'll wait. Not trying to be a d*ck, just being realistic.
Like I said before. My hopes are not solely dependent on CCP. If CCP doesn't then someone else will, and at that time I shall revel in watching the complete annihilation of both these games player bases, just for the simple fact that CCP could have done something revolutionary but didn't.
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
10513
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 23:06:00 -
[65] - Quote
Open world =/= sandbox
GTA can be considered open world but it is far removed from being a sandbox game.
Minecraft is open world and Sandbox.
CPM 0 Secretary
Omni-Soldier Specialist
Current Theme \\= Advanced Scrambler Rifle =// Unlocked
|
Mr m4gic
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
26
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 23:06:00 -
[66] - Quote
who knows what the future holds, we may get to do mining on planets, and explore deep cavens and lost citys, escort missions and bounty hunting, there are so many possibilities. 1 thing is for sure the game has got a lot of work ahead before we get anything on this kind of scale. but the real beauty of eve is you choose your own role. |
Jak'Saan
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
129
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 23:08:00 -
[67] - Quote
Son-Of A-Gun wrote:
Like I said before. My hopes are not solely dependent on CCP. If CCP doesn't then someone else will, and at that time I shall revel in watching the complete annihilation of both these games player bases, just for the simple fact that CCP could have done something revolutionary but didn't.
Reco-nize!
Seriously Son, what are you doing these days? You still playing Dust or just playing the forums? |
Son-Of A-Gun
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
351
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 23:12:00 -
[68] - Quote
Jak'Saan wrote:Son-Of A-Gun wrote:
Like I said before. My hopes are not solely dependent on CCP. If CCP doesn't then someone else will, and at that time I shall revel in watching the complete annihilation of both these games player bases, just for the simple fact that CCP could have done something revolutionary but didn't.
Reco-nize! Seriously Son, what are you doing these days? You still playing Dust or just playing the forums?
Wazup!
Mostly just playing forums. I come on every now and again though. Waiting for 1.7 to give it some serious play time again. "I had a dream" and that dream was a nice tank. We'll see what happens.
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
Dunk Mujunk
RestlessSpirits
270
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 23:15:00 -
[69] - Quote
Son-Of A-Gun wrote:Like I said before. My hopes are not solely dependent on CCP. If CCP doesn't then someone else will
Probably true. If you are looking for a Sci Fi MMORPG type game, then yeah, Star Citizen is probably something you may want to check out (I would, but my PC isn't strong enough :...-( )
But if you are looking for the type of game envisioned by CCP, thats a long ways off. CCP has a leg up on everyone being as how Eve exists already and is basically complete, and Dust (for all its short comings) is also already created.
Someone could pull it off one day, but I strongly doubt anyone other than CCP has a chance to do what CCP is trying to do within the next 5 years.
|
Dunk Mujunk
RestlessSpirits
270
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 23:17:00 -
[70] - Quote
Son-Of A-Gun wrote:I had a dream" and that dream was a nice tank. We'll see what happens.
And right here, in a nutshell, is why anything open worldish needs to be put on the back burner. A basic unit in an FPS game is not working properly.
|
|
Mr m4gic
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
26
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 23:21:00 -
[71] - Quote
Dunk Mujunk wrote:Son-Of A-Gun wrote:I had a dream" and that dream was a nice tank. We'll see what happens. And right here, in a nutshell, is why anything open worldish needs to be put on the back burner. A basic unit in an FPS game is not working properly.
open world games are amazing, u can do mostly anything plus dust brings u into a perimeter for battle so u don't have to go into the open world if it ever existed, and sorry folks but i spent a day building a pirate ship on minecraft is tht bad lol. |
Mr m4gic
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
26
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 23:25:00 -
[72] - Quote
you know they will get it right soon, im total agreement tht everything is pretty messed up right now but you only have to look at eve to see what they have already accomplished |
lordjanuz
Norwegian Dust514 Corporation Top Men.
221
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 23:31:00 -
[73] - Quote
CCP has said all the time that Dust514 will be a sandbox game , free and battles that goes on for days with no clone or time restrictions, only who have the best supply line.
That is the game I whant, and I do hope CCP still have that vision, and since this has been stated last in Las Vegas and before that on fanfest 2013 I hope we will go in that direction. |
Mr m4gic
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
26
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 23:43:00 -
[74] - Quote
definiton of a sand box game for those tht didnt know i just wikid it cos i never heard this term here you go ain i nice :)
A video game with nonlinear gameplay presents players with challenges that can be completed in a number of different sequences. Each player sees only some of the challenges possible, and the same challenges may be played in a different order. A video game with linear gameplay will confront a player with a fixed sequence of challenges. Every player sees every challenge and sees them in the same order.
A nonlinear game will allow greater player freedom than a linear game. For example, a nonlinear game may permit multiple sequences to finish the game, a choice between paths to victory, or optional side-quests and subplots. Some games feature both linear and nonlinear elements, and some games offer a sandbox mode that allows players to explore an open world game environment independently from the game's main objectives, if any objectives are provided at all.
A game that is significantly nonlinear is sometimes described as being open-ended or a sandbox, though that term is used incorrectly in those cases,[1][2][3][4] and is characterized by there being no "right way" of playing the game.[5] A common consequence (intentional or unintentional) of open-ended gameplay is emergent gameplay.[4]
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |