Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ryme Intrinseca
Seraphim Auxiliaries
240
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 17:52:00 -
[1] - Quote
The respec for vehicle skills is Pandora's box.
I don't, of course, mind vehicle users getting their SP back to put into their tanks and dropships of choice after the radical changes. The problem is tankers putting their SP into infantry. A 10mil SP tanker will be able to create a better infantryman than a 15mil SP infantryman has. He gets a chance to drop his points after the new rifles are released. He will also know how all the other weapons and suits are balanced in December 2013, which no infantryman had the luxury of when they were allocating their SP. Every dedicated infantryman will have millions of SP tied up in weapons and suits that they no longer use (either due to personal preference or nerfs). Former pilots, on the other hand, will be able to build the best possible infantryman for their SP budget.
Now you might say 'no pilots will want to spec infantry', but I can show you a dozen threads with tankers saying they want a respec to go full infantry. Or you might say NO RESPECS EVAR, HTFU, Welcome to New Eden, live with your choices, etc. And normally I would agree. Look through my posts, before today you will find not one supporting a full respec. But the vehicle respec changes everything. Vehicle users will not have to live with their choices when 1.7 drops. They can be anything they want, regardless of what they chose. Furthermore, they can be build a character that's better at a role they didn't choose - infantry - than anyone who chose that role can. This is a major balance issue.
Now the respec box has been opened, the respec cannot be contained. |
xSivartx
Valor Tactical Operations Immortal Coalition of New-Eden
16
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 18:00:00 -
[2] - Quote
Am I the only one that would spec into tanks if a respec would happen? I'd switch from my infantry role to a tank. |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
1714
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 18:03:00 -
[3] - Quote
Live with your choices he says
Big ******* problem is that my choices were made some time ago, now CCP has turned the vehicle tree upside down and it now looks completely different |
Awry Barux
Paladin Survey Force Amarr Empire
363
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 18:12:00 -
[4] - Quote
xSivartx wrote:Am I the only one that would spec into tanks if a respec would happen? I'd switch from my infantry role to a tank.
Yeah I'd love to switch to vehicles, infantry is getting old! Obviously I wasn't going to go pre-1.7 vehicles because they were terrible, but now that they might be actually viable it sounds fun. Anyway +1 to the OP |
Eris Ernaga
State Patriots
724
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 18:14:00 -
[5] - Quote
Ryme Intrinseca wrote:The respec for vehicle skills is Pandora's box.
I don't, of course, mind vehicle users getting their SP back to put into their tanks and dropships of choice after the radical changes. The problem is tankers putting their SP into infantry. A 10mil SP tanker will be able to create a better infantryman than a 15mil SP infantryman has. He gets a chance to drop his points after the new rifles are released. He will also know how all the other weapons and suits are balanced in December 2013, which no infantryman had the luxury of when they were allocating their SP. Every dedicated infantryman will have millions of SP tied up in weapons and suits that they no longer use (either due to personal preference or nerfs). Former pilots, on the other hand, will be able to build the best possible infantryman for their SP budget.
Now you might say 'no pilots will want to spec infantry', but I can show you a dozen threads with tankers saying they want a respec to go full infantry. Or you might say NO RESPECS EVAR, HTFU, Welcome to New Eden, live with your choices, etc. And normally I would agree. Look through my posts, before today you will find not one supporting a full respec. But the vehicle respec changes everything. Vehicle users will not have to live with their choices when 1.7 drops. They can be anything they want, regardless of what they chose. Furthermore, they can be build a character that's better at a role they didn't choose - infantry - than anyone who chose that role can. This is a major balance issue.
Now the respec box has been opened, the respec cannot be contained.
There is no point in this thread vehicles are being overhauled CCP didn't release a full respec for a reason it is more of a refund to be honest. Players who had skills in to vehicles will be able to spend them as they wish, that is all.
State Patriots a loyal Caldari based corporation is accepting all Caldari and Amarr to help fight on the front.
|
Lynn Beck
Granite Mercenary Division Top Men.
238
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 18:17:00 -
[6] - Quote
I wish to switch from infantry to 14 mill tanker :D
-Newly proclaimed Lazor riffle specialist-
"You said yourself fantastically 'congratulations you are all alone.'"
|
Rogue Saint
Science For Death The Shadow Eclipse
407
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 18:28:00 -
[7] - Quote
Ryme Intrinseca wrote: A 10mil SP tanker will be able to create a better infantryman than a 15mil SP infantryman has. He gets a chance to drop his points after the new rifles are released. He will also know how all the other weapons and suits are balanced in December 2013, which no infantryman had the luxury of when they were allocating their SP.
And this worries you because? You didn't know before hand so, now you do know, you want a respec?
What happens when more stuff is released? Demand another respec in 1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8 years time??
Ryme Intrinseca wrote: Every dedicated infantryman will have millions of SP tied up in weapons and suits that they no longer use (either due to personal preference or nerfs). Former pilots, on the other hand, will be able to build the best possible infantryman for their SP budget.
Isn't that the whole point of the game? You sepc into suits/weapons and get proficient in all of them so you can CHOOSE which to use for the battle conditions? I guess you are one of those guys that just wants one weapon/suit forever.
Ryme Intrinseca wrote: Furthermore, they can be build a character that's better at a role they didn't choose - infantry - than anyone who chose that role can. This is a major balance issue.
There are not that many high SP tank characters, I could understand if 50% of the player base was, but their not, so balance isn't an issue. Even if it was, cool, less tanks on the field, more infantry to kill in their proto gear.
GôêGÆ+GÆ+GƦ
|
SoTarian PoParrazi
Shining Flame Amarr Empire
308
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 18:30:00 -
[8] - Quote
so.. the time of respec has come.. because your jealous tankers can get out of being tankers and into infantry?
o.0? You're just proving how little effect tankers are if your fearing them putting more SP into infantry.
n+ÅS¦¦Gùò GÇ+GÇ+ GùòS¦¦n++ - Let's make a contract!
|
Pvt Numnutz
Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State
279
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 18:36:00 -
[9] - Quote
Which is why CCP won't do a respect again. Which is why they said choose wisely after uprising. That was it, to avoid situations like this. |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
2232
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 18:42:00 -
[10] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Live with your choices he says
Big ******* problem is that my choices were made some time ago, now CCP has turned the vehicle tree upside down and it now looks completely different
Are they still tanks? Did you pick tanks? That's your choice.
No.
|
|
Tech Ohm Eaven
L.O.T.I.S. Public Disorder.
949
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 18:45:00 -
[11] - Quote
Ryme Intrinseca wrote:The respec for vehicle skills is Pandora's box.
I don't, of course, mind vehicle users getting their SP back to put into their tanks and dropships of choice after the radical changes. The problem is tankers putting their SP into infantry. A 10mil SP tanker will be able to create a better infantryman than a 15mil SP infantryman has. He gets a chance to drop his points after the new rifles are released. He will also know how all the other weapons and suits are balanced in December 2013, which no infantryman had the luxury of when they were allocating their SP. Every dedicated infantryman will have millions of SP tied up in weapons and suits that they no longer use (either due to personal preference or nerfs). Former pilots, on the other hand, will be able to build the best possible infantryman for their SP budget.
Now you might say 'no pilots will want to spec infantry', but I can show you a dozen threads with tankers saying they want a respec to go full infantry. Or you might say NO RESPECS EVAR, HTFU, Welcome to New Eden, live with your choices, etc. And normally I would agree. Look through my posts, before today you will find not one supporting a full respec. But the vehicle respec changes everything. Vehicle users will not have to live with their choices when 1.7 drops. They can be anything they want, regardless of what they chose. Furthermore, they can be build a character that's better at a role they didn't choose - infantry - than anyone who chose that role can. This is a major balance issue.
Now the respec box has been opened, the respec cannot be contained.
I say once newer games draw away the Dust 514 playerbase to under 3000 peak will force CCP into a more flexible stance.
Now back to Three Dog!! and Fallout 4 tidbits |
Zimander
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. Renegade Alliance
5
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 18:45:00 -
[12] - Quote
Live with u F*****G choice They Nerf Guns u didn't here Infantry whining about re-space cuz the guns got NERF so shut up accept u decision in DUST |
Tech Ohm Eaven
L.O.T.I.S. Public Disorder.
949
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 18:49:00 -
[13] - Quote
Pvt Numnutz wrote:Which is why CCP won't do a respect again. Which is why they said choose wisely after uprising. That was it, to avoid situations like this.
Yeah ,sure choose wisely since we were told way in advance that in 1.7 lasers become useless...lol.
Lets see 7 or 8 more days until I get to play a good bunch of PS3 games that will use up my playtime.
Sorry Dust 514 you got a respec to the bench or the delete areas...lol. |
Tech Ohm Eaven
L.O.T.I.S. Public Disorder.
949
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 18:53:00 -
[14] - Quote
Zimander wrote:Live with u F*****G choice They Nerf Guns u didn't here Infantry whining about re-space cuz the guns got NERF so shut up accept u decision in DUST
Hey another newberry........lol! Hey how about spellcheck??
Yeah thats working great going from 9220 to barely above 4000 peak on weekends.
|
Ryme Intrinseca
Seraphim Auxiliaries
246
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 18:57:00 -
[15] - Quote
Zimander wrote:Live with u F*****G choice They Nerf Guns u didn't here Infantry whining about re-space cuz the guns got NERF so shut up accept u decision in DUST I think one or two people think I'm a pilot demanding my vehicle SP back . So just to be clear, CCP announced here that vehicle users will get their vehicle SP back. This thread is requesting that this be changed to a full respec for all characters. |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
1716
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 18:59:00 -
[16] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Live with your choices he says
Big ******* problem is that my choices were made some time ago, now CCP has turned the vehicle tree upside down and it now looks completely different Are they still tanks? Did you pick tanks? That's your choice.
I picked tanks and the skills i wanted for whatever reason i had at the time
Now i have new skills such as the CPU electronics skills which no longer adds 5% CPU per level and also i lose mods and vehicles to boot
I am a pilot, i skilled into all vehicles, no im losing 6 vehicles, 8 including the surya/sagaris
Its like taking your infantry tree and then turning it upside down while making it a bigger SP sink, take your favourite suit now lets replace the skill bonus it gets per level with something useless like 'once you take over 50% damage you will randomly blow up in 10seconds' and this increases by 10% per level so you will blow up in 5seconds at level 5 and then make it a x16 SP multiplier
Now you will die alot more, your KDR will plummet and you will be useless on the battlefield, would you like a respec? |
Tech Ohm Eaven
L.O.T.I.S. Public Disorder.
949
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 19:08:00 -
[17] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Live with your choices he says
Big ******* problem is that my choices were made some time ago, now CCP has turned the vehicle tree upside down and it now looks completely different Are they still tanks? Did you pick tanks? That's your choice. I picked tanks and the skills i wanted for whatever reason i had at the time Now i have new skills such as the CPU electronics skills which no longer adds 5% CPU per level and also i lose mods and vehicles to boot I am a pilot, i skilled into all vehicles, no im losing 6 vehicles, 8 including the surya/sagaris Its like taking your infantry tree and then turning it upside down while making it a bigger SP sink, take your favourite suit now lets replace the skill bonus it gets per level with something useless like 'once you take over 50% damage you will randomly blow up in 10seconds' and this increases by 10% per level so you will blow up in 5seconds at level 5 and then make it a x16 SP multiplier Now you will die alot more, your KDR will plummet and you will be useless on the battlefield, would you like a respec?
I want a rewind to when Dust 514 was not a AR twitch shooter. To when choosing a niche weapon was not a waste of time.
But for real in a few days Dust 514 will hardly get any playtime in my PS3 system and zero on a PS4 so I no longer care.
Later. |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
2233
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 19:19:00 -
[18] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Live with your choices he says
Big ******* problem is that my choices were made some time ago, now CCP has turned the vehicle tree upside down and it now looks completely different Are they still tanks? Did you pick tanks? That's your choice. I picked tanks and the skills i wanted for whatever reason i had at the time Now i have new skills such as the CPU electronics skills which no longer adds 5% CPU per level and also i lose mods and vehicles to boot I am a pilot, i skilled into all vehicles, no im losing 6 vehicles, 8 including the surya/sagaris Its like taking your infantry tree and then turning it upside down while making it a bigger SP sink, take your favourite suit now lets replace the skill bonus it gets per level with something useless like 'once you take over 50% damage you will randomly blow up in 10seconds' and this increases by 10% per level so you will blow up in 5seconds at level 5 and then make it a x16 SP multiplier Now you will die alot more, your KDR will plummet and you will be useless on the battlefield, would you like a respec?
It isn't being turned upside down, stop trying to blow it out of proportion.
You picked a role, and you still have it. HTFU.
You don't hear scouts asking for respecs, you hear them asking for balances & new content. The fact that some tankers don't do the same says to me that they really just wanted to roll about the battlefield with impunity.
No.
|
Izlare Lenix
FREE AGENTS LP
13
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 19:31:00 -
[19] - Quote
CCP should have never caved into the first wave of "I want a respec." Now whenever something goes from strong to weak the whiners will want "just one more respec."
Respecs are a terrible idea. Once you spend SP it is gone. You train it you bought it, sorry no refund. |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
7848
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 19:34:00 -
[20] - Quote
Izlare Lenix wrote:CCP should have never caved into the first wave of "I want a respec." Now whenever something goes from strong to weak the whiners will want "just one more respec."
Respecs are a terrible idea. Once you spend SP it is gone. You train it you bought it, sorry no refund. Yea, how dare I train shield extenders, boosters, and missiles to make my Incubus work, only to have that entire fit rendered completely obsolete
HTFUUUUU!!!!!!!
Read / Vid / Stream
|
|
Onesimus Tarsus
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
684
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 19:40:00 -
[21] - Quote
Any time people ask me why I want a respec, I'll just say, "My points should reflect my ever-evolving playstyle."
Seriously, why should anyone care where anyone else's SP is?
" 'Full respecs' , because it just doesn't matter yet." (tm) |
pdiddy anfama
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
78
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 20:02:00 -
[22] - Quote
Ryme Intrinseca wrote:The respec for vehicle skills is Pandora's box.
I don't, of course, mind vehicle users getting their SP back to put into their tanks and dropships of choice after the radical changes. The problem is tankers putting their SP into infantry. A 10mil SP tanker will be able to create a better infantryman than a 15mil SP infantryman has. He gets a chance to drop his points after the new rifles are released. He will also know how all the other weapons and suits are balanced in December 2013, which no infantryman had the luxury of when they were allocating their SP. Every dedicated infantryman will have millions of SP tied up in weapons and suits that they no longer use (either due to personal preference or nerfs). Former pilots, on the other hand, will be able to build the best possible infantryman for their SP budget.
Now you might say 'no pilots will want to spec infantry', but I can show you a dozen threads with tankers saying they want a respec to go full infantry. Or you might say NO RESPECS EVAR, HTFU, Welcome to New Eden, live with your choices, etc. And normally I would agree. Look through my posts, before today you will find not one supporting a full respec. But the vehicle respec changes everything. Vehicle users will not have to live with their choices when 1.7 drops. They can be anything they want, regardless of what they chose. Furthermore, they can be build a character that's better at a role they didn't choose - infantry - than anyone who chose that role can. This is a major balance issue.
Now the respec box has been opened, the respec cannot be contained.
Finally someone else talking sense. |
Ryme Intrinseca
Seraphim Auxiliaries
253
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 20:28:00 -
[23] - Quote
Rogue Saint wrote:Ryme Intrinseca wrote: A 10mil SP tanker will be able to create a better infantryman than a 15mil SP infantryman has. He gets a chance to drop his points after the new rifles are released. He will also know how all the other weapons and suits are balanced in December 2013, which no infantryman had the luxury of when they were allocating their SP. [1] And this worries you because? You didn't know before hand so, now you do know, you want a respec? [2] What happens when more stuff is released? Demand another respec in 1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8 years time?? Ryme Intrinseca wrote: Every dedicated infantryman will have millions of SP tied up in weapons and suits that they no longer use (either due to personal preference or nerfs). Former pilots, on the other hand, will be able to build the best possible infantryman for their SP budget. [3] Isn't that the whole point of the game? You sepc into suits/weapons and get proficient in all of them so you can CHOOSE which to use for the battle conditions? I guess you are one of those guys that just wants one weapon/suit forever. Ryme Intrinseca wrote: Furthermore, they can be build a character that's better at a role they didn't choose - infantry - than anyone who chose that role can. This is a major balance issue. [4]There are not that many high SP tank characters, I could understand if 50% of the player base was, but their not, so balance isn't an issue. Even if it was, cool, less tanks on the field, more infantry to kill in their proto gear. 1. If part of the playerbase gets to allocate their SP with knowledge of the current balance of suits and weapons, it's only fair that the whole playerbase does.
2. I didn't announce the respec, CCP did. I'm just saying it should apply to the whole playerbase. If CCP announce another 10mil+ respec then, yes, that should also be for everybody. I doubt this will happen often though.
3. I have HMG, FG and AR all up to at least prof. 3, and proto heavy and medium suits. So no, I can appreciate diversity. My point is that a tanker with a respec will even do better at diversity, because he gets to choose the best weapon and suit in each class at current stats. For instance, if rail rifle dominates as many suspect it will, he can dump his points into RR+gallente logi, the optimum fit under those conditions (plus HMG, FG and heavy suit for lols). Infantry never got to make that choice.
4. So if its only a minority of the playerbase that get an unfair advantage that's okay? Would you be happy if CCP said they'd decided to give a respec to Caldari characters only? The point is it upsets balance for no good reason, because the option of a universal respec is there. |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
1726
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 12:27:00 -
[24] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Live with your choices he says
Big ******* problem is that my choices were made some time ago, now CCP has turned the vehicle tree upside down and it now looks completely different Are they still tanks? Did you pick tanks? That's your choice. I picked tanks and the skills i wanted for whatever reason i had at the time Now i have new skills such as the CPU electronics skills which no longer adds 5% CPU per level and also i lose mods and vehicles to boot I am a pilot, i skilled into all vehicles, no im losing 6 vehicles, 8 including the surya/sagaris Its like taking your infantry tree and then turning it upside down while making it a bigger SP sink, take your favourite suit now lets replace the skill bonus it gets per level with something useless like 'once you take over 50% damage you will randomly blow up in 10seconds' and this increases by 10% per level so you will blow up in 5seconds at level 5 and then make it a x16 SP multiplier Now you will die alot more, your KDR will plummet and you will be useless on the battlefield, would you like a respec? It isn't being turned upside down, stop trying to blow it out of proportion. You picked a role, and you still have it. HTFU. You don't hear scouts asking for respecs, you hear them asking for balances & new content. The fact that some tankers don't do the same says to me that they really just wanted to roll about the battlefield with impunity.
The vehicles have changed
The mods have changed
Some mods have been removed
The skills are being changed and also removed
We have now lost 8vehicles in total
How is it not being completely changed? |
Fizzer94
L.O.T.I.S. Public Disorder.
848
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 12:42:00 -
[25] - Quote
For some reason, I think I would prefer a full reset rather than a respec. I don't know why, but a reset just sounds appealing to me right now. It would be a fresh new start for the game.
[+ªa¦Ç+¦++-ö-Å94]
Burner of faces.
The Plasma Cannon is not underpowered.
|
Bendtner92
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1299
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 13:21:00 -
[26] - Quote
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1517540#post1517540
CCP has two options:
1. Only allow refunded SP to be put back into vehicles, so that vehicle pilots' choices have consequences. By not doing this will allow vehicle pilots to do whatever they want with their SP like putting all/most of their SP into infantry and their choices wouldn't have consequences, while everyone else's choices have consequences. I assume it would likely be impossible for CCP to do this, so that brings me to the other option.
2. Give everyone a full respec. This is by far the most fair solution. If they don't give everyone a full respec CCP is playing favorites by giving vehicle pilots an unfair advantage.
Winner of the EU Squad Cup & the closed beta Tester's Tournament.
Go Go Power Rangers!
|
Korvin Lomont
United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION
243
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 14:00:00 -
[27] - Quote
Pvt Numnutz wrote:Which is why CCP won't do a respect again. Which is why they said choose wisely after uprising. That was it, to avoid situations like this.
Choose wisely is nice as long as your decision is persistent. You could make the wisest decision in the world but that won't help you If some changes the reason for that decision.
CCP should give partial SP refunds when they drastically change what you spend your SP for. I don't mind a rebalance so lets say skill y grant 5% to "x", a change to 2% would be ok. But if that skill all of sudden gives 5% to "a" instead of "x" this is no longer the skill I choosed to spec into....and CCP should be be fair enough to refund the SP |
Sigberct Amni
Goonfeet Top Men.
209
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 14:43:00 -
[28] - Quote
It's frustrating to know that vehicle users will be able to once again coast into the next flavor of the month. The only fair option is to force vehicle SP to remain in vehicles. That won't happen because it's a nightmare logistically.
The less appealing option is to give everyone a full respec. Alternatively, you could stop designing trap content that is essentially a skill point loss for players who unknowingly spend into it. Dropsuit command V? How about not nerfing things into uselessness?
Hey guys come play our game! You can wait or grind for normal progression or you can pay money for faster progression! Things will change every three months. We don't know what will change but you will be stuck with your progression into now broken/worthless things. Sometimes we will allow some subsets of players to spec into the latest FOTM, but not all. HTFUWELCOMETONEWEDENLOL. Man, I really want to play this game! |
Slag Emberforge
Immortal Retribution
136
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 15:28:00 -
[29] - Quote
Zimander wrote:Live with u F*****G choice They Nerf Guns u didn't here Infantry whining about re-space cuz the guns got NERF so shut up accept u decision in DUST
That wasn't even a crude facsimile of English. And you couldn't be more wrong, I have seen no end to the amount of complaints of players wanting their SP back after a weapon is nerfed, laser rifle, HMG, Flaylock, any of these ring a bell? |
Roger Cordill
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
21
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 15:35:00 -
[30] - Quote
No. I'll accept one only when it makes sense (frames/hulls that should've been in day one, or massive change to the item itself, and the skills that go along with it). The entire vehicle tree, as well as every aspect of vehicles is getting changed. Get over it, you're not getting one. |
|
PADDEHATPIGEN
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
91
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 15:42:00 -
[31] - Quote
HELL YEAH FULL RESPEC'S FOR ALL. |
Sigberct Amni
Goonfeet Top Men.
209
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 15:56:00 -
[32] - Quote
Roger Cordill wrote:No. I'll accept one only when it makes sense (frames/hulls that should've been in day one, or massive change to the item itself, and the skills that go along with it). The entire vehicle tree, as well as every aspect of vehicles is getting changed. Get over it, you're not getting one.
edit: This was a message from Godin. I think we should. But maybe he's right. I don't know..... This coming from a nobody who got banned. |
Kh405 L19th
Die Steppenwolfe
4
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 09:56:00 -
[33] - Quote
Well, I'm one more who isn't happy with only a partial respec (and just for those who had the fortune to invest in the vehicle skill tree) even though it would give me a nice 230k SP.
Usually, I would deal with the idea of holding "worthless" skills and move on, as I have the idea that maybe in the future I could get some use from those skills I'm no longer using because I love being a Jack of all trades. But I think there is a real issue in here: currently, people are more used to the gameplay and all the changes that it has gone through, so now I'm feeling as if I was deliberately deceived to believe that I have to learn from my choices and make the best out of them while others will be able to "go back in time" and undo their choices with the advantage of having all this new awareness about all the changes that have been and will be done. I think it's just not fair. It's like playing a board game knowing half of the rules while other contestants know the whole set of rules.
I love this game and have supported it by spending around $300 USD so that I can see improvements THAT ALL CAN TAKE ADVANTAGE FROM, which obviously includes me. Why should only some "privileged" people that had the luck to choose "wrongly well" in their skills be the ones who will get the chance to make the best out of these changes? I think that the time for a second FULL respec has come and it should be done by default, without the need of summiting a ticket, just like when the game was finally released, I mean if someone is happy with all of their choices they just need to use their SP in the same way they did, it's no issue at all.
CCP, do things right and equal for everyone!!! |
jin foxdale
Jedi Slime.
113
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 10:00:00 -
[34] - Quote
xSivartx wrote:Am I the only one that would spec into tanks if a respec would happen? I'd switch from my infantry role to a tank.
I'd have myself a little tank to fall back on. |
Justicar Karnellia
Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State
148
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 10:42:00 -
[35] - Quote
I'd say this makes sense... even though I'm happy where my points are. I'd also like CCP to bring in a AURUM for respec feature which is limited to 2 per year or something like that. (People without aurum could get one free respec per year). This would prevent the people asking for respecs every balance/patch/hotfix/nerf/new feature is announced.
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
1777
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 12:36:00 -
[36] - Quote
Bendtner92 wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1517540#post1517540
CCP has two options:
1. Only allow refunded SP to be put back into vehicles, so that vehicle pilots' choices have consequences. By not doing this will allow vehicle pilots to do whatever they want with their SP like putting all/most of their SP into infantry and their choices wouldn't have consequences, while everyone else's choices have consequences. I assume it would likely be impossible for CCP to do this, so that brings me to the other option.
2. Give everyone a full respec. This is by far the most fair solution. If they don't give everyone a full respec CCP is playing favorites by giving vehicle pilots an unfair advantage.
Spent in the same role but doesnt go as anywhere as far as in 1.6
Frankly CCP knew they were making the SP sink bigger by a factor of 3, players did not know unless you wanted to hold onto your SP for the next year and half
I skilled into a secondary role in infantry to help out for PC but since the SP sink for vehicles has been increased by a factor of 3 it means i need all my SP out of infantry
Likewise if someone wants to go all vehicles they need every SP they have
A full respec is the logical choice and outweighs all negatives and can only give positives
When will another total rebalance of any part of the skill tree happen again? frankly it wont and the vehicle tree changes are the biggest to hit and the last to be changed in a long time, all infantry and infantry weapons/mods were balanced long ago with only small changes now n again but this is a 1st for vehicles |
8213
BIG BAD W0LVES
806
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 12:55:00 -
[37] - Quote
1. The Vehicle Refund isn't a respec. Because they are changing the Skills so drastically that CCP needs to let people re-do or stop using vehicles.
2. No respecs, period. For new players' sake. We need to have at least some mispent SP so we're not perfect exploitive killing machines destroying newberries even worse. You realize the Uprising respec is when and what caused the slaughter we see today.
3. Respecs are just a cover up for wanting to spec into something else without having to grind more SP."Mass Drivers got nerfed, so I want spec into Gallente tank and ARs" |
Korvin Lomont
United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION
265
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 13:03:00 -
[38] - Quote
8213 wrote:1. The Vehicle Refund isn't a respec. Because they are changing the Skills so drastically that CCP needs to let people re-do or stop using vehicles.
2. No respecs, period. For new players' sake. We need to have at least some mispent SP so we're not perfect exploitive killing machines destroying newberries even worse. You realize the Uprising respec is when and what caused the slaughter we see today.
3. Respecs are just a cover up for wanting to spec into something else without having to grind more SP."Mass Drivers got nerfed, so I want spec into Gallente tank and ARs"
I would agree IF the skills would be persistant but they are not. To be fair anytime CCP changes the Bonus of a skill they should refund the SP. Because thast basicly a rework of said skill.
By your logic CCP should not refund the Vehicle skills they changed just the ones they removed... |
daishi mk03
BLACK-GUARD Die Fremdenlegion
407
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 13:03:00 -
[39] - Quote
There is no "tanker respec".
Everybody in this game, EVERYBODY, gets SP refunded of skill which are reworked. It's not like only tankers are allowed to respec.
There will never again be a full respec. Period. If skills change, people get SP refunded of said skills.
Give new player 10m SP cap ... that's so effing important. |
Vyzion Eyri
The Southern Legion The Umbra Combine
2117
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 13:07:00 -
[40] - Quote
Next thing you know, dropsuits get tiercided and rebalanced just like vehicles have their 'tiers' in the form of variants removed.
Forum starts crying for a partial respec to infantry skills, and everybody ignores vehicle users asking for a respec too simply because we're a minority.
Make no mistake, infantry is going to be revisited. See all those TTK threads a week ago? They're a sign of massive changes to infantry, and if you get a full respec. now you will most certainly cry for another one when those changes land.
Just my thoughts.
Oh, did you perhaps consider that pilots giving up on vehicles when swarms are nerfed might be a good thing for you infantry? Instead of pelting us with useless AR bullets we'll be stuck in a dropsuit for you to kill as easily as the next person, because we all know the difference between a 10mill infantryman and a 20mill infantryman is negligible if both have Duvolles and damage mods.
Stop victimising the infantry, because in the end you will always have the upper hand in this game.
"When nothing is going your way, go out of your way to do nothing."
|
|
Korvin Lomont
United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION
265
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 13:08:00 -
[41] - Quote
daishi mk03 wrote:There is no "tanker respec".
Everybody in this game, EVERYBODY, gets SP refunded of skill which are reworked. It's not like only tankers are allowed to respec.
There will never again be a full respec. Period. If skills change, people get SP refunded of said skills.
Give new player 10m SP cap ... that's so effing important.
Thats not quite correct. CCP will refund the SP spent for vehicle skills as part of the vehicle rework. They did not refund the SP to those who have spent SP into the Caldari Assault (bonus from Reload speed to smal extender bonus) and Logi (bonus from large extender bonus to regulator bonus) as they altered the skills there if I remember correctly. |
Saheiji
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
27
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 13:09:00 -
[42] - Quote
8213 wrote:1. The Vehicle Refund isn't a respec. Because they are changing the Skills so drastically that CCP needs to let people re-do or stop using vehicles.
2. No respecs, period. For new players' sake. We need to have at least some mispent SP so we're not perfect exploitive killing machines destroying newberries even worse. You realize the Uprising respec is when and what caused the slaughter we see today.
3. Respecs are just a cover up for wanting to spec into something else without having to grind more SP."Mass Drivers got nerfed, so I want spec into Gallente tank and ARs"
This, a million times this. Asking for a respec whenever something happens seems just lazy to me. A skill-bonus changed, an item changed, the server was down for 10 minutes longer than usual, and people cry, beg, ask for a respec. Vehicle specialized Mercenaries get their SP from Vehicle skills refunded because nearly everything about vehicles gets changed, boom, people demand a respec. It's just getting lame.
Say YES to change.
|
Heavenly Daughter
the Aurum Grinder and Company
162
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 13:17:00 -
[43] - Quote
Ryme Intrinseca wrote:The respec for vehicle skills is Pandora's box.
I don't, of course, mind vehicle users getting their SP back to put into their tanks and dropships of choice after the radical changes. The problem is tankers putting their SP into infantry. A 10mil SP tanker will be able to create a better infantryman than a 15mil SP infantryman has. He gets a chance to drop his points after the new rifles are released. He will also know how all the other weapons and suits are balanced in December 2013, which no infantryman had the luxury of when they were allocating their SP. Every dedicated infantryman will have millions of SP tied up in weapons and suits that they no longer use (either due to personal preference or nerfs). Former pilots, on the other hand, will be able to build the best possible infantryman for their SP budget.
Now you might say 'no pilots will want to spec infantry', but I can show you a dozen threads with tankers saying they want a respec to go full infantry. Or you might say NO RESPECS EVAR, HTFU, Welcome to New Eden, live with your choices, etc. And normally I would agree. Look through my posts, before today you will find not one supporting a full respec. But the vehicle respec changes everything. Vehicle users will not have to live with their choices when 1.7 drops. They can be anything they want, regardless of what they chose. Furthermore, they can be build a character that's better at a role they didn't choose - infantry - than anyone who chose that role can. This is a major balance issue.
Now the respec box has been opened, the respec cannot be contained.
I disagree entirely,
WHO ARE YOU, to dictate where I put my points after CCP as per usual GOT IT WRONG AGAIN AND NEED TO RESET THE SP.
If CCP changes the tree setup for vehicles ,do you think for one second people will have any confidence in the new layout over the old, NO. ! not for one second. I for one am glad that i'll be able to drop my MILLIONS wasted on vehicles back into infantry.
I've already calculated what I'm getting back and exactly where its going, including TWO PROTO weapons , 1 advanced racial suit and a few other skills too. :), I'll stick to using the BPO vehicles for as long as I can now until CCP removed them too.
Also pointed out by another on this thread, everyone skilled into vehicles get the SP back and will have the same options as everyone else so your argument doesn't stand, as YOU have a choice too.
. __
/.)\ Nade | Scan Attempt Prevented |
\__/ 514 | Longest Shot 588 Mtrs |
|
Korvin Lomont
United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION
265
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 13:25:00 -
[44] - Quote
Heavenly Daughter wrote:Ryme Intrinseca wrote:The respec for vehicle skills is Pandora's box.
I don't, of course, mind vehicle users getting their SP back to put into their tanks and dropships of choice after the radical changes. The problem is tankers putting their SP into infantry. A 10mil SP tanker will be able to create a better infantryman than a 15mil SP infantryman has. He gets a chance to drop his points after the new rifles are released. He will also know how all the other weapons and suits are balanced in December 2013, which no infantryman had the luxury of when they were allocating their SP. Every dedicated infantryman will have millions of SP tied up in weapons and suits that they no longer use (either due to personal preference or nerfs). Former pilots, on the other hand, will be able to build the best possible infantryman for their SP budget.
Now you might say 'no pilots will want to spec infantry', but I can show you a dozen threads with tankers saying they want a respec to go full infantry. Or you might say NO RESPECS EVAR, HTFU, Welcome to New Eden, live with your choices, etc. And normally I would agree. Look through my posts, before today you will find not one supporting a full respec. But the vehicle respec changes everything. Vehicle users will not have to live with their choices when 1.7 drops. They can be anything they want, regardless of what they chose. Furthermore, they can be build a character that's better at a role they didn't choose - infantry - than anyone who chose that role can. This is a major balance issue.
Now the respec box has been opened, the respec cannot be contained. I disagree entirely, WHO ARE YOU, to dictate where I put my points after CCP as per usual GOT IT WRONG AGAIN AND NEED TO RESET THE SP. If CCP changes the tree setup for vehicles ,do you think for one second people will have any confidence in the new layout over the old, NO. ! not for one second. I for one am glad that i'll be able to drop my MILLIONS wasted on vehicles back into infantry. I've already calculated what I'm getting back and exactly where its going, including TWO PROTO weapons , 1 advanced racial suit and a few other skills too. :), I'll stick to using the BPO vehicles for as long as I can now until CCP removed them too. Also pointed out by another on this thread, everyone skilled into vehicles get the SP back and will have the same options as everyone else so your argument doesn't stand, as YOU have a choice too.
The biggest problem I see here is that CCP already altered skills without a refund so why should vehicle users get a refund of changed skills where others had to live with the changes to their skills?
For skills that get removed the refund is obvious. I am against a full repec for anyone but CCP should be consistent regarding their SP refund policy...
|
Saheiji
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
27
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 13:37:00 -
[45] - Quote
Korvin Lomont wrote:The biggest problem I see here is that CCP already altered skills without a refund so why should vehicle users get a refund of changed skills where others had to live with the changes to their skills?
For skills that get removed the refund is obvious. I am against a full repec for anyone but CCP should be consistent regarding their SP refund policy...
You mean why should they be happy?
Say YES to change.
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
1780
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 13:44:00 -
[46] - Quote
I planned for the vehicle tree, i worked it out how much SP it would take for me to spec it out, i planned ahead
Once i specced out my vehicle tree i started planning for the pilot suits, they never arrived but i managed to save up 8mil SP
No more vehicles were arriving and the vehicle patch was way off in the future, could have been a year maybe more so i spent my SP on a secondary role
Now CCP has changed the amount of SP needed to be a vehicle specialist by a factor of 3, the amount i have now will not cover what i need in 1.7
I need my SP out of infantry to be even close to what i can do now in 1.7
I planned ahead and finished the vehicle tree, now CCP has changed the SP amount so its more of a sink so i now need even more SP to spec out in the vehicle tree
I made my choices, i planned it out and finished the vehicle tree which made me competitve in PC, im happy with my SP in where they are, but between vehicles and infantry i want to go full vehicles and the amount of SP needed in 1.7 has gone up by a factor of 3
In 1.6 i had access to every mod and vehicle (not lolenforcers)
Now i need to put every SP i have into vehicles because they changed it all around and increased the amount needed |
Sum1ne Else
WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL
772
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 13:48:00 -
[47] - Quote
But I want to 'be the mercenary of tomorrow......today!' - CCP Warbarge 2012
Public Relations WJR
Its a leopleuradon Charlie a magical leoplueradon, its gunna guide our way to candy mountain!
|
Zimander
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. Renegade Alliance
8
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 20:00:00 -
[48] - Quote
Tech Ohm Eaven wrote:Zimander wrote:Live with u F*****G choice They Nerf Guns u didn't here Infantry whining about re-space cuz the guns got NERF so shut up accept u decision in DUST Hey another newberry........lol! Hey how about spellcheck?? Yeah thats working great going from 9220 to barely above 4000 peak on weekends.
1Nope im not Neberry i played beta for your info 2 B for u gone say about someone spelling make sure u have good spelling to |
Jadd Hatchen
Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
66
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 20:29:00 -
[49] - Quote
Justicar Karnellia wrote:I'd say this makes sense... even though I'm happy where my points are. I'd also like CCP to bring in a AURUM for respec feature which is limited to 2 per year or something like that. (People without aurum could get one free respec per year). This would prevent the people asking for respecs every balance/patch/hotfix/nerf/new feature is announced.
I agree that AUR for respec would stop a lot of this whining.
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=118583&find=unread
|
TranquilBiscuit ofVaLoR
F.T.U.
695
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 20:47:00 -
[50] - Quote
i find it funny how people are always saying HTFU or NO MORE RESPECS!
do you realize that this game doesn't magically get money from free to play characters? and since this is free to play, there is nothing keeping people from leaving.
sure, nobody cares, but usually the people complaining are the people who spend money on this game, and when they are gone, then where will the profit come from in DUST 514?
Tell me, how exactly DOES a biscuit gain Valor?
|
|
KEROSIINI-TERO
The Rainbow Effect
867
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 20:51:00 -
[51] - Quote
If, because of vehicle skill changes, I would be forced to choose between "No Respec at all for any reason" and "full respec for everyone", I'd choose the no respec policy. Even though I have a char with virtually all SP in vehicles.
Feeling the scanner is too simple and off balance?
The fix:
|
Jadd Hatchen
Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
66
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 21:58:00 -
[52] - Quote
Ok, I ran out of space on the original post and this stupid system only lets you quote up to five times in one posting. So this will be part one of three...
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Live with your choices he says Big ******* problem is that my choices were made some time ago, now CCP has turned the vehicle tree upside down and it now looks completely different
Agreed. And it's still not done. I want to skill into Minmatar Tanks and Minmatar Dropships. Where is my choice at? Do I just not skill anything and save all my SP until 2 years later when they exist?
Pvt Numnutz wrote: Which is why CCP won't do a respect again. Which is why they said choose wisely after uprising. That was it, to avoid situations like this.
But they didn't give me *MY* choice. My choice was for Minmatar rifles and Minmatar Dropships. Where are they at? So I shouldn't play? Or should I just run around with newb gear until then banking millions of SP for the hope that it'll come?
Chunky Munkey wrote: Are they still tanks? Did you pick tanks? That's your choice.
No, my choice was and still is for a Minmatar Tank. I never picked Caldari or Galente, so where is my tank at?
Zimander wrote: Live with u F*****G choice They Nerf Guns u didn't here Infantry whining about re-space cuz the guns got NERF so shut up accept u decision in DUST /quote
I didn't hollar about nerfs like the Flaylock one because I was gonna use the Flaylock whether or not it was a good weapon anyways. Because it was Minmatar and that's what I wanted. But as we see now, the devs are still not sure on that one.
quote=Chunky Munkey It isn't being turned upside down, stop trying to blow it out of proportion. You picked a role, and you still have it. HTFU. You don't hear scouts asking for respecs, you hear them asking for balances & new content. The fact that some tankers don't do the same says to me that they really just wanted to roll about the battlefield with impunity.
And HTFU should apply to the devs too. They knew going into this that they weren't even 50% complete with the full racial spectrum of all the gear for the game. They knew they only had ONE AND ONLY ONE race's heavy armor to offer to the world. They knew they only had TWO RACES, not four, to offer for vehicles. So they should have known that players would want the ones not also available at some point. But to play the game, we had to skill into **** we didn't want in order to get SP to later use for the things we wanted later. And now that all turns out to be a waste of time?
Izlare Lenix wrote: CCP should have never caved into the first wave of "I want a respec." Now whenever something goes from strong to weak the whiners will want "just one more respec." Respecs are a terrible idea. Once you spend SP it is gone. You train it you bought it, sorry no refund.
I would agree with you if they hadn't already done the other two waves of respecs and declared this new wave of respecs. But since, as the OP pointed out, they have opened that box up, they have to live with it. So the "fair" thing to do is to give EVERYONE the option for a respec. If you "hardasses" don't want to use it, then don't and you can be masters of the forums for a day as you are so hardcore. But many of us still want to fly Minmatar Assault Dropships while wearing our Minmatar racial Pilot's suit using our Minmatar autocannon on it. But where the f**k are they at?
To be continued on next post... part two of three... |
Jadd Hatchen
Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
66
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 21:59:00 -
[53] - Quote
Part two of three...
8213 wrote: 1. The Vehicle Refund isn't a respec. Because they are changing the Skills so drastically that CCP needs to let people re-do or stop using vehicles. 2. No respecs, period. For new players' sake. We need to have at least some mispent SP so we're not perfect exploitive killing machines destroying newberries even worse. You realize the Uprising respec is when and what caused the slaughter we see today. 3. Respecs are just a cover up for wanting to spec into something else without having to grind more SP."Mass Drivers got nerfed, so I want spec into Gallente tank and ARs"
No, in this case for me, the respec lets me move something out of a category I would never have skilled into if I had the choice in the beginning that I should have had. In this case, all the points I have in AR I would instead put into Combat Rifle as I'm not Gallente, I'm Minmatar and I want Minmatar things. It's not lazy, it's the lack of options that the devs gave to me. So if ANYONE is lazy here it's the devs for not putting out all 4 races of stuff to begin with.
Saheiji wrote: This, a million times this. Asking for a respec whenever something happens seems just lazy to me. A skill-bonus changed, an item changed, the server was down for 10 minutes longer than usual, and people cry, beg, ask for a respec. Vehicle specialized Mercenaries get their SP from Vehicle skills refunded because nearly everything about vehicles gets changed, boom, people demand a respec. It's just getting lame.
I agree that respecs shouldn't happen for any reason, but BECAUSE they are already admitting their mistake and giving a respec to SOME then it is not fair to the rest that are not getting it. I put points into AR because I understood that when the Minmatar guns would come out later I would be able to put those points into that. But now that is not going to happen. They gave the expectation that a FULL respec would happen for everyone and instead are only giving a partial to some. This is what is upsetting me. I didn't want to waste my time with non-Minmatar stuff, but due to the VERY limited choices available in the game I had to skill into some weapon rather than none. And because the devs were "lazy" and did not give me the choice that I knew was supposed to be there, I had to pick from the choices that they gave me. Now they are telling others that they get a partial respec for bad choices they had to make because of their inadequate implementation and I'm claiming the exact thing. The didn't provide me with the full list of Minmatar choices and now I'm being screwed for it.
Korvin Lomont wrote: I disagree entirely,
WHO ARE YOU, to dictate where I put my points after CCP as per usual GOT IT WRONG AGAIN AND NEED TO RESET THE SP.
If CCP changes the tree setup for vehicles ,do you think for one second people will have any confidence in the new layout over the old, NO. ! not for one second. I for one am glad that i'll be able to drop my MILLIONS wasted on vehicles back into infantry.
I've already calculated what I'm getting back and exactly where its going, including TWO PROTO weapons , 1 advanced racial suit and a few other skills too. :), I'll stick to using the BPO vehicles for as long as I can now until CCP removed them too.
Also pointed out by another on this thread, everyone skilled into vehicles get the SP back and will have the same options as everyone else so your argument doesn't stand, as YOU have a choice too.
The biggest problem I see here is that CCP already altered skills without a refund so why should vehicle users get a refund of changed skills where others had to live with the changes to their skills?
For skills that get removed the refund is obvious. I am against a full repec for anyone but CCP should be consistent regarding their SP refund policy...
I agree with this. They've already established the trend. And until they FINISH the CORE of the game (meaning all the racial types for weapons, dropsuits, and vehicles) then this is an incomplete game and the expectation is that it will all get fixed and at that time players will have to option to fix the choices that they were FORCED INTO by the limited choices presented by the unfinished product.
to be continued on part 3... |
Jadd Hatchen
Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
66
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 22:00:00 -
[54] - Quote
part 3 of 3...
TranquilBiscuit ofVaLoR wrote:i find it funny how people are always saying HTFU or NO MORE RESPECS!
do you realize that this game doesn't magically get money from free to play characters? and since this is free to play, there is nothing keeping people from leaving.
sure, nobody cares, but usually the people complaining are the people who spend money on this game, and when they are gone, then where will the profit come from in DUST 514?
I may not have spent money on the game (I actually have, but mostly to try things out), but I have invested a lot of my TIME and for me that is a more limited item than money is. I can always earn more money, I cannot invent a time machine and get my life back. Besides which "free to play" is a misnomer because it isn't. Somewhere along the line someone pays.
Honestly, I don't care if they never do a respec again, but if they are gonna do any at all, then they need to be fair and impartial and provide it to EVERYONE. They already know that they cannot predict every possible usage and outcome of the things that they implement in game. Players will always be inventive and surprising and the way that the devs intend something to play out is hardly ever how it actually works out. The same applies to this haphazard way in which they are trying to do a partial respec. It an have unintended consequences that are worse than if they did a full respec. Again, I like to play Minmatar and you limited my ability to do so from beta. All I'm asking is that you give me a way to fix the choices you forced me into. What am I talking about?
Guy A wants to spec into Amarr only: Amarr Assault Suit, check Amarr Sidearm, check (scrambler pistol) Amarr Rifle, check (scrambler rifle) Good to go!
Guy B wanting to spec into Minmatar only: Minmatar Assault Suit, check Minmatar Sidearm, check (even though Flaylock says it's Minmatar, it's actually the SMG so likely to get confused and get wrong one) Minmatar Rifle... um, nothing available... What to do? Well AR is a projectile weapon right? so use that? WTF?
This is the choice you forced me into. I only want to move my AR SP to the new Combat Rifle when it comes out as it should be, but now I'm going to have millions of wasted skillpoints stuck in the AR. So WTF, how is this one simple situation supposed to be balanced? It gets a whole lot worse and lopsided and screwwed up if you apply it to heavy suits (only Amarr available duh) and heavy weapons or with vehicles (only Galente and Caldari available wtf?).
So what happens to all the players that wanted to stay and specialize into only one race's stuff? They just get screwed over and have to waste all that time and SP?
So do you at least understand the issue and problem that I'm pointing out here?
|
BMSTUBBY
341
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 22:22:00 -
[55] - Quote
Jadd Hatchen wrote:
So do you at least understand the issue and problem that I'm pointing out here?
Good luck getting CCP and EVE uber l33t fanbois to understand any of what you just posted.
I used to play DUST514 but then CCP took a COD arrow to their knee.
MMO Someday SoonGäó
|
KING CHECKMATE
AMARR IMPERIAL CRUSADERS
2425
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 22:25:00 -
[56] - Quote
Ryme Intrinseca wrote:The respec for vehicle skills is Pandora's box.
I don't, of course, mind vehicle users getting their SP back to put into their tanks and dropships of choice after the radical changes. The problem is tankers putting their SP into infantry. A 10mil SP tanker will be able to create a better infantryman than a 15mil SP infantryman has. He gets a chance to drop his points after the new rifles are released. He will also know how all the other weapons and suits are balanced in December 2013, which no infantryman had the luxury of when they were allocating their SP. Every dedicated infantryman will have millions of SP tied up in weapons and suits that they no longer use (either due to personal preference or nerfs). Former pilots, on the other hand, will be able to build the best possible infantryman for their SP budget.
Now you might say 'no pilots will want to spec infantry', but I can show you a dozen threads with tankers saying they want a respec to go full infantry. Or you might say NO RESPECS EVAR, HTFU, Welcome to New Eden, live with your choices, etc. And normally I would agree. Look through my posts, before today you will find not one supporting a full respec. But the vehicle respec changes everything. Vehicle users will not have to live with their choices when 1.7 drops. They can be anything they want, regardless of what they chose. Furthermore, they can be build a character that's better at a role they didn't choose - infantry - than anyone who chose that role can. This is a major balance issue.
Now the respec box has been opened, the respec cannot be contained.
+1 well said brother.
The Best Damage Mod, its a Headshot....
|
True Adamance
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
4299
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 22:31:00 -
[57] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Live with your choices he says
Big ******* problem is that my choices were made some time ago, now CCP has turned the vehicle tree upside down and it now looks completely different
Well said...and that will be the case for all forms of respect until all core content is out and skill trees are set in stone.
"All things were created by the Divine, and so the glory of our faith is inherent to us all"
|
Ryme Intrinseca
Seraphim Auxiliaries
286
|
Posted - 2013.11.26 14:01:00 -
[58] - Quote
Heavenly Daughter wrote:Ryme Intrinseca wrote:The respec for vehicle skills is Pandora's box.
I don't, of course, mind vehicle users getting their SP back to put into their tanks and dropships of choice after the radical changes. The problem is tankers putting their SP into infantry. A 10mil SP tanker will be able to create a better infantryman than a 15mil SP infantryman has. He gets a chance to drop his points after the new rifles are released. He will also know how all the other weapons and suits are balanced in December 2013, which no infantryman had the luxury of when they were allocating their SP. Every dedicated infantryman will have millions of SP tied up in weapons and suits that they no longer use (either due to personal preference or nerfs). Former pilots, on the other hand, will be able to build the best possible infantryman for their SP budget.
Now you might say 'no pilots will want to spec infantry', but I can show you a dozen threads with tankers saying they want a respec to go full infantry. Or you might say NO RESPECS EVAR, HTFU, Welcome to New Eden, live with your choices, etc. And normally I would agree. Look through my posts, before today you will find not one supporting a full respec. But the vehicle respec changes everything. Vehicle users will not have to live with their choices when 1.7 drops. They can be anything they want, regardless of what they chose. Furthermore, they can be build a character that's better at a role they didn't choose - infantry - than anyone who chose that role can. This is a major balance issue.
Now the respec box has been opened, the respec cannot be contained. I disagree entirely, WHO ARE YOU, to dictate where I put my points after CCP as per usual GOT IT WRONG AGAIN AND NEED TO RESET THE SP. If CCP changes the tree setup for vehicles ,do you think for one second people will have any confidence in the new layout over the old, NO. ! not for one second. I for one am glad that i'll be able to drop my MILLIONS wasted on vehicles back into infantry. I've already calculated what I'm getting back and exactly where its going, including TWO PROTO weapons , 1 advanced racial suit and a few other skills too. :), I'll stick to using the BPO vehicles for as long as I can now until CCP removed them too. Also pointed out by another on this thread, everyone skilled into vehicles get the SP back and will have the same options as everyone else so your argument doesn't stand, as YOU have a choice too. I get the same options as everyone else do i? 25 mil SP and im only getting half a mil back - not even enough to proto one rifle. While former pilots like yourself can prof 5 both rifles from day 1.
The respec is only really good for people in that exact position - vehicle users who want to turn full infantry. Anyone who is committed to their role gets the ****** end of the stick. Infantry get almost no SP back and are locked out of the new toys, while committed vehicle users dont get enough to SP back for their role due to the skill tree changes. And there i was thinking we were supposed to live with our choices. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |