DUST Search - No Turret removal :'(

All Channels

General Discussions

No Turret removal :'(

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 3 post(s)
Jason Pearson Animus Securities 2917	Posted - 2013.09.28 13:10:00 - [1] - Quote It was the only thing I wanted, am I bad for looking at the patch notes and not caring? Oh and I'm back now, prepare for many threads of QQ and rage until such the point that CCP decides to "remove" me for a terribad reason, again. King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here! Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here!
Crash Monster Snipers Anonymous 1483	Posted - 2013.09.28 13:11:00 - [2] - Quote Great, we don't get many QQ rage threads or anything... do you imagine we'll even notice?
Jason Pearson Animus Securities 2917	Posted - 2013.09.28 13:12:00 - [3] - Quote I am a sophisticated QQer, you'll notice I am sure. King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here! Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here!
Ansiiis The Trustworthy Robbing The Hood Public Disorder. 328	Posted - 2013.09.28 13:16:00 - [4] - Quote I know this is off topic but... Have you proven yourself yet?
Jason Pearson Animus Securities 2917	Posted - 2013.09.28 13:19:00 - [5] - Quote Prove myself my dear Ansiiis? I do so on a regular basis. King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here! Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here!
G Torq ALTA B2O 236	Posted - 2013.09.28 13:37:00 - [6] - Quote Jason Pearson wrote: It was the only thing I wanted, am I bad for looking at the patch notes and not caring? No, I checked; you're generally bad ;) Anyways, not every patch can have something for everybody - accept that some are more directly interesting to you, and some are less so.
Jason Pearson Animus Securities 2917	Posted - 2013.09.28 13:48:00 - [7] - Quote G Torq wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: It was the only thing I wanted, am I bad for looking at the patch notes and not caring? No, I checked; you're generally bad ;) Anyways, not every patch can have something for everybody - accept that some are more directly interesting to you, and some are less so. :'( NO YOU! But, I could've been so happy, I could've supported my team without being a distraction for blues that wanted to jump into my vehicle and fire at the MCC King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here! Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here!
shaman oga Nexus Balusa Horizon DARKSTAR ARMY 717	Posted - 2013.09.28 13:58:00 - [8] - Quote Somebody posted the proof that the blue were right, they CAN damage the enemy MCC, if you can't beat them join them
Mortedeamor Internal Rebellion 290	Posted - 2013.09.28 15:37:00 - [9] - Quote really jason u weren't excited about them giving us a vehicle lock 2? hey they gave us wp for transport but no vehicle lock again ccp does nothing but exacerbate the issue with vehicles
Mortedeamor Internal Rebellion 290	Posted - 2013.09.28 15:45:00 - [10] - Quote G Torq wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: It was the only thing I wanted, am I bad for looking at the patch notes and not caring? No, I checked; you're generally bad ;) Anyways, not every patch can have something for everybody - accept that some are more directly interesting to you, and some are less so. 1 jason pearson is one of the few decent tankers in dust 2 ccp has never done anything good for the vehicle class so no we dont expect every patch to be for us..we expect 1 PATCH FOR THE MOST RUINED ASPECT OF DUST now for over a year ccp has done nothing but infantry changes..and vehicle nerfs the entirety of the vehicle av aspect of dust is 100% destroyed but they dont feel its necessary atm to do anything about it..i bet if you did a tally you would find that a majority of the missing vet playerbase amounts to the old vehicle specs. the changes they are making in 1.5 are minimal and not enough to pull any of the playerbase back ccp's epic fail continues in uprising 1.5 you cannot blame the vehicle specs of dust for being this worn out, and fed up with dust ccp has never done anything for them..i am an ex tanker and current aver. my aspect of this game is broken. it is no fun insta popping vehicles ccp no serious gamer could specc up av and enjoy this game. it's boringly easy and has only gotten easier the more you nerf tanks.

Jason Pearson Animus Securities 2922	Posted - 2013.09.28 18:10:00 - [11] - Quote Mortedeamor wrote: really jason u weren't excited about them giving us a vehicle lock 2? hey they gave us wp for transport but no vehicle lock again ccp does nothing but exacerbate the issue with vehicles Apparently if a turret was removed so was the seat, so the Vehicle Lock didn't bother me as I never call a vehicle in/get out near blue/green dots, so much can go wrong. I can't even say I'm mad, just disappointed in CCP's ability to make promises and then not keep to them, we ask for this, they say yes, then they give us something we begged for months ago and we still can't use it because we cannot kick people from the vehicle, even if we come to a full stop and try and recall. **** is ridiculous. King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here! Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here!
ladwar Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn 1734	Posted - 2013.09.28 18:27:00 - [12] - Quote anything to do with vehicles was pushed...
Jason Pearson Animus Securities 2923	Posted - 2013.09.28 18:32:00 - [13] - Quote ladwar wrote: anything to do with vehicles was pushed... I knew the rebalance would be pushed back, but I always hoped they'd stick with allowing us to remove turrets, I truly looked forward to 1.5 for only that reason. King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here! Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here!
Lorhak Gannarsein Molon Labe. RISE of LEGION 439	Posted - 2013.09.28 18:36:00 - [14] - Quote Yeah. That was the thing I was looking forward to... I could even have dealt with (yet) another nerf to go with it; the security the removal of turrets would give me would be worth it.
ladwar Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn 1734	Posted - 2013.09.28 18:53:00 - [15] - Quote Jason Pearson wrote: ladwar wrote: anything to do with vehicles was pushed... I knew the rebalance would be pushed back, but I always hoped they'd stick with allowing us to remove turrets, I truly looked forward to 1.5 for only that reason. that's a big mistake. always prepare for the worse and hope for the best. the armor damage wasn't mentioned in 1.4 patches notes but still made it in.
Jason Pearson Animus Securities 2925	Posted - 2013.09.28 18:55:00 - [16] - Quote ladwar wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: ladwar wrote: anything to do with vehicles was pushed... I knew the rebalance would be pushed back, but I always hoped they'd stick with allowing us to remove turrets, I truly looked forward to 1.5 for only that reason. that's a big mistake. always prepare for the worse and hope for the best. the armor damage wasn't mentioned in 1.4 patches notes but still made it in. Bah, I know the rules :/ Never expect anything from CCP, it's probably disappointment, but it was so close :'( King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here! Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here!
G Torq ALTA B2O 237	Posted - 2013.09.30 17:51:00 - [17] - Quote Jason Pearson wrote: G Torq wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: It was the only thing I wanted, am I bad for looking at the patch notes and not caring? No, I checked; you're generally bad ;) Anyways, not every patch can have something for everybody - accept that some are more directly interesting to you, and some are less so. :'( NO YOU! But, I could've been so happy, I could've supported my team without being a distraction for blues that wanted to jump into my vehicle and fire at the MCC No worries, I think we'll both have reason to be happier sometime in the next 24 hours...
DUST Fiend OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 6521	Posted - 2013.09.30 17:52:00 - [18] - Quote This patch genuinely makes me laugh. Not to say it doesn't contain good things, but just....elohel.
Spkr4theDead International-Fleet 925	Posted - 2013.09.30 17:54:00 - [19] - Quote Jason Pearson wrote: Mortedeamor wrote: really jason u weren't excited about them giving us a vehicle lock 2? hey they gave us wp for transport but no vehicle lock again ccp does nothing but exacerbate the issue with vehicles Apparently if a turret was removed so was the seat, so the Vehicle Lock didn't bother me as I never call a vehicle in/get out near blue/green dots, so much can go wrong. I can't even say I'm mad, just disappointed in CCP's ability to make promises and then not keep to them, we ask for this, they say yes, then they give us something we begged for months ago and we still can't use it because we cannot kick people from the vehicle, even if we come to a full stop and try and recall. **** is ridiculous. King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here! Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here! Works even better for the seat to be removed.
Spkr4theDead International-Fleet 925	Posted - 2013.09.30 17:55:00 - [20] - Quote ladwar wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: ladwar wrote: anything to do with vehicles was pushed... I knew the rebalance would be pushed back, but I always hoped they'd stick with allowing us to remove turrets, I truly looked forward to 1.5 for only that reason. that's a big mistake. always prepare for the worse and hope for the best. the armor damage wasn't mentioned in 1.4 patches notes but still made it in. What armor damage in 1.4? I know explosive weaponry already had a bonus against armor.

THUNDERGROOVE ZionTCD 189	Posted - 2013.09.30 18:20:00 - [21] - Quote I already had my fit planned out for a domination CRU LAV too ;_;
CLONE117 Planetary Response Organization Test Friends Please Ignore 379	Posted - 2013.09.30 18:46:00 - [22] - Quote hmmm imagine the small amount of isk, pg and cpu id save with out the requirement of having to fit 2 small turrets on my hav!!!!!!!!!!
Jason Pearson Animus Securities 2941	Posted - 2013.09.30 19:03:00 - [23] - Quote CLONE117 wrote: hmmm imagine the small amount of isk, pg and cpu id save with out the requirement of having to fit 2 small turrets on my hav!!!!!!!!!! Meh ISK isn't important but you'd save a minimum of 160PG (Which is a lot on a Gunnlogi), but the main reason it's wanted is because it apparently removes the seat, meaning you could role up as a SUPPORT HAV, moving with blue dots rather than having them all scramble to get in. Blue dots are bad :( They're more effective as AR players than using my Missile Turrets, and if I need to run away I'm taking an additional 2 players out of the fight, and even bad players can turn the table when it comes to zerging someone, so by letting us remove the seats, we'll be able to roll up next to them and even roll in front of them to stop them being hit by small arms fire (I try this so many times, yet the squad of Blue dots I'm trying to cover, they stop firing and all turn to try and get in my tank, and when they can't they just fire at the tank and get themselves kill.) :'( King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here! Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here!
The legend345 TeamPlayers EoN. 1004	Posted - 2013.09.30 19:22:00 - [24] - Quote All i know is ima fan of your spider tanking :).
Xender17 Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN. 694	Posted - 2013.09.30 19:47:00 - [25] - Quote This topic has turned into a blog.
DUST Fiend OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 6528	Posted - 2013.09.30 19:49:00 - [26] - Quote Xender17 wrote: This topic has turned into a blog. This blog has turned into a taco.
Godin Thekiller Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 983	Posted - 2013.09.30 20:04:00 - [27] - Quote G Torq wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: It was the only thing I wanted, am I bad for looking at the patch notes and not caring? No, I checked; you're generally bad ;) Anyways, not every patch can have something for everybody - accept that some are more directly interesting to you, and some are less so. You really just typed that?
N1ck Comeau Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN. 1475	Posted - 2013.09.30 20:33:00 - [28] - Quote if rendering gets fixed thats a huge buff to all vehicles
G Torq ALTA B2O 237	Posted - 2013.10.01 09:22:00 - [29] - Quote Godin Thekiller wrote: G Torq wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: It was the only thing I wanted, am I bad for looking at the patch notes and not caring? No, I checked; you're generally bad ;) Anyways, not every patch can have something for everybody - accept that some are more directly interesting to you, and some are less so. You really just typed that? No, I typed it some time ago. Something on your mind?
ChromeBreaker SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 1320	Posted - 2013.10.01 09:29:00 - [30] - Quote Ha an extra 140+ pg and what... 80+ cpu... i would say thats quite a major balance change for tanks. Il be honest i doubt very much that CCP will do it. Lock your tanks by all means


CCP Logibro C C P C C P Alliance 2405	Posted - 2013.10.01 11:11:00 - [31] - Quote It's coming still, but not in 1.5 or 1.6. (And removing a turret removes the seat ) CCP Logibro // EVE Universe Community Team // Distributor of Nanites // Patron Saint of Logistics @CCP_Logibro

ChromeBreaker SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 1321	Posted - 2013.10.01 11:14:00 - [32] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: It's coming still, but not in 1.5 or 1.6. Yay found a dev
Jason Pearson Animus Securities 2952	Posted - 2013.10.01 11:18:00 - [33] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: It's coming still, but not in 1.5 or 1.6. (And removing a turret removes the seat ) Not 1.6 either? lol, yeah, I'm not going to bother logging in for a while then. King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here! Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here!
meri jin Goonfeet Top Men. 494	Posted - 2013.10.01 11:19:00 - [34] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: It's coming still, but not in 1.5 or 1.6. (And removing a turret removes the seat ) This is bitter sweet. I would love to look my vehicle as well, the LAVs can get expensive as well.
pegasis prime BIG BAD W0LVES 1098	Posted - 2013.10.01 11:25:00 - [35] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: It's coming still, but not in 1.5 or 1.6. Wow just wow. Us vehicle operatives have been playing this game through several nerfs and many many broken promises. How hard would it have been to even implament this simple function as a wee gesture of faith that you are acctually doing something to balance vehicles? How hard would it have been to give us our pg skill back? Something ALL vehicle ooeratives want. How hard would it have been to apply wp for vehicle scanners ? Ccp you have done nothing but pander to cod boys and whiners when folks like us vet pilots stick arround long after these folks have gone, even after all the nerfs you put us through we still stay and hold on to the thought of you balancing vehicles. You still disappoint and let down some of your most hardcore playerbase and wont even give us a morsel of balance.
Arc-08 Horizons' Edge Orion Empire 105	Posted - 2013.10.01 11:25:00 - [36] - Quote seriously, not in 1.6 either! i know it was alot of work for you, and you had to postpone it, but really 2 months! :( NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
The Attorney General ZionTCD 1085	Posted - 2013.10.01 11:29:00 - [37] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: It's coming still, but not in 1.5 or 1.6. (And removing a turret removes the seat ) Are vehicle locks post 1.6 as well? If they are, then Jason is right, time to take a long ass break from Dust. Appreciate the honesty, but really, what the hell is going on that yo can't even produce some small help for vehicles in the waiting period until you finally get the vehicle balance pass ready? Right now, I would put the odds of vehicle balance getting done in 1.6 at less than 20%. Don't worry CCP, feel free to take your time, not like there is no competition out there or anything.
pegasis prime BIG BAD W0LVES 1099	Posted - 2013.10.01 11:38:00 - [38] - Quote All us hav pilots shoukd take a 60.day break from dust and claim our black egle and quafe.suits.
Arc-08 Horizons' Edge Orion Empire 106	Posted - 2013.10.01 11:40:00 - [39] - Quote and same with dropship pilots
Jason Pearson Animus Securities 2961	Posted - 2013.10.01 11:44:00 - [40] - Quote pegasis prime wrote: All us hav pilots shoukd take a 60.day break from dust and claim our black egle and quafe.suits. Working on it :) King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here! Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here!


CCP Logibro C C P C C P Alliance 2411	Posted - 2013.10.01 11:57:00 - [41] - Quote We are looking at putting some stuff into 1.6 to alleviate some pressure points ahead of the general vehicle rebalance, but I don't have specifics (but I think I might have heard something about dropships in between howls in the night) CCP Logibro // EVE Universe Community Team // Distributor of Nanites // Patron Saint of Logistics @CCP_Logibro

The Attorney General ZionTCD 1087	Posted - 2013.10.01 12:06:00 - [42] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: We are looking at putting some stuff into 1.6 to alleviate some pressure points ahead of the general vehicle rebalance, but I don't have specifics (but I think I might have heard something about dropships in between howls in the night) And there is confirmation vehicles are not getting done before Christmas. Tankers, we can all just take it easy until January. Thank god I skilled into RE's and Sniper Rifles. Time to be a scrub.
calisk galern BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder. 1046	Posted - 2013.10.01 12:45:00 - [43] - Quote i'd try to fit it in, vehicles have been waiting for something for a long time.... either this or vehicle locks.
Absolute Idiom II No Free Pass 789	Posted - 2013.10.01 12:46:00 - [44] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: We are looking at putting some stuff into 1.6 to alleviate some pressure points ahead of the general vehicle rebalance, but I don't have specifics (but I think I might have heard something about dropships in between howls in the night) Do you mean 1.5 since vehicles is currently slated for 1.6?
Zeylon Rho Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 2586	Posted - 2013.10.01 12:52:00 - [45] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: We are looking at putting some stuff into 1.6 to alleviate some pressure points ahead of the general vehicle rebalance, but I don't have specifics (but I think I might have heard something about dropships in between howls in the night) Does this mean that the new infantry weapons (and their balance) is 1.6? Or is that even later? It seems odd to release vehicle notes ahead of weapon notes for input if the former is releasing after the latter.

CCP Logibro C C P C C P Alliance 2415	Posted - 2013.10.01 12:55:00 - [46] - Quote Absolute Idiom II wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: We are looking at putting some stuff into 1.6 to alleviate some pressure points ahead of the general vehicle rebalance, but I don't have specifics (but I think I might have heard something about dropships in between howls in the night) Do you mean 1.5 since vehicles is currently slated for 1.6? No. The major vehicle changes aren't going to be in 1.6. We ran into some integration issues with the existing work that's going to take a little too long to iron out. CCP Logibro // EVE Universe Community Team // Distributor of Nanites // Patron Saint of Logistics @CCP_Logibro

DUST Fiend OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 6565	Posted - 2013.10.01 12:59:00 - [47] - Quote Removing turret removes the seat? Whos fail idea was that? Blueberry gunners dont shoot anything as is.....wow man....just....wow.
Jason Pearson Animus Securities 2961	Posted - 2013.10.01 13:04:00 - [48] - Quote DUST Fiend wrote: Removing turret removes the seat? Whos fail idea was that? Blueberry gunners dont shoot anything as is.....wow man....just....wow. Maybe for Dropships.. for Tanks they shoot at the MCC and the sky constantly, I quite liked the thought of it removing the seat. King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here! Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here!
Aeon Amadi A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. 3187	Posted - 2013.10.01 13:07:00 - [49] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: Absolute Idiom II wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: We are looking at putting some stuff into 1.6 to alleviate some pressure points ahead of the general vehicle rebalance, but I don't have specifics (but I think I might have heard something about dropships in between howls in the night) Do you mean 1.5 since vehicles is currently slated for 1.6? No. The major vehicle changes aren't going to be in 1.6. We ran into some integration issues with the existing work that's going to take a little too long to iron out. Same goes for the weapon changes. Think it might be time for CCP to hire Bioware's Public Relations guy.
The Attorney General ZionTCD 1089	Posted - 2013.10.01 13:08:00 - [50] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: No. The major vehicle changes aren't going to be in 1.6. We ran into some integration issues with the existing work that's going to take a little too long to iron out. Same goes for the weapon changes. Quoting for posterity, and damn, that sucks. Best of luck with it, looking forward to giving opinions when you get those numbers out.

Reav Hannari Red Rock Outriders 1547	Posted - 2013.10.01 13:08:00 - [51] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: No. The major vehicle changes aren't going to be in 1.6. We ran into some integration issues with the existing work that's going to take a little too long to iron out. Same goes for the weapon changes. Is 1.6 going to turn into another light weight patch? I'm not complaining, just managing my own expectations. Integration issues? Sounds like someone dug in deep with the code chainsaw. Speaking of which, I get to fire up the chainsaw at work today. It's going to be glorious.
Harpyja Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 593	Posted - 2013.10.01 13:12:00 - [52] - Quote Broken promise after broken promise. "First vehicle balance pass will happen in 1.5" - before 1.4 deployment. "Sorry, more work than we expected, so it will happen in 1.6" - after 1.4 deployment. "Uhmm, yeah. We are too lazy so don't expect anything in 1.6 either" - before 1.5 deployment. Come on CCP, put your **** together. I kept my faith for a while, but I might just throw it away if there is one more broken promise.
grunt party Carbon 7 CRONOS. 59	Posted - 2013.10.01 13:17:00 - [53] - Quote Jason Pearson wrote: It was the only thing I wanted, am I bad for looking at the patch notes and not caring? Oh and I'm back now, prepare for many threads of QQ and rage until such the point that CCP decides to "remove" me for a terribad reason, again. King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here! Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here! he is back ban him
Aeon Amadi A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. 3189	Posted - 2013.10.01 13:24:00 - [54] - Quote Harpyja wrote: Broken promise after broken promise. "First vehicle balance pass will happen in 1.5" - before 1.4 deployment. "Sorry, more work than we expected, so it will happen in 1.6" - after 1.4 deployment. "Uhmm, yeah. We are too lazy so don't expect anything in 1.6 either" - before 1.5 deployment. Come on CCP, put your **** together. I kept my faith for a while, but I might just throw it away if there is one more broken promise. You could always do what I'm doing and go to college for game design to help out.
Vespasian Andendare Subsonic Synthesis Alpha Wolf Pack 495	Posted - 2013.10.01 13:50:00 - [55] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: Absolute Idiom II wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: We are looking at putting some stuff into 1.6 to alleviate some pressure points ahead of the general vehicle rebalance, but I don't have specifics (but I think I might have heard something about dropships in between howls in the night) Do you mean 1.5 since vehicles is currently slated for 1.6? No. The major vehicle changes aren't going to be in 1.6. We ran into some integration issues with the existing work that's going to take a little too long to iron out. Same goes for the weapon changes. Oy, CCP. You're making it hard to buy what you guys are selling.
Aeon Amadi A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. 3193	Posted - 2013.10.01 13:57:00 - [56] - Quote Vespasian Andendare wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: Absolute Idiom II wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: We are looking at putting some stuff into 1.6 to alleviate some pressure points ahead of the general vehicle rebalance, but I don't have specifics (but I think I might have heard something about dropships in between howls in the night) Do you mean 1.5 since vehicles is currently slated for 1.6? No. The major vehicle changes aren't going to be in 1.6. We ran into some integration issues with the existing work that's going to take a little too long to iron out. Same goes for the weapon changes. Oy, CCP. You're making it hard to buy what you guys are selling. Patience =D It'll all pay off. You also get the luxury of what many Eve Players have: Being able to say you were around during the Dark Ages when things were terrible. I was there when Gallente literally had no useful ship apart from the Lachesis/Arazu and Capital Ships. Now, Gallente are amazing ^_^
Tebu Gan CrimeWave Syndicate 117	Posted - 2013.10.01 14:11:00 - [57] - Quote Wow, just wow. I don't even know what to say. Been waiting on this for 3 months now. So now it's December, MAYBE. sigh This game keeps dwindling down further and further. Most everyone I have played with don't bother signing on. GtaV online today. Probably be buggy as hell, but I bet ya they fix those issues quicker than once a month! Now I want a respec. Done with tanks...
Aeon Amadi A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. 3197	Posted - 2013.10.01 14:14:00 - [58] - Quote Tebu Gan wrote: Wow, just wow. I don't even know what to say. Been waiting on this for 3 months now. So now it's December, MAYBE. sigh This game keeps dwindling down further and further. Most everyone I have played with don't bother signing on. GtaV online today. Probably be buggy as hell, but I bet ya they fix those issues quicker than once a month! Now I want a respec. Done with tanks... Helps when you have revenue to boot
Robert JD Niewiadomski NULLIMPEX INC 583	Posted - 2013.10.01 14:16:00 - [59] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: We are looking at putting some stuff into 1.6 to alleviate some pressure points ahead of the general vehicle rebalance, but I don't have specifics (but I think I might have heard something about dropships in between howls in the night) Cough... Cough... Infantry weapons use for dropship passengers maybe? Cos it doesn't feels like major change... Don't shoot! Don't shoot! I am UP!
Sgt Buttscratch SLAPHAPPY BANDITS 855	Posted - 2013.10.01 14:25:00 - [60] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: Absolute Idiom II wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: We are looking at putting some stuff into 1.6 to alleviate some pressure points ahead of the general vehicle rebalance, but I don't have specifics (but I think I might have heard something about dropships in between howls in the night) Do you mean 1.5 since vehicles is currently slated for 1.6? No. The major vehicle changes aren't going to be in 1.6. We ran into some integration issues with the existing work that's going to take a little too long to iron out. Same goes for the weapon changes. This is just pathetic, quit worrying about your ***** AUR items getting integrated and get us a base game. (They managed to get AUR versions of every weapon added in very easily) 1.5 SHOULD HAVE: Reduced vehicle/turret/module prices by half in many case enforcers reduced by 1million ISK. Swarmer fix, 1.4 buff is ******, you can get hit by 3 proto swarm volleys before reps activate. Increase price fore forge guns, 610 ISK gets you a MLT forge fun that does more nearly 400 more direct damage, and 75(ish) more splash than a 16k rail gun. PG skill fixed from giving a cpu reduction to PG modules, to actually GIVING PG. Rail turrets should have the same rendering range as rail turret installation, same goes for missiles. Increase drophip hp. None of this is hard to do. pricing requires some numbers being changed, swarmer, revert to 1.3, PG skill, copy the drop suit engineering and manipulate the code a little. Turret installations, revert their setting to 1.2, reduce missile range to 400m. Dropship hp change the numbers. We'll test the changes for you, we always do, even if you say you've already tested them. We need some small tie overs, at this rate, you are screwing yourself. We need some quick fixes

Shley Ashes TanksVeryMuch 29	Posted - 2013.10.01 14:44:00 - [61] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: It's coming still, but not in 1.5 or 1.6. (And removing a turret removes the seat ) So this would also be the reason that no Dev blog / Forum post's from Wolfman have appeared What a let down..... I am incredibly disappointed......... /walks away /to original Hulk TV series theme
Noc Tempre Imperfects Negative-Feedback 2559	Posted - 2013.10.01 14:55:00 - [62] - Quote Jason Pearson wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: It's coming still, but not in 1.5 or 1.6. (And removing a turret removes the seat ) Not 1.6 either? lol, yeah, I'm not going to bother logging in for a while then. King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here! Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here! I hear there is free swag for that.
Ryder Azorria Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 619	Posted - 2013.10.01 15:07:00 - [63] - Quote Sgt Buttscratch wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: Absolute Idiom II wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: We are looking at putting some stuff into 1.6 to alleviate some pressure points ahead of the general vehicle rebalance, but I don't have specifics (but I think I might have heard something about dropships in between howls in the night) Do you mean 1.5 since vehicles is currently slated for 1.6? No. The major vehicle changes aren't going to be in 1.6. We ran into some integration issues with the existing work that's going to take a little too long to iron out. Same goes for the weapon changes. This is just pathetic, quit worrying about your ******* AUR items getting integrated and get us a base game. (They managed to get AUR versions of every weapon added in very easily) By "Integration issues" I'm fairly confident he meant either technical or balance problems ( or possibly calculus issues - although that seems less likely).
GVGMODE WorstPlayersEver 61	Posted - 2013.10.01 15:22:00 - [64] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: Absolute Idiom II wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: We are looking at putting some stuff into 1.6 to alleviate some pressure points ahead of the general vehicle rebalance, but I don't have specifics (but I think I might have heard something about dropships in between howls in the night) Do you mean 1.5 since vehicles is currently slated for 1.6? No. The major vehicle changes aren't going to be in 1.6. We ran into some integration issues with the existing work that's going to take a little too long to iron out. Same goes for the weapon changes. I can't be bothered to play anymore since I have 9/10 of my SP into vehicles, maybe by the time 2.0 comes we could have decent vehicles... may Dust rest in peace along with the aurum offers lol.
Rogatien Merc Red Star. EoN. 1290	Posted - 2013.10.01 15:26:00 - [65] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: Absolute Idiom II wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: We are looking at putting some stuff into 1.6 to alleviate some pressure points ahead of the general vehicle rebalance, but I don't have specifics (but I think I might have heard something about dropships in between howls in the night) Do you mean 1.5 since vehicles is currently slated for 1.6? No. The major vehicle changes aren't going to be in 1.6. We ran into some integration issues with the existing work that's going to take a little too long to iron out. Same goes for the weapon changes. Fair enough. "alleviate some pressure points" is possibly great news. Hope you guys do some minor but much-needed tweaking on some of the things most of the community can agree on like the Veh Engineering skill change to 5% PG boost.
GVGMODE WorstPlayersEver 61	Posted - 2013.10.01 15:32:00 - [66] - Quote Rogatien Merc wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: Absolute Idiom II wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: We are looking at putting some stuff into 1.6 to alleviate some pressure points ahead of the general vehicle rebalance, but I don't have specifics (but I think I might have heard something about dropships in between howls in the night) Do you mean 1.5 since vehicles is currently slated for 1.6? No. The major vehicle changes aren't going to be in 1.6. We ran into some integration issues with the existing work that's going to take a little too long to iron out. Same goes for the weapon changes. Fair enough. "alleviate some pressure points" is possibly great news. Hope you guys do some minor but much-needed tweaking on some of the things most of the community can agree on like the Veh Engineering skill change to 5% PG boost. Do not count on it knowing CCP they will come with a bad update as usual, it is on their antecdents.
Sgt Buttscratch SLAPHAPPY BANDITS 856	Posted - 2013.10.01 15:54:00 - [67] - Quote GVGMODE wrote: Rogatien Merc wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: Absolute Idiom II wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: We are looking at putting some stuff into 1.6 to alleviate some pressure points ahead of the general vehicle rebalance, but I don't have specifics (but I think I might have heard something about dropships in between howls in the night) Do you mean 1.5 since vehicles is currently slated for 1.6? No. The major vehicle changes aren't going to be in 1.6. We ran into some integration issues with the existing work that's going to take a little too long to iron out. Same goes for the weapon changes. Fair enough. "alleviate some pressure points" is possibly great news. Hope you guys do some minor but much-needed tweaking on some of the things most of the community can agree on like the Veh Engineering skill change to 5% PG boost. Do not count on it knowing CCP they will come with a bad update as usual, it is on their antecdents. yup, they'll give us a new menu goodie, like pie charts on your character sheet, or maybe a framed picture of your clone in your MQ
Aikuchi Tomaru Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 1020	Posted - 2013.10.01 15:59:00 - [68] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: Absolute Idiom II wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: We are looking at putting some stuff into 1.6 to alleviate some pressure points ahead of the general vehicle rebalance, but I don't have specifics (but I think I might have heard something about dropships in between howls in the night) Do you mean 1.5 since vehicles is currently slated for 1.6? No. The major vehicle changes aren't going to be in 1.6. We ran into some integration issues with the existing work that's going to take a little too long to iron out. Same goes for the weapon changes. What about our new toys? The new weapons?
Keri Starlight Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 550	Posted - 2013.10.01 16:04:00 - [69] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: It's coming still, but not in 1.5 or 1.6. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uekLLXcg-ng
ugg reset Molon Labe. RISE of LEGION 387	Posted - 2013.10.01 16:09:00 - [70] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: It's coming still, but not in 1.5 or 1.6. (And removing a turret removes the seat ) boo. if anything removing a turret should add a seat for a fourth person in a LAV

Fox Gaden Immortal Guides 1151	Posted - 2013.10.01 16:24:00 - [71] - Quote DUST Fiend wrote: This patch genuinely makes me laugh. Not to say it doesn't contain good things, but just....elohel. This patch is the result of moving to a system where they release stuff when it is ready rather than only releasing stuff every six months. Sometimes not a lot of stuff is ready and we end up with a 1.3 or a 1.5. Having stuff that we were expecting in 1.5 moved back to 1.6 is still better in my opinion than having to wait six months for new stuff.
Sgt Buttscratch SLAPHAPPY BANDITS 856	Posted - 2013.10.01 16:36:00 - [72] - Quote Fox Gaden wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: This patch genuinely makes me laugh. Not to say it doesn't contain good things, but just....elohel. This patch is the result of moving to a system where they release stuff when it is ready rather than only releasing stuff every six months. Sometimes not a lot of stuff is ready and we end up with a 1.3 or a 1.5. Having stuff that we were expecting in 1.5 moved back to 1.6 is still better in my opinion than having to wait six months for new stuff. That would be a fair statement if we hadn't been waiting since MAY, currently 5 months, 1.6 = 6MONTHS, 1.7 = 7 MONTHS. In other words we are waiting over 6 months for these vehicle fixes. ***** getting old.
Fox Gaden Immortal Guides 1151	Posted - 2013.10.01 17:12:00 - [73] - Quote Yeah, I posted before I read LogibroGÇÖs post. Makes you think that the light at the end of the tunnel is just a guy with a lantern running farther into the dark. On the other hand, if it was every six months, and they missed the deadline...
jerrmy12 kahoalii Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION 53	Posted - 2013.10.01 19:03:00 - [74] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: Absolute Idiom II wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: We are looking at putting some stuff into 1.6 to alleviate some pressure points ahead of the general vehicle rebalance, but I don't have specifics (but I think I might have heard something about dropships in between howls in the night) Do you mean 1.5 since vehicles is currently slated for 1.6? No. The major vehicle changes aren't going to be in 1.6. We ran into some integration issues with the existing work that's going to take a little too long to iron out. Same goes for the weapon changes. then dont put weapons in there, just vehicles
R F Gyro Clones 4u 559	Posted - 2013.10.01 19:11:00 - [75] - Quote Ryder Azorria wrote: By "Integration issues" I'm fairly confident he meant either technical or balance problems ( or possibly calculus issues - although that seems less likely). Edit: Doesn't make the repeated delays and setbacks any less disappointing / rage inducing mind you I really hope "integration issues" doesn't mean "we went off and coded in a branch for a month or two, and assumed we could merge it back in to mainline in a couple of days".
Luk Manag of Terror TRE GAFFEL 102	Posted - 2013.10.01 20:23:00 - [76] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: No. The major vehicle changes aren't going to be in 1.6. We ran into some integration issues with the existing work that's going to take a little too long to iron out. Same goes for the weapon changes. Is this is the official position on new things for 1.6? What specifically fails to integrate? Would a temporary work-around be possible? Ex: If it is too hard to add a new gun, then re-use existing graphical models, or if it is too hard to remove turrets, then release a cheap 'offline' turret that doesn't do anything and costs 0cpu and 0pg?
Cenex Langly D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 223	Posted - 2013.10.01 20:35:00 - [77] - Quote Aeon Amadi wrote: Harpyja wrote: Broken promise after broken promise. "First vehicle balance pass will happen in 1.5" - before 1.4 deployment. "Sorry, more work than we expected, so it will happen in 1.6" - after 1.4 deployment. "Uhmm, yeah. We are too lazy so don't expect anything in 1.6 either" - before 1.5 deployment. Come on CCP, put your **** together. I kept my faith for a while, but I might just throw it away if there is one more broken promise. You could always do what I'm doing and go to college for game design to help out. I did that, but game design is exceptionally difficult! Ended up going back to school for my PhD in astrophysics. It turns out much easier than game design. Though I give much respect to CCP, you guys need to manage your public relations much better than you are now. You can't constantly disappoint like you have been. You're killing your player base.
ladwar Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn 1793	Posted - 2013.10.01 21:36:00 - [78] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: Absolute Idiom II wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: We are looking at putting some stuff into 1.6 to alleviate some pressure points ahead of the general vehicle rebalance, but I don't have specifics (but I think I might have heard something about dropships in between howls in the night) Do you mean 1.5 since vehicles is currently slated for 1.6? No. The major vehicle changes aren't going to be in 1.6. We ran into some integration issues with the existing work that's going to take a little too long to iron out. Same goes for the weapon changes. hey can we get a sticky for this to let people know your pushing vehicles back again.
The legend345 TeamPlayers EoN. 1039	Posted - 2013.10.01 21:41:00 - [79] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: It's coming still, but not in 1.5 or 1.6. (And removing a turret removes the seat ) So that means 1.9 for sure
Mobius Wyvern Guardian Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY 3681	Posted - 2013.10.02 00:23:00 - [80] - Quote Harpyja wrote: Broken promise after broken promise. "First vehicle balance pass will happen in 1.5" - before 1.4 deployment. "Sorry, more work than we expected, so it will happen in 1.6" - after 1.4 deployment. "Uhmm, yeah. We are too lazy so don't expect anything in 1.6 either" - before 1.5 deployment. Come on CCP, put your **** together. I kept my faith for a while, but I might just throw it away if there is one more broken promise. When have they ever "promised" anything, you self-entitled child? They've stated when they've planned to release things, and those plans are always subject to change if something goes wrong. Go take your whiny bullshit somewhere else.

Blaze Ashra Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire 11	Posted - 2013.10.02 00:30:00 - [81] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: Absolute Idiom II wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: We are looking at putting some stuff into 1.6 to alleviate some pressure points ahead of the general vehicle rebalance, but I don't have specifics (but I think I might have heard something about dropships in between howls in the night) Do you mean 1.5 since vehicles is currently slated for 1.6? No. The major vehicle changes aren't going to be in 1.6. We ran into some integration issues with the existing work that's going to take a little too long to iron out. Same goes for the weapon changes. Here's a poll to see what/if changes vehicle users would be happy to deal with while we are waiting for the rebalancing to go through. I posted it here in case you want to see discussion about it. Hope it's useful.
CommanderBolt A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. 343	Posted - 2013.10.02 00:39:00 - [82] - Quote Ha! No wonder there wasn't a dev. blog about it all. I don't think the message could be any clearer now about this game.
grunt party Carbon 7 CRONOS. 61	Posted - 2013.10.02 01:24:00 - [83] - Quote Jason Pearson wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: Removing turret removes the seat? Whos fail idea was that? Blueberry gunners dont shoot anything as is.....wow man....just....wow. Maybe for Dropships.. for Tanks they shoot at the MCC and the sky constantly, I quite liked the thought of it removing the seat. King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here! Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here! don't forget the floor and buildings oh and any other inanimate object you cant kill
grunt party Carbon 7 CRONOS. 62	Posted - 2013.10.02 01:56:00 - [84] - Quote but i hope there are 2 forms of no turret no seat and passenger seat
Mortedeamor Internal Rebellion 324	Posted - 2013.10.02 02:00:00 - [85] - Quote grunt party wrote: but i hope there are 2 forms of no turret no seat and passenger seat no need when the turrets are removed a tank should become a 1 man unit. unless ccp plans on giving us a kick function or vehicle lock
Asirius Medaius Planetary Response Organization Test Friends Please Ignore 552	Posted - 2013.10.02 02:29:00 - [86] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: It's coming still, but not in 1.5 or 1.6. (And removing a turret removes the seat ) You (CCP) just screwed yourself with this; If it was in 1.6, fine... but now that it isn't in either 1.5 or 1.6, that means we won't see it until December at the earliest. You are going to lose a lot more people than you already have if you don't listen to the community's prime concerns, and right now, vehicle users are feeling quite shafted (myself included). Seriously, you could have just told us to just uninstall the game altogether, that would have saved us all time.
GET ATMESON Dem Durrty Boyz Public Disorder. 137	Posted - 2013.10.02 02:45:00 - [87] - Quote Just rage quit and play GTA online once the online kicks up. Im a heavy and I support tankers,scouts, and heavy's. Most of the changes have messed up these classes. Tanks are so very weak against anything AV. Its AV for a reason but it should be FAR superior. Scouts are useless(not bagging on you) but you can get a logy suit and make it a scout with all the lows. Heavys with the aim assist and are huge fat heads. The HP we have is cut down very easily. Get used to SOONtm in dust 514 with broken promises. If you enjoy waiting then Dust 514 is for you!
Tectonic Fusion The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 269	Posted - 2013.10.02 02:46:00 - [88] - Quote Jason Pearson wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: It's coming still, but not in 1.5 or 1.6. (And removing a turret removes the seat ) Not 1.6 either? lol, yeah, I'm not going to bother logging in for a while then. King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here! Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here! Enjoy getting the free suits :p
Godin Thekiller Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 1033	Posted - 2013.10.02 02:47:00 - [89] - Quote Going to keep on leveling up infantry then. Hell, might as well spend the 1.1 mil I have saved for the pilot suit.....
Covert Clay Red Star. EoN. 70	Posted - 2013.10.02 04:46:00 - [90] - Quote After I read that the vehicle update got delayed again (for the 3rd or 4th time. Can't remember because I lost count) I was stunned and speechless. That being said, I know exactly what I will and won't be playing when (or if) the vehicle update drops.(Hint: Its not Dust) And that is assuming they don't screw up vehicles again.....Damn, I'm glad I preordered a PS4 launch edition months ago. Its been 8 months but now its finally getting beyond ridiculous. I thought this game had some good potential months ago. Boy was i wrong. Goodbye Dust 514, it was fun while it lasted. May you Rest in Peace. Tank Vet./ PC vet signing off, ~CovertClay

LudiKure ninda Black Phoenix Mercenaries 34	Posted - 2013.10.02 06:35:00 - [91] - Quote Gimme a respec for my tank wasted sp!!!!!!
Eurydice Itzhak Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State 223	Posted - 2013.10.02 07:02:00 - [92] - Quote Vehicle fixes: a tale from 1.3 to 1.7 and beyond. ******* joke man. This development team is a joke.
Spkr4theDead International-Fleet 946	Posted - 2013.10.02 07:19:00 - [93] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: It's coming still, but not in 1.5 or 1.6. (And removing a turret removes the seat ) I'm sure a lot of tankers won't mind that at all. I know I wouldn't.
The legend345 TeamPlayers EoN. 1066	Posted - 2013.10.02 10:18:00 - [94] - Quote Mobius Wyvern wrote: Harpyja wrote: Broken promise after broken promise. "First vehicle balance pass will happen in 1.5" - before 1.4 deployment. "Sorry, more work than we expected, so it will happen in 1.6" - after 1.4 deployment. "Uhmm, yeah. We are too lazy so don't expect anything in 1.6 either" - before 1.5 deployment. Come on CCP, put your **** together. I kept my faith for a while, but I might just throw it away if there is one more broken promise. When have they ever "promised" anything, you self-entitled child? They've stated when they've planned to release things, and those plans are always subject to change if something goes wrong. Go take your whiny bullshit somewhere else. I payed over 80 dollers on the game go fish
lordjanuz Norwegian Dust514 Corporation Top Men. 194	Posted - 2013.10.12 11:10:00 - [95] - Quote Mobius Wyvern wrote: Harpyja wrote: Broken promise after broken promise. "First vehicle balance pass will happen in 1.5" - before 1.4 deployment. "Sorry, more work than we expected, so it will happen in 1.6" - after 1.4 deployment. "Uhmm, yeah. We are too lazy so don't expect anything in 1.6 either" - before 1.5 deployment. Come on CCP, put your **** together. I kept my faith for a while, but I might just throw it away if there is one more broken promise. When have they ever "promised" anything, you self-entitled child? They've stated when they've planned to release things, and those plans are always subject to change if something goes wrong. Go take your whiny bullshit somewhere else. Not correct, Check out the CCP presents 2013 on YouTube, there are some spesific there, just take the vita app , we will get i before the summer they said, hmmm havent seen it yet.
Ghosts Chance Inf4m0us 24	Posted - 2013.10.12 11:17:00 - [96] - Quote shaman oga wrote: Somebody posted the proof that the blue were right, they CAN damage the enemy MCC, if you can't beat them join them it takes more then an hour to put a dent into it though...


Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.