Ohhh.. so you are not trying to make any points, just trying to make me look bad in every single post i make. Well , i dont give a **** HOW you write,you still sound ret@rded.

And im sorry, but as you MAY or MIGHT NOT KNOW, english is not the only language in the world.Sorry if i not write like : ''like someone that majored in English'' , but i dont need it to write my opinion.

..I.. ( -.- )

As always you are off topic,just pointing out my mistakes and trying to troll me, FAIL again. Get a grip...

Because all AV weapons are designed to take down tanks. A MAV would not be maneuverable enough to make a forge miss or escape swarms consistently. Proto anti tank weapons are the only AV in dust and they already solo tanks. So my gunlogi with 40% passive resist and 5k shields is destroyed by proto forge gunners in 4 shots. So a MAV would be destroyed in 2? And these things could be troop transports? thats an easy 5+ kills. all im sayin. MAVs can not survive in dust, the AV is too strong

So I make you look bad by pointing out how dumb your posts are?

This!

as i said before, LLAVs have built in resist, will be more mobile than MAVs, and do not kill anyone. MAVs will not be as mobile, will be attempting to get kills, and will not have any or as much built in resist. They are not LLAVs, they have completly different roles

The APC would avoid the enemy with scanners. Problem solved.

doubt it. The forge and swarm launcher will always be anti TANK weapons. That means they will obliterate anything that is not a tank with ease. Forges and swarms are easy mode, and easy mode will be rewarded when they release MAVs

MAVs don't necessarily need to have less eHP than HAVs- they could just greatly sacrifice weaponry.

Hey look, a thread speculating about something we know literally nothing about, not even if it has zero resists or a passive 80%, or innate modules or how fast or slow or how many slots or what color it is...

And people are already argueing about how MAVs are balanced/unbalanced... Even though MAVs literally have zero info on them...

Don't see why MAV's can't essentiall be HAV''s without the turret, and a lot more speed.

but... its a MAV. No tank anywhere in history or any other video game has had less protection than an APC. Thats like, completely against the rules of making vehicles. But then again, gattling guns are called HMGs and these "HMGs" dont have the stoping power or range of an assualt rifle. So i geuss it would "make sence" for the tank to be the weakest vehicle too?

Think Warhammer 40k.

All Space marine, and most other races tanks simply use a Standard Template of Construction, much like in reality a couple of APC's could look similar to the HAV, but sacrifice armour and fire power for much better speed.

Don't worry we are getting proto tanks in 1.5 ... nevermind let's say 3.0 to make sure it happens

lol theyre not even sure how to balance them. try 4.0

Let's not speculate SoonTM

Well HERE is MY vision on how MAVs should be. Of course. Please take into consideration i think of this in a world where tanks ALREADY have at least a 50% TOTAL HP buff (were tanks run with 6000 HP MINIMUm....)

I was thinking something like:

Gallante MAV-BREACH APC:
900 SHields
2200 Armor (Without modules)
15% default Armor Resistance
1Med Turret (Gunner)
1Small turret (Driver)
Space, up to 4 passangers.
Good PRecision scan and range.
Speed : Faster than the fastest tank.
50-Shield regen per sec (Caldaris would have MORE)

Gallante MAV-LOGI APC
800 Shields
2300 Armor
20% Default Armor resistance
1 Med Turret (Gunner)
Enough PG / CPU for a repairer (to fulfil Logi purposes)
embedded CRU.
Speed : Faster than the fastest tank.
50-Shield regen per sec
5 passanger capacity

---

Say a GOOD (as an example) Gallante MAV-Breach APC would have
Around (With passives included):

1080 SHields
4450 Armor
25 Passive Armor damage resistance
1 SMall cycled Missile launcher
1 MEd Turret
at least 1 Active Damage reductor
Scan Precision of 38 range 50 mts
Shield regen of 62.5 per sec (and this is not even a shield MAV)
Faster than any tanks, a little slower than a tanked Gallante LLAV.

A GOOD Gallante Logi APC-MAV would be :
960 Shields
4700 Armor
1 Med Turret
CRU and Remote rapair
around 30-34% Passive dam resistance
At least 27% dam reduction active module for then the Sh**storm unleashes.
Faster than any tank but slightly slower than the Breach MAV.
Also has worst turning speed due to increased ''weight''.
The Logi MAV can choose to NOT EQUIP ANY WEAPON in order to have more pace for other modules.
The CRU comes as if it was a MLT Blueprint so it must be equipped in every MAV-LAV.

Well HERE is MY vision on how MAVs should be. Of course. Please take into consideration i think of this in a world where tanks ALREADY have at least a 50% TOTAL HP buff (were tanks run with 6000 HP MINIMUm....)

I was thinking something like:

Gallante MAV-BREACH APC:
900 SHields
2200 Armor (Without modules)
15% default Armor Resistance
1Med Turret (Gunner)
1Small turret (Driver)
Space, up to 4 passangers.
Good PRecision scan and range.
Speed : Faster than the fastest tank.
50-Shield regen per sec (Caldaris would have MORE)

Gallante MAV-LOGI APC
800 Shields
2300 Armor
20% Default Armor resistance
1 Med Turret (Gunner)
Enough PG / CPU for a repairer (to fulfil Logi purposes)
embedded CRU.
Speed : Faster than the fastest tank.
50-Shield regen per sec
5 passanger capacity

---

Say a GOOD (as an example) Gallante MAV-Breach APC would have
Around (With passives included):

1080 SHields
4450 Armor
25 Passive Armor damage resistance
1 SMall cycled Missile launcher
1 MEd Turret
at least 1 Active Damage reductor
Scan Precision of 38 range 50 mts
Shield regen of 62.5 per sec (and this is not even a shield MAV)
Faster than any tanks, a little slower than a tanked Gallante LLAV.

A GOOD Gallante Logi APC-MAV would be :
960 Shields
4700 Armor
1 Med Turret
CRU and Remote rapair
around 30-34% Passive dam resistance
At least 27% dam reduction active module for then the Sh**storm unleashes.
Faster than any tank but slightly slower than the Breach MAV.
Also has worst turning speed due to increased ''weight''.
The Logi MAV can choose to NOT EQUIP ANY WEAPON in order to have more pace for other modules.
The CRU comes as if it was a MLT Blueprint so it must be equipped in every MAV-LAV.

---

Isee MAVs being a lot faster than tanks but with a LOT less manuverability (sorry i know i wrote tht wrong) than LAVs , having to HEAVILY slow downt to take curves, there by thats their weak spot....