|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
903
   |
Posted - 2013.09.26 03:37:00 -
[1] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Because all AV weapons are designed to take down tanks. A MAV would not be maneuverable enough to make a forge miss or escape swarms consistently. Proto anti tank weapons are the only AV in dust and they already solo tanks. So my gunlogi with 40% passive resist and 5k shields is destroyed by proto forge gunners in 4 shots. So a MAV would be destroyed in 2? And these things could be troop transports? thats an easy 5+ kills. all im sayin. MAVs can not survive in dust, the AV is too strong LLAVS DO JUST FINE. LLAVs dont kill anyone! A MAV is going to be something people want to get kills with. Like the MTAC (the walker suit). and it, along with the other MAVs, will not be able to escape anti tank weaponry because they are not maneuverable enough. BTW, look at the scout lavs. No one uses them because they suck. all they do is blow up and get no kills. just like future MAVs will - Sorry sorry . I must correct you there.Im not talking about killing. Im talking about taking hits and surviving. Hell, combined with dam reduction mods and speed they are harder to kill than tanks. If MAV's had MORE HP and slightly less speed they would outlive both tanks and LLAVs as they are now.... -I know Scouts LAV's suck, i did not start playing yesterday.-With 4 turrets an MAV will have more HP than an LLAV, more speed than a tank and a LOT of Anti-Infantry Firepower.Just saying, they would have a niche in DUST.Hell, i might even use one to transport my squad....
So you're complaining that LAVs as they are, are too fast? And that it's not fair they can fit passive shield and armor hardeners? |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
903
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 04:11:00 -
[2] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:
Nope,you are putting words in my mouth as usual.trying to troll and failing,as usual. Im saying MAVs do have a role in Dust514.
I'm not trolling at all. You're still complaining that vehicles have any advantage at all over AV. |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
903
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 04:25:00 -
[3] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:
Nope,you are putting words in my mouth as usual.trying to troll and failing,as usual. Im saying MAVs do have a role in Dust514.
I'm not trolling at all. You're still complaining that vehicles have any advantage at all over AV. Ok so you are saying LLAvs are SLOW? and they get 1 HKOd by PROTO AV weapory?
You are still complaining vehicles are UP and they are not.
AV is just working, vehicles dont have proto yet.
Where did I mention anything about scout LAVs?
Dude, are you on medication? |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
903
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 04:39:00 -
[4] - Quote
I'm easy to understand, and type like someone that majored in English without using big, fancy words and some words you only knew because of the American SATs. I also usually put my arguments in a logical, easy to understand, precise manner. That you're saying that, basically tells me you've given up trying to respond to me, because you're just not able to, not because you can't understand what I'm saying. |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
903
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 04:47:00 -
[5] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:I'm easy to understand, and type like someone that majored in English without using big, fancy words and some words you only knew because of the American SATs. I also usually put my arguments in a logical, easy to understand, precise manner. That you're saying that, basically tells me you've given up trying to respond to me, because you're just not able to, not because you can't understand what I'm saying. Ohhh.. so you are not trying to make any points, just trying to make me look bad in every single post i make. Well , i dont give a **** HOW you write,you still sound ret@rded. And im sorry, but as you MAY or MIGHT NOT KNOW, english is not the only language in the world.Sorry if i not write like : ''like someone that majored in English'' , but i dont need it to write my opinion. ..I.. ( -.- ) As always you are off topic,just pointing out my mistakes and trying to troll me, FAIL again. Get a grip...
So I make you look bad by pointing out how dumb your posts are? |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
903
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 05:08:00 -
[6] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:I'm easy to understand, and type like someone that majored in English without using big, fancy words and some words you only knew because of the American SATs. I also usually put my arguments in a logical, easy to understand, precise manner. That you're saying that, basically tells me you've given up trying to respond to me, because you're just not able to, not because you can't understand what I'm saying. Ohhh.. so you are not trying to make any points, just trying to make me look bad in every single post i make. Well , i dont give a **** HOW you write,you still sound ret@rded. And im sorry, but as you MAY or MIGHT NOT KNOW, english is not the only language in the world.Sorry if i not write like : ''like someone that majored in English'' , but i dont need it to write my opinion. ..I.. ( -.- ) As always you are off topic,just pointing out my mistakes and trying to troll me, FAIL again. Get a grip... So I make you look bad by pointing out how dumb your posts are? You try. and fail. So there by. I'll have to withdraw my attention from your posts.
Have fun hatin bro .
Fine with me, I have enough things killing my brain cells. |
|
|
| |
|