Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
1378
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 02:48:00 -
[1] - Quote
Because all AV weapons are designed to take down tanks. A MAV would not be maneuverable enough to make a forge miss or escape swarms consistently. Proto anti tank weapons are the only AV in dust and they already solo tanks. So my gunlogi with 40% passive resist and 5k shields is destroyed by proto forge gunners in 4 shots. So a MAV would be destroyed in 2? And these things could be troop transports? thats an easy 5+ kills. all im sayin. MAVs can not survive in dust, the AV is too strong |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
906
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 02:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
True, which is why things are changing...... |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
1378
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 02:52:00 -
[3] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:True, which is why things are changing...... doubt it. The forge and swarm launcher will always be anti TANK weapons. That means they will obliterate anything that is not a tank with ease. Forges and swarms are easy mode, and easy mode will be rewarded when they release MAVs |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
906
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 02:54:00 -
[4] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:True, which is why things are changing...... doubt it. The forge and swarm launcher will always be anti TANK weapons. That means they will obliterate anything that is not a tank with ease
Like really |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1296
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 02:55:00 -
[5] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Because all AV weapons are designed to take down tanks. A MAV would not be maneuverable enough to make a forge miss or escape swarms consistently. Proto anti tank weapons are the only AV in dust and they already solo tanks. So my gunlogi with 40% passive resist and 5k shields is destroyed by proto forge gunners in 4 shots. So a MAV would be destroyed in 2? And these things could be troop transports? thats an easy 5+ kills. all im sayin. MAVs can not survive in dust, the AV is too strong
LLAVS DO JUST FINE. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
1378
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 02:56:00 -
[6] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:True, which is why things are changing...... doubt it. The forge and swarm launcher will always be anti TANK weapons. That means they will obliterate anything that is not a tank with ease Like really yeah. really. unless a MAV (APC transport) becomes as durable as a tank they will get wiped out in less than a full clip from anti tank weapons, and anti tank weapons are very easy to aquire. Can you argue against this or just say really? like really? really now. really |
TechMechMeds
Swamp Marines Kleenex Inc.
250
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 02:59:00 -
[7] - Quote
Maybe if it had enough HP without mods it could be fitted purely with repair and resistance plates, but I totally agree at the mo |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
1382
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 02:59:00 -
[8] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Because all AV weapons are designed to take down tanks. A MAV would not be maneuverable enough to make a forge miss or escape swarms consistently. Proto anti tank weapons are the only AV in dust and they already solo tanks. So my gunlogi with 40% passive resist and 5k shields is destroyed by proto forge gunners in 4 shots. So a MAV would be destroyed in 2? And these things could be troop transports? thats an easy 5+ kills. all im sayin. MAVs can not survive in dust, the AV is too strong LLAVS DO JUST FINE. LLAVs dont kill anyone! A MAV is going to be something people want to get kills with. Like the MTAC (the walker suit). and it, along with the other MAVs, will not be able to escape anti tank weaponry because they are not maneuverable enough. BTW, look at the scout lavs. No one uses them because they suck. all they do is blow up and get no kills. just like future MAVs will |
Dunk Mujunk
RestlessSpirits D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
146
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 03:00:00 -
[9] - Quote
Are the MAVs gonna be APC like? If they are I could see them being faster than tanks, maybe armor somewhere in the rough ballpark of a tank. No big gun, obviously, to justify all of this, just anti infantry weapons at most. This would create the mechanized infantry situation and ground troops would be able to keep up with fast advancing tank forces. Probably would want higher player counts to really make it work well. Of course, that's assuming the MAV is an APC type, I have no idea. At some point a few weeks back I saw someone reference a Mech, then someone said that would be an MTAC or something, I don't know. Anyway, i'm rambling.
I do totally agree with you though. If all AV is balanced around just killing tanks, then yeah, everything else is going to have it pretty rough.
EDIT: APC like I see. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
1382
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 03:01:00 -
[10] - Quote
TechMechMeds wrote:Maybe if it had enough HP without mods it could be fitted purely with repair and resistance plates, but I totally agree at the mo it would have to be as durable as a standard tank to be survivable at all. But they are not tanks, they are MAVs. Against AV made to kill tanks |
|
Beck Weathers
High-Damage
143
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 03:03:00 -
[11] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Because all AV weapons are designed to take down tanks. A MAV would not be maneuverable enough to make a forge miss or escape swarms consistently. Proto anti tank weapons are the only AV in dust and they already solo tanks. So my gunlogi with 40% passive resist and 5k shields is destroyed by proto forge gunners in 4 shots. So a MAV would be destroyed in 2? And these things could be troop transports? thats an easy 5+ kills. all im sayin. MAVs can not survive in dust, the AV is too strong LLAVS DO JUST FINE.
Because they are are manuzerable and can zoom by quicker than you can get a good shot off on them, or at least a second shot. |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1298
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 03:03:00 -
[12] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Because all AV weapons are designed to take down tanks. A MAV would not be maneuverable enough to make a forge miss or escape swarms consistently. Proto anti tank weapons are the only AV in dust and they already solo tanks. So my gunlogi with 40% passive resist and 5k shields is destroyed by proto forge gunners in 4 shots. So a MAV would be destroyed in 2? And these things could be troop transports? thats an easy 5+ kills. all im sayin. MAVs can not survive in dust, the AV is too strong LLAVS DO JUST FINE. LLAVs dont kill anyone! A MAV is going to be something people want to get kills with. Like the MTAC (the walker suit). and it, along with the other MAVs, will not be able to escape anti tank weaponry because they are not maneuverable enough. BTW, look at the scout lavs. No one uses them because they suck. all they do is blow up and get no kills. just like future MAVs will
-Sorry sorry . I must correct you there.Im not talking about killing. Im talking about taking hits and surviving. Hell, combined with dam reduction mods and speed they are harder to kill than tanks. If MAV's had MORE HP and slightly less speed they would outlive both tanks and LLAVs as they are now.... -I know Scouts LAV's suck, i did not start playing yesterday. -With 4 turrets an MAV will have more HP than an LLAV, more speed than a tank and a LOT of Anti-Infantry Firepower.Just saying, they would have a niche in DUST.Hell, i might even use one to transport my squad.... |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
1382
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 03:06:00 -
[13] - Quote
Dunk Mujunk wrote:Are the MAVs gonna be APC like? If they are I could see them being faster than tanks, maybe armor somewhere in the rough ballpark of a tank. No big gun, obviously, to justify all of this, just anti infantry weapons at most. This would create the mechanized infantry situation and ground troops would be able to keep up with fast advancing tank forces. Probably would want higher player counts to really make it work well. Of course, that's assuming the MAV is an APC type, I have no idea. At some point a few weeks back I saw someone reference a Mech, then someone said that would be an MTAC or something, I don't know. Anyway, i'm rambling.
I do totally agree with you though. If all AV is balanced around just killing tanks, then yeah, everything else is going to have it pretty rough.
EDIT: APC like I see.
yeah the MTAC is a MAV walker, like a mini gundam suit. Other MAVs would be APCs, that is confirmed. Dunno what other MAVs there will be, but none of these will be able to fit in tight spaces, turn sharply or reach the speeds like LAVs to doge/escape the anti tank AV. They are extremely simple to use and even more extremely easy mode, theres no way theyd be able to doge them consistently. So yeah... because everything is made to kill tanks these things are going to be dead quick. Waste of SP |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
1382
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 03:15:00 -
[14] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Because all AV weapons are designed to take down tanks. A MAV would not be maneuverable enough to make a forge miss or escape swarms consistently. Proto anti tank weapons are the only AV in dust and they already solo tanks. So my gunlogi with 40% passive resist and 5k shields is destroyed by proto forge gunners in 4 shots. So a MAV would be destroyed in 2? And these things could be troop transports? thats an easy 5+ kills. all im sayin. MAVs can not survive in dust, the AV is too strong LLAVS DO JUST FINE. LLAVs dont kill anyone! A MAV is going to be something people want to get kills with. Like the MTAC (the walker suit). and it, along with the other MAVs, will not be able to escape anti tank weaponry because they are not maneuverable enough. BTW, look at the scout lavs. No one uses them because they suck. all they do is blow up and get no kills. just like future MAVs will - Sorry sorry . I must correct you there.Im not talking about killing. Im talking about taking hits and surviving. Hell, combined with dam reduction mods and speed they are harder to kill than tanks. If MAV's had MORE HP and slightly less speed they would outlive both tanks and LLAVs as they are now.... -I know Scouts LAV's suck, i did not start playing yesterday.-With 4 turrets an MAV will have more HP than an LLAV, more speed than a tank and a LOT of Anti-Infantry Firepower.Just saying, they would have a niche in DUST.Hell, i might even use one to transport my squad.... LLAVs are given a 35% natural damage resist because they suffer 50% damage reduction to its turrents, its supposedly not meant for combat, only logistics and transportation. And thats all theyre used for now, they do not kill anyone. If theres a logistics transport that does the same thing then cool. It wouldent kill much and prolly wouldent be much more than a sight to laugh at as it ferries ppl around. The second one is made to be combat, actually supporting the troops its ferrying out/retrieving, it would be insta poped in less than 3 seconds by a single forge gunner. Nevermind anyone else in the area. They wouldn't be fast enough to escape the impossibly fine aim of forge gunners and the missile lock of swarms, expescially when theyre trying to pick up/drop off ppl |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
903
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 03:37:00 -
[15] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Because all AV weapons are designed to take down tanks. A MAV would not be maneuverable enough to make a forge miss or escape swarms consistently. Proto anti tank weapons are the only AV in dust and they already solo tanks. So my gunlogi with 40% passive resist and 5k shields is destroyed by proto forge gunners in 4 shots. So a MAV would be destroyed in 2? And these things could be troop transports? thats an easy 5+ kills. all im sayin. MAVs can not survive in dust, the AV is too strong LLAVS DO JUST FINE. LLAVs dont kill anyone! A MAV is going to be something people want to get kills with. Like the MTAC (the walker suit). and it, along with the other MAVs, will not be able to escape anti tank weaponry because they are not maneuverable enough. BTW, look at the scout lavs. No one uses them because they suck. all they do is blow up and get no kills. just like future MAVs will - Sorry sorry . I must correct you there.Im not talking about killing. Im talking about taking hits and surviving. Hell, combined with dam reduction mods and speed they are harder to kill than tanks. If MAV's had MORE HP and slightly less speed they would outlive both tanks and LLAVs as they are now.... -I know Scouts LAV's suck, i did not start playing yesterday.-With 4 turrets an MAV will have more HP than an LLAV, more speed than a tank and a LOT of Anti-Infantry Firepower.Just saying, they would have a niche in DUST.Hell, i might even use one to transport my squad.... So you're complaining that LAVs as they are, are too fast? And that it's not fair they can fit passive shield and armor hardeners? |
Dunk Mujunk
RestlessSpirits D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
146
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 03:49:00 -
[16] - Quote
Maybe make AV more varied so what is good for tanks is not nearly as good for MAVs (for example), or what is good for LAVs performs poorly against tanks? Possibly tie it to racial variants so (for example) the Minmatar AV grenade has bonuses that make it ideal for anti tank duty, or the Gallente have bonuses vs LAVs, ect ect? Thoughts? |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1303
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 03:55:00 -
[17] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Because all AV weapons are designed to take down tanks. A MAV would not be maneuverable enough to make a forge miss or escape swarms consistently. Proto anti tank weapons are the only AV in dust and they already solo tanks. So my gunlogi with 40% passive resist and 5k shields is destroyed by proto forge gunners in 4 shots. So a MAV would be destroyed in 2? And these things could be troop transports? thats an easy 5+ kills. all im sayin. MAVs can not survive in dust, the AV is too strong LLAVS DO JUST FINE. LLAVs dont kill anyone! A MAV is going to be something people want to get kills with. Like the MTAC (the walker suit). and it, along with the other MAVs, will not be able to escape anti tank weaponry because they are not maneuverable enough. BTW, look at the scout lavs. No one uses them because they suck. all they do is blow up and get no kills. just like future MAVs will - Sorry sorry . I must correct you there.Im not talking about killing. Im talking about taking hits and surviving. Hell, combined with dam reduction mods and speed they are harder to kill than tanks. If MAV's had MORE HP and slightly less speed they would outlive both tanks and LLAVs as they are now.... -I know Scouts LAV's suck, i did not start playing yesterday.-With 4 turrets an MAV will have more HP than an LLAV, more speed than a tank and a LOT of Anti-Infantry Firepower.Just saying, they would have a niche in DUST.Hell, i might even use one to transport my squad.... So you're complaining that LAVs as they are, are too fast? And that it's not fair they can fit passive shield and armor hardeners? Nope,you are putting words in my mouth as usual.trying to troll and failing,as usual. Im saying MAVs do have a role in Dust514. |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
909
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 03:57:00 -
[18] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Dunk Mujunk wrote:Are the MAVs gonna be APC like? If they are I could see them being faster than tanks, maybe armor somewhere in the rough ballpark of a tank. No big gun, obviously, to justify all of this, just anti infantry weapons at most. This would create the mechanized infantry situation and ground troops would be able to keep up with fast advancing tank forces. Probably would want higher player counts to really make it work well. Of course, that's assuming the MAV is an APC type, I have no idea. At some point a few weeks back I saw someone reference a Mech, then someone said that would be an MTAC or something, I don't know. Anyway, i'm rambling.
I do totally agree with you though. If all AV is balanced around just killing tanks, then yeah, everything else is going to have it pretty rough.
EDIT: APC like I see. yeah the MTAC is a MAV walker, like a mini gundam suit. Other MAVs would be APCs, that is confirmed. Dunno what other MAVs there will be, but none of these will be able to fit in tight spaces, turn sharply or reach the speeds like LAVs to doge/escape the anti tank AV. They are extremely simple to use and even more extremely easy mode, theres no way theyd be able to doge them consistently. So yeah... because everything is made to kill tanks these things are going to be dead quick. Waste of SP
MTAC's aren't medium vehicles, their light |
FATPrincess - XOXO
Shining Flame Amarr Empire
578
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 04:07:00 -
[19] - Quote
Nerf AV!
-XOXO |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
903
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 04:11:00 -
[20] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Nope,you are putting words in my mouth as usual.trying to troll and failing,as usual. Im saying MAVs do have a role in Dust514.
I'm not trolling at all. You're still complaining that vehicles have any advantage at all over AV. |
|
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1305
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 04:15:00 -
[21] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote: Nope,you are putting words in my mouth as usual.trying to troll and failing,as usual. Im saying MAVs do have a role in Dust514.
I'm not trolling at all. You're still complaining that vehicles have any advantage at all over AV.
Ok so you are saying LLAvs are SLOW? and they get 1 HKOd by PROTO AV weapory?
You are still complaining vehicles are UP and they are not. AV is just working, vehicles dont have proto yet. |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
903
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 04:25:00 -
[22] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote: Nope,you are putting words in my mouth as usual.trying to troll and failing,as usual. Im saying MAVs do have a role in Dust514.
I'm not trolling at all. You're still complaining that vehicles have any advantage at all over AV. Ok so you are saying LLAvs are SLOW? and they get 1 HKOd by PROTO AV weapory?
You are still complaining vehicles are UP and they are not. AV is just working, vehicles dont have proto yet. Where did I mention anything about scout LAVs?
Dude, are you on medication? |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
914
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 04:31:00 -
[23] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Because all AV weapons are designed to take down tanks. A MAV would not be maneuverable enough to make a forge miss or escape swarms consistently. Proto anti tank weapons are the only AV in dust and they already solo tanks. So my gunlogi with 40% passive resist and 5k shields is destroyed by proto forge gunners in 4 shots. So a MAV would be destroyed in 2? And these things could be troop transports? thats an easy 5+ kills. all im sayin. MAVs can not survive in dust, the AV is too strong LLAVS DO JUST FINE. LLAVs dont kill anyone! A MAV is going to be something people want to get kills with. Like the MTAC (the walker suit). and it, along with the other MAVs, will not be able to escape anti tank weaponry because they are not maneuverable enough. BTW, look at the scout lavs. No one uses them because they suck. all they do is blow up and get no kills. just like future MAVs will - Sorry sorry . I must correct you there.Im not talking about killing. Im talking about taking hits and surviving. Hell, combined with dam reduction mods and speed they are harder to kill than tanks. If MAV's had MORE HP and slightly less speed they would outlive both tanks and LLAVs as they are now.... -I know Scouts LAV's suck, i did not start playing yesterday.-With 4 turrets an MAV will have more HP than an LLAV, more speed than a tank and a LOT of Anti-Infantry Firepower.Just saying, they would have a niche in DUST.Hell, i might even use one to transport my squad....
MAV's only have 2 turrets, and although might have more speed, will definitely have a lower acceleration. |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
914
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 04:32:00 -
[24] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote: Nope,you are putting words in my mouth as usual.trying to troll and failing,as usual. Im saying MAVs do have a role in Dust514.
I'm not trolling at all. You're still complaining that vehicles have any advantage at all over AV. Ok so you are saying LLAvs are SLOW? and they get 1 HKOd by PROTO AV weapory?
You are still complaining vehicles are UP and they are not. AV is just working, vehicles dont have proto yet.
vehicles aren't getting PROTO. That would be OP. |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
914
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 04:34:00 -
[25] - Quote
'thread stop'
Hit 911, so I must pray for the dead.
'thread resume' |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1306
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 04:37:00 -
[26] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:[quote=KING CHECKMATE] Where did I mention anything about scout LAVs?
Dude, are you on medication?
The same im thinking about you man, you make no sense at all,i dont even know why you are arguing now....
Im just saying as it is, LLAvs chave a good survival rate ATM, and if MAVs have a little less speed,with some extra module slots and HP thay might achieve something thats all.... I wasnt even trolling nor anything... |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
903
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 04:39:00 -
[27] - Quote
I'm easy to understand, and type like someone that majored in English without using big, fancy words and some words you only knew because of the American SATs. I also usually put my arguments in a logical, easy to understand, precise manner. That you're saying that, basically tells me you've given up trying to respond to me, because you're just not able to, not because you can't understand what I'm saying. |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
915
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 04:40:00 -
[28] - Quote
And here comes the breakdown. Well, it was nice while it lasted....... |
Lorhak Gannarsein
Molon Labe. RISE of LEGION
429
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 04:42:00 -
[29] - Quote
I imagine that MAVs (at least, of a transport persuasion) would be similarly resilient to the HAVs we have already, but with slightly higher speed and less offensive capability. Basically a rather more survivable dropship with wheels. |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1308
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 04:42:00 -
[30] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:I'm easy to understand, and type like someone that majored in English without using big, fancy words and some words you only knew because of the American SATs. I also usually put my arguments in a logical, easy to understand, precise manner. That you're saying that, basically tells me you've given up trying to respond to me, because you're just not able to, not because you can't understand what I'm saying.
Ohhh.. so you are not trying to make any points, just trying to make me look bad in every single post i make. Well , i dont give a **** HOW you write,you still sound ret@rded.
And im sorry, but as you MAY or MIGHT NOT KNOW, english is not the only language in the world.Sorry if i not write like : ''like someone that majored in English'' , but i dont need it to write my opinion.
..I.. ( -.- )
As always you are off topic,just pointing out my mistakes and trying to troll me, FAIL again. Get a grip... |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |