Still we need a video purely focusing on the conditioning of tracking what ranges, and things that cannot be attested to lag or desyncing issues as well.

For example at the 2 minute mark the guy never fired so we don't know if the guy strafing off to the left or right would have been hit as the tracking was not perfect. The target also never strafed that long to see how far it sticks or if there is a threshold of unsticks to see if its angle based or speed based.

If you guys really want to change things you need to start breaking things down to a science. I'm serious because all of these "I thinks' is not getting anywhere fast.

Still we need a video purely focusing on the conditioning of tracking what ranges, and things that cannot be attested to lag or desyncing issues as well.

For example at the 2 minute mark the guy never fired so we don't know if the guy strafing off to the left or right would have been hit as the tracking was not perfect. The target also never strafed that long to see how far it sticks or if there is a threshold of unsticks to see if its angle based or speed based.

If you guys really want to change things you need to start breaking things down to a science. I'm serious because all of these "I thinks' is not getting anywhere fast.

well, we finally got our video. Unfortunately for the crowd speaking against the people complaining, this is pretty tough to refute.

Aim assist is ESSENTIAL in a game like Dust, but this shows it is simply too much. A good aim assist is something you never see and should certainly never move the reticule without user input.

That hipfire tracking was very strong and he wasnt even touching his analog. Less and less people are defending the tracking now and the ones left are trying pretty hard.

As far as i can tell the aim assist is pretty much the same as any other console game, i dont see any problems.

You realize the reason many people play Dust is because we are sick of other console games?

your begging for a COD troll right now...

That dosent matter. Consoles use aim assist because controlers arnt as accurate as a KB/M

Let me ask you this.

What do you really think a video of someone's screen can prove?

Do you know what kind of control input device he is using? No! Can you see it? No!

Can you simultaneously watch his thumbs (or hands if he is using a Mouse) and the screen to judge if his movements correspond to the reticule moving on the screen or if the reticule is moving of it's own volition? No!

Can you confirm that he has no framerate lag? No!

All of his movements look twitchy, honestly. I can 100% with out a doubt tell you that there is no "lock on" feature with the current aim assist. As a matter of fact, I would venture to say that because all of his movements look twitchy, he is probably using a Kb/M.

Notice when he is aiming from hip and strafing, there is no visible tell that there is any aim assist whatsoever. There is no "magnetism" there is not "target lock" When his buddy strafes in front of his reticule, the reticule does not "auto track" him.

When he is ADS, he is simply strafing a tiny bit and stopping when he is actually aming at his buddy.

His movements look fast and jerky because of the way you move with a Kb/M set up.

Analog stick left to right movement works like this:
You start at center, speed up to move right, slow down to center, speed up to left. When you change directions with an analog stick, you must always first pass through center. This cause you to slow down, then speed back up when you begin to move in the other direction. This makes your movements more fluid and more predictable.

Kb/M movement works like this:
You mash a button to move left, you mash a different button and you are immediately moving the other direction. So you can go from full speed right strafe to full speed left strafe without having to slow down, then speed up. This makes your movements look more twitchy, and less predictable.

Are you people really this gullible?

Seriously?

KB/M has input delay, and when it tracked it was consistent with the movement of the character itself without any delay.

You are the only one gullible I am afraid.

Still we need a video purely focusing on the conditioning of tracking what ranges, and things that cannot be attested to lag or desyncing issues as well.

For example at the 2 minute mark the guy never fired so we don't know if the guy strafing off to the left or right would have been hit as the tracking was not perfect. The target also never strafed that long to see how far it sticks or if there is a threshold of unsticks to see if its angle based or speed based.

If you guys really want to change things you need to start breaking things down to a science. I'm serious because all of these "I thinks' is not getting anywhere fast.

Wouldn't bother, you're arguing with literally the only person left who is bad enough to still be defending the aimbot assist.

Notice how everyone else who was defending it in the first 24-48 hours has pretty much said "okay, yeah, you guys are right - this **** is dumb"? Especially after the videos that have been posted proving how strong it is.

Now that this is actually the case, all of you protobear n00b stompers are shitting your britches because you know your days are numbered.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMqe6MhXY6Y

One of the only vids iv found actually testing the aim assist. i hope you guys take something from this vid and not exaggerate things of the forums before getting evidence.

Its astonishing that people see this and still try to deny the effect of aa

Yes, but some people see this and cry aimbot, both are wrong, this is somewhere in the middle, it needs a little tweaking, but its not infalable, undodgeable auto aim people are STILL claiming!! This aim assist combined with improved (maybe to much) hit detection and the power of Hrof weapons have created an almost paradoxical effect compared to 1.1, 2 and 3!! Changes need to be made, but its not as bad or undealable as some make it out to be!!

The system is broken monkey.. specially when its moving and tracking targets with no input what so ever.