Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Needless Sacermendor
Red Fox Brigade
385
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:08:00 -
[61] - Quote
You know what CCP ... just do it ... the players that are here now are the core of this game, the ones that have stuck with it through thick and thin and will stick with it and promote it and make it good.
What you're doing over the next couple of months you should be able to bring some good balance and roles and hopefully some big improvements to hit detection / lag problems.
So just give an optional respec, hell give an optional asset liquidation aswell (unless you think you can float the market before christmas) ... and make it VERY clear there will never be another one, so if you want the Minmatar Heavy either save your points till it's released (preferably giving a clue how soon) and make do with basic gear till then or skill the Amarr and put up with it till you have the sp to cross train the Minmatar aswell.
I don't really want one, but if you're going to do it I may aswell drop my AV skills and you may aswell cancel 1.5 and start working on something else, cos the way this lot are going on there won't be any vehicles in the game no matter how good you make them.
Signed for the 'Could care less anymore whether you give a respec or not so long as it shuts this lot up' petition. |
The Robot Devil
Echo Galactic Industries
880
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:16:00 -
[62] - Quote
Aero Yassavi wrote:Jimbo1337 wrote:Aero Yassavi wrote:Jimbo1337 wrote:I am sorry that you skilled a ton of SP into the flaylock and now want that SP back. Well I would love to get the hundreds of deaths due to the flaylock back but that doesn't seem likely does it. So I laugh at all of you who skilled into that weapon and I am currently laughing at all of you who then transferred over to the MD.
THAT is why people don't deserve a respec. You do realize that you could just PLAY THE GAME and gain more SP right? Do you honestly think this is the reason? I haven't spent a single point on flaylocks (or Cadari suits and ARs for that matter) and I'm still mostly in favor of this. Then maybe you should actually take the time to skill into the correct things once in a while. I mean...how hard is it to skill into what you have been dying to get for 1 week, 2 weeks, sometimes a month? I mean come on! Seriously people. If you made a mistake and skilled into something that is useless...who is to blame? Yourself! Take responsibility for your own actions and act like adults instead of a child. Its a game that is supposed to be played for a LONG TIME. Take the time to play the game and request something more meaningful. Stop with the stupid gun nerfs and whining and actually have some fun. Request new game modes. Request new maps. This is truly what the game is lacking instead of another stupid respec. For the record, I personally do not want a respec. I don't need one, I have my skills where I want them considering the content currently available. The reason I am sort of in favor of a respec is because there have been a lot of vehicles changes being made and those guys skilled into one thing and CCP changed it to something else. Think of it like CCP took their skill points away and instead of giving them back as unallocated they moved them somewhere else.
I see it more like that vehicles were designed to work a certain way and that isn't how we use them. The feel awkward and lumbering because we are used to lone wolf type vehicles instead of working as a team and using reps and transports. They are working as designed but we don't use them that way so they feel weak. |
The Robot Devil
Echo Galactic Industries
880
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:17:00 -
[63] - Quote
Needless Sacermendor wrote:You know what CCP ... just do it ... the players that are here now are the core of this game, the ones that have stuck with it through thick and thin and will stick with it and promote it and make it good.
What you're doing over the next couple of months you should be able to bring some good balance and roles and hopefully some big improvements to hit detection / lag problems.
So just give an optional respec, hell give an optional asset liquidation aswell (unless you think you can float the market before christmas) ... and make it VERY clear there will never be another one, so if you want the Minmatar Heavy either save your points till it's released (preferably giving a clue how soon) and make do with basic gear till then or skill the Amarr and put up with it till you have the sp to cross train the Minmatar aswell.
I don't really want one, but if you're going to do it I may aswell drop my AV skills and you may aswell cancel 1.5 and start working on something else, cos the way this lot are going on there won't be any vehicles in the game no matter how good you make them.
Signed for the 'Could care less anymore whether you give a respec or not so long as it shuts this lot up' petition.
It won't that is the problem. We are not always correct. |
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG
Pradox One
13
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:21:00 -
[64] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote: Trying a new role. Most gear has a militia version and if not then level one is usually affordable. To make the right decision. Sorry, we all make mistakes To spec into FoTM. Bad all the way around. Will spec into FoTM. We can't prove this but it does allow them to spec out of FoTM which is bad also. They have the right build they want. I don't know how to answer this. They already had a respec. Yes they did but we are missing "core" items that are needed.
I see more negatives than positives and I agree with no refunds until ALL racial items are in game and then only partial respecs for the skills in the same tree as the missing stuff. I am willing to convert but I need better reasons.
They have the right build as in they like the way they spent their SP and don't want a respec to happen.
I'm not going to try to force you to change your mind but how long do you think it will take until ALL of the racial variants are out?1 or 2 years? By that time we wont even need a respec or a lot of people will probably have left Dust but who knows.
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
1308
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:22:00 -
[65] - Quote
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Until we see the exact changes being made, you have no basis for a respec. Changing how vehicles work might be more comprehensive, but it's no different than changing the behaviour of flaylocks, Tacs, or CalLogis. At the end of the day, the content is still the same content.
You skilled into vehicles, so you're keeping vehicles. All you're trying to do is squeeze something you want out of CCP. Your arguments are all proxies for this, not the real reason for receiving this. Looks like someone already has their perfect build.
Yup, and even if it changes drastically, it's still going to be the perfect build. That's because I picked the playstyle I wanted, rather than the stats I wanted.
If people don't want tanks anymore, despite the fact that they're still going to be tanks, then it's clear they didn't pick the playstyle they wanted. It's their own fault, they shouldn't be rewarded for it. |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1280
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:24:00 -
[66] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:5P3CTR3 R1S1NG wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Until we see the exact changes being made, you have no basis for a respec. Changing how vehicles work might be more comprehensive, but it's no different than changing the behaviour of flaylocks, Tacs, or CalLogis. At the end of the day, the content is still the same content.
You skilled into vehicles, so you're keeping vehicles. All you're trying to do is squeeze something you want out of CCP. Your arguments are all proxies for this, not the real reason for receiving this. Looks like someone already has their perfect build. Yup, and even if it changes drastically, it's still going to be the perfect build. That's because I picked the playstyle I wanted, rather than the stats I wanted. If people don't want tanks anymore, despite the fact that they're still going to be tanks, then it's clear they didn't pick the playstyle they wanted. It's their own fault, they shouldn't be rewarded for it.
Honestly, you are absolutely right in that post. This is the reason i have stayed in tanks through nerf after nerf |
Needless Sacermendor
Red Fox Brigade
385
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:25:00 -
[67] - Quote
Lurchasaurus wrote:Jimbo1337 wrote:I am perfectly okay with everyone getting a respec under one circumstance.
All SP that was used to skill into Flaylocks, MD, Caldari Logi, and Melee will be "Locked"
This is coming from someone who wouldn't change one thing in my skill tree. That is all I would ask if this was to be done. If this doesn't seem fair then your intentions for this respec are not pure. ah, **** it....im gettin into this thread. jimbo, funny post, yet there is truth there. Ever since day 1 i have specced into tanks and run militia/dren/skinweaves as infantry, so i know just how ****** MDs, cores, duvolles, etc. can be. BELIEVE ME i have wanted to spec into them (yay alts) but because i understand that balancing bites the FOTM users in the long run, I have maintained a realistic and SMART allocation of my sp into what i like to play instead of what i think kills the best. Because of this i get to enjoy knowing my sp is safe from the side effects of a ruined character who has sp jumbled into a bunch of subpar things. I play what i like and because i wasnt fickle with my sp my char does what i want it to do and does it exceptionally well Lucky you ... I specced the flaylock on day one because I liked the way it looked on the video and it worked great with my Swarms (a little too great) so it became a FotM and got nerfed ... since that nerf it simply doesn't register damage if I hit someone square in the chest or right between their feet, so I've got well over a million sp invested in flaylock but I run with a skill free Toxin SMG now for the fitting requirements and I've got it up to level 3 or 4 operation now.
Not saying I want a respec per se (see my above post for this opinion) I'm just saying lucky you that what you skilled in still works ! and hopefully hit detection will render my points useful again since I've heard other people say it's still useable. |
The Robot Devil
Echo Galactic Industries
881
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:28:00 -
[68] - Quote
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG wrote:The Robot Devil wrote: Trying a new role. Most gear has a militia version and if not then level one is usually affordable. To make the right decision. Sorry, we all make mistakes To spec into FoTM. Bad all the way around. Will spec into FoTM. We can't prove this but it does allow them to spec out of FoTM which is bad also. They have the right build they want. I don't know how to answer this. They already had a respec. Yes they did but we are missing "core" items that are needed.
I see more negatives than positives and I agree with no refunds until ALL racial items are in game and then only partial respecs for the skills in the same tree as the missing stuff. I am willing to convert but I need better reasons.
They have the right build as in they like the way they spent their SP and don't want a respec to happen. I'm not going to try to force you to change your mind but how long do you think it will take until ALL of the racial variants are out?1 or 2 years? By that time we wont even need a respec or a lot of people will probably have left Dust but who knows.
I think we may have a fire lit under them and I want to say December for a full line up. I am not being an a#$ but how long of a notice do we need for mercs to prepare. If they were to come out in Dec. would a months notice give us enough time to save for the skill? If a five week notice was given would we need a refund? |
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG
Pradox One
13
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:29:00 -
[69] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:
Yup, and even if it changes drastically, it's still going to be the perfect build. That's because I picked the playstyle I wanted, rather than the stats I wanted.
If people don't want tanks anymore, despite the fact that they're still going to be tanks, then it's clear they didn't pick the playstyle they wanted. It's their own fault, they shouldn't be rewarded for it.
That's exactly one of the points I'm making , you have the build you want and therefore you are saying "No respecs because I have the build I wanted" that's what the majority of anti-respec people say its not like we are all the same , people make different choices and you made a choice that you were happy with. As for vehicles you can utilize those way more than other things if you goof up on them. |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1280
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:32:00 -
[70] - Quote
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:
Yup, and even if it changes drastically, it's still going to be the perfect build. That's because I picked the playstyle I wanted, rather than the stats I wanted.
If people don't want tanks anymore, despite the fact that they're still going to be tanks, then it's clear they didn't pick the playstyle they wanted. It's their own fault, they shouldn't be rewarded for it.
That's exactly one of the points I'm making , you have the build you want and therefore you are saying "No respecs because I have the build I wanted" that's what the majority of anti-respec people say its not like we are all the same , people make different choices and you made a choice that you were happy with. As for vehicles you can utilize those way more than other things if you goof up on them.
not necessarily |
|
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG
Pradox One
13
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:33:00 -
[71] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:
I think we may have a fire lit under them and I want to say December for a full line up. I am not being an a#$ but how long of a notice do we need for mercs to prepare. If they were to come out in Dec. would a months notice give us enough time to save for the skill? If a five week notice was given would we need a refund?
But that's the problem we don't know when or even a timeframe of when they will come out and even if they did come out there shouldn't be a full respec for every time something new comes out.
This is why dust needs a Test server like Eve. |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1280
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:33:00 -
[72] - Quote
Needless Sacermendor wrote:Lurchasaurus wrote:Jimbo1337 wrote:I am perfectly okay with everyone getting a respec under one circumstance.
All SP that was used to skill into Flaylocks, MD, Caldari Logi, and Melee will be "Locked"
This is coming from someone who wouldn't change one thing in my skill tree. That is all I would ask if this was to be done. If this doesn't seem fair then your intentions for this respec are not pure. ah, **** it....im gettin into this thread. jimbo, funny post, yet there is truth there. Ever since day 1 i have specced into tanks and run militia/dren/skinweaves as infantry, so i know just how ****** MDs, cores, duvolles, etc. can be. BELIEVE ME i have wanted to spec into them (yay alts) but because i understand that balancing bites the FOTM users in the long run, I have maintained a realistic and SMART allocation of my sp into what i like to play instead of what i think kills the best. Because of this i get to enjoy knowing my sp is safe from the side effects of a ruined character who has sp jumbled into a bunch of subpar things. I play what i like and because i wasnt fickle with my sp my char does what i want it to do and does it exceptionally well Lucky you ... I specced the flaylock on day one because I liked the way it looked on the video and it worked great with my Swarms (a little too great) so it became a FotM and got nerfed ... since that nerf it simply doesn't register damage if I hit someone square in the chest or right between their feet, so I've got well over a million sp invested in flaylock but I run with a skill free Toxin SMG now for the fitting requirements and I've got it up to level 3 or 4 operation now. Not saying I want a respec per se (see my above post for this opinion) I'm just saying lucky you that what you skilled in still works ! and hopefully hit detection will render my points useful again since I've heard other people say it's still useable.
sounds rough, im minny all the way so i got them for that and for the simple idea of having rocket pistols. Do i dislike the huge nerf? ya
do i still use em? hell ya |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1280
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:35:00 -
[73] - Quote
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG wrote:The Robot Devil wrote:
I think we may have a fire lit under them and I want to say December for a full line up. I am not being an a#$ but how long of a notice do we need for mercs to prepare. If they were to come out in Dec. would a months notice give us enough time to save for the skill? If a five week notice was given would we need a refund?
But that's the problem we don't know when or even a timeframe of when they will come out and even if they did come out there shouldn't be a full respec for every time something new comes out. This is why dust needs a Test server like Eve.
the original biannual update roadmap was scrapped to make way for the monthly plan due to popular DEMAND. crying might be a more appropriate word here |
The Robot Devil
Echo Galactic Industries
881
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:36:00 -
[74] - Quote
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:
Yup, and even if it changes drastically, it's still going to be the perfect build. That's because I picked the playstyle I wanted, rather than the stats I wanted.
If people don't want tanks anymore, despite the fact that they're still going to be tanks, then it's clear they didn't pick the playstyle they wanted. It's their own fault, they shouldn't be rewarded for it.
That's exactly one of the points I'm making , you have the build you want and therefore you are saying "No respecs because I have the build I wanted" that's what the majority of anti-respec people say its not like we are all the same , people make different choices and you made a choice that you were happy with. As for vehicles you can utilize those way more than other things if you goof up on them.
Respecs for unhappy allocation isn't a good reason for refunds like being happy with my placement is not a reason against. I love my builds but I made mistakes and I skilled into things I don't like or are unhappy with performance. There is nothing I can do about it and I moved on, I want ewar so I speced into active scanners, they feel pointless. I will use them again and they will be tweaked so my SP wasn't wasted. That doesn't mean I am happy about it but I suck it up and keep going. The main point I try to keep making is try before blindly dumping into high level skills. It does help. |
Interplanetary Insanitarium
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
189
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:37:00 -
[75] - Quote
Hahaha, I thought this was a LIST of people against respecs. Then I read the title again and was disappointed. |
The Robot Devil
Echo Galactic Industries
881
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:38:00 -
[76] - Quote
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG wrote:The Robot Devil wrote:
I think we may have a fire lit under them and I want to say December for a full line up. I am not being an a#$ but how long of a notice do we need for mercs to prepare. If they were to come out in Dec. would a months notice give us enough time to save for the skill? If a five week notice was given would we need a refund?
But that's the problem we don't know when or even a timeframe of when they will come out and even if they did come out there shouldn't be a full respec for every time something new comes out. This is why dust needs a Test server like Eve.
We are the test server, balancing the game is fun and creates conflict. Until we have higher numbers a test server isn't worth the time and effort. |
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG
Pradox One
13
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:45:00 -
[77] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:
We are the test server, balancing the game is fun and creates conflict. Until we have higher numbers a test server isn't worth the time and effort.
It certainly is worth it seeing that it has created this problem, or we could at least get more aurum variants of things. |
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG
Pradox One
13
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:52:00 -
[78] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote: Respecs for unhappy allocation isn't a good reason for refunds like being happy with my placement is not a reason against. I love my builds but I made mistakes and I skilled into things I don't like or are unhappy with performance. There is nothing I can do about it and I moved on, I want ewar so I speced into active scanners, they feel pointless. I will use them again and they will be tweaked so my SP wasn't wasted. That doesn't mean I am happy about it but I suck it up and keep going. The main point I try to keep making is try before blindly dumping into high level skills. It does help.
That's a problem, most cant extensively try something out unless you have aurum, and some people don't even have aurum. and you may say "make an alt and try it out" remember not everyone thinks the same so most wouldn't think of that or they just don't have the SP. |
KING SALASI
MAJOR DISTRIBUTION
220
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:54:00 -
[79] - Quote
We will never get respecs until the player base shrinks to a 1000 or less. Anyway i don't care anymore GTA V in two weeks good luck to CCP. |
The Robot Devil
Echo Galactic Industries
881
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:56:00 -
[80] - Quote
Not having a test server didn't created any problems. It may help find some but it didn't create any. The problems we have are normal problems. The problems seem worse because of the SP system. We feel locked into a role and we feel like prototype gear is the only answer to every problem. We don't try before we buy and we are used to games that allow us to do anything we want pretty much whenever we want without consequences. It is a mentality problem more than anything. |
|
The Robot Devil
Echo Galactic Industries
882
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 00:00:00 -
[81] - Quote
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG wrote:The Robot Devil wrote: Respecs for unhappy allocation isn't a good reason for refunds like being happy with my placement is not a reason against. I love my builds but I made mistakes and I skilled into things I don't like or are unhappy with performance. There is nothing I can do about it and I moved on, I want ewar so I speced into active scanners, they feel pointless. I will use them again and they will be tweaked so my SP wasn't wasted. That doesn't mean I am happy about it but I suck it up and keep going. The main point I try to keep making is try before blindly dumping into high level skills. It does help.
That's a problem, most cant extensively try something out unless you have aurum, and some people don't even have aurum. and you may say "make an alt and try it out" remember not everyone thinks the same so most wouldn't think of that or they just don't have the SP.
Most items have militia versions and most level one skills are cheap (five battles cheap), not being able to try anything because of lack of real life money isn't a valid argument. All items are available in game for ISK. |
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG
Pradox One
13
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 00:12:00 -
[82] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:Not having a test server didn't created any problems. It may help find some but it didn't create any. The problems we have are normal problems. The problems seem worse because of the SP system. We feel locked into a role and we feel like prototype gear is the only answer to every problem. We don't try before we buy and we are used to games that allow us to do anything we want pretty much whenever we want without consequences. It is a mentality problem more than anything. You can't try before you buy without aurum which is basically saying "If you don't want to waste SP buy aurum" whch is gonna force people that actually want to keep up and are cautious about what they are getting to spend money to test the things they are aiming for. |
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG
Pradox One
13
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 00:14:00 -
[83] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:
Most items have militia versions and most level one skills are cheap (five battles cheap), not being able to try anything because of lack of real life money isn't a valid argument. All items are available in game for ISK.
Which requires you to use SP to obtain which nullifies but at the same time help your statement |
The Robot Devil
Echo Galactic Industries
882
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 00:19:00 -
[84] - Quote
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG wrote:The Robot Devil wrote:
Most items have militia versions and most level one skills are cheap (five battles cheap), not being able to try anything because of lack of real life money isn't a valid argument. All items are available in game for ISK.
Which requires you to use SP to obtain which nullifies but at the same time help your statement
Malitia require no skill and yes level one cost sp but it so little I don't consider it a cost. When I say try before by I mean try before spending level 3 points on and item you haven't used. Aura items require skill points so they are in the same place as any other item. Aur items are a trap like lottery tickets, if you believe that they help you win then you have already lost. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
3413
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 00:20:00 -
[85] - Quote
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG wrote:The Robot Devil wrote:Most items have militia versions and most level one skills are cheap (five battles cheap), not being able to try anything because of lack of real life money isn't a valid argument. All items are available in game for ISK. Which requires you to use SP to obtain which nullifies but at the same time help your statement That SP argument could potentially be a partial counter to the post if it hadn't included this part:
The Robot Devil wrote:most level one skills are cheap (five battles cheap) |
Thurak1
Psygod9
107
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 00:25:00 -
[86] - Quote
Well as i have said before to me there really are 2 options that CCP has to make this game very successful. The first and probably most popular would be to have a REAL play test server. This would be a server where hundred of hardcore gamers are invited to play. This is where players get all sorts of goodies to play with and break and such before released to the general public. They would have first crack at everything and get to have all sorts of fun testing weapons that on initial release are OP. CCP would get all sorts of data on this and be able to release a balanced weapon.
However i have no confidence that will ever be the case. So because of CCP's lack of ability to release balanced weapons and such i believe that they should be very willing to give out at the very least partial re-specs.
This would apply any time they make major changes to any item and allow people that specked into said item to change their mind. I consider this holing CCP to the same standards they hold players to. If i spec into a dropsuit that has a ehp of 2k with no mods and has the run speed of an assault suit then a month later ccp cuts the ehps in half and makes it as slow as a heavy i should be able to get those sp's back. Its not my fault they released a very desirable product to me that didnt require a glitch to make it awesome. Yes this would result in a lot of what people call flavor of the month. Keep in mind this is not my preferred solution either. I would prefer a test server |
The Robot Devil
Echo Galactic Industries
882
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 00:27:00 -
[87] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:5P3CTR3 R1S1NG wrote:The Robot Devil wrote:Most items have militia versions and most level one skills are cheap (five battles cheap), not being able to try anything because of lack of real life money isn't a valid argument. All items are available in game for ISK. Which requires you to use SP to obtain which nullifies but at the same time help your statement That SP argument could potentially be a partial counter to the post if it hadn't included this part: The Robot Devil wrote:most level one skills are cheap (five battles cheap)
I try to be fair and see both sides. This game is complicated to discuss because of all the possibilities and view points. |
Assert Dominance
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
274
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 00:28:00 -
[88] - Quote
Honestly this communitys total IQ hurts, respecs should be given bi-monthly. This is a beta ffs. |
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG
Pradox One
14
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 00:32:00 -
[89] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote: Malitia require no skill and yes level one cost sp but it so little I don't consider it a cost. When I say try before by I mean try before spending level 3 points on and item you haven't used. Aura items require skill points so they are in the same place as any other item. Aur items are a trap like lottery tickets, if you believe that they help you win then you have already lost.
Militia is garbage and basic is far from Advanced equipment so if you wanted to really get a feel for something then you would have to get the advanced to see how it does which is a bit of SP to get which would be a waste if it doesn't work how its supposed to or its broken. There are still good aurum Items which are worth using aurum for. |
The Robot Devil
Echo Galactic Industries
882
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 00:33:00 -
[90] - Quote
Thurak1 wrote:Well as i have said before to me there really are 2 options that CCP has to make this game very successful. The first and probably most popular would be to have a REAL play test server. This would be a server where hundred of hardcore gamers are invited to play. This is where players get all sorts of goodies to play with and break and such before released to the general public. They would have first crack at everything and get to have all sorts of fun testing weapons that on initial release are OP. CCP would get all sorts of data on this and be able to release a balanced weapon.
However i have no confidence that will ever be the case. So because of CCP's lack of ability to release balanced weapons and such i believe that they should be very willing to give out at the very least partial re-specs.
This would apply any time they make major changes to any item and allow people that specked into said item to change their mind. I consider this holing CCP to the same standards they hold players to. If i spec into a dropsuit that has a ehp of 2k with no mods and has the run speed of an assault suit then a month later ccp cuts the ehps in half and makes it as slow as a heavy i should be able to get those sp's back. Its not my fault they released a very desirable product to me that didnt require a glitch to make it awesome. Yes this would result in a lot of what people call flavor of the month. Keep in mind this is not my preferred solution either. I would prefer a test server
We don't need anything to draw players away from the real game. How are we going to select the invites? Giving players a place to go where stats aren't tracked and decisions don't matter then they will play there because they want a game that lets them do what they want. I think it is bad because for the time the server is up lots of players will flock there just for fun instead of playing on the real server for fun. Lots of people don't like the SP system or loosing expensive gear and a test server only gives them a place to go.
If CCP send invites to select mercs then they are playing favorites and the tin foil will be folded into many hats. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |