|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG
Pradox One
11
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 21:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
Reasons why we want respecs : To try a new role
To make the right decision
To spec into the next FoTM
Anti-respect peoples reasons to not give us respecs : We will spec into the FoTM
There will probably be a rise in people using protogear
They already have the right build they want
They already got a respec in uprising(so they don't want to be stomped by new protogear)
The main thing I hear from anti-respec people is that "there shouldn't be a respec because people are just gonna spec into the next FoTM". I say let them have their respecs, if they spec into the FoTM again then they are SOL , THEN there shouldn't be any more respecs. The only thing anti-respec people hear when someone mentions a respc is "I wanna spec into the FoTM". Try looking at this respec war from a different point of view then you will see the logic behind both sides |
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG
Pradox One
12
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 22:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
P14GU3 wrote:5P3CTR3 R1S1NG wrote:Reasons why we want respecs :
To try a new role
To make the right decision
To spec into the next FoTM
Anti-respect peoples reasons to not give us respecs : We will spec into the FoTM
There will probably be a rise in people using protogear
They already have the right build they want
They already got a respec in uprising(so they don't want to be stomped by new protogear)
The main thing I hear from anti-respec people is that "there shouldn't be a respec because people are just gonna spec into the next FoTM". I say let them have their respecs, if they spec into the FoTM again then they are SOL , THEN there shouldn't be any more respecs. The only thing anti-respec people hear when someone mentions a respc is "I wanna spec into the FoTM". Try looking at this respec war from a different point of view then you will see the logic behind both sides We just did that. Ok so we do it ONE MORE TIME. Then two months down the road, CCP adds caldari/mini heavy/scout. MOAR RESPECTS! So when does it end? I say let them make their changes, get all the content in, then we can have one FINAL respec. Until then why bother with respec threads?
That's another reason. If we have a solid date on when the new racial things will come out then we could save the SP we got from the respec, or CCP could just refund us the SP , example: Im specced into Gallente Scout and Caldari and Amarr scout comes out, the SP I put into my Gallente scout should be refunded to use on the other racial variants. |
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG
Pradox One
12
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:04:00 -
[3] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Until we see the exact changes being made, you have no basis for a respec. Changing how vehicles work might be more comprehensive, but it's no different than changing the behaviour of flaylocks, Tacs, or CalLogis. At the end of the day, the content is still the same content.
You skilled into vehicles, so you're keeping vehicles. All you're trying to do is squeeze something you want out of CCP. Your arguments are all proxies for this, not the real reason for receiving this. Looks like someone already has their perfect build. |
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG
Pradox One
13
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:21:00 -
[4] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote: Trying a new role. Most gear has a militia version and if not then level one is usually affordable. To make the right decision. Sorry, we all make mistakes To spec into FoTM. Bad all the way around. Will spec into FoTM. We can't prove this but it does allow them to spec out of FoTM which is bad also. They have the right build they want. I don't know how to answer this. They already had a respec. Yes they did but we are missing "core" items that are needed.
I see more negatives than positives and I agree with no refunds until ALL racial items are in game and then only partial respecs for the skills in the same tree as the missing stuff. I am willing to convert but I need better reasons.
They have the right build as in they like the way they spent their SP and don't want a respec to happen.
I'm not going to try to force you to change your mind but how long do you think it will take until ALL of the racial variants are out?1 or 2 years? By that time we wont even need a respec or a lot of people will probably have left Dust but who knows.
|
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG
Pradox One
13
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:29:00 -
[5] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:
Yup, and even if it changes drastically, it's still going to be the perfect build. That's because I picked the playstyle I wanted, rather than the stats I wanted.
If people don't want tanks anymore, despite the fact that they're still going to be tanks, then it's clear they didn't pick the playstyle they wanted. It's their own fault, they shouldn't be rewarded for it.
That's exactly one of the points I'm making , you have the build you want and therefore you are saying "No respecs because I have the build I wanted" that's what the majority of anti-respec people say its not like we are all the same , people make different choices and you made a choice that you were happy with. As for vehicles you can utilize those way more than other things if you goof up on them. |
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG
Pradox One
13
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:33:00 -
[6] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:
I think we may have a fire lit under them and I want to say December for a full line up. I am not being an a#$ but how long of a notice do we need for mercs to prepare. If they were to come out in Dec. would a months notice give us enough time to save for the skill? If a five week notice was given would we need a refund?
But that's the problem we don't know when or even a timeframe of when they will come out and even if they did come out there shouldn't be a full respec for every time something new comes out.
This is why dust needs a Test server like Eve. |
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG
Pradox One
13
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:45:00 -
[7] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:
We are the test server, balancing the game is fun and creates conflict. Until we have higher numbers a test server isn't worth the time and effort.
It certainly is worth it seeing that it has created this problem, or we could at least get more aurum variants of things. |
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG
Pradox One
13
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 23:52:00 -
[8] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote: Respecs for unhappy allocation isn't a good reason for refunds like being happy with my placement is not a reason against. I love my builds but I made mistakes and I skilled into things I don't like or are unhappy with performance. There is nothing I can do about it and I moved on, I want ewar so I speced into active scanners, they feel pointless. I will use them again and they will be tweaked so my SP wasn't wasted. That doesn't mean I am happy about it but I suck it up and keep going. The main point I try to keep making is try before blindly dumping into high level skills. It does help.
That's a problem, most cant extensively try something out unless you have aurum, and some people don't even have aurum. and you may say "make an alt and try it out" remember not everyone thinks the same so most wouldn't think of that or they just don't have the SP. |
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG
Pradox One
13
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 00:12:00 -
[9] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:Not having a test server didn't created any problems. It may help find some but it didn't create any. The problems we have are normal problems. The problems seem worse because of the SP system. We feel locked into a role and we feel like prototype gear is the only answer to every problem. We don't try before we buy and we are used to games that allow us to do anything we want pretty much whenever we want without consequences. It is a mentality problem more than anything. You can't try before you buy without aurum which is basically saying "If you don't want to waste SP buy aurum" whch is gonna force people that actually want to keep up and are cautious about what they are getting to spend money to test the things they are aiming for. |
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG
Pradox One
13
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 00:14:00 -
[10] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:
Most items have militia versions and most level one skills are cheap (five battles cheap), not being able to try anything because of lack of real life money isn't a valid argument. All items are available in game for ISK.
Which requires you to use SP to obtain which nullifies but at the same time help your statement |
|
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG
Pradox One
14
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 00:32:00 -
[11] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote: Malitia require no skill and yes level one cost sp but it so little I don't consider it a cost. When I say try before by I mean try before spending level 3 points on and item you haven't used. Aura items require skill points so they are in the same place as any other item. Aur items are a trap like lottery tickets, if you believe that they help you win then you have already lost.
Militia is garbage and basic is far from Advanced equipment so if you wanted to really get a feel for something then you would have to get the advanced to see how it does which is a bit of SP to get which would be a waste if it doesn't work how its supposed to or its broken. There are still good aurum Items which are worth using aurum for. |
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG
Pradox One
14
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 00:35:00 -
[12] - Quote
Assert Dominance wrote:Honestly this communitys total IQ hurts, respecs should be given bi-monthly. This is a beta ffs. Now bi-monthly may be too much, or at least if it was bi-monthly to have it cost aurum.
|
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG
Pradox One
14
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 00:42:00 -
[13] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:Assert Dominance wrote:Honestly this communitys total IQ hurts, respecs should be given bi-monthly. This is a beta ffs. They developed it and released it so it is not a Beta because they say so. No other option counts because they said it is released. You can call it beta all you want but they own the game and they say it is release. Bi-monthly respecs would kill this game in four months. If you think it is bad now just imagine people only playing on weeks 7-9 of the respec. We would all be happy if a respec came so we can try other things and so this war on respecs can stop. |
5P3CTR3 R1S1NG
Pradox One
16
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 00:59:00 -
[14] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:You know, I suffered by many LAVs. Just earlier today, I played a domination match where a LLAV just drove around running my teammates and I over. I got on comms to coordinate swarm attacks but the vehicle was just too powerful.
So I suggested on comms that our team just clone them to punish them for using LLAVs. It worked out nicely. The whole team just turned a page and began decimating the reds while NULL cannon decimated their MCC. We just did our best effort to avoid the LAV while rapidly picking off the reds. It was great
I said all this to say this, I think its not cool those folks get respecs for all their SP dumped into LAVs. They used a very easy, cheap method to gain kills. With every reward there is risk and vice versa. Just like I suffered at the wheel of many LAV (and the worst is when your dead body is dragged around like a scene from Troy), they should suffer the consequences of making that decision to just skill up a vehicle just to play murder taxi.
I think its utterly wrong. They had their fun. The respecs they are asking for is just to continue that. If you're ready to win, you should be ready to lose. It's their time to lose. It's only fair. Once 1.5 comes the people who specced into murder taxi'sjust to kill will be SOL, that's a reason why anti-respec people don't want respec's to happen because people will spec into the FoTM but you already know if there is a FoTM its gonna get nerfed or balanced so that means that your fault if you spec into the FoTM aain after we get a respec which means CCP gave you a chance and you did stupid with it which means NOW you are stuck with it. |
|
|
|