| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1741. If you didn't spam so many tanks... - in General Discussions [original thread]
MR TANKIE wrote: Void Echo wrote: typical infantry scrub, I give troll rating 3/10 Its called rolling infantry and proto AV, and rolling fully specced out maddys. Ive seen both sides of the spectrum. Roll a maddy w/ a poly plate, heavy rep...
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.28 18:43:00
|
1742. Dumb people speced into logi and assault - in General Discussions [original thread]
Knightshade Belladonna wrote: THEAMAZING POTHEAD wrote: Its called PC, we cant afford to not have at least 10mil SP into a fitting well designed & effective or you'd get owned in PC, the skill core upgrades is an SP sink past level 2, an...
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.28 16:51:00
|
1743. Aren't vehicles earned? - in General Discussions [original thread]
ZDub 303 wrote: Just own up to the fact that you have no idea what you're talking about, and realize that you absolutely cannot have a tank with that much raw hp. To fit 4 180mm polycrystalline plates, you could reach 15k armor... At the cost ...
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.28 15:48:00
|
1744. Aren't vehicles earned? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Just own up to the fact that you have no idea what you're talking about, and realize that you absolutely cannot have a tank with that much raw hp. To fit 4 180mm polycrystalline plates, you could reach 15k armor... At the cost of over 5000 PG. N...
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.28 14:58:00
|
1745. Aren't vehicles earned? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pretty sure its theoretically impossible to fit a tank with 15k/15k no matter how much SP or PG you have.
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.28 14:44:00
|
1746. Reason for respecs you can not argue against! - in General Discussions [original thread]
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: i argue against it, as much as i would like a respec to get back sp from skills i am no longer able to use effectively i disagree with your post. for a few reasons. why should ccp punish players who didn't use op/unbalance...
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.28 14:10:00
|
1747. Reason for respecs you can not argue against! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Heimdallr69 wrote: ZDub 303 wrote: What if some people spec'd into it, wanting a shield tanked logistics, knowing full well the shield buff was probably going to be removed, but then are forced to deal with -40 base CPU. They tried to pred...
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.28 07:42:00
|
1748. Reason for respecs you can not argue against! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Heimdallr69 wrote: ZDub 303 wrote: Heimdallr69 wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP ...
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.28 07:35:00
|
1749. Reason for respecs you can not argue against! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Heimdallr69 wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Sadly. a motivator in why i stand up to the haters, speds, Devs and derps who vote against respecs. Because iknow first hand what its like to invest time and SP into a class and have it ruined due to ba...
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.28 07:25:00
|
1750. Reason for respecs you can not argue against! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Heimdallr69 wrote: For tankers should be given a respec..... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T85rSUPT5w8&feature=youtube_gdata_player , ill sign A hilariously sad yet perfect description of the state of game balance in dust. +1
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.28 07:24:00
|
1751. Reason for respecs you can not argue against! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Heimdallr69 wrote: I agree with a respec but after all the weapons are implemented and balanced so there is no fotm **** Essentially you're telling people to stop playing for the next 4 months while CCP balances weapons then? FOTM weaponry...
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.28 07:04:00
|
1752. Reason for respecs you can not argue against! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Malkai Inos wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Heathen Bastard wrote: My opinion is that you should live with it. they said your decisions matter, And they do. You chose to spec into a very specific role on an ever changing battlefield. when the ...
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.28 06:41:00
|
1753. Reason for respecs you can not argue against! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: That's just the nature of things. Just pray to the CCP gods to have mercy and not to bring the nerf hammer, but the nerf chisel for your OP item. But it doesn't have to be.
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.28 06:20:00
|
1754. Reason for respecs you can not argue against! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Heathen Bastard wrote: I'm a shield-missile tanker. My entire playstyle is invalidated by a single forge gunner, or even half-decent tank on the field. you know what I did? grabbed a heavy machine gun and a fatsuit after a week long break. it's...
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.28 06:17:00
|
1755. Reason for respecs you can not argue against! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Opus, I think you're too optimistic. Given the last 6 months ive played this game, and how little has gone right since the beginning of chromosome. I cannot imagine this game with be balanced before February next year.
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.28 05:52:00
|
1756. Reason for respecs you can not argue against! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Heathen Bastard wrote: It's your choice to spend the SP on something that is obviously OP. It's your choice to continue playing after you were invalidated. It's your choice to whine on the forums for a respec that won't come. What did he s...
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.28 05:48:00
|
1757. light weapon in heavy slot? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thang Bausch wrote: i abondoned this fit. hated the slow turn speed. Wait until 1.4, they are decoupling aim sens from move speed. Should feel much better.
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.28 05:44:00
|
1758. Reason for respecs you can not argue against! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Meeko Fent wrote: Very rarely do classes that weren't being abused get nerfed hard enough to makes respec necessary. That's a matter of opinion though. Should people not have the ability to choose if that's the case?
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.28 05:40:00
|
1759. Reason for respecs you can not argue against! - in General Discussions [original thread]
I agree, once were relatively close to balancing the core gameplay (ie drop suit and weapon stats) then we can all confidently say that our skill points are true investments and we have no reason to QQ about changes. But until then... Until the...
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.28 05:35:00
|
1760. Aren't vehicles earned? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I think OP saw a tank with 3000 hp and mentally added a zero lol. 30k HP tank is impossible to fit.
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.28 04:59:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |