| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
2301. The Reasons we use tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nguruthos IX wrote: "lola's yolo yoyo" Is the hardest thing to say fast. Especially when no reading it not unless you practice saying it...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.08.29 09:12:00
|
2302. The Reasons we use tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lurchasaurus wrote: Void Echo wrote: Repe Susi wrote: Void Echo wrote: Repe Susi wrote: Those might very well be reasons for you but still you tankers are superior to infantry and there`s no point crying over AV when you go over 20/...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.08.29 09:11:00
|
2303. The Reasons we use tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
pegasis prime wrote: I likey splosions . Redberry go boom. HAHAHAHAHA
- by Void Echo - at 2013.08.29 09:05:00
|
2304. The Reasons we use tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Repe Susi wrote: Void Echo wrote: Repe Susi wrote: Those might very well be reasons for you but still you tankers are superior to infantry and there`s no point crying over AV when you go over 20/0 in majority of matches.It is VERY rare fo...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.08.29 09:01:00
|
2305. The Reasons we use tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Repe Susi wrote: Those might very well be reasons for you but still you tankers are superior to infantry and there`s no point crying over AV when you go over 20/0 in majority of matches.It is VERY rare for me or anybody really to solo kill one ...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.08.29 08:56:00
|
2306. The Reasons we use tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Obodiah Garro wrote: Void Echo wrote: 8. This is not meant to be a normal boring old FPS like COD, BF or Halo. COD/Halo are crap but BF has some pretty intense vehicle combat, hell Bad Company 2 still has the best vehicle combat I d...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.08.29 08:55:00
|
2307. Logi LAV'S have ruined the game for tankers. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jason Pearson wrote: N1ck Comeau wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: It's a good thing. I specced into Proto AV because I'm not a dumb ****, but apparently the majority of the people in this game needed a push into it, chill out, LLAVs only sped...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.08.29 08:52:00
|
2308. Tankers do have it pretty hard. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Acturus Galaxy wrote: Void Echo wrote: Acturus Galaxy wrote: If that is the case, then stop running tanks with expensive large proto turrets, make the tank cheaper. Add nice small turrets and efficient scanners to help out the team and...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.08.29 08:49:00
|
2309. Tankers do have it pretty hard. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Acturus Galaxy wrote: If that is the case, then stop running tanks with expensive large proto turrets, make the tank cheaper. Add nice small turrets and efficient scanners to help out the team and let them get some of the kills and protect y...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.08.29 08:43:00
|
2310. The Reasons we use tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Once again all of you are making false claims of why we use tanks, whether it be "to buff up your K/Dr", "show up as highest on the leaderboards", "never die", etc etc, iv seen many many false claims from infantry as to why we skill into tanks. T...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.08.29 08:38:00
|
2311. Tankers do have it pretty hard. - in General Discussions [original thread]
pegasis prime wrote: Thats it jason, void , maple and ladwar lets set up a 5 man spider tank squad with the sole intentions of finding mr mrs leukoplast and compleatly reafirm his hav piles . Lets show him how op we can be if acctually all squa...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.08.29 08:24:00
|
2312. Tankers do have it pretty hard. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Acturus Galaxy wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: DJINN leukoplast wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: It seems like the other team did really badly, probably because you weren't out there to help them. Think that might have had anything to do with it? Omg s...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.08.29 08:22:00
|
2313. To the people who say tanks are stupid for blowing up supply depot - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bittersteel the Bastard wrote: negative49er wrote: Michael Arck wrote: I still think it's stupid though. Retake the objective. Why destroy a supply depot when the opposing team might pull a rabbit out of the hat that requires you going to...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.08.29 08:16:00
|
2314. To the people who say tanks are stupid for blowing up supply depot - in General Discussions [original thread]
Another Heavy SOB wrote: Damn, I had no idea there were 95 other AV options on top of Grenade, Forge guns, plasma cannons, swarm launchers and proximity mines.....Please tell me were on the market I can find the hundreds of AV threats to vehicl...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.08.29 08:15:00
|
2315. To the people who say tanks are stupid for blowing up supply depot - in General Discussions [original thread]
lrian Locust wrote: daishi mk03 wrote: I destroy each and every neutral/red installation (including CRUs) immediately and I don't care about you infantry guys. Tankers will take care for you. Just do your stupid hacking, shooting stuff. Now...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.08.29 08:12:00
|
2316. Tankers do have it pretty hard. - in General Discussions [original thread]
DJINN leukoplast wrote: Just saw Jason Pearson in a skirmish match I was AFKing in, he was in his gunnlogi (solo tanking from what I could tell). Figured I would share the post-match results, which does paint a pretty good picture of how hard...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.08.29 07:59:00
|
2317. [Discussion] LetGÇÖs talk about tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Obodiah Garro wrote: Void Echo wrote: and that's where it needs to start.. vehicles are not dropsuits and shouldn't be balanced as such, they are entirely different from vehicles, it needs to be separated from infantry balances entirely if ...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.08.29 03:41:00
|
2318. Vehicles in 1.5 and beyond! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Skihids wrote: Void Echo wrote: ladwar wrote: seeing this page have 20 pages of replies and 1.4 only has 16. clearly a lot of pilots are going to leave if they don't actually balance anything out and it turns out to be the same fail sauce...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.08.29 03:37:00
|
2319. Tank vs AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
Obodiah Garro wrote: Ted Nugget wrote: Bubba Salaman wrote: So you're complaining that a dedicated AV fit designed to kill vehicles are good at killing vehicles? That's hilarious. i dont think you read the post... av on top of towers...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.08.29 03:34:00
|
2320. Tank vs AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bubba Salaman wrote: So you're complaining that a dedicated AV fit designed to kill vehicles are good at killing vehicles? That's hilarious. its an imbalanced that needs to be fixed, it takes an entire ******* team to kill a single LAV an...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.08.29 03:29:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |