| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
2261. Why the hate towards the CPM? - in General Discussions [original thread]
They had 1 job to do and they still havnt done it
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.03 12:51:00
|
2262. so i have infantry skills, and vehicles skills. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Go infantry, you might aswell
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.02 18:15:00
|
2263. Why infantry doesn't want tankers to get a full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: That doesn't change the statement. Thats why, change everything about vehicles changes you vehicle respec. It's not their problem you put SP elsewhere. But something to consider, spkr said you could max out the HAV relevant...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.02 15:35:00
|
2264. how about a tanker truce in 1.7 :-) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Meh With the high damage turrets do its suicide
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.02 12:11:00
|
2265. how about an infantry truce in 1.7 :-) - in General Discussions [original thread]
daishi mk03 wrote: I will fly my old AV dropship Militia Dropship 2 friends with AV grenades fly up to the ceiling fly over tank jump throw 9 Lai Dai Packed in an instant lol lololololol lol That wont work I had WTF try that at me in a PC...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.02 12:09:00
|
2266. Why infantry doesn't want tankers to get a full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: They're scared to death at the prospect of intelligent, unkillable tanks. The half respec is CCP's way of saying "there you go, you have no SP into vehicles n...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.02 11:47:00
|
2267. Why infantry doesn't want tankers to get a full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
knight of 6 wrote: seriously? you do realize that CCP favors infantry right? and at the slightest provocation they will hit us with the nerf bat so hard we wont profit for builds. don't rub your victory in infantry's face, literally no good c...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.01 20:54:00
|
2268. Why infantry doesn't want tankers to get a full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: Personally I don't really care. I wasted SP on scout LAVs that I might use to finish maxing out my pistol proficiency or something. I know pilots who will do the same as you They may have skilled up a fairly decent HAV or ADS...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.01 20:36:00
|
2269. 1.7 respec - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
daishi mk03 wrote: 2 proto suits with 2 proto weapons and core skills is FAR away from everything. 20m SP now grants you all, ALL vehicles. I think it will be more fair in 1.7. you can skill 1 turret (usage), both available tank hulls (at once...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.01 20:23:00
|
2270. 1.7 respec - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
daishi mk03 wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: daishi mk03 wrote: I don't get what you trying to say but you can spec a tank easily for 20m next patch 1.7 and you will get a respec, because you tanker and you are mad and you can also go infa...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.01 20:02:00
|
2271. 1.7 respec - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
daishi mk03 wrote: I don't get what you trying to say but you can spec a tank easily for 20m next patch 1.7 and you will get a respec, because you tanker and you are mad and you can also go infantry and you are Minmatar spy edit: execuse my en...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.01 19:48:00
|
2272. 1.7 respec - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
daishi mk03 wrote: Takahiro is mad, because he has skilled into heavy suits and has to run with a duvolle now. Vehicle respec yay, full respec NO. Also, he is a Minmatar spie. I like my heavy suit and duvolle I just dont use em anymore exce...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.01 19:16:00
|
2273. We need an Amarr FW chat - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thats rich I saw OP fighting for the minmatar lol
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.01 12:30:00
|
2274. 1.7 respec - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Heavy Salvo wrote: WELL insofar we have the Vehicle perspective although it seems as though you are quite upset he & the other pilots aren't looking at this from the infantry perspective and I'm assuming also disre...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.01 12:28:00
|
2275. Anti-Vehicle CPM Representation - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: IWS is prob about as anti vehicle as you can get He already doesnt want vehicles in the game let alone have proto vehicles while infantry keep proto AV Umm. He wants to remove the entire STD-ADV-PRO ...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.11.30 16:42:00
|
2276. Anti-Vehicle CPM Representation - in General Discussions [original thread]
IWS is prob about as anti vehicle as you can get He already doesnt want vehicles in the game let alone have proto vehicles while infantry keep proto AV
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.11.30 16:26:00
|
2277. How hard is it to introduce STD-ADV-PRO tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Infantry wont allow it at all Yet they will keep STD-ADV-PRO AV weapons to fight against the basic vehicles You either a) Get rid of all STD-ADV-PRO weapons/mods/suits etc Or b) Make everything have STD-ADV-PRO tiers so its fair to all ...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.11.30 15:29:00
|
2278. LOL TANK NERF - in General Discussions [original thread]
With my vehicle respec i can hit up 3 proto suits, 2 more proto weaopns, finish out the core skills and proto stomp all day because its **** easy to do and im rich
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.11.30 12:26:00
|
2279. 1.7 respec - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
D3LTA Blitzkrieg II wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Keep changing it to suit your needs but its a SINK Vehicle tree in 1.7 is a SINK - fact I wouldnt have mind it being a SINK if it was changed at least 6month...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.11.30 12:20:00
|
2280. Judge Rhadamanthus for vehicle CPM! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Judge does have qualities but I am not sure how extensive those qualities would be useful and if so, how rarely? I mean its great to have a specialist on the team but lately ingame skills/expertise/profession have been to...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.11.29 19:48:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |