| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
dogmanpig
black market bank
52
   |
Posted - 2013.11.30 01:48:00 -
[31] - Quote
Llast 326 wrote:jenza aranda wrote:to be honest, while i am sure some of these people could be good CPMs, I really dont like it when people say "vehicle CPM" or "scout CPM" or anything like that.
Honestly, CPMs really need to have experience in a very wide area to understand beyond their class, that and there is the risk of people only wanting their personal class to be buffed and working only on that.
just food for thought. This Representing the community as a whole is important to the job. Everyone has bias but recognizing where those biases are is part of not allowing them to interfere with representation of an entire community.
the hard facts are that it is true that is how CPM will effect the game and thats why if there isn't any then it gets no balanced attention and falls into useless and trash. its just basic human nature and no matter how much they want to say or seem balanced they just are not always looking for their favorite way to end up on top, thats why CPM is a bad idea.
You hate me, I hate you. Lets keep it that way.
Level 7 1/3 Forum alt.
"Its worth half a penny and a reach around"
|
Pvt Numnutz
Ikomari-Onu Enforcement
Caldari State
365
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 02:39:00 -
[32] - Quote
Jesus Atiim, why are you so angry all the time? Also why do you make so many concpiracys? Judge doesn't want vehicles to be overpowered or flavors of the month. He has stated this several times, which is why he is a good choice.
What you think he is just gonna tell ccp to make vehicles overpowered? That's not judge. |
SoTarian PoParrazi
Shining Flame
Amarr Empire
357
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 03:10:00 -
[33] - Quote
Slag Emberforge wrote:SoTarian PoParrazi wrote:Atiim wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Eheh. Is there a problem? Do you believe that AV shouldn't get a spot on the CPM? No - AV should not get a spot. Infantry is the AV role - if you're pure AV you're playing this game wrong or have no aspirations to be any good on a competitive level. Basically - anyone who understands Infantry should also understand AV. Wow, you couldn't be more wrong. I do not go full AV, but my focal drop suits are all about taking out enemy vehicles, to do that you need some level of AI proficiency as well or you will simply never make it into position to do any good. With that said if as part of a squad, a pure AV member is extremely effective when protected and chauffeured to strategic points by anti-infantry. Having the ability to blast out swarms and nades to spike damage to kill off HAVs is super effective . Without doubt a slayer vs AV+AI(secondary) are different, as regardless of whether you are a FGer or swarmer, you are replacing your primary weapon with something not meant explicitly for a slayer role, and a FG does not have the speed, efficiency, stealth, or pure RoF that an AR or SCR has when it comes to killing efficiency.
Since you used yourself as an example let me ask: How many PC's have you been in? And how many corps welcome a guy with AV but no proto weapons or equipment when facing a good team?
AV is effective only when there's a vehicles on the other side - and who knows how long a vehicles will remain in play? What if he stops tanking and switches to his proto logi slayer? What are you then but fodder?
"Most dedicated AV have proto weapons, though." Then they're infantry with AV capacity - how is that any different then me and my prof V forge and proto nades?
AV does not need a seat - it's a waste. But beyond that - any seat that's taken by a specific roled player is dumb. CPM should be the unbiased logic of the community so they can reach our voices closer to CCP - not change things by themselves with there 'dedicated' knowledge. That knowledge only helps them understand to translate - not take over for the community.
n+ÅS¦¦Gùò GÇ+GÇ+ GùòS¦¦n++ - Let's make a contract!
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1448
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 03:40:00 -
[34] - Quote
SoTarian PoParrazi wrote:Atiim wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Eheh. Is there a problem? Do you believe that AV shouldn't get a spot on the CPM? No - AV should not get a spot. Infantry is the AV role - if you're pure AV you're playing this game wrong or have no aspirations to be any good on a competitive level. Basically - anyone who understands Infantry should also understand AV.
With that logic, basically anyone who understands assault should also understand heavies, along with scouts, and snipers.
And I don't see why if HAVs get a spot, the sole class that it is balanced against should not get a spot. That's like offering North Korea a spot in the UN but telling South Korea to go f*** itself.
Check out my corp's new website here :D
-HAND
|
SoTarian PoParrazi
Shining Flame
Amarr Empire
358
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 03:47:00 -
[35] - Quote
Atiim wrote:SoTarian PoParrazi wrote:Atiim wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Eheh. Is there a problem? Do you believe that AV shouldn't get a spot on the CPM? No - AV should not get a spot. Infantry is the AV role - if you're pure AV you're playing this game wrong or have no aspirations to be any good on a competitive level. Basically - anyone who understands Infantry should also understand AV. With that logic, basically anyone who understands assault should also understand heavies, along with scouts, and snipers. And I don't see why if HAVs get a spot, the sole class that it is balanced against should not get a spot. That's like offering North Korea a spot in the UN but telling South Korea to go f*** itself.
Excuse me, but case to explain how you view my logic? Because your response made you look very, very dumb. There are, obviously, different types of infantry. But AV is one role that can be only handled in one or maybe two ways.
And now I understand this thread better - you're butt hurt that a tanker could get a spot but not your precious AV.
Neither of you will get a spot - Only community role models are getting CPM, not role specific players. Can you name any current CPM whose even really even half decent at the game?
You're not even well liked, or considered fondly. You're more on my level - despised for every post.
n+ÅS¦¦Gùò GÇ+GÇ+ GùòS¦¦n++ - Let's make a contract!
|
Sgt Kirk
SyNergy Gaming
EoN.
3103
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 03:48:00 -
[36] - Quote
I think we need Sgt Kirk as the CPM for Sgt Kirk related activities.
Something desperately needed in DUST.
Sgt Kirk for CPM. |
SoTarian PoParrazi
Shining Flame
Amarr Empire
360
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 03:50:00 -
[37] - Quote
Sgt Kirk wrote:I think we need Sgt Kirk as the CPM for Sgt Kirk related activities.
Something desperately needed in DUST.
Sgt Kirk for CPM.
I approve of this message.
Why not be my campaign manager?
CPM could use a troll to get all over CCP's grill. 
n+ÅS¦¦Gùò GÇ+GÇ+ GùòS¦¦n++ - Let's make a contract!
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1448
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 03:51:00 -
[38] - Quote
Pvt Numnutz wrote:Jesus Atiim, why are you so angry all the time? Also why do you make so many concpiracys? Judge doesn't want vehicles to be overpowered or flavors of the month. He has stated this several times, which is why he is a good choice.
What you think he is just gonna tell ccp to make vehicles overpowered? That's not judge.
What reason do I have not to be angry?
And where have I stated or implied that I believe that Judge want's vehicles to be overpowered of a FoTM? In fact, I believe that I've stated quite the contrary.
I'm just saying, if we get a Vehicle CPM, we should get an Anti-Vehicle CPM.
Check out my corp's new website here :D
-HAND
|
Sgt Kirk
SyNergy Gaming
EoN.
3104
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 03:58:00 -
[39] - Quote
SoTarian PoParrazi wrote:Sgt Kirk wrote:I think we need Sgt Kirk as the CPM for Sgt Kirk related activities.
Something desperately needed in DUST.
Sgt Kirk for CPM.
I approve of this message. Why not be my campaign manager? CPM could use a troll to get all over CCP's grill.
I am in full support of a CPM member that's not a lap dog. |
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui
Kinsho Swords
Caldari State
137
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 04:05:00 -
[40] - Quote
Shokhann Echo wrote:Atiim wrote:ZeHealingHurts HurtingHeals wrote:I thought Judge was also specced extensively into AV on alts? I'm also specced into HAVs. Should I be apart of the CPM on vehicles? (Not saying Judge is incapable, in fact he's quite the opposite) Think about it this way, if we have a Democrat in Congress, shouldn't we also have a Republican? (You may not understand this if you don't live in the US) thing about that is that with both parties nothing will get done, one of the main reasons why the u.s is so ******
I don't know about that . I can understand about people having representation because some say I talk about those who whine too much , so I will calm down on that part but it just can get so tiresome to hear on a constant basis . I like Cosgar for a CPM position , I don't hide that fact but for an AV representative I'm not sure about that . I really don't see too many people defending AV use so that's hard for me to say .
I like Judge because of the un bias nature that he seems to represent as well as his professionalism , he is a True Diplomat . I like Cosgar because he has some great ideals about solving issues and because of his overall knowledge and views that he display , he is a True Diplomat as well , so it's good to have those two in that position . You not only want to have someone that can represent YOU but someone who knows how to problem solve ( there are a lot of issues that need to be solved ) as well as someone who is not bias and can compromise with those in power .
People who can get the " powers that be " to see things from different points of view as well as those who can enhance their ideals and help implement them as well as helping the community to be informed and understanding of necessary changes . Yes they also need to have a deep since of restraint in dealing with the community given they way that most speak disrespectfully to others .
" BANE " of ALL vehicle users , Crush , Kill and Destroy ALL vehicles !!!!!
|
|
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1448
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 04:07:00 -
[41] - Quote
SoTarian PoParrazi wrote:
Excuse me, but case to explain how you view my logic? Because your response made you look very, very dumb. There are, obviously, different types of infantry. But AV is one role that can be only handled in one or maybe two ways.
And now I understand this thread better - you're butt hurt that a tanker could get a spot but not your precious AV.
Neither of you will get a spot - Only community role models are getting CPM, not role specific players. Can you name any current CPM whose even really even half decent at the game?
You're not even well liked, or considered fondly. You're more on my level - despised for every post.
You couldn't be further away from the truth. There are more ways to handle the role of AV then there are complete roles in this entire game.
Butthurt? Why would I be butthurt over Judge getting a spot on the CPM? The only thing I said is that I would also like an Anti-Vehicle CPM on the CPM1 board as well. I just so happened to come prepared for the HAV purist group that I like to label "LOLTank Brigade", along with people who think that AV doesn't deserve or need a spot on the CPM
And you say "precious AV" as if I'm an AV crusader who would like nothing better than to OHK every vehicle in sight. In reality, I'm actually quite fond of vehicles. Especially LLAVs.
You can like me, dislike me, or make a freaking voodoo doll of me and jab pins into it like your Micheal Myers. I couldn't care. It wouldn't make what I'm saying any more or less true or credible.
Check out my corp's new website here :D
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1448
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 04:08:00 -
[42] - Quote
CharCharOdell wrote:Atiim wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Eheh. Is there a problem? Do you believe that AV shouldn't get a spot on the CPM? Not unless there is a vehicle purist
Why would I want a vehicle purist in the CPM? I wouldn't even want an AV purist in the CPM.
Check out my corp's new website here :D
-HAND
|
SoTarian PoParrazi
Shining Flame
Amarr Empire
360
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 04:22:00 -
[43] - Quote
Atiim wrote:SoTarian PoParrazi wrote:
Excuse me, but case to explain how you view my logic? Because your response made you look very, very dumb. There are, obviously, different types of infantry. But AV is one role that can be only handled in one or maybe two ways.
And now I understand this thread better - you're butt hurt that a tanker could get a spot but not your precious AV.
Neither of you will get a spot - Only community role models are getting CPM, not role specific players. Can you name any current CPM whose even really even half decent at the game?
You're not even well liked, or considered fondly. You're more on my level - despised for every post.
You couldn't be further away from the truth. There are more ways to handle the role of AV then there are complete roles in this entire game. Butthurt? Why would I be butthurt over Judge getting a spot on the CPM? The only thing I said is that I would also like an Anti-Vehicle CPM on the CPM1 board as well. I just so happened to come prepared for the HAV purist group that I like to label "LOLTank Brigade", along with people who think that AV doesn't deserve or need a spot on the CPM And you say "precious AV" as if I'm an AV crusader who would like nothing better than to OHK every vehicle in sight. In reality, I'm actually quite fond of vehicles. Especially LLAVs. You can like me, dislike me, or make a freaking voodoo doll of me and jab pins into it like your Micheal Myers. I couldn't care. It wouldn't make what I'm saying any more or less true or credible.
Awesome - you don't care what people think. I'm sure you'll win a ton of votes if elections are ever made.
And ignoring my snide remarks that you took literal, you could explain what these 'other ways to AV' are? Far as I know, there's Forge, Swarms, nades, RE's and other tanks. But I wouldn't refer tank vs tank as AV.
n+ÅS¦¦Gùò GÇ+GÇ+ GùòS¦¦n++ - Let's make a contract!
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1448
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 04:23:00 -
[44] - Quote
Eris Ernaga wrote:Atiim wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Eheh. Is there a problem? Do you believe that AV shouldn't get a spot on the CPM? Based on this post I can tell what kind of supporter you are plus less then 1% of the player base doesn't represent the community.
So me believing that every class including AV should have at least 1 spot on the CPM is wrong? I can clearly see what kind of supporter you are then.
And that less than 1% of the playerbase statement is incredibly false.That would mean that only 30-40 people are skilled into AV in this entire game. And even if that statistic was true, that 1% of the playerbase is all that stands in the way between DUST 514 and Tank 514.
Check out my corp's new website here :D
-HAND
|
dogmanpig
black market bank
52
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 04:28:00 -
[45] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Eris Ernaga wrote:Atiim wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Eheh. Is there a problem? Do you believe that AV shouldn't get a spot on the CPM? Based on this post I can tell what kind of supporter you are plus less then 1% of the player base doesn't represent the community. So me believing that every class including AV should have at least 1 spot on the CPM is wrong? I can clearly see what kind of supporter you are then. And that less than 1% of the playerbase statement is incredibly false.That would mean that only 30-40 people are skilled into AV in this entire game. And even if that statistic was true, that 1% of the playerbase is all that stands in the way between DUST 514 and Tank 514.
yes that is wrong, no kindof "class" should be supported by CPM, they shouldn't have any more effect on the game then other well write w/ reasonable supporting arguments for their feedback on the forums feedback section and they have had way more then that and are driving dust into well dust.
DOWN WITH CPM, FOREVER
You hate me, I hate you. Lets keep it that way.
Level 7 1/3 Forum alt.
"Its worth half a penny and a reach around"
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1448
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 04:35:00 -
[46] - Quote
SoTarian PoParrazi wrote:
Awesome - you don't care what people think. I'm sure you'll win a ton of votes if elections are ever made.
And ignoring my snide remarks that you took literal, you could explain what these 'other ways to AV' are? Far as I know, there's Forge, Swarms, nades, RE's and other tanks. But I wouldn't refer tank vs tank as AV.
There are always people who will dislike you. I don't believe you understand what I'm saying so maybe I should put it in a more broader term for you.
Atiim wrote:I could honestly care less if you dislike me me. If you really think that you disliking me will change anything then you can wait in line with the others.
You want to know more ways of AVing?
- Ambush the target
- "Snipe" the target
- Hit and Run
- Corner the target
- The ye old "yolonade" trick.
- Saturate the target
- Orbital Strike the target (though I don't think that would really count as AV)
- Plasma Cannons
- Shoot the gunners out of the vehicle, rendering the vehicle near useless. (Only works on DSs and LAVs)
- etc. etc. etc.
Check out my corp's new website here :D
-HAND
|
Racro 01 Arifistan
501st Knights of Leanbox
80
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 04:36:00 -
[47] - Quote
Harpyja wrote:I say, let us have vehicle representation and no AV representation. Let's put AV through 6 months of nerfs and vehicles through 6 months of buffs 
just like what happend with the LOLswarms.
i played a few games yesterday where std and adv swarms were in abundance of 2-3 people and thier damage was equivlent to just 1 wykomi thats how big of a gap there is between std-adv-proto AV weapons. |
Shotty GoBang
Pro Hic Immortalis
2488
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 05:06:00 -
[48] - Quote
CCP -- not CPM -- is in the best possible position to address balance.
What we need is the Dev or Dev Team responsible for weapon/role balance to step up, assess, and take ownership. The last thing we'd need is a CPM representative from every conceivable field vocalizing 'official' discontent and impeding progress.
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1455
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 16:22:00 -
[49] - Quote
Racro 01 Arifistan wrote:Harpyja wrote:I say, let us have vehicle representation and no AV representation. Let's put AV through 6 months of nerfs and vehicles through 6 months of buffs just like what happend with the LOLswarms. i played a few games yesterday where std and adv swarms were in abundance of 2-3 people and thier damage was equivlent to just 1 wykomi thats how big of a gap there is between std-adv-proto AV weapons.
Why is there a problem with this?
I think all weapons should have a similar gap between MLT/STD and PRO. It's called getting what you paid for. Similar to how Complex mods on vehicles make much more of a difference than MLT/STD mods.
(Except hardners. Only a 10% increase from STD to PRO tier? Really CCP?)
Check out my corp's new website here :D
-HAND
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star.
EoN.
1806
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 16:26:00 -
[50] - Quote
IWS is prob about as anti vehicle as you can get
He already doesnt want vehicles in the game let alone have proto vehicles while infantry keep proto AV |
|
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1456
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 16:29:00 -
[51] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:IWS is prob about as anti vehicle as you can get
He already doesnt want vehicles in the game let alone have proto vehicles while infantry keep proto AV
Umm. He wants to remove the entire STD-ADV-PRO tier system from all classes.
And where has he said that he wants vehicles removed?
Check out my corp's new website here :D
-HAND
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star.
EoN.
1806
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 16:42:00 -
[52] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:IWS is prob about as anti vehicle as you can get
He already doesnt want vehicles in the game let alone have proto vehicles while infantry keep proto AV Umm. He wants to remove the entire STD-ADV-PRO tier system from all classes. And where has he said that he wants vehicles removed?
All classes? lolno he wants it for vehicles only so they are useless in game
With his pointless forums posts and actions |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1460
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 16:50:00 -
[53] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Atiim wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:IWS is prob about as anti vehicle as you can get
He already doesnt want vehicles in the game let alone have proto vehicles while infantry keep proto AV Umm. He wants to remove the entire STD-ADV-PRO tier system from all classes. And where has he said that he wants vehicles removed? All classes? lolno he wants it for vehicles only so they are useless in game With his pointless forums posts and actions
Considering the "logic" pilots used to say that I'm on an AV Crusade, I'm going to call "BS" on that claim untill you can supply actual proof that he said he want's vehicles removed, as well as a link to the original quote itself.
Check out my corp's new website here :D
-HAND
|
Xender17
Ahrendee Mercenaries
EoN.
936
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 16:59:00 -
[54] - Quote
Something most players don't get is that vehicle users (only DS and HAV pilots) have both sides of experience im fully specced into AV and still think its op.
What the fox say?
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1464
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 18:06:00 -
[55] - Quote
Xender17 wrote:Something most players don't get is that vehicle users (only DS and HAV pilots) have both sides of experience im fully specced into AV and still think its op.
I'm also specced into AV, and I honestly could care less if the CPM for vehicles is also specced into AV.
That's like voting for a Democratic president because he has 1 or 2 similar views as the Republican party, and vice versa.
Who's to stop a vehicle CPM from making AV useless? CCP? They fail terribly at balancing.
And let's put another spin on things, I am AV but I'm also specced into HAVs. Do you think I'm qualified to make balancing decisions on HAVs?
(I don't think Judge will do something like that, but let's face facts. Not every vehicle CPM is going to be like Judge, and Judge won't be the vehicle CPM forever)
And I wouldn't trust a pilot to make an unbiased, perfectly balanced decision in terms of AV. Just like pilots wouldn't trust a member of the AV community to make unbiased and perfectly balanced decisions in terms of vehicles.
Check out my corp's new website here :D
-HAND
|
kayn TARON
Molon Labe.
RISE of LEGION
26
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 02:38:00 -
[56] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Xender17 wrote:Something most players don't get is that vehicle users (only DS and HAV pilots) have both sides of experience im fully specced into AV and still think its op. I'm also specced into AV, and I honestly could care less if the CPM for vehicles is also specced into AV. That's like voting for a Democratic president because he has 1 or 2 similar views as the Republican party, and vice versa. Who's to stop a vehicle CPM from making AV useless? CCP? They fail terribly at balancing. And let's put another spin on things, I am AV but I'm also specced into HAVs. Do you think I'm qualified to make balancing decisions on HAVs? (I don't think Judge will do something like that, but let's face facts. Not every vehicle CPM is going to be like Judge, and Judge won't be the vehicle CPM forever) And I wouldn't trust a pilot to make an unbiased, perfectly balanced decision in terms of AV. Just like pilots wouldn't trust a member of the AV community to make unbiased and perfectly balanced decisions in terms of vehicles.
Face it no one likes you, nor takes any post you say serious lol. You wonder why you are never invited into squad from most of the big general chats :p I'd invite you just to kick you lol. |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1480
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 02:46:00 -
[57] - Quote
kayn TARON wrote:
Face it no one likes you, nor takes any post you say serious lol. You wonder why you are never invited into squad from most of the big general chats :p I'd invite you just to kick you lol.
And I care why? What will people disliking me do? It won't make what what I'm saying any less true or credible.
And actually, when I LFS, I do get invited to squads
I just rarely LFS in #SAND CASTLES. The only reason I have that channel in the first place is because some of my friends from D3LTA Academy and D3LTA FORC3 decided to go to Molon Labe.
I do miss them though. It was fun stealing kills from Eldest and going rambo on everyone just have Katty save my sorry a$$ 10 seconds later.
(Also, were you in D3LTA? I swear I remember you from somewhere)
My Very First Thread About Tanks
-HAND
|
MINA Longstrike
2Shitz 1Giggle
78
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 02:48:00 -
[58] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Ok, so the community has already agreed that they want Judge Rhadamanthus as the CPM in terms of vehicles and it's operation But what about the Anti-Vehicle community? Do we get representation on the CPM? Or is CCP going to ignore yet another part of the community? If AV doesn't get a spot on the CPM, I can guarantee that this could quite possibly make AV the most unused classes, as there would be no way of relaying any problem(s) that might be present within the class as a whole to CCP. Leading to the same problem Heavies and Scouts had to deal with (and are still dealing with) before the "buff". However; If we do get a spot on the CPM1, who do you think it should be? I would run personally, but I have absolutely no time to be apart of the CPM with my college and work. So if I had the option, I would nominate KING CHECKMATE, as he is far more qualified for the position than I, and while I hate to say this so aggressively; he is far more tolerant in terms of "BS" and extreme laps of judgement and/or logic from others. But don't let my idea(s) sway or deter you from nominating someone else, or even yourself as a whole. -HAND
Judge does both av and vehicles... and IMO you need a person who does vehicles in order to properly represent av. Judge was on a video recently where someone was talking about how they thought that a dropship pilot was always aware of where the forge guns / swarm launchers were when they were getting killed by them and they thought this because they don't use vehicles at all.
You need to see both sides of the issue in order to properly represent either vehicles or av, claiming that someone needs to represent the 'av community' simply because others have nominated judge for vehicles is a kneejerk reaction that implies that the vehicle community is somehow biased. We may be a little biased, but ultimately what we'd like is for someone who can represent the issues that are faced on BOTH SIDES, and right now AV is so pathetically easy it's a goddamn joke. Point a swarmlauncher at something, receive kills (maybe), I'd be in favor of buffing av if the only weapon you guys had was the plasma cannon (which takes a *LOT* of skill to kill vehicles with). |
Benjamin Ciscko
The Generals
General Tso's Alliance
255
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 03:04:00 -
[59] - Quote
Atiim wrote:ZeHealingHurts HurtingHeals wrote:I thought Judge was also specced extensively into AV on alts? I'm also specced into HAVs. Should I be apart of the CPM on vehicles? (Not saying Judge is incapable, in fact he's quite the opposite) Think about it this way, if we have a Democrat in Congress, shouldn't we also have a Republican? (You may not understand this if you don't live in the US)
Hell no
and no that is flawed either way you cut it if you have 2 parties they block each other and nothing ever gets done *cough* *cough* the republicans, but if you had 1 party even if it was the one I support it gives them too much power and is the path towards corruption.
Vehicle rework scheduled for 1.5.... 1.6.... 1.7........
Tanker/Logi
Wait until AV feels the pain vehicle users have
|
KING CHECKMATE
AMARR IMPERIAL CRUSADERS
2598
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 03:15:00 -
[60] - Quote
Roger Cordill wrote:Message from Godin: Judge would be fine for this as well. Many pilots also do AV as well (hey, we know our strengths and weaknesses, so why not ), and he has shown that he does in fact have PROTO AV, and can use it (I was the sole survivor of a attack he pulled on me and 2 other bluedots. ******* Wiki Swarms...... Point being, he can do both, and imo is the best option for both.
Message to Godin. Putting a Vehicle user as a Judge sounds pretty biased to me too.
Dont forget people , owning some Proto AV does NOT make you a AV SPECIALIST,same as me owning some tanks wont make me a tanker.
Now atiim, i really do appreciate the support, and i AM very flattered, but In around a month as soon as i get the SP necesary i will be ABANDONING AV SPECIALIST ROLE and spec Fully into scouts again.
Now i do agree I would, now being mainly a scout and having enough knowledge on AV weapons ,would make me a less biased judge than you XD LOL
BUT STILL i have 2 flaws that wont work very well with this position bro.
1- English is not my main language there by , believe it or not, i cannot elaborate as precisely as a CPM needs to.
2- Even if i can take enough BS,as soon as Biased ''ideas'' of vehicle users pop up , my immediate response is to propose an intentionally Biased AV proposal, mostly for the trolls...and i think a CPM should be more serious than this.
just saying : /
The Best Damage Mod, its a Headshot....
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |