Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
2521. AV buff? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Heimdallr69 wrote: Really guys...just refund tank users and take tanks out the game, you will never make it fair cuz there will always be people who think they should be able to solo any tank in any situation.. If we're losing tanks, then eve...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.06 17:55:00
|
2522. AV buff? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Omareth Nasadra wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Beck Weathers wrote: As I keep telling everyone, AV damage isent the problem, its HAV torque that lets them escape from danger in mere seconds, and ramp over hills like a dirt bike. So, being a...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.06 17:54:00
|
2523. AV buff? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spectre-M wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: da GAND wrote: So since CCP plans to limit you guys to two AV nades it kind of seems like the best choice right now would be to increase the damage of AV nades. Examples of how much the damage should b...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.06 08:08:00
|
2524. AV buff? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Beck Weathers wrote: As I keep telling everyone, AV damage isent the problem, its HAV torque that lets them escape from danger in mere seconds, and ramp over hills like a dirt bike. So, being able to escape is a problem. Okay Dropsuits get ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.06 05:59:00
|
2525. AV buff? - in General Discussions [original thread]
da GAND wrote: So since CCP plans to limit you guys to two AV nades it kind of seems like the best choice right now would be to increase the damage of AV nades. Examples of how much the damage should be increased? I've waited for the perfect ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.06 05:46:00
|
2526. Pilot dropsuit - in General Discussions [original thread]
Awry Barux wrote: Egonz4 wrote: Is there any chance that's still coming cuz u would think it would come first since it already has a placed reserved for it in the marketplace. What would a pilot suit add to the game? Serious question- wha...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.06 05:35:00
|
2527. (video) reaction to 1.8 dev blog - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ludvig Enraga wrote: nakaya indigene wrote: bump no opinions? I love how it's the guy who runs a tank in a pub that provides an 'in-depth' analysis of balancing in 1.8. How's that for an opinion? So because someone that doesn't run the...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.06 05:26:00
|
2528. [CCP response requested] With 1.8 on the near horizon... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Miokai Zahou wrote: There is a response given by ccp here Off topic
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.06 05:06:00
|
2529. [CCP response requested] With 1.8 on the near horizon... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Will us pilots finally get a timeline for the release of more racial hulls / turrets and / or pilot suits? If that's more than 6 months off, then I'm going to just fill out the rest of my vehicle stuff, then go into infantry. But if it's soon, an...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.06 04:38:00
|
2530. Maths is OP Analysis needs nerf in 1.8 - in General Discussions [original thread]
SPESHULz wrote: All these people using numbers and graphs and fitting tool is unbalanced and is the only cause of proto stomping. Suit, module and weapon choices should be 94% cosmetic and all AR's the same. Why cant this game be more like bat...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.06 04:30:00
|
2531. Let's Be Real About the Railgun - in General Discussions [original thread]
CLONE117 wrote: i chased a tank down with a blaster tank just yesterday.. sadly i was getting pummeled by the forgers. but i killed the gunlogi first. but within seconds i died shortly after. probably shouldnt have driven after the rail gunlog...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.05 19:04:00
|
2532. Are AV granades being reduced to 2 as well? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cody Sietz wrote: If so, why? Core locus granaded were the only spam problem, not flux and AV. Will AV granaded get a buff to compensate for the nerf? Contact grenades were the problem, and when infantry complained about them, they were ner...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.05 18:17:00
|
2533. Another AV nerf, well done CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: sebastian the huds wrote: Atiim wrote: sebastian the huds wrote: Crimson Cerberes wrote: Yep, there is absolutely no reason to fit AV grenades anymore. 2 AV grenades will not kill anything. You aren't supposed to be a...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.05 18:13:00
|
2534. Another AV nerf, well done CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
The dark cloud wrote: Well done CCP now complex damage mods are beeing toned down from +10% to +5%. This is another nerfbat to AV like if it wasnt bad enough. At the moment its allmost impossible to kill tanks but after the changes it will trul...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.05 18:11:00
|
2535. Anti-infantry HAVs cannot ever be balanced in Ambush - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: And not only that, CCP already did their AV / vehicle balance pass, which infantry basically forced them to do. Why are you not happy with the work you forced CCP to do? By your logic, TANKS are forcing...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.04 20:30:00
|
2536. Anti-infantry HAVs cannot ever be balanced in Ambush - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cody Sietz wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Awry Barux wrote: Tanks as they stand right now (anti-infantry, operable by a single merc) can never, ever be balanced in a pure TDM game mode. They fill the exact same role as an assault suit: roll a...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.04 20:29:00
|
2537. What playstyle allows the fastest character progression? - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Logistics. Have a fit for nanohives and uplinks, spam those at the start of the match, then switch to your scanner / rep / injector and soak up those points from your squad / random blueberries. Most WP for least effort = fa...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.04 20:08:00
|
2538. Anti-infantry HAVs cannot ever be balanced in Ambush - in General Discussions [original thread]
And not only that, CCP already did their AV / vehicle balance pass, which infantry basically forced them to do. Why are you not happy with the work you forced CCP to do?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.04 19:53:00
|
2539. Anti-infantry HAVs cannot ever be balanced in Ambush - in General Discussions [original thread]
Awry Barux wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: So you don't use damage mods when using a forge gun? And you're basically complaining that you can't solo a tank with a forge gun. But, I can. So, where does the problem lie? It doesn't matter what...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.04 19:52:00
|
2540. Anti-infantry HAVs cannot ever be balanced in Ambush - in General Discussions [original thread]
Awry Barux wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Awry Barux wrote: deepfried salad gilliam wrote: Awry Barux wrote: Tanks as they stand right now (anti-infantry, operable by a single merc) can never, ever be balanced in a pure TDM game mode. T...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.04 19:41:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |