DUST Search - Are AV granades being reduced to 2 as well?

All Channels

General Discussions

Are AV granades being reduced to 2 as well?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Cody Sietz Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising 2510	Posted - 2014.03.05 11:38:00 - [1] - Quote If so, why? Core locus granaded were the only spam problem, not flux and AV. Will AV granaded get a buff to compensate for the nerf? "I do agree with you there though. shudders" -Arkena Wyrnspire
hgghyujh Expert Intervention Caldari State 310	Posted - 2014.03.05 12:11:00 - [2] - Quote I would assume that only locus will get the nerf. frankly the nerf is stupid CCP should just charge for every grenade thrown, when standing on a hive and spamming grenades could end up costing you more then the worth of the suit grenades would be used tactically, other wise ccp is just gonna have to nerf them down to one and make them instapop hives to prevent spam and even then coordinated teams will use them to group spam enemy forces because thats all they will be good for. Same thing goes for hives and uplinks.
Echoist Dogs of War Gaming Zero-Day 215	Posted - 2014.03.05 12:18:00 - [3] - Quote Personally any thing CCP does to reduce grenade spam I'm all for. Actually for all I care they could have them do no damage and just explode with glitter. Noobasaures: "Rawr" Laser Rifle Specialist, Rail Rifles... Lol fail STINGY: Yes I did nickname my laser rifle.
mollerz 2593	Posted - 2014.03.05 12:27:00 - [4] - Quote You know.. 2 AV nades.. or 3.. JLAV You gotta hustle if you wanna make a dolla
Mregomies Beer For Evil Mercs 170	Posted - 2014.03.05 12:29:00 - [5] - Quote so if AV nades is going 3->2... I'll take prox.ex with me. Done Suomi, Finland, PERKELE! Logibro
Hecarim Van Hohen ACME SPECIAL FORCES RISE of LEGION 528	Posted - 2014.03.05 13:05:00 - [6] - Quote I hope not Flux and Locus I understand but AV too? Talking about collateral damage... BANGO SKANK WAS HERE 1.7 best match (HMG): 40/9/9 (K/A/D)
Deltahawk Durango Subsonic Synthesis RISE of LEGION 128	Posted - 2014.03.05 13:09:00 - [7] - Quote patch notes not out yet... i predict damage incease for AV nades... I don't believe in an eye for an eye... I believe in two eyes for an eye!
Cody Sietz Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising 2512	Posted - 2014.03.05 13:09:00 - [8] - Quote Hecarim Van Hohen wrote: I hope not Flux and Locus I understand but AV too? Talking about collateral damage... Flux wasn't even that bad. But I'm not in a shield suit, so I guess I don't have where with all to argue. Though it does still hurt AV if you can't flux a tank and it still only takes one flux to take away a shield suits shields. Not to mention the uplink spam they helped fight. "I do agree with you there though. shudders" -Arkena Wyrnspire
Justicar Karnellia Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State 712	Posted - 2014.03.05 13:10:00 - [9] - Quote Hecarim Van Hohen wrote: I hope not Flux and Locus I understand but AV too? Talking about collateral damage... Exactly... I think a blanket across the board grenade change wasn't needed. Locus spam is a problem, not AV grenade spam - they're not even that effective anymore...
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 2819	Posted - 2014.03.05 13:16:00 - [10] - Quote lol if it happens At least with normal grenades you have to aim somewhat instead of these auot seek and never miss 100% hit rate AV nades Intelligence is OP

Cody Sietz Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising 2517	Posted - 2014.03.05 13:45:00 - [11] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: lol if it happens At least with normal grenades you have to aim somewhat instead of these auot seek and never miss 100% hit rate AV nades Yeah, because AV granades are a real problem to tanks right now "I do agree with you there though. shudders" -Arkena Wyrnspire
Roy Ventus Axis of Chaos 1235	Posted - 2014.03.05 13:46:00 - [12] - Quote I'm assuming that it's more of a problem with coding than common sense. Especially since there's only one skill for all of those grenades. "There once was a time when there wasn't a Roy Ventus and it wasn't much of a time at all." Roy Ventus
DeadlyAztec11 Ostrakon Agency Gallente Federation 4494	Posted - 2014.03.05 13:47:00 - [13] - Quote Cody Sietz wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: lol if it happens At least with normal grenades you have to aim somewhat instead of these auot seek and never miss 100% hit rate AV nades Yeah, because AV granades are a real problem to tanks right now Cody, you know he lacks logic. Don't play around with a dunce. Taco Cat backwards is still Taco Cat
Fox Gaden Immortal Guides 2732	Posted - 2014.03.05 13:50:00 - [14] - Quote Nerfing AV grenades from 3 to 2 could easily be a way of balancing a dramatic Damage buff... Hand/Eye coordination cannot be taught. For everything else there is the Learning Coalition.
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 2820	Posted - 2014.03.05 13:53:00 - [15] - Quote Cody Sietz wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: lol if it happens At least with normal grenades you have to aim somewhat instead of these auot seek and never miss 100% hit rate AV nades Yeah, because AV granades are a real problem to tanks right now Real problem to my LAV Anyways you still have the auto seeking never miss feature on it, what more do you want? Intelligence is OP
Hecarim Van Hohen ACME SPECIAL FORCES RISE of LEGION 530	Posted - 2014.03.05 13:57:00 - [16] - Quote DeadlyAztec11 wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: lol if it happens At least with normal grenades you have to aim somewhat instead of these auot seek and never miss 100% hit rate AV nades Yeah, because AV granades are a real problem to tanks right now Cody, you know he lacks logic. Don't play around with a dunce. Let's be honest here, logic is not the only thing he lacks BANGO SKANK WAS HERE 1.7 best match (HMG): 40/9/9 (K/A/D)
Cody Sietz Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising 2521	Posted - 2014.03.05 13:59:00 - [17] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: lol if it happens At least with normal grenades you have to aim somewhat instead of these auot seek and never miss 100% hit rate AV nades Yeah, because AV granades are a real problem to tanks right now Real problem to my LAV Anyways you still have the auto seeking never miss feature on it, what more do you want? Yeah, 3 shotting a MLT LAV with packed AV can be a problem when it's standing still. "I do agree with you there though. shudders" -Arkena Wyrnspire
Zeylon Rho Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 3717	Posted - 2014.03.05 14:12:00 - [18] - Quote The state of AV is a pertinent question, and hopefully it'll be addressed. Dren and Templar equipment stats, wrong since release.
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1904	Posted - 2014.03.05 18:17:00 - [19] - Quote Cody Sietz wrote: If so, why? Core locus granaded were the only spam problem, not flux and AV. Will AV granaded get a buff to compensate for the nerf? Contact grenades were the problem, and when infantry complained about them, they were nerfed into the ground. When tankers complained about AV grenades, infantry said "LOL HTFU." I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
DUST Fiend OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 12026	Posted - 2014.03.05 18:19:00 - [20] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: lol if it happens At least with normal grenades you have to aim somewhat instead of these auot seek and never miss 100% hit rate AV nades ::cough cough:: blaster turrets ::cough cough hack wheeeeze:: Good tankers don't just sit around waiting to get pelted by grenades Videos / Fiction Closed Beta Vet; Incubus Pilot

Aero Yassavi Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 7211	Posted - 2014.03.05 18:22:00 - [21] - Quote Funniest thing about the grenade nerf: CCP thinks this will reduce grenade spam. They don't realize that grenade spam happens when people are sitting on clusters of nanohives. They could nerf the grenade count to 1, people will still be able to grenade spam as they traditionally do. Mail me in game if interested in learning about the Amarr Empire and serving them in Faction Warfare. Amarr Victor!
Cody Sietz Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising 2522	Posted - 2014.03.05 18:25:00 - [22] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: If so, why? Core locus granaded were the only spam problem, not flux and AV. Will AV granaded get a buff to compensate for the nerf? Contact grenades were the problem, and when infantry complained about them, they were nerfed into the ground. When tankers complained about AV grenades, infantry said "LOL HTFU." Ummm, AV was nerfed into the ground because tankers said they were OP. Contact granades, CalLogis and flaylocks were PC specials. "I do agree with you there though. shudders" -Arkena Wyrnspire
DUST Fiend OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 12026	Posted - 2014.03.05 18:29:00 - [23] - Quote Cody Sietz wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: If so, why? Core locus granaded were the only spam problem, not flux and AV. Will AV granaded get a buff to compensate for the nerf? Contact grenades were the problem, and when infantry complained about them, they were nerfed into the ground. When tankers complained about AV grenades, infantry said "LOL HTFU." Ummm, AV was nerfed into the ground because tankers said they were OP. Contact granades, CalLogis and flaylocks were PC specials. Spkr is the only person on these forums who believes that the current AV / Vehicle "balance" is infantries fault. He seems to forget how good AV used to be vs most tanks, and how tankers like himself would complain about being solo'd by AV. So, now that he's on top of the hill, it's suddenly our fault Videos / Fiction Closed Beta Vet; Incubus Pilot
Cody Sietz Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising 2532	Posted - 2014.03.05 21:43:00 - [24] - Quote DUST Fiend wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: If so, why? Core locus granaded were the only spam problem, not flux and AV. Will AV granaded get a buff to compensate for the nerf? Contact grenades were the problem, and when infantry complained about them, they were nerfed into the ground. When tankers complained about AV grenades, infantry said "LOL HTFU." Ummm, AV was nerfed into the ground because tankers said they were OP. Contact granades, CalLogis and flaylocks were PC specials. Spkr is the only person on these forums who believes that the current AV / Vehicle "balance" is infantries fault. He seems to forget how good AV used to be vs most tanks, and how tankers like himself would complain about being solo'd by AV. So, now that he's on top of the hill, it's suddenly our fault Yes, it seems the gruesome twosome is out in force today. "I do agree with you there though. shudders" -Arkena Wyrnspire


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.