| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
3481. AV Users, stop crying, you've had your fun. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Needless Sacermendor wrote: I think Void Echo skipped debating 101 class ! Actually, we win our arguments with lists, comparisons, facts, and above all, math.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.10.31 03:33:00
|
3482. AV Users, stop crying, you've had your fun. - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: It doesn't take 20 mil SP to use AV well. Not even close. Well of course not, who said that>? not me for sure. But again thats not what w...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.10.30 23:19:00
|
3483. AV Users, stop crying, you've had your fun. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Judge Rhadamanthus wrote: Justin Tymes wrote: Yet another "X SP should mean superiority" thread. Save your SP > skill rant for when 1.7 comes out. Your roll eyes emote and your 1 lin...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.10.30 23:16:00
|
3484. AV Users, stop crying, you've had your fun. - in General Discussions [original thread]
CharCharOdell wrote: How about this: LIGHT AV weapons should be good at taking out light vehicles, but ineffective at taking out heavy vehicles, while heavy AV kills all vehicles relatively quickly. Doesn't that make sense? It makes too much ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.10.30 23:15:00
|
3485. AV Users, stop crying, you've had your fun. - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Foxhound Elite wrote: I like to see people giving out about the upcoming changes to AV. You've had it coming, and stop complaining about how it's going to look about in the future vs. Tanks. I see nobodys saying 'but we...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.10.30 23:14:00
|
3486. AV Users, stop crying, you've had your fun. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Foxhound Elite wrote: I like to see people giving out about the upcoming changes to AV. You've had it coming, and stop complaining about how it's going to look about in the future vs. Tanks. I see nobodys saying 'but we won't have any way to fe...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.10.30 23:13:00
|
3487. Announcement:Weapon stats! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Text Grant wrote: Templar 514 wrote: Text Grant wrote: Swarms need that range. Without it I only see 2 fixes. 1 make them OHK fast vehicles and 3 hit kill slow ones. 2 make them sidearms with reduced skill multipliers and CPU pg usage ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.10.30 23:07:00
|
3488. Nerfed Proto Swarm Launchers are WORSE than current Standard Swarm Launchers. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Borne Velvalor wrote: Fox Gaden wrote: Borne Velvalor wrote: Just so people understand the severity of the nerf, after 1.6 proto swarms will deal the same damage as current standard swarms, with a 55% range reduction. Hardened HAVs have a...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.10.30 23:03:00
|
3489. Nerfed Proto Swarm Launchers are WORSE than current Standard Swarm Launchers. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: MassiveNine wrote: swarms were OP and now they aren't end of discussion. Tanks were OP and now they aren't Logic doesn't suit you does it? Lol when were tanks OP?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.10.30 23:01:00
|
3490. Nerfed Proto Swarm Launchers are WORSE than current Standard Swarm Launchers. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Delta 749 wrote: Kallas Hallytyr wrote: My opinion on Swarm Launchers, they should either be: - Long range and low damage: this would allow them to apply constant nagging pressure to vehicles but it d...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.10.30 23:00:00
|
3491. Nerfed Proto Swarm Launchers are WORSE than current Standard Swarm Launchers. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Tanks should never be a better counter to themselves, especially when there is an AV class present Explain this nugget of extreme intelligence, which in this day and age is akin to being in the Flat Earth Society.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.10.30 22:56:00
|
3492. Nerfed Proto Swarm Launchers are WORSE than current Standard Swarm Launchers. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: Borne Velvalor wrote: Just so people understand the severity of the nerf, after 1.6 proto swarms will deal the same damage as current standard swarms, with a 55% range reduction. Hardened HAVs have around the ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.10.30 22:55:00
|
3493. Nerfed Proto Swarm Launchers are WORSE than current Standard Swarm Launchers. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Justin Tymes wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Justin Tymes wrote: CharCharOdell wrote: So stop trying to solo tanks and you'll be okay. Did you know that if you get your whole squad to equip mlt swarms, you can kill any tank possible in two ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.10.30 22:53:00
|
3494. Nerfed Proto Swarm Launchers are WORSE than current Standard Swarm Launchers. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Borne Velvalor wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Borne Velvalor wrote: pegasis prime wrote: born when you say pro launchers do std damage std havs are getting mlt grade hp HAVs are getting a big buff to hardeners. I did the math when the ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.10.30 22:52:00
|
3495. The Math of AV and Tanks Post 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Void Echo wrote: Atiim wrote: Soldiersaint wrote: Wait correct me if im wrong but the best way to use the swarm launcher now is to do taliban style ambushes ? It's always been that way. AV is only OP in the eyes of QQers like Void an...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.10.30 11:17:00
|
3496. The Math of AV and Tanks Post 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Toby Flenderson wrote: KenKaniff69 wrote: Atiim wrote: KenKaniff69 wrote: Atiim wrote: Lai Dai deals somewhere around 1700 damage At least try using them Once again read the post Mr. I have no idea about resist. The numbers do...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.10.30 11:14:00
|
3497. The Math of AV and Tanks Post 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Needless Sacermendor wrote: That would be because in every match there is at least one HAV that would just sit there spamming infinate ammo at spawn points ... infantry have had to adapt or die ... literally ! So infantry can spawn elsewhere...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.10.30 11:13:00
|
3498. The Math of AV and Tanks Post 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
daishi mk03 wrote: Needless Sacermendor wrote: Takahiros 'partner' will be here shortly to reply 10 times to each individual comment from anyone who isn't supporting the HAV campaign ... you wait n see lol ... You were right and the best ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.10.30 11:03:00
|
3499. If FW is getting FF... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ayures II wrote: Can we finally get a "join as team" option for FW? I'm cool with getting killed by blues, but getting stuck with pubbies who can't aim straight with FF on sounds pretty terrible. If that were to be implemented, CCP needs to m...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.10.30 10:52:00
|
3500. The Math of AV and Tanks Post 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shattered Mirage wrote: Yes, yes your arguments are weak based on the fact that all you tend to insult others and sprout bullshit out of your mouth instead of giving facts, numbers, videos, and other types of evidence like many others have. ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.10.30 04:35:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |