| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
2801. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: See, this guy isn't a tanker but he gets it. Is it really that hard? I would be happy with prices being jacked back up; it'd help with the spam. As it is, you shouldn't be losing too many tanks a...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.13 10:38:00
|
2802. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Cost so much? They're cheaper than an advanced suit Even well fit ones are only a couple of proto suits at best Of course you want PRO turret prices back at 1mil ISK.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.13 10:35:00
|
2803. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Korvin Lomont wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: No, its meant to repel them. Tanks are supposed to be able to withstand the punishment to a degree. Hence the term tank. If they could not perform their job, nobody would invest in the damn thing...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.13 10:33:00
|
2804. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Chunky Munkey wrote: I have a Sica with a blaster, shield booster, and shield hardener. So long as I can make it to a safe spot with my modules still active, it is invincible to infantry. The fit costs less than many of my suits. Don't tell m...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.13 10:30:00
|
2805. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jack McReady wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: GET ATMESON wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Otherwise they wouldn't cost so much. No, you are not entitled to be able to fight back 1v1. That would make the entire risk vs reward of using a tank...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.13 10:29:00
|
2806. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rei Shepard wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Otherwise they wouldn't cost so much. No, you are not entitled to be able to fight back 1v1. That would make the entire risk vs reward of using a tank pointless. The problem isn't the tank being OP. ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.13 10:26:00
|
2807. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
8213 wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Otherwise they wouldn't cost so much. No, you are not entitled to be able to fight back 1v1. That would make the entire risk vs reward of using a tank pointless. The problem isn't the tank being OP. The pro...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.13 10:25:00
|
2808. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Chibi Andy wrote: lol you serious? my suit cost more than your tank. lolwut
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.13 10:23:00
|
2809. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jack McReady wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Otherwise they wouldn't cost so much crediblity lost in the first sentence. a tank is cheap now beside that ISK is not a balance factor, which again shows your lack of credibility. Himiko Ku...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.13 10:21:00
|
2810. Suicide LAV - in General Discussions [original thread]
Raeb Mond wrote: BOOM! WTF! I got tagged by a suicide LAV today, talk about a surprise! I spent the rest of the match frantically scanning everything for that sneaky bastard. That is really an effective tactic against tanks, really made the m...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.13 10:18:00
|
2811. Why can tanks solo, but not AV? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Galvan Nized wrote: The Attorney General wrote: You can solo a tank, it just takes smarts, and patience. When you develop them, tanks will fall. Until then, practice. Show us a vid of how you kill tanks...not using another tank. Not ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.13 06:26:00
|
2812. Why can tanks solo, but not AV? - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Black SlaverX wrote: ISKIES are NOT a balancing factor. For proof, see titans and supercarriers. So why do tanks require no teamwork at all, but to take the out requires tremendous teamwork? Because tank514 It's...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.13 06:04:00
|
2813. Why can tanks solo, but not AV? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Black SlaverX wrote: ISKIES are NOT a balancing factor. For proof, see titans and supercarriers. So why do tanks require no teamwork at all, but to take the out requires tremendous teamwork? Did you even read any of the threads posted by CCP...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.13 05:55:00
|
2814. Why vehicle rebalancing of 1.7 was bad. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Galthur wrote: Why would CCP balance a unfinished product, now they'll have to rebalance twice (again in the future) wasting dev time rather then some quick hotfix. For those confused we still need: Amaar tank Minmatar tank Gallente long ranged...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.12 20:40:00
|
2815. To People Who are Spamming Tanks in Pubs - in General Discussions [original thread]
KenKaniff69 wrote: 1. Most of you are just zerging around with the militia nitrous glitch 2. Most of you don't even know what resist is 3. Someone needs to hack the point 4. Someone needs to go defend the point 5. 3&4 Apply to you sh!tty ta...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.12 15:46:00
|
2816. Intelligence is OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jack McReady wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Korvin Lomont wrote: to 2) So we agree the PLC is UP and not very viable as AV weapon ^^ to 6) Its easy 1 person should be able to fight of 1 tank as long as 1 person is enough to have a tank ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.12 15:41:00
|
2817. Intelligence is OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Atiim wrote: ] Can't say I didn't expect this from you. You can't balance vehicles and AV for a game mode that the majority of the playerbase doesn't participate in, nor could participate in if they ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.12 15:40:00
|
2818. Intelligence is OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Atiim wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Jack McReady wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: try it in PC another proof of lack of credibility. PC aka photoslideshow 514, is definately the answer to everything ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.12 15:34:00
|
2819. let the tankers have their victory - in General Discussions [original thread]
8213 wrote: HiddenBrother wrote: You're the guy that kept redlining my 2.2 million ISK Vayu. Alone. I remember that game. My boss kept you redlined the whole game, because: 1. You were to stupid to just recall and give up. 2. Couldn't d...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.12 15:20:00
|
2820. 375 HP/s with 3x Large Militia Armor reps - in General Discussions [original thread]
Luk Manag wrote: We should have a discussion about unkillable tanks. http://i.imgur.com/pOfezYn.jpg I theory crafted this before 1.7 and it is every bit as insane as I thought it would be. It is fun, but the only real infantry counter is hi...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.12 14:07:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |