| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
881. CCP and the CPM failed hard - in General Discussions [original thread]
No, it doesn't run counter to anything I've said. You simply aren't comprehending what I am explaining. I will try one more time. You can base ISK cost on effectiveness. You cannot base effectiveness on ISK cost.
- by Soraya Xel - at 2014.10.29 18:28:00
|
882. To Every Anti Respec Person Ever - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: If theres one thing Ratatti clearly still struggles to understand, its AV vs Vehicle balance. This is the first time in the game's history we've legitimately had any attempt at AV vs. Vehicle balance.
- by Soraya Xel - at 2014.10.29 18:08:00
|
883. CCP and the CPM failed hard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Many things are goofy from the old way of doing things. Generally, ISK should be fairly representative of a thing's effectiveness in battle. Better things should cost more. ISK still obviously has a point, because there are tiers of items. But IS...
- by Soraya Xel - at 2014.10.29 17:42:00
|
884. CCP and the CPM failed hard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kallas Hallytyr wrote: Soraya Xel wrote: I've answered your question already. ISK is not a balancing factor. Ok, so with that being the case, why does a Prototype suit cost more than a Standard suit? Why does an ADS hull cost more than a ...
- by Soraya Xel - at 2014.10.29 16:45:00
|
885. To Every Anti Respec Person Ever - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael, Rattati's primary statistic for balance is not forum whining. You may wish to check the post he made today, it has pretty graphs and charts and explains a lot about the balance process. :)
- by Soraya Xel - at 2014.10.29 16:11:00
|
886. JudgeRhadamanthus LIVE! - in General Discussions [original thread]
TheD1CK wrote: The DUST community would appreciate the current cpm a lot more if they were seen to be part of it - While we may not have a high player count, there is a vast majority of DUST gamers not forum active So all of these posts are vi...
- by Soraya Xel - at 2014.10.29 16:09:00
|
887. To Every Anti Respec Person Ever - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: There is no such thing as true balance. It cannot be achieved because few are good with a controller and majority are not. If a player masters his weapon loadout, then he is penalized for "true balance" which basically means...
- by Soraya Xel - at 2014.10.29 16:06:00
|
888. CCP and the CPM failed hard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Derrith Erador wrote: yet looking at the math, it's not worth level 5, especially when asking 1.2mil. care to tell me why my most expensive skill is nothing more than convenient? Skills are intended to use diminishing returns, from level 1 t...
- by Soraya Xel - at 2014.10.29 15:56:00
|
889. To Every Anti Respec Person Ever - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael, what is the current FOTM? How much stronger is it than the next strongest fit?
- by Soraya Xel - at 2014.10.29 15:52:00
|
890. To Every Anti Respec Person Ever - in General Discussions [original thread]
Time limits were definitely discussed. Note that respeccing every week would steadily eat their ISK, and Rattati is aggressively pursuing nerfs to FOTMs. I think boosters (particularly with their new ability to stack) should generally be a smarter...
- by Soraya Xel - at 2014.10.29 15:44:00
|
891. CCP and the CPM failed hard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Derrith Erador wrote: well, you didn't answer mine. You skill into ROF if you want a greater ROF.
- by Soraya Xel - at 2014.10.29 15:27:00
|
892. To Every Anti Respec Person Ever - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bright Cloud, I've heard this argument, but there is no logic to it. Just saying it repetitively does not make it true. Every respec will cost money. (Exact cost not announced at current.) Players are not going to pay to switch fits every time th...
- by Soraya Xel - at 2014.10.29 15:25:00
|
893. 1.9 and what CCP has done... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I think it's worth noting here that DUST purchases support DUST. There's definitely people complaining about some things marketed for AUR because they want them, but do not want to spend money. The thing is, if AUR items are not appealing, if you...
- by Soraya Xel - at 2014.10.29 14:46:00
|
894. CCP and the CPM failed hard - in General Discussions [original thread]
I've answered your question already. ISK is not a balancing factor.
- by Soraya Xel - at 2014.10.29 14:42:00
|
895. To Every Anti Respec Person Ever - in General Discussions [original thread]
True enough. Okay, good game balance... combined with the cost of the respec which will likely make it not worth it for very small gains in benefit.
- by Soraya Xel - at 2014.10.29 14:36:00
|
896. CCP and the CPM failed hard - in General Discussions [original thread]
The game has to be balanced independently of ISK. Then you set the ISK rate to fit the effectiveness of things afterwards.
- by Soraya Xel - at 2014.10.29 14:35:00
|
897. CCP and the CPM failed hard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kallas, the point is, ISK cannot be a justification to buff a thing. Because that is not balance. You can set the ISK price based on power and effectiveness, but that is the afterthought. The balance must be from how it plays in the game.
- by Soraya Xel - at 2014.10.29 14:13:00
|
898. Asking the important questions first - in General Discussions [original thread]
Auris Lionesse wrote: if its isk i would buy it. if its aurum i never will. f2p means i should be able to do everything with ingame money. and the aurum is just the easy fast track option. not the only option imo. You can still do everything...
- by Soraya Xel - at 2014.10.29 14:10:00
|
899. To Every Anti Respec Person Ever - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mobius Kaethis wrote: How does that reduce the pay to win aspect or the homogenizing effect this will have on the battlefield? There is no pay to win aspect. And good game balance will prevent homogenization on the battlefield. The fact tha...
- by Soraya Xel - at 2014.10.29 14:08:00
|
900. To Every Anti Respec Person Ever - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mobius Kaethis wrote: Soraya Xel wrote: Mobius Kaethis wrote: KEROSIINI-TERO wrote: No, this mean everybody loses. Well, every dust player at least. I can't help but agree. All that is happening is the switch from dust as a free to...
- by Soraya Xel - at 2014.10.29 06:58:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |