| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
301. Who should win, 1v1? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Waaaait a second. So some of you are suggesting that essentially, a tank coming up against two AVers should basically be instagibbed? I would think that a 50/50 in 1v1 is about right, considering that it 's kind of im...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.18 00:42:00
|
302. Minimum range on rail turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Haven't thought this through, just chucking it out there... What would happen if rails had a minimum range, below which they won't fire at all. Something like 20 or 30 meters.
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.18 00:40:00
|
303. Vehicle Recall has no reason to exist anymore. - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: ........ That doesn't even make sense. So you can't switch your fits, that's what you're telling me? You don't want vehicles to have the ability to be recalled, yet you're afraid of them being destroyed while being recalled?...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.18 00:31:00
|
304. TANKS 514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Joseph Ridgeson wrote: I edited your text slightly to make it more legible. Thanks, I was all set to ignore this thread. En Driago wrote: I just wanted my voice heard on this subject. Heard by who? Devs have already indicated they are ...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.18 00:25:00
|
305. Who should win, 1v1? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aqil Aegivan wrote: R F Gyro wrote: C'mon guys, try answering the question. Please? Can't. You omitted HAV vs HAV. While AV is less effective vs tanks than other tanks the game stays broken. Well, either that or CCP implements additional...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.18 00:19:00
|
306. Vehicle Recall has no reason to exist anymore. - in General Discussions [original thread]
No, don't take it away. I like the ability to call in a vehicle, use it while its adding value, then recall it and go back to infantry play. Just lock them so you can't exit within 5 seconds of taking damage or something.
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.18 00:15:00
|
307. Who should win, 1v1? - in General Discussions [original thread]
T'orq wrote: What I meant about 25/75 is AV wins 25% over infantry and infantry win 75% over AV * or should, depending if AV have a sidearm Yep, I figured that's what you meant.
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.18 00:10:00
|
308. Who should win, 1v1? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tectonic Fusion wrote: I think head on tanks should be able to kill just about anything. Also it depends on which weapon is used. A railgun tank should beat a dropship, but a blaster tank should lose against a missile dropship. So what shoul...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.18 00:09:00
|
309. Who should win, 1v1? - in General Discussions [original thread]
C'mon guys, try answering the question. Please?
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.17 23:59:00
|
310. Who should win, 1v1? - in General Discussions [original thread]
P14GU3 wrote: T'orq wrote: 1. 50/50 2. 50/50 3. Dropship 4. 50/50 5. HAV 6. 25/75 So infantry almost always loses? So what do you think it should be then?
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.17 23:56:00
|
311. Who should win, 1v1? - in General Discussions [original thread]
In the following scenarios... 1. Dropship vs HAV 2. Dropship vs AV 3. Dropship vs Infantry 4. HAV vs AV 5. HAV vs Infantry 6. AV vs Infantry Assuming reasonably competent players on both sides. And by "who should win" I mean for the game to fee...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.17 23:44:00
|
312. New Amarrians of DUST sound Badass - in General Discussions [original thread]
Don't give me gleaming gold. Give me reddy-brown with thick grey stripes. (that's rusty metal with duct tape holding it together, btw)
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.17 23:37:00
|
313. What's very very broken with tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Though I was surprised, I remembered you as being in my "not stupid" list I wonder how many pens you wore out making that list for this community.
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.17 23:34:00
|
314. What's very very broken with tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: R F Gyro wrote: No, its a tank . Its supposed to murder infantry. But it's AV. It's supposed to demolish vehicles. My trolling was clearly a little too subtle, sorry Atiim.
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.17 23:09:00
|
315. What's very very broken with tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: R F Gyro wrote: No, its a tank . Its supposed to murder infantry. /me will ignore this stupid post and hopes that the next will be a decent one Yeah, but its amazing how often this crops up in tank threads, and how many ...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.17 22:03:00
|
316. What's very very broken with tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
No, its a tank . Its supposed to murder infantry.
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.17 21:26:00
|
317. Tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Use the railguns on the field. They make me tuck tail and run. Then again, the AI controlling them is better than infantry is at destroying tanks. Infantry, get gud. Computers are better than you. How can you let a machin...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.17 21:25:00
|
318. What does not make since - in General Discussions [original thread]
Son-Of A-Gun wrote: Chesyre Armundsen wrote: Actually I believe the shotgun and assault riffle are a plasma/gas propellant weapons. Also I believe the word you're looking for is "sense" instead of "since". You're welcome. Not really a ...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.17 13:03:00
|
319. PSN refunds for stolen blue prints! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Leonid Tybalt wrote: R F Gyro wrote: I'm not sure you are allowed to post GM conversations here, so careful with that. Also, are you sure that CCP weren't simply telling you that the mechanics of a cash refund had to go through Sony? You ...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.17 13:00:00
|
320. So, a dropsuit respec is pretty much a given now . . . - in General Discussions [original thread]
Oh, and I'd support race-respec as well. You petition for a reallocation of skill levels from one racial dropsuit to another racial variant of the same dropsuit skill; Amarr heavy frame to Gallente heavy frame, for example.
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.17 12:35:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |