| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 |
81. New weapons and ranges - in General Discussions [original thread]
I would change literally all of it. Seriously, a STD shotgun should do 550 damage? Wtf are you smoking?
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.10.24 00:22:00
|
82. New weapons and ranges - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fizzer94 wrote: It SHOULD work something like this: These numbers should represent STD level weapons. Nova Knives: Melee Range (0-1m) 250 damage per hit 5 uncharged swings per second 0.5 second charge time 625 damage for charged hit (~1250 max...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.10.23 05:51:00
|
83. whos gonna be grabbin the new W.A.R kits? - in General Discussions [original thread]
You couldn't pay me to buy that garbage.
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.10.22 14:28:00
|
84. So, when is AR514:AA edition getting fixed? - in General Discussions [original thread]
8213 wrote: RECON BY FIRE wrote: 8213 wrote: Paran Tadec wrote: Just ran a few rounds as a HMG sentinel heavy, all proto (armor, hmg, suit) alt, Duvolle melts it in a half second in CQB. GG CCP, no wonder this game is dead. How long ...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.10.15 13:39:00
|
85. So, when is AR514:AA edition getting fixed? - in General Discussions [original thread]
8213 wrote: Paran Tadec wrote: Just ran a few rounds as a HMG sentinel heavy, all proto (armor, hmg, suit) alt, Duvolle melts it in a half second in CQB. GG CCP, no wonder this game is dead. How long does it take to reduce AR dmg by 20%? ...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.10.15 04:41:00
|
86. I don't know 1 person in real life who plays this game... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I know one person IRL who played the game, but no one who plays it. He simply couldn't deal with the constant grind for SP and really I cant blame him. If I hadn't been playing since closed beta (and if I wasn't a former EVE player) I probably wou...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.10.11 16:57:00
|
87. Playstation W.A.R. sets cost 50 and 100 dollar and don't contain any BPOs - in General Discussions [original thread]
ghjl ghjkl wrote: RECON BY FIRE wrote: ghjl ghjkl wrote: RECON BY FIRE wrote: They figured out you will have to keep buying the packs if its limited run. What they haven't figured out though is that nobody wants the garbage theyre offe...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.10.10 19:20:00
|
88. Playstation W.A.R. sets cost 50 and 100 dollar and don't contain any BPOs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maximus Stryker wrote: RECON BY FIRE wrote: ghjl ghjkl wrote: RECON BY FIRE wrote: They figured out you will have to keep buying the packs if its limited run. What they haven't figured out though is that nobody wants the garbage theyre...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.10.10 18:18:00
|
89. Playstation W.A.R. sets cost 50 and 100 dollar and don't contain any BPOs - in General Discussions [original thread]
ghjl ghjkl wrote: RECON BY FIRE wrote: They figured out you will have to keep buying the packs if its limited run. What they haven't figured out though is that nobody wants the garbage theyre offering. They will trick noobs into buying it an...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.10.10 18:12:00
|
90. Playstation W.A.R. sets cost 50 and 100 dollar and don't contain any BPOs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Awry Barux wrote: Frank Olson Usul wrote: I know that BPOs are gone forever, but I still put it into the title. Why? Because I think that it is totally sick to spend 100 dollars on items that have 400 runs only. Even if it is so many of the...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.10.10 17:47:00
|
91. Playstation W.A.R. sets cost 50 and 100 dollar and don't contain any BPOs - in General Discussions [original thread]
They figured out you will have to keep buying the packs if its limited run. What they haven't figured out though is that nobody wants the garbage theyre offering. They will trick noobs into buying it and then once those noobs figure out they just ...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.10.10 17:41:00
|
92. Proto swarms??? - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: RECON BY FIRE wrote: With the shield bonus forges get I really doubt swarms actually outdamage them in actual application. The reason they hit for so much though is proficiency and damage mods. Your typical proto swarmer...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.10.09 02:31:00
|
93. Proto swarms??? - in General Discussions [original thread]
With the shield bonus forges get I really doubt swarms actually outdamage them in actual application. The reason they hit for so much though is proficiency and damage mods. Your typical proto swarmer will have no less than proficiency 3 as well as...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.10.09 02:27:00
|
94. Surely CCP raised WP limit for Battle Academy on 1.5... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: LOADED'HORN wrote: I know right. It is so sad they wreck new players best chance to start having fun immediately. I feel bad for them newbies. I suspect it has something to do with driving aurum sales. What else is the...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.10.09 02:15:00
|
95. Tell Me More About Reygnum... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Hes Canadian, and therefore not a real person.
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.10.08 19:50:00
|
96. AV players, would you accept a temporary removal of advance weapons? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jack McReady wrote: RECON BY FIRE wrote: I don't really give a **** what you actually operate, you obviously don't care about actual balance. Ill tell you this, if a standard tank can be taken out by a standard Swarm that tank is not worth e...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.10.03 16:02:00
|
97. AV players, would you accept a temporary removal of advance weapons? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't really give a **** what you actually operate, you obviously don't care about actual balance. Ill tell you this, if a standard tank can be taken out by a standard Swarm that tank is not worth even owning. There is a difference in levels bet...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.10.03 14:32:00
|
98. AV players, would you accept a temporary removal of advance weapons? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nguruthos IX wrote: I know it would suck, and I sure wouldn't want to do it. But lets be honest here, this is nothing to do with nerfing AV or making the game suck for AV players while re-building vehicles. I just honestly wonder how CCP inte...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.10.03 14:13:00
|
99. Petition for New Vehicle Changes to be Thrown in the Meatgrinder in Favor of Add... - in General Discussions [original thread]
They should have had a capacitor from the beginning.
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.10.02 21:20:00
|
100. Announcement:Vehicle Changes and Beyond - Part 2 - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't see how you tankers aren't absolutely furious over this. As an AV player, and sometimes tanker on an alt, every single one of these changes looks like pure garbage to me. I see so many problems with this system that I cannot even begin to ...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.10.02 14:42:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |