Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1521. Minmatar Heavy is a "Free Kill" / Gallente & Amarr lac... - in General Discussions [original thread]
buzzzzzzz killllllllll wrote: try running a min heavy with biotics/dampeners and a burst hmg... wrecks all other heavies Dampener on a heavy? Why?
- by Nothing Certain - at 2014.04.11 15:22:00
|
1522. MLT Tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Boot Booter wrote: Just get rid of them. Tank spam literally makes this game garbage. They are the only thing keeping better tanks from non - stop stomping.
- by Nothing Certain - at 2014.04.11 15:05:00
|
1523. A call to forge gunners. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Supernus Gigas wrote: The Forge Gun itself isn't broken. It's the charge time reduction bugging out due to the skill not applying right when you spawn. Give it a bit to kick in, and it'll fire like normal. And to those saying you can't out DPS...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2014.04.11 01:31:00
|
1524. Anyone think we shoud.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
It is a business, you don't sink more resources in then you get in return. It is not a charity or a public service that you are entitled to. Do you have any evidence that they are deliberately sabotaging through neglect their own product?
- by Nothing Certain - at 2014.04.11 00:26:00
|
1525. Solution for Brick-Scouts. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ivan Avogadro wrote: The REAL solution is more modules, especially High modules. The choice between tank and gank is all there is. Now that EWAR stacking is a thing, you see a lot of scouts trying it out. But those guys have 300-400 HP. Hackin...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2014.04.10 19:42:00
|
1526. Solution for Brick-Scouts. - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't see the need for this but if I were to change armor and shield plating I would probably make it percentage based rather than a simple absolute. Either that or the movement penalty for armor would be percentage based. It makes sense to me t...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2014.04.10 19:37:00
|
1527. A call to forge gunners. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vulpes Dolosus wrote: There's this wonderful new technique called math that can answer this without you actually doing it. Considering you're wanting optimal conditions, it shouldn't be a problem. I think testing what should be against what ...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2014.04.10 16:18:00
|
1528. A call to forge gunners. - in General Discussions [original thread]
DJINN Nukem wrote: msg me In game, Prof 5, with a Neo proto Cal Hvy ( 4 complex damage mods ) Why 4 damage mods? Is the .6125% worth it?
- by Nothing Certain - at 2014.04.10 16:13:00
|
1529. i love wp for vehicle damage - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Robot Devil wrote: Charlotte O'Dell wrote: Last night I made >768k from one battle netting >4,000 WP. How? 10 vehicle kills and a few assists vs a squad of 3 ADS' and 3 HAVs. I love love love it. Only lost a couple tanks doing so ...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2014.04.10 15:33:00
|
1530. i love wp for vehicle damage - in General Discussions [original thread]
EverNub wrote: Nothing Certain wrote: Charlotte O'Dell wrote: Crimson Cerberes wrote: Only vehicle users are claiming balance, everyone else still see that there is no balance between vehicles and infantry, not even close. Blasters ar...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2014.04.10 15:25:00
|
1531. i love wp for vehicle damage - in General Discussions [original thread]
EverNub wrote: Stalken Pathfinder wrote: Charlotte O'Dell wrote: The DUELIST rail fit is back, gents. No redline. All risk. Intel ware are at its finest.... The two biggest noob tactics: redline rails and hardener stacking were nerfed....
- by Nothing Certain - at 2014.04.10 15:22:00
|
1532. i love wp for vehicle damage - in General Discussions [original thread]
Charlotte O'Dell wrote: Nothing Certain wrote: Stalken Pathfinder wrote: 2-3 remote explosives = dead tank regardless of fit... Just because old AV tactics don't work doesn't mean there aren't new ones. Stop complaining and trying to forc...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2014.04.10 15:15:00
|
1533. Skill into AV if you're tired of getting destroyed by tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
negative49er wrote: I'm having difficulty with my proto swarms or is i just me Help No, it is not just you and there is no help. Swarms by themselves are not viable, they can work in conjunction with some other measure.
- by Nothing Certain - at 2014.04.10 15:03:00
|
1534. Skill into AV if you're tired of getting destroyed by tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zaaeed Massani wrote: True Adamance wrote: Zaaeed Massani wrote: Good players can make anything feel OP. Always has been that way in PvP games, and it always will. Yeah most people cannot believe that my best games came out of 1.4-1...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2014.04.10 13:30:00
|
1535. Logically... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sana Rayya wrote: Nothing Certain wrote: knight of 6 wrote: They're homophones not homonyms. Get your **** straight. Muphry's Law strikes again. I don't think either one should be tolerated on the forums. Muphry's Law? *don't know ...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2014.04.10 05:36:00
|
1536. AV vs HAV. My technically repeated opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
That probably is the best AV fit and tactic right now and it is only possible because of a mistaken mechanic, but this does not make a balanced game. This is a tactic that sometimes work in some situations, it can work if your team controls the fi...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2014.04.09 20:53:00
|
1537. Who is your best ingame friend? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm lonely, ohhh, so lonely..
- by Nothing Certain - at 2014.04.09 20:43:00
|
1538. i love wp for vehicle damage - in General Discussions [original thread]
Charlotte O'Dell wrote: Crimson Cerberes wrote: Only vehicle users are claiming balance, everyone else still see that there is no balance between vehicles and infantry, not even close. Blasters are still the best weapon in the game bar none...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2014.04.09 20:39:00
|
1539. i love wp for vehicle damage - in General Discussions [original thread]
Stalken Pathfinder wrote: 2-3 remote explosives = dead tank regardless of fit... Just because old AV tactics don't work doesn't mean there aren't new ones. Stop complaining and trying to force the game to do what you want it to. Adapt or just k...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2014.04.09 20:34:00
|
1540. Logically... - in General Discussions [original thread]
knight of 6 wrote: They're homophones not homonyms. Get your **** straight. Muphry's Law strikes again. I don't think either one should be tolerated on the forums.
- by Nothing Certain - at 2014.04.09 18:28:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |