| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1761. If they want DS pilots to stick around till 1.5 We're gonna need a - in General Discussions [original thread]
FATPrincess - XOXO wrote: Ishokune Assault Forge Gun says Hi. -XOXO I am not impressed. My 5 year old nephew can kill assault drop ships with a militia forge. Although there's no need, if he'd just wait 2 minutes a bloody RDV would spawn i...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.05 23:04:00
|
1762. Remind me again, why does Armor burn? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Why is there not a hull to vehicles? armor burning lol wut If you peal off all the armor from an armored car and shoot a bullet at it, it does not blow up instantly. And if you peal off 75% of the armor from an armored vehicle it does not experi...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.05 23:03:00
|
1763. If they want DS pilots to stick around till 1.5 We're gonna need a - in General Discussions [original thread]
band aid or some bloody ISK injection. I'm losing patience with Dust. Especially after OMS/Ambush merger (lolwtf)
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.05 22:56:00
|
1764. CCP, have you given any thought to what Heavy Air Vehicles will be like? - in General Discussions [original thread]
It's the one missing, mysterious role that you have not spoken about once nor shown any artwork for. Very curious. PS. I'd like a refund for the 500 million ISK that your RDV's have cost crashing/spawning into my dropships. Makes this unsustainab...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.05 21:11:00
|
1765. Is the forge gun the best weapon in dust? - in General Discussions [original thread]
jack of all trades. Master of.. all?
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.03 07:26:00
|
1766. Heavy aircraft - a LIE - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rusty Shallows wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: Wait I'm so confused. Who was talking about fixed wing anything or fast "air tanks" ? I don't think any person is suggesting there should be jets moving at jet speed that are tankier than a HAV (See...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.03 05:31:00
|
1767. Heavy aircraft - a LIE - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tallen Ellecon wrote: gbghg wrote: Probably still stuck in the art department. This CPM stated in IRC that the art department is actually not the holdup, as revealed to them by CCP in conversations. Basically Heavy Aircraft Vehicle h...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.03 05:16:00
|
1768. Heavy aircraft - a LIE - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rusty Shallows wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: So what is the problem with a heavy aircraft vehicle again? The problem was Fixed Wing Heavy Aircraft. Because high eHP and good mobility will equal invulnerability in this game. L-LAVs have pret...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.03 05:06:00
|
1769. Heavy aircraft - a LIE - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aizen Intiki wrote: xSaloLx wrote: Gunships. EHP of a tank, lower speed than a std dropship, can't fly very high but can fit 6 small turrets (3 each side) and one large or medium turret up front. Hell no. All those guns would take so...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.03 04:32:00
|
1770. Heavy aircraft - a LIE - in General Discussions [original thread]
GET ATMESON wrote: darkiller240 wrote: So dropships are medium expensive paper weight, still hasent been fixed. SOON we Will have 'fighter' crafts (cheap assult dropships) wich Will be' nice But as i recently discovered the 'bomber' that we...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.03 04:25:00
|
1771. Heavy aircraft - a LIE - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't see the problem with a "Flying tank" Or heavily armored gunship. The secret advantage of Tanks and LAV's right now over dropships (other than DS being paper) is the Fact that they are on the ground. Or rather, they are constantly LOS and ...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.03 04:13:00
|
1772. Heavy aircraft - a LIE - in General Discussions [original thread]
darkiller240 wrote: xSaloLx wrote: Gunships. EHP of a tank, lower speed than a std dropship, can't fly very high but can fit 6 small turrets (3 each side) and one large or medium turret up front. Good luck getting that through AR supremi...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.02 22:08:00
|
1773. Heavy aircraft - a LIE - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP has never even indirectly stated what their plans for Heavy Air Vehicles looks like. We have LAV, HAV, dropship (light land, heavy land, medium air) We've seen models for MAV, Speeders, Jets (Medium land, light land, light air) That leaves o...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.02 22:07:00
|
1774. Heavy aircraft - a LIE - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rusty Shallows wrote: Anyone who expects fast flying aircraft to be in the heavy class with more eHp than a dropship are going to be sorely disappointing. Who said its going to be fast?
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.02 22:04:00
|
1775. I hear people say "The game should not be balanced around ISK" - in General Discussions [original thread]
steadyhand amarr wrote: As a fyi this is getting addressed in verc blance pass of 1.4 1.5, 2+ months from now. And we'll see what happens there. Hopefully before its all code locked.
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.02 18:50:00
|
1776. I hear people say "The game should not be balanced around ISK" - in General Discussions [original thread]
ZDub 303 wrote: No... I don't think they should ever balance the core stats of a suit or vehicle around its isk price. They should create and balance without even considering isk price and then come back and determine an isk price that is appr...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.02 18:49:00
|
1777. I hear people say "The game should not be balanced around ISK" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Csikszent Mihalyi wrote: I think you are missing a few things: - While AV causes a lot of damage if it downs a tank, it doesn't do much anything else. It doesn't nearly have the battlefield presence that a tank has, nor does it provide nearly ...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.02 18:48:00
|
1778. I hear people say "The game should not be balanced around ISK" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Knightshade Belladonna wrote: If we had a market and economy dictated by the players, you would see this eventually balance itself out. True. True. But we are Years out from that. In the mean time, if anyone is to keep playing this game. Som...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.02 12:22:00
|
1779. I hear people say "The game should not be balanced around ISK" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vyzion Eyri wrote: Just the cost of prototype and maybe advanced infantry gear should go up. Leave everything else as it is. That's all that needs to be balanced ISK-wise. I'd actually prefer prototype gear to become salvage from PvE missions ...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.02 11:47:00
|
1780. I hear people say "The game should not be balanced around ISK" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kaptein Blod wrote: So u want cheap tanks eyh? Spam the battlefield with tanks and dropships. That will be fun. Nope. Saying DS price needs to go down, or it needs to not suck. And Actually I agree with everyone here. Vehicles should be exp...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.02 11:34:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |