| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
181. What would make PC matter? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alaika Arbosa wrote: IDK that it'll ever mean anything to me ever. CCP kept the faucets on until the farmers had pasdively accumulated enough ISK to field the equivalent of 200m clone armies equipped in full proto and then changes it so that y...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.11.21 07:30:00
|
182. What would make PC matter? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: The materials to create implants. What does an implants do
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.11.21 07:14:00
|
183. What would make PC matter? - in General Discussions [original thread]
In the future, what eventually could make PC and district ownership Really matter enough that people cared about who had them? Has CCP hinted at their plans regarding this?
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.11.21 07:06:00
|
184. Reasons to go tank again? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Exmaple Core wrote: TranquilBiscuit ofVaLoR wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Why should we respec into tanks after they have been abused so hardcore in the last 10 months. Any reasons? Convince me. Sell it ;D because you obviously want to, ot...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.11.21 06:18:00
|
185. How AUR purchanses work - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: since theres alot of dumbass people who dont understand exactly what they are buying (not CCPs fault, its yours) im going to spell it out here you can purchase AUR, and legally speaking thats the only legal purchase you c...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.11.21 05:31:00
|
186. So which rail rifle will be the best rail rifle? - in General Discussions [original thread]
the one that makes obsolete lasers cry the most
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.11.21 05:21:00
|
187. Im already seeking legal action against CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
I really want to see the official filed paperwork for this lawsuit and the bill I don't believe anyone would actually be daft enough to try this. It has to be a troll.
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.11.21 04:45:00
|
188. So CCP, 1.7 looks great and all.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
You know the answer to all of this is no. especially not fixing the dropship rotation bug, that resets aim when you look with it towards a huge, perfectly valid area. Which happens to be the most important area to be able to shoot out of a dropsh...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.11.21 03:58:00
|
189. LOL, about those supply depots in 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Why destory it? Just camp from beyond render distance with a forge gun and 2 shot every stationary dropship that is forced back to the same 5 cubed feet area
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.11.21 03:32:00
|
190. 1.7 Python vs Incubus Realization - in General Discussions [original thread]
Also starting to look like the roles are reversed because Armor repairs being passive means very slow recharge and long down times. Shields being passive, but with boosters and injections means faster downtimes and full repairs. So, whereas a...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.11.21 02:37:00
|
191. I will be in full support of CCP over 1.7 IF . . . - in General Discussions [original thread]
~Each small turret is paid attention to. Small blasters are not left broken the way Rails have been for a year. ~Militia vehicles are of comparable usefulness to militia dropsuits. A militia DS does not get inst-gibbed by any and all AV rendering...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.11.21 01:23:00
|
192. Somebody explain this exerpt from Dev Blog about rendering to me: - in General Discussions [original thread]
THEAMAZING POTHEAD wrote: considering even AS infantry trying to render vehicles,infantry,turrets etc. is iffy at 200m, while from vehicles viewpoint rendering is EVEN WORSE, ill be glad just to have things render at all. so many times i've ha...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.11.21 01:05:00
|
193. I hope CCP is aware that 1.7 testing will be moot if they do not fix small-blast... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Borne Velvalor wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: Borne Velvalor wrote: I've used Blasters on my Somas for a while now. I recently upgraded to the Stabilized variant for the range (the PG cost is so high!) and I miss a lot. It can take me several...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.11.21 01:04:00
|
194. I hope CCP is aware that 1.7 testing will be moot if they do not fix small-blast... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shokhann Echo wrote: it will also be mute if the sp sink is over what it is now Yeah, who's going to spec that much SP into a broken turret, when CCP's history with broken turrets (see small rail) is to ignore it for 2 years and not say a si...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.11.21 01:02:00
|
195. I hope CCP is aware that 1.7 testing will be moot if they do not fix small-blast... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Borne Velvalor wrote: I've used Blasters on my Somas for a while now. I recently upgraded to the Stabilized variant for the range (the PG cost is so high!) and I miss a lot. It can take me several seconds to take out enemies, with my reticule o...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.11.21 01:00:00
|
196. I hope CCP is aware that 1.7 testing will be moot if they do not fix small-blast... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Has any CCP DEV commented on what changes were made to small blasters in 1.5 And or why they were made and what they were supposed to do?
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.11.21 00:56:00
|
197. I hope CCP is aware that 1.7 testing will be moot if they do not fix small-blast... - in General Discussions [original thread]
SOMETHING happened in 1.5 that took blasters from being decent weapons (But with way high PG req and situational uses) to completely broken for killing anything. I'm not positive if it was a hit detection change, or removal of some secret splash...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.11.21 00:52:00
|
198. Somebody explain this exerpt from Dev Blog about rendering to me: - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: It seems like a short quick fix until more time can be dedicated to it and I hope this is NOT the final solution. The blog seems to indicate that; yes it would benefit those that stopping to observe, zoom, or take aim wo...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.11.21 00:47:00
|
199. is the Python / Incubus a standard dropship? Are Assaults just variations of st... - in General Discussions [original thread]
EternalRMG wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: Does this imply we will eventually see proto vehicles, capable of fitting the PG reqs from complex vehicle mods? You can fit all pro modules on the incubus Not all variations of all proto modules...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.11.21 00:43:00
|
200. is the Python / Incubus a standard dropship? Are Assaults just variations of st... - in General Discussions [original thread]
TranquilBiscuit ofVaLoR wrote: they are standard, as far as i know. just like enforcers are still considered standard. just my two iskies. Reason my asking is that current dropships (1.7) look to have far too PG/CPU to make any interestin...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.11.21 00:34:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |