| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
341. Why we should have Respecs: Vet Perspective - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ninjanomyx wrote: Hardly 13 kid.....& I have shown the capacity to both accept & understand, even compromise with differing point of view. Those were well-delivered, effortfully thought out, constructive presentations. On the other hand...
- by Midas Fool - at 2013.08.17 04:42:00
|
342. What is your favorite weapon? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Standard Mass Driver. Proficiency to 4, Rapid Reload to 4. Or a Shotgun.
- by Midas Fool - at 2013.08.17 02:37:00
|
343. Why we should have Respecs: Vet Perspective - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ninjanomyx wrote: I'm a 22 Mil SP, 600 Mil ISK, Top 50 Killboard, Top 20 WP Board, Tanker Main w/ Minmatar Logi Sub who dabbled in Caldari Logi OP TAC AR Hacked EXO FOTM for ***** 'n giggles (All on just this Character). You obviously did not l...
- by Midas Fool - at 2013.08.17 01:50:00
|
344. Why we should have Respecs: Vet Perspective - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ninjanomyx wrote: At the very least you get a 4/10 for Trolling & an A for "Effort". Your lack of constructive criticism & relevant feedback has thusly labeled your input as void in regards to this discussion. Thanx for trying nonethele...
- by Midas Fool - at 2013.08.17 01:43:00
|
345. HEY BLUE BERRY LISTEN UP!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
OZAROW wrote: 2. When you call in a car bring some friggen people with you 3. When you call in a car don't drag your friggen teammate across the map by the bumper 2. But then I get a clown car where blues are jumping in and out, and as soon ...
- by Midas Fool - at 2013.08.17 01:21:00
|
346. Why we should have Respecs: Vet Perspective - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ninjanomyx wrote: A product may or may not be noted of its flaws until sometimes many years after its production/release cycle. It may very well get boastful reviews and be sung songs of praises & honor until, on that fated day, the evils o...
- by Midas Fool - at 2013.08.17 01:06:00
|
347. Cal logi CPU nerf was too much - in General Discussions [original thread]
KingBabar wrote: Give the FOTM talk a rest now, I specced into it 30 minutes after I downloaded the new content. Hmm...assualt 4 H 3L...logistics 5 H 4L?! Sign me up! Do you have Core Upgrades, Light Weapon Operation, Explosives, and Electr...
- by Midas Fool - at 2013.08.16 11:09:00
|
348. Why we should have Respecs: Vet Perspective - in General Discussions [original thread]
xSaloLx wrote: The benefit of a respec is that it shows these imbalances almost immediately, whereas it might take weeks or months for people to be able abuse them anyway. "The benefit of a respec is that everyone can spec into/out of FoTM ...
- by Midas Fool - at 2013.08.16 10:11:00
|
349. Shield Recharge. Assault VS Logistic - in General Discussions [original thread]
Well...its true. Your numbers show it. Dunno. Maybe they figured people would throw on a recharger or two on those high slots. And with the passive armor regen on Minmatar suits they probably figured that people would prioritize shield regulators...
- by Midas Fool - at 2013.08.16 09:59:00
|
350. Why we should have Respecs: Vet Perspective - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ninjanomyx wrote: If you believe a company does not have to be "apologetic" for a fatal flaw (IE: My baby carriage is faulty, malfunctioned, and my baby is dead)....then you sir are a rather uninformed, complacent, intellectually lacking, and t...
- by Midas Fool - at 2013.08.16 09:43:00
|
351. ETA on respec? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: One word Crosstrain B-b-but it takes so long!!!!!!!!!
- by Midas Fool - at 2013.08.16 09:32:00
|
352. ETA on respec? - in General Discussions [original thread]
xLTShinySidesx wrote: Call me a douche if you want but here is how I go about this game. Step 1: train all of your core skills up, shields, armor, engineering, electronics, equipment, etc.. Step 2: find a suit you like to run and what works b...
- by Midas Fool - at 2013.08.16 09:31:00
|
353. How Dust 514 has gone wrong, from a Gaming Marketing & Devoloping standpoint. - in General Discussions [original thread]
THEAMAZING POTHEAD wrote: No doubt its not like I'm super qualified to be making these criticisms, but it also not like I don't know wtf I'm talking about. If I had pursued a career in Game Design or something of the like, I sure as hell wouldn...
- by Midas Fool - at 2013.08.16 09:19:00
|
354. How Dust 514 has gone wrong, from a Gaming Marketing & Devoloping standpoint. - in General Discussions [original thread]
THEAMAZING POTHEAD wrote: haha, im not a game marketer, ive just taken a few classes in game design, which included all this stuff, its all pretty common knowledge, but.... I AM THEAMAZING POTHEAD :P Well hue...I guess? I don't know if a few...
- by Midas Fool - at 2013.08.16 08:57:00
|
355. Gallente and Amarr will become heavies and heavies will become... tanks... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Super pumped...as long as they don't penalize shields in any way. Shields are in a really good spot. Instead of bringing good things down, why not elevate poor things to the level of those good things? That way everybody wins. However, I think t...
- by Midas Fool - at 2013.08.16 08:27:00
|
356. How Dust 514 has gone wrong, from a Gaming Marketing & Devoloping standpoint. - in General Discussions [original thread]
You have the best name. How am I supposed to take you seriously Are you a game marketer AND an amazing pothead? Because that's like awesome bro.
- by Midas Fool - at 2013.08.16 08:18:00
|
357. Wow... really? LLAV's. - in General Discussions [original thread]
DJINN leukoplast wrote: Goodness these things are out of control, not sure if they are glitched or what, but unless under constant heavy AV from several players all at once, they are invincible. I knew these things were already like that, but...
- by Midas Fool - at 2013.08.16 08:10:00
|
358. Why we should have Respecs: Vet Perspective - in General Discussions [original thread]
"I don't think this game is good enough yet" is a false dilemma. CCP doesn't have to be apologetic, not even to you. I'm OK with a respec a year, but it absolutely must cost Aurum. It would be like an optional subscription fee and everyone who do...
- by Midas Fool - at 2013.08.16 07:58:00
|
359. ARE YOU READY? READY DOESN'T EVEN BEGIN TO DESCRIBE IT. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Heinrich Jagerblitzen wrote: I have a bit of an unfair advantage here, but my money's all on Amarr Heavies toting HMG's. Booooooooooooooo..... Actually, good for them. Now they might step up instead of cry moar. Good heavies are going to ...
- by Midas Fool - at 2013.08.16 07:22:00
|
360. ARE YOU READY? READY DOESN'T EVEN BEGIN TO DESCRIBE IT. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zeylon Rho wrote: The lower slot count on Amarr suits makes me think otherwise. A PRO Amarr Assault has 3 High, 3 Low, and even the shield-tankin Caldari Assault also has 3 low (and the Amarr gets a "laser" bonus, no special armor bonus) (Cal-L...
- by Midas Fool - at 2013.08.16 07:14:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |