| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 [100] |
1981. Theoretically Win FW 50% Of Time - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: MINA Longstrike wrote: Clone D wrote: MINA Longstrike wrote: You're stupid aren't you? Or you didn't get through math or probability in grade 7. I have displayed the probability above. You have displayed nothing of qu...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.04 06:44:00
|
1982. Theoretically Win FW 50% Of Time - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: MINA Longstrike wrote: You're stupid aren't you? Or you didn't get through math or probability in grade 7. I have displayed the probability above. You have displayed nothing of quantitative significance. No, you have ac...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.04 06:31:00
|
1983. Theoretically Win FW 50% Of Time - in General Discussions [original thread]
You're stupid aren't you? Or you didn't get through math or probability in grade 7.
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.04 06:19:00
|
1984. Quick question - in General Discussions [original thread]
Learn some ****ing math. I'm not your goddamn calculator.
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.04 06:11:00
|
1985. Unanswered question - in General Discussions [original thread]
brett morris518 wrote: MINA Longstrike wrote: 4 Thank u.. Where did u find this info please In feedback & ideas discussion. Where rattati keeps the chart that he updates his proposals with, where this has been talked about for weeks?
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.04 06:10:00
|
1986. Theoretically Win FW 50% Of Time - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: MINA Longstrike wrote: ^Extrapolate from what other people have told you. Faction warfare prefers squads. There is no checks for 'balance' in its 'matchmaking'. Mu cannot be used to balance as you have already determined whic...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.04 06:08:00
|
1987. Theoretically Win FW 50% Of Time - in General Discussions [original thread]
^Extrapolate from what other people have told you. Faction warfare prefers squads. There is no checks for 'balance' in its 'matchmaking'. Mu cannot be used to balance as you have already determined which team you want to play for. You do not hav...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.04 06:02:00
|
1988. Theoretically Win FW 50% Of Time - in General Discussions [original thread]
^You only perceive it to be this way because you do not understand the way that faction warfare works. There is no equal chance that your team will have organized squads. In fact if you are running solo it is LESS likely that your team will have o...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.04 05:57:00
|
1989. Unanswered question - in General Discussions [original thread]
4
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.04 05:45:00
|
1990. Theoretically Win FW 50% Of Time - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: It is a 50% probability. 50% my team will be built in such a way that they have an advantage. 50% the opposing team will be built in such a way that they have an advantage. No, it isn't a 50% probability. 'Matchmaking' in fa...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.04 05:38:00
|
1991. Theoretically Win FW 50% Of Time - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: Statistically, shouldn't I be assigned to the team that will win FW 50% of the time? While I have finished in the top 3 every FW battle, the teams that I have been assigned to have lost 19 out of 20 battles. That defies the sta...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.04 05:27:00
|
1992. Kirjuun Heiian - Caldari FW 1.9 - in General Discussions [original thread]
We had 3 points up until the dropship went down. KH has still won more syncs vs LE with equal squads.
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.03 23:09:00
|
1993. Kirjuun Heiian - Caldari FW 1.9 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: MINA Longstrike wrote: Had a number of really great matches with really good players today, ran from like noon till just now (and when I left people were still running). Won the vast majority of our matches aside from a few w...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.03 22:28:00
|
1994. Kirjuun Heiian - Caldari FW 1.9 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Had a number of really great matches with really good players today, ran from like noon till just now (and when I left people were still running). Won the vast majority of our matches aside from a few where we lost a lot of players due to fatal er...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.03 09:52:00
|
1995. 1.10 Overnerf of Range Amplifiers - in General Discussions [original thread]
You're seeing this as a nerf when it only looks so completely out of context, almost every suit is getting a huge buff to their base scan ranges.
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.03 04:00:00
|
1996. 5 more weapons would be nice - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spears/lances are too big to be reliable though. I could see something like a gladius (which is great at stabbing into armor), or if you wanted to go full hellboy 2, you could have something like that that also extends from a leaf bladed sword int...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.03 02:02:00
|
1997. 5 more weapons would be nice - in General Discussions [original thread]
I didn't say anything about an axe. I was also poking True Adamance (a player I know fairly well) about his love for warhammer and religious iconography with some other media. As far as things go, the Amarr are one of the least likely races to res...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.02 20:58:00
|
1998. 5 more weapons would be nice - in General Discussions [original thread]
DEATH THE KlD wrote: Lmao. So in a futuristic very advanced setting a laser sword or lance is idiotic? I'm not referring to this **** now am I? If you can't accept my thoughts why should I accept yours? tl,dr; "I know nothing about the variou...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.02 20:51:00
|
1999. I wonder what the other Amarr weapons will be like? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Cratar wrote: Weapons to discuss: Shotgun. Smg. Sniper. Av weapon. Grenade. You are looking at weapons wrong if you think every race needs 'shotgun' and 'sniper'. Each race is very distinct and instead would operate more along ...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.02 20:42:00
|
2000. 5 more weapons would be nice - in General Discussions [original thread]
DEATH THE KlD wrote: What is with the Amarr and no swords? Seriously it'd be laser technology they're not barbaric or in the ice age like minmatar. But a laser lance would be sick. Y'know, the whole "HURRR AMARR = ALL LASERS ALL THE TIME" ...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.02 20:36:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 [100] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |