| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
161. Can we get shield regulators to affect the shield inhibition value? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
S0Lid 5N4K3 wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: I disagree. These numbers are far, far too high. This makes shields regen through certain weapons within their optimal, like almost all the kinetic damage weapons (CR, HMG, etc.) That should never...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.08.01 19:35:00
|
162. Ship hangar - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Dewie Cheecham wrote: The models and textures are already there, except for the barge. And how easy do you think it is to design a carrier/freighter sized model... that would also chew up some of the resources available in our captains qua...
- by Mina Longstrike - at 2015.08.01 17:24:00
|
163. Can we get shield regulators to affect the shield inhibition value? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cross Atu wrote: An Assault or two armor brick tanked with a logi behind them can actually do quite well. Had a squad like that a while back where a fire team of 2 (one logi one AmAss) split off and held a point on their own because of the tank...
- by Mina Longstrike - at 2015.08.01 17:21:00
|
164. My Official CPM Platform - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Every candidate is a bad candidate for DUST. Remember to vote for the most entertaining and disruptive people, that way when your CPM is busy doing nothing to make the game better, you can at least laugh at the chaos they brin...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.08.01 17:15:00
|
165. Can we get shield regulators to affect the shield inhibition value? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sequal's Back wrote: Good idea ! I don't think it would be OP. Armor is constently repping and it doesn't make it OP. Armor regen in some suits (gal heavy, gal assault and amarr assault mostly) can go up to 30-40hp/s which is close to what a ...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.08.01 16:46:00
|
166. My Official CPM Platform - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Pokey and Breakin are spreadsheet warriors. Spreadsheets get torn up in in-game conditions. Oh god did your ban expire?
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.08.01 15:27:00
|
167. List of good animes - in The Locker Room [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ak8cY6Cd63k New Sword Art Online Abridged episode toplel I don't really like the team that's doing SAO... it's kind of a weak running gag without an actual punchline to me. It just lacks the g...
- by Mina Longstrike - at 2015.08.01 04:54:00
|
168. Galmando with SG is great - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: Squagga wrote: Thokk Nightshade wrote: Squagga wrote: My whole thing with commando is I can't keep my av nades. I just feel naked without em. What I would really like, is an underslung shotgun barrel, or grenade launche...
- by Mina Longstrike - at 2015.08.01 04:51:00
|
169. Drifters are beating the snot out of the amarr navy again in highsec - in General Discussions [original thread]
First Prophet wrote: Maybe if you can't accept the forums in the state that it is without complaining about the whiners then maybe you shouldn't browse the forums. Touche, though we shouldn't give into the whiners, they are the weakest link...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.08.01 04:18:00
|
170. Ship hangar - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Dewie Cheecham wrote: With the addition to "our" warbarge, it would be a nice move for the sake of immersion to open the door to the gantry and ships hanger, allowing us to see the barge. The barge isn't an asset that has a model currently. ...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.08.01 04:10:00
|
171. Drifters are beating the snot out of the amarr navy again in highsec - in General Discussions [original thread]
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: 1) I'm just pointing out how ridiculous the "well you don't have to play it" excuse is for legitimate problems. 2) An ad hominem would be to just insult you, or accuse you of some personal failing. I did use you a...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.08.01 04:06:00
|
172. Drifters are beating the snot out of the amarr navy again in highsec - in General Discussions [original thread]
^Cool ad hominem, now point out where I've claimed I aspire to be a dev? Even jokingly I don't really care to listen to whiny off topic self-aggrandizing crap. It's pitiful "woe is me, we have it soooooooo bad" negativity that offers no solutions...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.08.01 01:35:00
|
173. Drifters are beating the snot out of the amarr navy again in highsec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: Onesimus Tarsus wrote: Meanwhile, in DUST 514.... .... Meanwhile in DUST 514 stasis webifier technology is running amok causing cloned soldiers to experience something they call, "lag". If you don't like it you do...
- by Mina Longstrike - at 2015.08.01 00:53:00
|
174. Drifters are beating the snot out of the amarr navy again in highsec - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Mina Longstrike wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: Why doesn't Concord OHKO them? Because concord is an agency that deals solely with capsuleers. Neither the amarr navy or drifters are recognized as capsuleers. That seems odd...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.07.31 23:33:00
|
175. Drifters are beating the snot out of the amarr navy again in highsec - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Why doesn't Concord OHKO them? Because concord is an agency that deals solely with capsuleers. Neither the amarr navy or drifters are recognized as capsuleers.
- by Mina Longstrike - at 2015.07.31 23:17:00
|
176. Drifters are beating the snot out of the amarr navy again in highsec - in General Discussions [original thread]
So the empress is apparently building a new type of battleship in the amarr system "Safizon", and it's been pretty well protected by the amarr navy for the most part. Until today when ~150 drifter battleships showed up and WRECKED the amarr...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.07.31 23:06:00
|
177. [Brainstorm] RADICAL FW / LP IDEA - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Forcing people to play fw to get prototype gear is kind of a problem. It removes functionality and choice.
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.07.31 22:21:00
|
178. [Brainstorm] RADICAL FW / LP IDEA - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I dont think this really fixes anything and at best it introduces a whole slew of new problems.
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.07.31 22:13:00
|
179. Creating Tank Destroyers: Theory Crafting in dire need of Suggestion... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I dont think this really fixes anything true as a recurring problem with vehicles is that they're really only fun for one person in an 'engagement' and even then barely.
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.07.31 22:09:00
|
180. Let me see who is in chat during battle. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Switch voice channels?
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.07.31 21:30:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |