| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
1141. So how many respec topics do you think it will take to get a dev tag... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Saberwing responded to me on Twitter, said "I can't comment further until we've come to a solid decision. We're still discussing!"
- by KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf - at 2014.02.17 16:57:00
|
1142. AR Fatties, you're safe... - in General Discussions [original thread]
My thoughts on the "issue": Dust is largely about customizing your fit and creating your own role within the parameters of your suit (CCP often uses the example of a heavy sniper). Removing the ability to equip light weapons on heavies would ruin...
- by KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf - at 2014.02.17 16:49:00
|
1143. Why infantry is DESERVE to a respec for 1.8 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Do it!
- by KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf - at 2014.02.17 16:43:00
|
1144. If there is no respec.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I wouldn't, I got what I want, and I like the bonuses I'll be getting for my Amarr logi, and the bonus I'll be keeping for my Amarr assault. That being said, I wouldn't blame others for quitting, and I think the scope of these changes mean infant...
- by KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf - at 2014.02.17 16:40:00
|
1145. Guys, it's called an sp REFUND not a RESPEC - in General Discussions [original thread]
I-Shayz-I wrote: Woah...people are actually taking me seriously here? I was just posting this as a joke thread XD Carry on. I could use more free likes. I reread it again, and none of it seems like a joke.
- by KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf - at 2014.02.17 16:33:00
|
1146. Guys, it's called an sp REFUND not a RESPEC - in General Discussions [original thread]
They mean the same thing: Partial respec = partial refund Full respec = full refund Respecs/refunds don't give you advantages, you still have the same amount of SP capable of doing the same exact things. Is players making informed intelligent dec...
- by KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf - at 2014.02.17 16:27:00
|
1147. The four Races - a different look at them - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: We believe in a God named Tetrimon Looked it up, and turns out Tetrimon was a saint , not your God. Couldn't find any name for your God besides just "God".
- by KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf - at 2014.02.17 16:15:00
|
1148. Why dont we have officer weapons for the new weapons? - in General Discussions [original thread]
TcuBe3 wrote: Because they haven't made them yet. Well why didn't they made them when they were making the standard, advanced, and prototype tiers with all the special variants?
- by KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf - at 2014.02.17 15:10:00
|
1149. Why infantry is DESERVE to a respec for 1.8 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bojo The Mighty wrote: Of course suit command and upgrades deserve a respect however I think weaponry should be left alone, Suit choice often goes hand in hand with weapon choice. A former HMG sentinel who chooses to skill into a scout will h...
- by KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf - at 2014.02.17 09:26:00
|
1150. Why infantry is DESERVE to a respec for 1.8 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Obodiah Garro wrote: Signed. The logic CCP uses for their persistant skill point system has been well shot to death by this point. Our choices dont mean anything when CCP invalidates them. I go further and call for a full respec, then ill see...
- by KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf - at 2014.02.17 09:00:00
|
1151. Assault dropship costs are insane - in General Discussions [original thread]
/me slashes prices with nova knives
- by KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf - at 2014.02.17 01:04:00
|
1152. Why infantry is DESERVE to a respec for 1.8 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Soldiersaint wrote: nothing will ever be set in stone. they will always nerf and buff stuff because people don't know when to stop complaining and just play the game. I'm not asking for a respec because things are being nerfed and buffed. I'm...
- by KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf - at 2014.02.17 00:33:00
|
1153. Why infantry is DESERVE to a respec for 1.8 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Hoping for a reply from CCP about it.
- by KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf - at 2014.02.16 23:43:00
|
1154. A new low - in General Discussions [original thread]
+1 I understand the desire to play with an organized stacked team, but it really should only be allowed if the enemy team will also be an organized stacked team; otherwise its basically stomping on newbs and making them more likely to quit Dust.
- by KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf - at 2014.02.16 23:24:00
|
1155. [Request] Game mode: Scan & Destroy - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm sick of Skirmish. Ambush is has broken spawns and overflooded with tanks. Domination is BORINGLY one-sided. I want something new that isn't one-dimensional.
- by KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf - at 2014.02.16 22:09:00
|
1156. Good bye - in General Discussions [original thread]
Make sure to check back on Dust every couple months, the game might pleasantly surprise you. If you have no intention of returning, mind sending me (just KAGEGOSHI, not Horned Wolf) your ISK please? no need to have it go to waste.
- by KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf - at 2014.02.16 21:59:00
|
1157. Why infantry is DESERVE to a respec for 1.8 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Awry Barux wrote: Alternate Insano wrote: Dear CCP, DC Universe Online makes a lot of money charging players for respecs. You need a lot of money. DUST Players want respecs. Hello? Shut your face, this one needs to be free. It's not "...
- by KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf - at 2014.02.16 17:37:00
|
1158. Future vision of Dust (Warning: contents are GL¦PRIOUS!) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mortedeamor wrote: KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Mortedeamor wrote: i really like how you make different environment impact the gear you should use brilliant ..however were amarr havs not supposed to hover over the ground? wouldnt that mea...
- by KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf - at 2014.02.16 17:29:00
|
1159. Assault dropship costs are insane - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cmdr Wolfe wrote: when they first came out it was 1.2 mil isk for a proto assault dropship.. so stop your whinning Prices going from extremely insane to just insane is still pretty ******* insane.
- by KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf - at 2014.02.16 17:13:00
|
1160. Assault dropship costs are insane - in General Discussions [original thread]
straya fox wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: straya fox wrote: @numnutz, so at 650k ISK a pop you must be putting some fairly decent gear on your dropship, that you use in pubs. Like say running a proto drop suit in pubs, infantry expect to los...
- by KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf - at 2014.02.16 07:46:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |