| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
721. Is this game starting to feel...right? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The only thing that caught my attention was that you managed to strip the shields of a HAV with a small blaster? The damage threshold on shields is much higher than the damage a small blaster turret can ever dream of.
- by Harpyja - at 2014.04.01 04:35:00
|
722. [Screenshots From Singularity] AMARR/MINMATAR VEHICLES - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Saberwing wrote: Haha - nice April Fools attempt! Even in my old, weary age I can discern the poor Photoshop action. The fonts are too obvious dude! (so, yes - not true. But A+ for effort on April 1st.) Aww damn, I got fooled on March ...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.04.01 04:31:00
|
723. Just spray at the shimmer! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ivan Avogadro wrote: Harpyja wrote: I think the cloak should deactivate if sufficient damage is taken. This avoids decloaking from stray bullets but actually puts the cloaked user at risk if someone knows where to shoot. The cloak user i...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.03.31 18:35:00
|
724. Just spray at the shimmer! - in General Discussions [original thread]
I think the cloak should deactivate if sufficient damage is taken. This avoids decloaking from stray bullets but actually puts the cloaked user at risk if someone knows where to shoot.
- by Harpyja - at 2014.03.31 14:38:00
|
725. Vehicle users ONLY - in General Discussions [original thread]
Skihids wrote: BrotherofHavok wrote: Varjac Theobroma Montenegro wrote: So far, I like the new changes. I really have to plan routes and make sure I communicate to optimize survival. There is nothing better than getting four swarms and a ...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.03.31 14:35:00
|
726. Vehicle users ONLY - in General Discussions [original thread]
Garrett Blacknova wrote: MarasdF Loron wrote: Judge Rhadamanthus wrote: Judge is coming after your rep stacking. Judge, 90% of the time I agree with what you say and whatever points you make, but please.. please.. Armor Repper stacking ...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.03.31 13:59:00
|
727. Vehicle users ONLY - in General Discussions [original thread]
pyramidhead 420 wrote: MarasdF Loron wrote: Judge Rhadamanthus wrote: Judge is coming after your rep stacking. Judge, 90% of the time I agree with what you say and whatever points you make, but please.. please.. Armor Repper stacking ha...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.03.31 13:49:00
|
728. Vehicle users ONLY - in General Discussions [original thread]
Judge Rhadamanthus wrote: Judge is coming after your rep stacking. I think Judge just wants to be able to kill you with his ADS without you getting back to full health each time he misses a shot or needs to reload. Well Judge, I'm sorry to s...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.03.31 13:47:00
|
729. Vehicle users ONLY - in General Discussions [original thread]
It's only gotten more unbalanced with the hardener nerfs. Well, vehicles vs AV is in a slightly better spot now, but vehicles vs vehicles is ****** up right now, and that's what I care about. A 0 SP Sica with a MLT hardener and MLT damage mod sho...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.03.31 13:38:00
|
730. PETITION FOR 3 AV GRENADES HOTFIX - in General Discussions [original thread]
Signed
- by Harpyja - at 2014.03.30 05:31:00
|
731. Remove vehicles from ambush and have vehicle deployment cost wp? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Hell no!
- by Harpyja - at 2014.03.29 22:36:00
|
732. I hate to say it, but 1.6 may have been better... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Darken-Soul wrote: I think you just like crying. I find tanking is even better since the hardener nerfs. My ion cannon shreds tanks super fast. Then I can get back to killing infantry. I seek balance. And look at you, of course you love the ...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.03.29 22:35:00
|
733. CCP PLEASE REMOVE TANKS FROM AMBUSH - in General Discussions [original thread]
SALH wrote: Harpyja wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: SALH wrote: Infantry only? That sounds wonderful. Just tired of being uplinked trapped by tanks . *cough*Smart deploy sucking is a totally different issue than that tanks need to be...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.03.29 21:46:00
|
734. CCP can we please remove tiers already? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I say no to tiericide until we get passive skills for everything. I want SP investment to be worth a damn. Otherwise what's the point if a heavily invested player is only marginally better than someone who has 0 SP in the same thing? That's wh...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.03.29 21:17:00
|
735. CCP PLEASE REMOVE TANKS FROM AMBUSH - in General Discussions [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: SALH wrote: Infantry only? That sounds wonderful. Just tired of being uplinked trapped by tanks . *cough*Smart deploy sucking is a totally different issue than that tanks need to be removed*cough* Also the stupid...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.03.29 20:57:00
|
736. The Hardemer Nerf was an indirect Buff for Blaster Tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael-J-Fox Richards wrote: who cares if blaster tanks can kill other tanks more easily now? who gives a **** about that? how does that effect anything at all? Because blasters > infantry. And if blasters > tanks, then blasters > a...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.03.29 20:48:00
|
737. The Hardemer Nerf was an indirect Buff for Blaster Tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Rail damage/Missile damage mods are even more effective now what's your problem? My problem is that I still need more than one volley to take out most tanks, while I go down more easily. So I still need the same amount ...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.03.29 20:46:00
|
738. The Hardemer Nerf was an indirect Buff for Blaster Tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
With the nerf to the hardeners, blasters are getting close to what they were in 1.6, capable of slaughtering both infantry and vehicles. Vehicle vs vehicle was almost balanced (aside from the large railgun), but the hardener nerf broke whatever p...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.03.29 20:35:00
|
739. CCP PLEASE REMOVE TANKS FROM AMBUSH - in General Discussions [original thread]
Forever ETC wrote: Make a new game mode, called onslaught. 150 clones, only supply depots, 15 min, and no vehicles. This would only be fought on city sockets and their would be a red line 100m from around the city. Also spawns would be from opp...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.03.29 20:17:00
|
740. CCP PLEASE REMOVE TANKS FROM AMBUSH - in General Discussions [original thread]
Infantry cries to lower tank limits. CCP lowers vehicle limit to two. Infantry remains unhappy, cries for the entire removal of tanks. This is why we can't have good things and balance.
- by Harpyja - at 2014.03.29 20:13:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |