Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
201. AV is currently used to supplement vehicles. Not WTFYOLOSOLO them anymore. - in General Discussions [original thread]
KGB Sleep wrote: Eurydice Itzhak wrote: A tank does sacrifice boot power. I'm not dropping uplinks, spawning at uplinks, capturing points, reviving teammates, or any of the myriad of things ONLY infantry can do. Namely: Winning the game. ...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.12.13 14:59:00
|
202. questions for tankers + DEV's - please read and answer - in General Discussions [original thread]
Two hardeners running at the same time is like 84% resistances, before diminishing returns are calculated. Also AV isn't meant as a sole means of killing vehicles anymore. Abandon the thought.
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.12.13 10:05:00
|
203. AV is currently used to supplement vehicles. Not WTFYOLOSOLO them anymore. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jack McReady wrote: I dont get what there is not to comprehend? obviously you are not haveing more PC experience than me. if you want to capture a point you keep the enemy dead and away from it. you want economize your clones at all cost. ...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.12.13 10:03:00
|
204. AV is currently used to supplement vehicles. Not WTFYOLOSOLO them anymore. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jack McReady wrote: Eurydice Itzhak wrote: KGB Sleep wrote: A tank does not sacrifice boot power. IT SHOULD which is my point. Extra person to run your modules. How, if that is the case for both sides, is that unbalanced? You can still...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.12.13 09:58:00
|
205. AV is currently used to supplement vehicles. Not WTFYOLOSOLO them anymore. - in General Discussions [original thread]
KGB Sleep wrote: A tank does not sacrifice boot power. IT SHOULD which is my point. Extra person to run your modules. How, if that is the case for both sides, is that unbalanced? You can still tank dance with the stars. Strength should come...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.12.13 09:51:00
|
206. AV is currently used to supplement vehicles. Not WTFYOLOSOLO them anymore. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jack McReady wrote: Eurydice Itzhak wrote: Tanks have a a fairly difficult go around for killing other tanks even though we are the best suited to do it. We can usually avoid each other or flee if the fight isnt going our way but we escape ...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.12.13 09:49:00
|
207. gunlogi? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Agent Monroe wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Ran into two state issued ones, could get near them to scare them off in my maddy and they prevented deployment of replacement tanks. Wow how many times did they lose ...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.12.13 09:29:00
|
208. gunlogi? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I have three fits. Gunnlogi: complex extender. complex hardener. enhanced booster. PG/PG upgrades. Proto missile. no smalls. DEEPS: Two hardeners, Dmod. cpu/pg upgrades. Proto missile. Small missile. State: Two hardeners. Booster. pg/(ammo?pg?cp...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.12.13 09:26:00
|
209. AV is currently used to supplement vehicles. Not WTFYOLOSOLO them anymore. - in General Discussions [original thread]
KGB Sleep wrote: Nope. As long as you get thousands of HP, are temporarily invincible and only have to use one person to do it you are OP. Why doesn't everyone field a tank? Who doesn't want that kind of power? Even I am running tanks now. Y...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.12.13 09:24:00
|
210. my take on teamwork.....for the benefit of some tankers - in General Discussions [original thread]
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: alot of tankers have a warped view on what teamwork actually is. 2+ guys assaulting a position together - teamwork logibro doing his thing - teamwork scout sneaking in behind enemy lines capturing points and dropping uplinks...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.12.13 09:20:00
|
211. AV is currently used to supplement vehicles. Not WTFYOLOSOLO them anymore. - in General Discussions [original thread]
KGB Sleep wrote: Tanks are simply OP dropsuits at this point. The tanker's team suffers no penalty for a tank being fielded. They should lose one person to help with that kind of firepower, resistance and burst invincibility. To say otherwis...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.12.13 09:01:00
|
212. AV is currently used to supplement vehicles. Not WTFYOLOSOLO them anymore. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: I'll say this One forge gunner, allows me to kill 3 tanks, I will lose out on the kill credit but its 3 tanks dead. Aye Ive been murdering tanks too with assist points nearly every time haha. Sometimes its even a MD ...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.12.13 08:28:00
|
213. AV is currently used to supplement vehicles. Not WTFYOLOSOLO them anymore. - in General Discussions [original thread]
KGB Sleep wrote: If it takes more than one proto AV to destroy a tank it should take more than one operator for a tank to reach full potential. Tanks throughout history have been team vehicles. At least 2 people to operate a tank. 1 driver /...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.12.13 08:24:00
|
214. AV is currently used to supplement vehicles. Not WTFYOLOSOLO them anymore. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Crimson Cerberes wrote: why should av be supplemental to killing tanks when tanks are not in any way shape or form supplimental to killing EVERYTHING? I'm not sure that is coherent but I think I understand what you're trying to say. It's b...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.12.13 07:23:00
|
215. AV is currently used to supplement vehicles. Not WTFYOLOSOLO them anymore. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Eurydice Itzhak wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Why should AV be supplemental when it costs more than your tank? Uhh what? I know that tank prices were reduced but you don't have an AV fit that costs 495k you j...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.12.13 07:20:00
|
216. AV is currently used to supplement vehicles. Not WTFYOLOSOLO them anymore. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Why should AV be supplemental when it costs more than your tank? Uhh what? I know that tank prices were reduced but you don't have an AV fit that costs 495k you just dont.
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.12.13 07:12:00
|
217. AV is currently used to supplement vehicles. Not WTFYOLOSOLO them anymore. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tanks have a a fairly difficult go around for killing other tanks even though we are the best suited to do it. We can usually avoid each other or flee if the fight isnt going our way but we escape by the skin of our teeth (all mods down, less tha...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.12.13 06:50:00
|
218. My thoughts on Vehicles and AV in 1.7 uprising - in General Discussions [original thread]
Minor Treat wrote: Well why is it required for a Vehicle to destroy another Vehicle when there is equipment meant to destroy Vehicles? Also, what makes you think this was CCP intention to make Anti Vehicle equipment to be supplemental to Vehic...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.12.13 05:42:00
|
219. My thoughts on Vehicles and AV in 1.7 uprising - in General Discussions [original thread]
Burntface man112 wrote: Eurydice Itzhak wrote: Minor Treat wrote: Well to be honest I only replied to myself because I wanted to add something, but lets talk like adults and argue like adults. Then feel free to reply to either of the ...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.12.13 05:27:00
|
220. My thoughts on Vehicles and AV in 1.7 uprising - in General Discussions [original thread]
burning powers wrote: Thats ******* stupid... Anti Vehicle is meant to destroy Vehicles... Thats why its called ANTI VEHICLES What a well thought out argument. My rebuttal: HURR ADURR. Discuss.
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.12.13 05:25:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |