| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
641. Stop Complaining, The HMG Is Fine - in General Discussions [original thread]
Reduce the dispersion on the HMG by 5% and you have a usable gun. As of now the Ishukone SMG and Shotgun even outclass the HMG in CQC. Then again, the Ishukone SMG is fuckin ******** strong anyways. Why again can a Sidearm out damage Light Wea...
- by Duran Lex - at 2013.11.08 04:04:00
|
642. Is forge anti vehicle or infantry? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: Duran Lex wrote: Harpyja wrote: Chris F2112 wrote: Being able to camp on a roof with a forge gun is a dumb mechanic. It's not fun for anyone involved except possibly the forge gunner. The way I see it the forge gun need...
- by Duran Lex - at 2013.10.26 02:34:00
|
643. AR 514 and we get MORE assault rifles?? really CCP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kane Fyea wrote: Duran Lex wrote: Vell0cet wrote: We finally get new weapons and people complain... The sooner these come out the sooner CCP can balance them and move onto new heavy weapons. Light weapons can be used by everyone, heavy w...
- by Duran Lex - at 2013.10.26 02:30:00
|
644. Just what does balanced mean? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Balance? It's quite simple. Release an arsenal of AR's and give the finger to Heavies. Balance.
- by Duran Lex - at 2013.10.26 02:00:00
|
645. Is forge anti vehicle or infantry? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: Chris F2112 wrote: Being able to camp on a roof with a forge gun is a dumb mechanic. It's not fun for anyone involved except possibly the forge gunner. The way I see it the forge gun needs to either lose it's splash damage co...
- by Duran Lex - at 2013.10.26 01:58:00
|
646. Is forge anti vehicle or infantry? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Paran Tadec wrote: Brigitte Newt wrote: Read the description for FG. It's both. "Anti-Material" in the description refers to "materiel" or military hardware, ie. vehicles, turrets, but not infantry. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Materie...
- by Duran Lex - at 2013.10.26 01:56:00
|
647. Infantry AV vs. HAVs (numeric balance) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arirana wrote: Atiim wrote: Arirana wrote: IMO it should take 3 AVers to take down one tank because AV is a low risk high reward class. You don't need to worry about the ISK cost when running AV as much as a tanker. Getting your 800k-2.5m...
- by Duran Lex - at 2013.10.26 01:50:00
|
648. Infantry AV vs. HAVs (numeric balance) - in General Discussions [original thread]
CharCharOdell wrote: Duran Lex wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Duran Lex wrote: You argument can be used against you as well. Why are you assuming those 3 AVers taking out tanks are completely immune to all anti infantry? What if al...
- by Duran Lex - at 2013.10.26 01:44:00
|
649. AR 514 and we get MORE assault rifles?? really CCP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vell0cet wrote: We finally get new weapons and people complain... The sooner these come out the sooner CCP can balance them and move onto new heavy weapons. Light weapons can be used by everyone, heavy weapons only by heavies, so these have th...
- by Duran Lex - at 2013.10.26 01:36:00
|
650. AR 514 and we get MORE assault rifles?? really CCP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kane Fyea wrote: I'm not even arguing about the lack of heavy weapons so how about you shut the f uck up little prick. Never said you were arguing over heavy weapons. So i say again, Shut the **** up Kane.
- by Duran Lex - at 2013.10.26 01:32:00
|
651. AR 514 and we get MORE assault rifles?? really CCP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kane Fyea wrote: crazy space 1 wrote: Kane Fyea wrote: crazy space 1 wrote: And currently they aren't planning on removing the burst AR and TAR like was promised. The TAR is staying I know that 100% because CCP said they are taking ...
- by Duran Lex - at 2013.10.26 00:45:00
|
652. flaylock - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kasote Denzara wrote: Duran Lex wrote: That defense would make sense if there wasn't the ishukone SMG and scrambler pistols. Isn't Ishukone a prototype weapon? Plus one that requires prof. to at least 1. Hmmm... Scrambler Pistol has been...
- by Duran Lex - at 2013.10.25 18:14:00
|
653. flaylock - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kasote Denzara wrote: It's where it needs to be. A sidearm. That defense would make sense if there wasn't the ishukone SMG and scrambler pistols.
- by Duran Lex - at 2013.10.25 17:30:00
|
654. Infantry AV vs. HAVs (numeric balance) - in General Discussions [original thread]
pegasis prime wrote: Duran Lex wrote: pegasis prime wrote: Also anti infantry players can also carry tge cruch knows as packed av nades. Thysly enabeling them to take on said tank as well as other infantry. If 6 anti ifantry merca have ...
- by Duran Lex - at 2013.10.25 17:29:00
|
655. Infantry AV vs. HAVs (numeric balance) - in General Discussions [original thread]
pegasis prime wrote: Also anti infantry players can also carry tge cruch knows as packed av nades. Thysly enabeling them to take on said tank as well as other infantry. If 6 anti ifantry merca have packed av nades then any tank that gets near...
- by Duran Lex - at 2013.10.25 17:16:00
|
656. Tankers will rise once again - in General Discussions [original thread]
Negative. Many tankers will cry after all these releases because they still won't have their god machine trolling the battlefield unhindered. Tanks are being tweaked, AV is being tweaked with them. Balance will attempt to be achieved (or so one...
- by Duran Lex - at 2013.10.25 16:55:00
|
657. Infantry AV vs. HAVs (numeric balance) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Duran Lex wrote: You argument can be used against you as well. Why are you assuming those 3 AVers taking out tanks are completely immune to all anti infantry? What if all 3 AVer's die by the 15 other anti infantry...
- by Duran Lex - at 2013.10.25 16:18:00
|
658. I'm Done good, I gave a earnest try this game is broke. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Operative 1171 Aajli wrote: Ah the inevitable responses of "You suck" and "Get better". Grow up children. Poor playability is poor playability. Just because you are a pro thumb jockey in dad's basement doesn't mean you are the standard by whic...
- by Duran Lex - at 2013.10.25 16:02:00
|
659. Infantry AV vs. HAVs (numeric balance) - in General Discussions [original thread]
You argument can be used against you as well. Why are you assuming those 3 AVers taking out tanks are completely immune to all anti infantry? What if all 3 AVer's die by the 15 other anti infantry? or the 12 others? or the 6 others? one 1 other...
- by Duran Lex - at 2013.10.25 15:57:00
|
660. I called it, oh did I call it - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: Delta 749 wrote: The QQ over the rail rifle has already begun and people are freaking out so much I guess they just dont want to see the Caldari have nice things at all Oh and I like how the ARs range stats are a...
- by Duran Lex - at 2013.10.25 15:42:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |