| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
1561. Player drive storefronts - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mobius Wyvern wrote: So, you guys planning on making up your minds? "Core gameplay" or a player market? I see the same people saying both should be "highest priority". "Simple player to player trading" will do. The full-fledged market can ...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2013.06.20 23:37:00
|
1562. Nova Knives are too powerful and need a nerf. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Harry Hendersons wrote: is this a joke? It's an acrostic. Word.
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2013.06.20 22:15:00
|
1563. Player drive storefronts - in General Discussions [original thread]
Telcontar Dunedain wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: Item transferring, or trading, is something we have been thinking about. Actually worked on a bit of the design for it awhile ago. We have other priorities right now, True Grit is working on roles...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2013.06.20 19:01:00
|
1564. Heavies, if you ever feel alone and underpowered - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kitten Empress wrote: Actually. All explosives do a ridiculos amount of damage against armor. They also do lol damage against shields. Effective HP works out to be about the same. I did the math in another thread of yours. Quote: The...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2013.06.20 05:16:00
|
1565. Heavies, if you ever feel alone and underpowered - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kitten Empress wrote: P.S HMG does 110% damage to armor. I'm aware, but it isn't in a fact in favor of buffing armor tanking. (Armor bonused weapons and shield bonused weapons are about even in number, but shield bonused weapons are more p...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2013.06.20 05:05:00
|
1566. Heavies, if you ever feel alone and underpowered - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yeah, so, I'm not going to lie. I don't like Cat/Kitten's style of "troll for balance." But as an HMG Heavy, I eat Gallente Assaults for breakfast. It feels like being the fat kid who's always picked on, then involuntarily picking on the skinny d...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2013.06.20 04:29:00
|
1567. To the Future - in General Discussions [original thread]
Something positive on Dust forums? GTFO
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2013.06.20 02:38:00
|
1568. Scrambler Rifle - OVERPOWERED - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aesiron Kor-Azor wrote: Plus I hope you know what an Acronym is. Not to be the sole English nerd here, but technically, it's an Acrostic. ED: And +1 for writing an Acrostic troll thread on a gaming forum. ED2: Dammit, I am so late to this p...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2013.06.20 01:59:00
|
1569. Why do you wear proto suits in instant battles? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sephirian Fair wrote: Then why not burn through your isk? Why save it? It has no purpose in Dust save for buying gear to use. I hope to be able to do this in my Merc Quarters some day.
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2013.06.20 01:52:00
|
1570. CCP, I have to ask. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Taurion Bruni wrote: I would be in the same situation if I would finally start Eve today, except that they would be ten years ahead, and I would never be able to compete on their level Except yes you can compete on their level. There is a ma...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2013.06.20 01:26:00
|
1571. CCP Play Alts - in General Discussions [original thread]
IamI3rian wrote: Is there something I'm missing here? Because it's one of the stupidest f***ing things I've ever heard in my life. As opposed to, what...? A protohorse? Is that a different fit? Pretty sure it's a mutation of an EVE Online...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2013.06.20 01:15:00
|
1572. CCP, I have to ask. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Altina McAlterson wrote: I was with you until "/thread", which is almost as bad "tl;dr". I'm going to continue to add to the conversation even though you feel nothing more needs to said. With all due respect I don't give a ****. Confirming ...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2013.06.20 01:07:00
|
1573. Layered Objectives done Quick - in General Discussions [original thread]
Just posting to support a cool idea. I could see this blended with Skirmish 1.0 so that taking over a district feels like assaulting an outpost. Infiltrate -> Undermine -> Overrun +1 to OP.
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2013.06.19 01:51:00
|
1574. someone ingame told me there are nude photos of mintchip out there. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Posting in a DOOM'd thread. CCP Mintchip, the remaining reasonable adults on this forum salute you for braving the horrors of the Internet to do your job. It can't be easy, and we thank you for it. Now time for someone to hit the Nuke Thread but...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2013.06.19 01:05:00
|
1575. Announcement:Skill Respec // AUR Account Reset Delays - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mikey HeLikesIt wrote: Wow you just admitted all the effects the ddos attacks caused you. How intelligent of you, might actually cause more harm than the excuse you used it for. Lol fail. In this thread: "WAAAAH We want acknowledgment/at...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2013.06.19 00:45:00
|
1576. the actual fix for the HMG plz take note CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ignatius Crumwald wrote: An HMG is also not nearly as versatile. It has it's place and that place is close range. It needs less range, faster heat build up, and more DPS. Giving the HMG more range is like giving a drag racer a bigger gas tank...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2013.06.18 22:59:00
|
1577. the actual fix for the HMG plz take note CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
I have a hard time stomaching balance comments from people who can't do math. The HMG does not have a DPS problem compared to the AR. It does 29% more damage per second than the AR. In a game where the difference between noob gear and pro gear ...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2013.06.18 22:44:00
|
1578. Impracticality of MTACs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Charlotte O'Dell wrote: NO MTAC FOR INFANTRY! ONLY VEHICLE USERS GET MTACS BECAUSE THEYRE VEHICLES! Indeed. However, my mythical non-existant MTAC requires infantry Heavy Weapon skills for the dual HMGs! I'm as skilled into it as you are, ...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2013.06.18 04:51:00
|
1579. Impracticality of MTACs - in General Discussions [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: It will probably be anti infantry not anti vehicle, and it will probably move faster than a tank. I'm picturing a Heavy, except wielding two HMGs, same speed or faster, more HP, and can't be one-hit-killed by an LAV. So......
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2013.06.18 04:42:00
|
1580. Minmatar Rocket Launcher Idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Hellkeizer wrote: Then maybe have it as the Minmatar heavy variant of the Forge Gun? I am completely and totally okay with this. Aaannd one more ED: I always figured the Heavy version of the Forge Gun would be something like the artill...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2013.06.18 02:29:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |