| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
521. To those old vets, I salute you - in General Discussions [original thread]
August 2012 for me, too. Sadly, just missed Skirmish 1.0. These days I miss the old DUST Bowl ambush map from Chromosome more than anything... it was a blood bath every time. I used to miss the Heavy Type-II suit the most, but after a year of ...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2014.02.10 22:30:00
|
522. DUST is near unplayable today - in General Discussions [original thread]
Xer0 Zexeroth wrote: Don't you just want to thrust your hand through my ribcage, rip out my heart, and extract my soul for murdering a defenseless animal? Well too bad, my inability to play dust at the moment says otherwise... Well, it's not...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2014.02.10 20:56:00
|
523. DUST is near unplayable today - in General Discussions [original thread]
Son-Of A-Gun wrote: axis alpha wrote: Yups. Dehydration I heard... Poor Lil guy *appalled* Monsters! The little steel ball at the end of his sippy bottle malfunctioned. The devs are looking into it. Could be murder.
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2014.02.10 19:58:00
|
524. to all SELF-PROCLAIMED intellectuals - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nuh uh! UR MOM!
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2014.02.10 19:45:00
|
525. ETA on new heavy weapons please - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm still stoked were finally getting new fat suits. I figured I can stop busting CCPs balls about heavy weapons for a few weeks. Still, don't expect them any time before summer, maybe even not this year. We tend to see a concept art leak many...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2014.02.08 06:22:00
|
526. Killing Heavies in 1.8...OP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cody Sietz wrote: Heavies=tanks? Even with the new bonuses, I'm not sure Sentinel will be that OP...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2014.02.08 03:58:00
|
527. Killing Heavies in 1.8...OP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Slen Kaleth wrote: Disturbingly Bored wrote: Vitharr Foebane wrote: Of course that 15% resistance only applies to the armor and not the shield which is getting reduced in 1.8, I totally overlooked that. So it isn't even a 15% EHP bump....
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2014.02.08 03:53:00
|
528. Killing Heavies in 1.8...OP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vitharr Foebane wrote: ReGnYuM wrote: Currently soloing a proto heavy is very hard... In 1.8, I assume that even catching a heavy in the back might not be enough to win the dual... TBH 1.8 is going to be a ShitShOW You've GOT to be jokin...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2014.02.08 02:20:00
|
529. Killing Heavies in 1.8...OP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vitharr Foebane wrote: Of course that 15% resistance only applies to the armor and not the shield which is getting reduced in 1.8, I totally overlooked that. So it isn't even a 15% EHP bump. I can't be considered an impartial opinion... I'...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2014.02.08 02:06:00
|
530. Killing Heavies in 1.8...OP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Worst-case scenario (you're using, say, a Combat Rifle against a maxxed Amarr fattie), Sentinels can have up to 15% more EHP than they have currently. That's a sizable chunk, but it's not as much as when CCP bumped total Heavy HP up by 20% a patc...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2014.02.08 01:54:00
|
531. Serious Question - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: Do you even think brah? I do. I think defending a weapon with equal DPS to the AR and with 75% more optimal is whining about losing a crutch. I heard it all before with the TAC. The arguments don't hold any more water no...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2014.02.07 22:18:00
|
532. Huge gap between ADV and Proto - in General Discussions [original thread]
We talking weapons or suits? Because for weapons the different between ADV and PRO is the same as between STD and ADV... 5%.
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2014.02.07 22:07:00
|
533. Serious Question - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: How is it this game will grow when we keep nerfing everything that kills the weaker players? Let me get this straight... You're saying that weaker players need to be continually curbstomped so that the game will grow?
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2014.02.07 22:04:00
|
534. Is the combat rifle next??????? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Confirming that Combat Rifle is next on the nerf QQ list. And for a good reason. CCP forgot why they had to fix the TAC. Make it fire in 3-round bursts with a slight pause only and we're all good.
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2014.02.07 20:54:00
|
535. Did you beat dust? Is it over? Should you just move on to the next ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Judging by the trend of how people disappear from the game, you need to make it into Imperfects or Teamplayers to have Platinum Trophied DUST. Once people do that, they've beaten the game and they tend to stop playing. You're required to do an ...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2014.02.07 20:45:00
|
536. Getting Sick of CCP's approach to this game - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sev Alcatraz wrote: Listening to the god damn CODlings every time they start crying and beckoning to there every whim.... Let me guess. You use the RR. And you used the TAC before that?
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2014.02.07 20:03:00
|
537. If you don't like heavies with light weapons . . . - in General Discussions [original thread]
VALCORE72 wrote: heavys with light weapons is being addressed in 1.8 ......... byby light weapons .......... if you want light weapon heavy run the dam commando Any confirmation of this? Anyway. I'm a fattie through and through. And I'd pre...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2014.02.07 19:12:00
|
538. Worried about the Rail Rifle nerf - in General Discussions [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: Six kin smg does 23.1 damage with a rof of 1000, that's 23100 damage per minute, 23100/60 = 385 dps. Unless your math includes weapon proficiency, mine does not in both figures. Not to keep arguing this point, but your infor...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2014.02.07 17:31:00
|
539. Worried about the Rail Rifle nerf - in General Discussions [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: I am available to do math now, proto smg has 385 DPS, proto magsec has 423 dps. Unless SMG is getting a nerf in 1.8, proto SMG does 421.6 DPS. Still, that's ridiculous that MagSec beats it. How the hell does CCP think that...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2014.02.07 17:20:00
|
540. Worried about the Rail Rifle nerf - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nocturnal Soul wrote: Smg needs a buff? Your insane. It's like saying the AR needs a buff. I agree. But I never looked at the Magsec SMG stats. 388 DPS at the base level, compared to the normal SMGs 383? So it has higher DPS and 60% gre...
- by Disturbingly Bored - at 2014.02.07 17:09:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |