| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 |
141. What Exactly Makes Dust An MMO? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Also what is an MMO? I just want to get a better grasp on what Dust 514 is trying to be so I know where we're headed.
- by CuuCH Crusher - at 2013.07.24 05:27:00
|
142. Why the Nerf Hammer is Always so Bloody... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: lol... Very few, if any person on this forum has played BF3 more than me, and they DID nerf and buff weapons quite a bit, actually they nerfed the F2000, only to buff it back. The AEK didn't need a buff, and they bu...
- by CuuCH Crusher - at 2013.07.24 05:18:00
|
143. Remote Explosive Under Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
Galvan Nized wrote: So in other words no one knows conclusively? Plus I've never got the remotes and proxies together to work, I thought it just viewed the explosion as friendly. Maybe it works In PC? Don't worry. It might cost me a few t...
- by CuuCH Crusher - at 2013.07.24 01:10:00
|
144. Remote Explosive Under Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
2-Ton Twenty-One wrote: damage to the underside of a tank is 125% efficacy, or at least that was what it was last time i cheched. To test, get forge gun and get a tank to have its belly exposed and check, should still be 125% That's easier...
- by CuuCH Crusher - at 2013.07.24 00:52:00
|
145. 1.3 patch notes are up - in General Discussions [original thread]
When will the patch go live?
- by CuuCH Crusher - at 2013.07.23 23:23:00
|
146. Seal the deal CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Sorry not happening. Logis are getting logistics based bonuses such as better nanite injectors and bigger nano hives and the sorts. Maybe more explosions. My alt is a Minmatar Logi. I like the hacking ability. It suit...
- by CuuCH Crusher - at 2013.07.23 23:19:00
|
147. Remote Explosive Under Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: They shouldn't. There is something fishy going on with them disappearing though when limit isn't reached and it was not shot at. I have notice this too. Also sometimes I find my character holding invisible remote expl...
- by CuuCH Crusher - at 2013.07.23 23:10:00
|
148. Remote Explosive Under Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
Do remote explosives so extra damage when you blow them up under a tank?
- by CuuCH Crusher - at 2013.07.23 23:04:00
|
149. NERF NOW! - in General Discussions [original thread]
bear90211 wrote: CuuCH Crusher wrote: People are calling you a bad tanker for a reason: 1. You stated that you camp the same spot and tank snipe. 2. You allow breach forge guns to blow you up. 3. You let forge gunners sneak up behind you ...
- by CuuCH Crusher - at 2013.07.23 22:42:00
|
150. NERF NOW! - in General Discussions [original thread]
bear90211 wrote: The Attorney General wrote: bear90211 wrote: wow, 3 pages worth of replies, and half of them are probably from forge gunners themselfs or people that didnt read what i said, lol Scrub tankers like you give the rest of ...
- by CuuCH Crusher - at 2013.07.23 21:15:00
|
151. NERF NOW! - in General Discussions [original thread]
bear90211 wrote: CuuCH Crusher wrote: Op is an obvious troll. If you get destroyed by a breach forge gun that means that you sat in the same place for 18 seconds. That couple with the fact that breach forge guns make it so you can't move whi...
- by CuuCH Crusher - at 2013.07.23 21:03:00
|
152. CCP your abit hypocritical (not a rant, but please explain) - in General Discussions [original thread]
HMG and AR are both primary weapons, your logic is flawed.
- by CuuCH Crusher - at 2013.07.23 20:55:00
|
153. NERF NOW! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Op is an obvious troll. If you get destroyed by a breach forge gun that means that you sat in the same place for 18 seconds. That couple with the fact that breach forge guns make it so you can't move while charging, means if you get blown up by on...
- by CuuCH Crusher - at 2013.07.23 20:43:00
|
154. nerflocks anyone? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: CuuCH Crusher wrote: Nope. Fraylocks are sidearms. They should not be more powerful that primary weapons. Now it will take some actual skill to use them. You do realize that all the sidearms have higher DPS than most light w...
- by CuuCH Crusher - at 2013.07.23 19:24:00
|
155. nerflocks anyone? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nope. Fraylocks are sidearms. They should not be more powerful that primary weapons. Now it will take some actual skill to use them.
- by CuuCH Crusher - at 2013.07.23 16:22:00
|
156. THATS IT?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Where did you hear that from?
- by CuuCH Crusher - at 2013.07.23 16:07:00
|
157. YET ANOTHER RESPEC THREAD...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
SILVERBACK 01 wrote: aden slayer wrote: No. HTFU and live with your mistakes. my mistakes? its CCPs mistake for making the specialization i skilled into OP one update then nerffed to hell the next up date.. why should i pay the prince fo...
- by CuuCH Crusher - at 2013.07.22 03:37:00
|
158. PROOF that AV is OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
More like proof you suck. If you get soloed by a forge gunner, just quit the game. (You can't be helped.)
- by CuuCH Crusher - at 2013.07.21 05:39:00
|
159. CCP planning on making vehicle Armor Repairers a 1/3 of their power - in General Discussions [original thread]
I say let the tankers keep there armor repair. I haven't had a problem blowing tanks up even with the armor repair (I hit them from the back with the forge cannon)
- by CuuCH Crusher - at 2013.07.20 19:07:00
|
160. Weapons that I consider 'perfect' - in General Discussions [original thread]
I like this guy. He doesn't want to nerf my FG.
- by CuuCH Crusher - at 2013.07.20 07:19:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |