| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
501. All the people complaining about tanks... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: There was this one time, where I was on Manus Peak and there were two Dropships tearing everything to shreds with 20GJ Blasters and Small Missile Turrets, and then I jumped behind cover. I was picking off their gunners with an AR w...
- by Bethhy - at 2014.09.07 04:18:00
|
502. cpm's MYSTERIOUS uplink solution - in General Discussions [original thread]
Make them only operable on solid ground.
- by Bethhy - at 2014.09.07 04:10:00
|
503. OP this OP that... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mobius Kaethis wrote: Bethhy wrote: HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: The most op thing in the game is vets q-syncing. 6-12 high sp elites running proto in pubs ( I don't care about FW or PC ) using every exploit or OP fit/weapon possible. Personally...
- by Bethhy - at 2014.09.07 04:05:00
|
504. OP this OP that... - in General Discussions [original thread]
HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: The most op thing in the game is vets q-syncing. 6-12 high sp elites running proto in pubs ( I don't care about FW or PC ) using every exploit or OP fit/weapon possible. Personally I'd love to see no squads in public match...
- by Bethhy - at 2014.09.07 03:54:00
|
505. All the people complaining about tanks... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Leeroy Gannarsein wrote: I don't recognise many of them anymore. Gone are the old days indeed. I guess they all just quit. I know when I want to get my tank fix these days I just play War Thunder; DUST tanking is dull nowadays. Most fun I ever...
- by Bethhy - at 2014.09.07 03:38:00
|
506. Can we have our vehicles back? Please? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I would love a Logi LAV with a functional AoE Shield regeneration field. Something that actually makes the LAV functional as a support vehicle... It should have resistance to Tank damage but be vulnerable to Infantry based AV. A Logi LAV that...
- by Bethhy - at 2014.09.07 03:24:00
|
507. Blaster turrets are AV!! TANKERS! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bradric Banewolf wrote: Vulpes Dolosus wrote: They're anti-vehicle with anti-infantry suppression. That what they said to justify the bravo(?) turret nerf. Meaning, they're best suited for AV, but still a threat to infantry, though not as ef...
- by Bethhy - at 2014.09.07 02:32:00
|
508. Rattati / CPM: Remove the Wallhacks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Soulja Ghostface wrote: Go play call of duty. He's probably one of the most Die hard dusters.... Been here playing it competitively since the start. The scanning things is neat... But the scanning things through walls just isn't... Pre-...
- by Bethhy - at 2014.09.07 02:22:00
|
509. Cheating in Dust - in General Discussions [original thread]
Funkmaster Whale wrote: This would never be a problem if we got rid of the stupid redline or at least made the redline even for both sides. The "Red-line" Only exists because of players in Beta bitching about having one. You used to jump fr...
- by Bethhy - at 2014.09.07 02:11:00
|
510. SCR vs TAC Science video - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vell0cet wrote: Bethhy wrote: Vell0cet wrote: There's an issue in the debate that is relevant, and you're kind of the perfect person to address it. That's how overheat balances the ScR. In my experience, there are 2 circumstances with the...
- by Bethhy - at 2014.09.04 03:25:00
|
511. Rattati, Uplinks and Rooftop campers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ask for a ladder or elevator or anti grav pad..... The only problem with rooftops is CCP barely did any conceptualizing when they sent their map teams to go build them... The had no big picture how they where to even work. The few ladders we ha...
- by Bethhy - at 2014.09.03 13:28:00
|
512. Fixed commando colors appear to be live - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Logibro wrote: You're welcome. Should put in a resume into Blizzard... I Hear WoW is recoloring a couple year old Skins as well.
- by Bethhy - at 2014.09.03 13:21:00
|
513. SCR vs TAC Science video - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vell0cet wrote: There's an issue in the debate that is relevant, and you're kind of the perfect person to address it. That's how overheat balances the ScR. In my experience, there are 2 circumstances with the ScR. The first is you accept that y...
- by Bethhy - at 2014.09.03 13:19:00
|
514. Dust the game of losers. - in General Discussions [original thread]
There has never been a reason to win except your own ego. CCP doesn't incentivize or teach players to get better or be better at DUST 514. Instead they dumb down the game and make it easy, drastically reduce TTK and install aim assists that tra...
- by Bethhy - at 2014.09.03 13:16:00
|
515. So drive by burst HMG - so totally op its not funny. - in General Discussions [original thread]
taxi bastard wrote: Cat Merc wrote: Players negating two of their disadvantages (Speed and range). We really shouldn't be surprised this is a thing. Make AV grenades destroy LAV's easily and watch it stop. personally i think light weapon...
- by Bethhy - at 2014.09.03 13:10:00
|
516. SCR vs TAC Science video - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Thanks, have you taken a look at the proposal in the Scrambler thread in I&F forums? This was a really good video, and clearly laid out the problems of the Tac AR and the "efficiency" of the Scrambler, more than my number...
- by Bethhy - at 2014.09.03 12:54:00
|
517. CCP opened Pandoras box - in General Discussions [original thread]
The dark cloud wrote: With the recent announcment that CCP is bringing back BPO's and that there is aswell a high possibility that more are to follow they basically admitted that the long term plan for the game has beeing cancelled. The marketi...
- by Bethhy - at 2014.09.03 03:09:00
|
518. All That Was Lost In Uprising 1.7... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: Bethhy wrote: CCP has systematically Cut the balls off this game since beta. No one came to DUST and are is still here because they wanted a dumbed down "Easier" shooter. That is what we got anyway and with every patch CCP ...
- by Bethhy - at 2014.08.18 02:04:00
|
519. What do you think about Charlie ??? - in General Discussions [original thread]
7 months of shield and armor imbalances in suits.. And it still gets worse. The simple fact that they made it 50x worse in one patch makes all their hard work moot. Pretty much this explains Hotfix Charlie
- by Bethhy - at 2014.08.13 14:23:00
|
520. When are we getting hotfix charlie? - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Logibro wrote: Tomorrow. (Wednesday) Terrible Terrible Terrible Terrible...... 7 months of shield and armor imbalances.... To the point where everyone was brick tanking. Then you make shield still even shittier? Like dayum. Test yo...
- by Bethhy - at 2014.08.13 14:19:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |