| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
1261. Game mode idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nope. You lose word privileges. No more words for you.
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.13 21:38:00
|
1262. Thank you CCP (No Sarcasm) - in General Discussions [original thread]
+1, I too genuinely enjoy this game despite all its flaws. CCP is trying very hard to create a truly unique MMOFPS experience, and while it hasn't lived up to grand expectations, I still find myself sitting down, playing Dust, then looking up surp...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.13 21:12:00
|
1263. Soooo my dust account has been banned??? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Headless Horseman wrote: Levithunder wrote: Darken-Soul wrote: Levithunder wrote: Darken-Soul wrote: You haven't been very clear. Is your psn banned? Dust account or accounts you shouldn't boost. People report that you kno...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.13 20:17:00
|
1264. Soooo my dust account has been banned??? - in General Discussions [original thread]
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.13 19:29:00
|
1265. The Amarr grenade - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Ever see a shock grenade from borderlands? If it's going to Amarr tech, it absolutely must be a longbow grenade. For those not familiar with borderlands, it's a grenade that teleports forward in a straight line, all...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.13 03:22:00
|
1266. Tank Spam vs Protostomping - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thor Odinson42 wrote: I think a webifier nade would be pretty awesome. I think these alone would do the trick. You'd never have a blaster tank camp infantry again. At least not from 20 meters away. Blaster tanks need a range nerf. On Frac...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.13 01:31:00
|
1267. Shouldn't the Gallente heavy have +3 armor rep? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: We don't need independent heavies. One hp is enough at the most two hp/s. This. The scout will never have a pocket logi- the heavy is practically designed around having one. Thus, the difference in intrinsic reps.
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.13 01:07:00
|
1268. Tryharding 101 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dagger-Two wrote: I see your tryharding, and raise you epic trolling . 24/34 headshot kills?
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.12 06:31:00
|
1269. how can people jump around all over the place and shoot you? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kristoff Atruin wrote: If anyone thinks that kb/m is why this happens, you only need to try playing with kb/m to see that it's pretty much like this: http://a.gifb.in/1232550737_predator%20duck%20hunt1.gif QFT. As a long-time PC FPS player...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.12 06:16:00
|
1270. how can people jump around all over the place and shoot you? - in General Discussions [original thread]
snazzbear wrote: Reav Hannari wrote: snazzbear wrote: play unreal tournament and come back here. Honestly how often do you ADS? About 90%. You? For the most part I just use hip fire. Works well enough with an AR, and well most weap...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.12 04:49:00
|
1271. Tryharding 101 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Niiiiiice.
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.12 04:38:00
|
1272. Proximity mines do low damage? No problem. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Actually, I find the problem is more often that the proxies simply don't detonate quickly enough when a tank drives over them at any amount of speed. Pure REs are 1000x more reliable, if more work intensive.
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.12 03:05:00
|
1273. Remote Explosive Grenades - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: ........**** yes. Mission accomplished.
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.12 01:36:00
|
1274. Easy fix to TTK - in General Discussions [original thread]
I lol'd. If you think perfectly rebalancing every weapon in the game is easy, well, you should go apply for a job. You'll quickly discover that's not the case.
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.11 23:03:00
|
1275. About the matchmaking - in General Discussions [original thread]
inb4 "use teamwork scrub" I agree with you, though I've already beaten this horse to death repeatedly to no avail.
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.11 22:01:00
|
1276. CCPs stance on tank514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dauth Jenkins wrote: Altina McAlterson wrote: Alternate Insano wrote: I was sick of all the tanks, so I put a cpl SP into forge gun operation. Went to the market, bought a few breach FGs, and found a match of domination already in progres...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.11 21:29:00
|
1277. Why sniper rifles won't ever be sniper rifles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Auris Lionesse wrote: They need more zoom. Preferably variable zoom. Add a marksman variant that does 0 body damage and ohk on headshots. 1 bullet, bolt action, pull the bolt back and put another bullet in. About 2 or 3 seconds per shot. Le...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.11 20:28:00
|
1278. Why sniper rifles won't ever be sniper rifles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Awry Barux wrote: As I said above- redline sniping should be made impossible by any means necessary, though the approach CCP took to the Gallente Research Facility was very much the wrong one (making all objectives ...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.11 20:17:00
|
1279. Why sniper rifles won't ever be sniper rifles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Here are my thoughts: Poor hit detection/blue shield flashes is terrible and should have been fixed... years ago. It's pretty disgusting that we have these problems even after over a year of dealing with them. Sniper...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.11 20:01:00
|
1280. Why sniper rifles won't ever be sniper rifles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Awry Barux wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: Um. The Sniper Rifle has never been nerfed. The only "bad" thing to ever happen to it was when the Charged Sniper Rifle got moved to the Prototype tier. If an...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.11 19:44:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |