Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 [60] 70 |
1181. Assault dropship costs are insane - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tailss Prower wrote: Awry Barux wrote: Kagehoshi is never wrong. +1 Everyone is wrong at some point in time not that im disagreeing with him You dare to insult the god-king, lord of threads? Seriously, though, I spend more time reading ...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.16 06:32:00
|
1182. Assault dropship costs are insane - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kagehoshi is never wrong. +1
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.16 06:09:00
|
1183. Why are they called Prototype? Aside from ISK what are the drawbacks... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote: Awry Barux wrote: lithkul devant wrote: The OP does have a point though, prototype does in fact mean a thing that has not been tested throughly, not one that has been made millions of times and is in mass ...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.16 05:39:00
|
1184. What Exactly Does the "Accuracy" Stat Represent? - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: Son-Of A-Gun wrote: It is the hip fire accuracy. The higher the number the more acurate the hip fire. Tbh, I'm surprised at how many people answered this thread and didn't know this? ADS also has dispersion, does it n...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.16 05:27:00
|
1185. Why are they called Prototype? Aside from ISK what are the drawbacks... - in General Discussions [original thread]
lithkul devant wrote: The OP does have a point though, prototype does in fact mean a thing that has not been tested throughly, not one that has been made millions of times and is in mass use. I mean, the idea behind prototype gear is that it...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.16 05:25:00
|
1186. Dust 514 Corps that think they are good list - in General Discussions [original thread]
Espartoi wrote: Awry Barux wrote: Ghost Kaisar wrote: Patrick57 wrote: lol someone's butthurt..... Are you an AE alt? He said he thought all scouts in AE were hackers. So I doubt it. He is butthurt though. Also, here is his ...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.16 04:35:00
|
1187. Killed by remote explosive used as a grenade - in General Discussions [original thread]
Summ Dude wrote: Shyeer Alvarin wrote: My scout + Shotgun vs Heavy = Dead scout. Scout + RE vs Heavy = Dead Heavy. Scout + LAV + RE vs tightly bunched redberries = "Hold my beer, this is gonna be awesome." Honestly... If you see something...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.16 04:22:00
|
1188. Dust 514 Corps that think they are good list - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghost Kaisar wrote: Patrick57 wrote: lol someone's butthurt..... Are you an AE alt? He said he thought all scouts in AE were hackers. So I doubt it. He is butthurt though. Also, here is his list of garbage corps Hmm, so Zero-d...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.16 04:17:00
|
1189. Aim Assist - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Awry Barux wrote: Knight Solitaire wrote: SILENTSAM 69 wrote: Aim assist is a good thing. It helps level the playing field. It helped a lot of weaker players, and the main people complaining are the people who no...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.16 03:25:00
|
1190. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Darken-Soul wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Darken-Soul wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Bojo The Mighty wrote: You don't speak for the dead You speak for the spammers Spammers? Last I remember, there was a problem with MLT spam. I don't use...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.16 02:45:00
|
1191. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Awry Barux wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Okay playing along with this class separation thing to make a point. Tankers are the ones to blame for getting tanks to the current state that they are in,...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.16 02:39:00
|
1192. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Okay playing along with this class separation thing to make a point. Tankers are the ones to blame for getting tanks to the current state that they are in, not infantry. That doesn't even make sense...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.16 02:26:00
|
1193. The PG on the kin cats...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: the problem is shield extender pg being way too high to use them with The proto kincats use 15 pg, more than my freedom MD, that's too damn high no matter how you slice it. It's almost as bad...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.16 00:27:00
|
1194. The PG on the kin cats...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
And why is the skill bonus 1% to kin cat efficacy per level? With complex kin cats, that's a whole 0.6% faster!
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.16 00:18:00
|
1195. "fixing" tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
A thorough look at the various aspects of the issue. +1. If only it had capital letters at the beginning of sentences...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.15 22:07:00
|
1196. Tankers: Pick two of three poll - in General Discussions [original thread]
FarQue FromAfar wrote: Awry Barux wrote: Tanks right now are fast, durable, and can deal massive damage to infantry. Which two aspects would you like to keep? Because you're not allowed to have all three. It is a TANK... Not a little dro...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.15 21:08:00
|
1197. Objective Tank Solutions - in General Discussions [original thread]
Altina McAlterson wrote: Awry Barux wrote: Objectivity isn't real. Your ideas aren't bad- I'm increasingly coming to agree that it may be genuinely impossible to balance tanks for ambush and skirmish simultaneously. The lore is easy- Ambush ...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.15 20:57:00
|
1198. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Henchmen21 wrote: Spkr4theDead: making Andrew Wiggin look the fool. Seriously. He's sullying the name.
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.15 20:51:00
|
1199. Curious - in General Discussions [original thread]
Eh. I'm always calculating my ISK gained/lost in my head anyway. It would be nice to have the game tell me, but it's not strictly needed. If you can't calculate it, stop playing Dust and go back to school.
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.15 20:48:00
|
1200. Objective Tank Solutions - in General Discussions [original thread]
Objectivity isn't real. Your ideas aren't bad- I'm increasingly coming to agree that it may be genuinely impossible to balance tanks for ambush and skirmish simultaneously. The lore is easy- Ambush = no MCC = no RDV control AI = no vehicles.
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.15 20:31:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 [60] 70 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |