| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 |
5801. Hotfix [Echo] - Fixing Ewar - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jebus McKing wrote: The solution is not buffing precision, it is buffing damps. This might come in handy for Haerr's cloak concept ... If cloak is active, set precision = 99 (scouts are effectively blind while cloaked).
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 15:26:00
|
5802. Hotfix [Echo] - Fixing Ewar - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I've already told you several times, Magnus. Because tweaking the top-end of the spectrum impacts the low-end of the spectrum. The only realistic workaround is the Active Scanner.
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 15:19:00
|
5803. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
hfderrtgvcd wrote: Maybe shield extenders could also get their current penalty replaced with one to scan profile? Would disproportionately impact MN/CA Scouts. Movement penalty is one thing. Having your position revealed to entire enemy squa...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 15:17:00
|
5804. Hotfix [Echo] - Fixing Ewar - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Magnus Amadeuss wrote: 1. No, you are the one who only wants to tweak one variable. 2. You are the only one who thinks it is fine that an assault CANNOT see an undamped scout with just a cloak on it. 3. The interplay between passives is still...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 15:06:00
|
5805. Yet another ads thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
XxGhazbaranxX wrote: ... going 40-0 with a scout, a heavy or a logi as long as those damn ADS pilots aren't able to. It's a really hipocritical idea that ground troops will always stick to. To be fair, anyone and everyone can shoot back at a...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 14:45:00
|
5806. Breach Shotgun - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
You missed it, man. The breach shotgun was a blast back in the Chromosome. PS: You're right. Not a good weapon at the moment. Rattati will get to it in due time :-)
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 14:40:00
|
5807. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Adipem Nothi wrote: Appia Nappia wrote: And messing with the Active scanner values **** over medium frames. If you decrease the proto scanner below 28 then there is no reason for a medium frame to use profile dampeners. . . and thanks to th...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 14:01:00
|
5808. Hotfix [Echo] - Fixing Ewar - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
xAckie wrote: not sure I understand what you mean by EWAR normalisation. Pre Charlie, two Scouts were EWAR competitive; the CA Scout and the GA Scout. AM/MN Scouts were marginalized by CA Scout scan intensity, which was required to keep pa...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 13:49:00
|
5809. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Cloaking is compromised as is...I don't see a reason to make it any worse TBH. If something like this happened, id like to actually be invisible, and to get a better dampening bonus. Then Id be all for it. If we move...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 13:42:00
|
5810. Hotfix [Echo] - Fixing Ewar - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
xAckie wrote: Jebus McKing wrote: Stats would then be: Assault 44/50 profile/precision Logi 44/44 profile/precision STD Active scanner 44db why would the logi be better than the assault when the assault should be the hunter? Logi Pr...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 13:34:00
|
5811. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: @ Everyone I truly believe Haerr is on to something; the more I think about his suggestion, the more I like it: If Cloak is Active, set Scan Range = 0. I think this would make gameplay much more ...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 13:21:00
|
5812. [Compilaton] For Hotfix Echo! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Adipem Nothi wrote: For the List * Buff 28 dB Active Scanners to 25 dB. * Buff 46 dB Active Scanners to 44 dB. * Buff Assault/Logi Scan Profile by 6 dB. Benefits * Affords non-scouts a better means by which to scan undampened scouts * Impr...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 13:14:00
|
5813. Hotfix [Echo] - Fixing Ewar - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jebus McKing wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Jebus McKing wrote: Instead of buffing the active scanners which would have unforseen consequences for the medium suit ewar I again propose to make scout bonuses modify ewar module efficiency. Et v...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 13:10:00
|
5814. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Will even harsher speed penalties on plates accomplish two things, slow down brick tanked scouts and make Commandos the same HP as brick tanked Aesaults yet naturally faster at the same eHP? Heavies previously indicated th...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 13:05:00
|
5815. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: Efficacy Bonuses Efficacy Bonuses made more sense prior to EWAR normalization, and even then they were a shoehorn (originally pointed out by Aeon). There are cleaner and less restrictive ways to address high-HP Scouts.
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 12:47:00
|
5816. Hotfix [Echo] - Fixing Ewar - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
[quote=Magnus Amadeuss Actually I just finished a really nifty spreadsheet for passives.[/quote] We can't satisfy demand to scan at high end of the spectrum (where assault lite lives) without interfering with interplay at the low end of the spectr...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 12:35:00
|
5817. Hotfix [Echo] - Fixing Ewar - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jebus McKing wrote: Instead of buffing the active scanners which would have unforseen consequences for the medium suit ewar I again propose to make scout bonuses modify ewar module efficiency. Et voila! Undampened scouts can be seen by a prot...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 12:21:00
|
5818. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
LeGoose wrote: Jeeze you guys have been busy this weekend. Took me like an hour of not reading a majority of the long posts just to catch up. Anywho do we have any ideas how people are doing in the sidearm challenge? Musturd played for exa...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 05:44:00
|
5819. Yet another ads thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Not sure if you're the right guy to ask or not, but would increasing the ADS / DS acceleration or top speed help?
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 05:40:00
|
5820. [IDEA] Give scouts their logical drawbacks. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: Personally I say derpa Fancy meeting you here! Where's Apothecary?
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 05:33:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |